Article published In:
IPrA Papers in Pragmatics
Vol. 2:1/2 (1988) ► pp.84105
References (22)
Araki, Hiroyuki
(1983) Nihongo kara Nihonjin o kangaeru (A Study of the Japanese people from the viewpoint of their language). Tokyo: Asahi-Shinbun-Sha.Google Scholar
(1983) Keigo Nihonjin Ron. (Honorifics: the Japanese). Kyoto: PHP Kenkyuu-jo.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S
(1978) "Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena." in E. Goody (ed.) Questions and politeness: Strategies in Social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L
(1976) "Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View" In Li (ed.) Subject and Topic. New York: Acdemic Press: 25-55.Google Scholar
Doi, Takeo
(1973) The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International, Ltd.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. & Tamura, K
(1975) Japan & America: A Comparative Study in Language and Culture. Tokyo: The Charles E. Tuttle Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, J. Bresnan & G. Miller
(eds.) (1978) Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
(1981) "Suru" to "Naru" no Gengo-gaku: Gengo to Bunka no Taipologii e no shiron. (Linguistics of "Do" and "Become": A tentative typological analysis of language and culture). Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
(1982) "Hyoogen Koozoo no Hikaku: Suruteki na gengo to Naruteki na gengo" (A comparison in the mechanism of expression: Do-language and Become-language). In Kunihiro (ed.) Nichi-Ei-Go Hikaku Kooza Vo1.4: Hassoo to Hyoogen (Comparative Studies of Japanese and Enlish Vol.4: Conception and Expression). Tokyo: Taishuukan. 67-109.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Wesley
(1981) Transitivity in the Japanese Verbal System. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Chicago. (Published by Linguistics Club, University of Indiana, 1982).
Jackendoff, Ray
(1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
(1978) Danwa no Bumpoo (Grammar of Discourse). Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
(1987) Functional Syntax: Anaphora. Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lawler, John
(1980) "Notes on Frame Semantics". In The University the Air. Peripheral Vision Center.Google Scholar
(1984) "Semantics, Metaphors, and Commercial Transactions". (unpublished paper).
Tokunaga, Misato
(1985) " A Strategy for Objective Expressions in Japanese". In Journal of Asian Culture Vol.91: 181-198. Graduate Studies in Asian Studies at UCLA.Google Scholar
(1986) Affective Deixis in Japanese: A Case Study of Directional Verbs. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Michigan.
(1987) "Dichotomy in the Structure of Honorifics of Japanese". Presented at Honorifics Conference at Portland State University and Reed College.
(1988) "Integrating Pragmatics into the Language Instruction: A Rule for Choice of Appropriate Expressions in Japanese". (unpublished paper). Presented at Conference on Innovations in Teaching Chinese and Japanese at Rutgers University, March, 1988.
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Maynard, Senko K.
1995. Jane M. Bachnik & Charles J. QuinnJr. (eds.), Situated meaning: Inside and outside in Japanese self, society, and language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994. Pp. xiv, 309. Hb $49.50, pb $16.95.. Language in Society 24:4  pp. 611 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics,  pp. 481 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.