Article published in:
What Influences Influence? How the Communicative Situation Influences Persuasion
Edited by Kerstin Fischer and Jaap Ham
[Interaction Studies 22:3] 2021
► pp. 303342
References
Amari, Y., Okada, S., Matsumoto, M., Sadamitsu, K., & Nakamoto, A.
(2021, July). Multimodal Analysis of Client Persuasion in Consulting Interactions: Toward Understanding Successful Consulting. In: G. Meiselwitz (Eds.) Social Computing and Social Media: Applications in Marketing, Learning, and Health. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 29–40), 12775 1. Springer, Cham. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antonakis, John, Marika Fenley & Sue Liechti
(2011) Can charisma be taught? Tests of two interventions. Academy of Management Learning & Education 101, 374–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B.
(2016) Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3 1, 293–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babcock-Roberson, M. E. & Strickland, O. J.
(2010) The Relationship Between Charismatic Leadership, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144:3, 313–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, S., Niebuhr, O., & Brem, A.
(2020) Of voices and votes: Phonetic charisma and the myth of Nixon’s radio victory in his first 1960 TV debate with Kennedy. In M. Elmentaler, & O. Niebuhr (Eds.), An den Rändern der Sprache (Vol. 121, pp. 109–145). Peter Lang. Kieler Forschungen zur Sprachwissenschaft Vol. 12.Google Scholar
Biadsy, F., Rosenberg, A., Carlson, R., Hirschberg, J., & Strangert, E.
(2008) A cross-cultural comparison of American, Palestinian, and Swedish perception of charismatic speech. In Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody Conference (Vol. 371, p. 579), Campinas, Brasil 2008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P.
(2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5:9/10, 341–345.Google Scholar
Bosker, H. R.
(2017) The role of temporal amplitude modulations in the political arena: Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump. Proceedings of Interspeech 2017 (pp. 2228–2232). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brem, A., Niebuhr, O.
(2021) Dress to Impress? On the Interaction of Attire with Prosody and Gender in the Perception of Speaker Charisma. In: Weiss, B., Trouvain, J., Barkat-Defradas, M., Ohala, J. J. (Eds.) Voice Attractiveness. Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics. Springer, Singapore. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, M. A. J.
(2008) The influence of the auditory environment on the emotional perception of speech. Thesis, TU EInhoven, The Netherlands.
Campbell, N., & Mokhtari, P.
(2003) Voice quality: the 4th prosodic dimension. In 15th ICPhS (pp. 2417–2420).Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Bogler, R., & Tzuman, O.
(2019) “Judging a Book by Its Cover”: The Dominance of Delivery Over Content When Perceiving Charisma. Group & Organization Management, 44 (6), 1067–1098. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Feng, G., Joe, J., Leong, C. W., Kitchen, C., & Lee, C. M.
(2014) Towards automated assessment of public speaking skills using multimodal cues. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 200–203), New York, NY: ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T.
(2009) Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior research methods, 41 (2), 385–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Errico, F., Niebuhr, O., & Poggi, I.
(2019) Humble voices in political communication: A speech analysis across two cultures. In: Misra, S. et al. (Eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 361–374), vol. 116201. Springer, Cham. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Errico, F., Signorello, R., Demolin, D., & Poggi, I.
(2013) The perception of charisma from voice: A cross-cultural study. Proceedings of the Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (pp. 552–557). Geneva, Switzerland, IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, L. C., & Pitt, M. A.
(2010) Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. Psychological Science, 21 (11), 1664–1670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R.
(1982) Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach. Journal of retailing, 58 (1), 34–57.Google Scholar
Dow Jr, T. E.
(1969) The theory of charisma. The Sociological Quarterly, 10(3), 306–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K., Niebuhr, O., Jensen, L. C., & Bodenhagen, L.
(2020) Speech melody matters – How robots profit from using charismatic speech. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 9 (1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friend, T.
(2005) Animal talk: Breaking the codes of animal language. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Glaser, J., & Salovey, P.
(1998) Affect in electoral politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2 1, 156–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregory Jr, S. W., & Gallagher, T. J.
(2002) Spectral analysis of candidates’ nonverbal vocal communication: Predicting US presidential election outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 298–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutnyk, A., Niebuhr, O., & Gu, W.
(2021) Speaker Charisma Analyzed through the Cultural Lens. In 2021 12th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanauska & Leßmöllmann
(2022) Persuasion in Science Communication: empirical findings on scientific weblogs. Special Issue on What Influences Influence: How Aspects of Context and Medium Influence the Persuasiveness of Discourse, Interaction Studies (in this volume).Google Scholar
Heldner, M.
(2011) Detection thresholds for gaps, overlaps, and no-gap-no-overlaps. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130 (1), 508–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helmer, A.
(2019, March 10). 10.בחירות 2019 – גנץ לא היה עובר ראיון עבודה...! [video]. YouTube. https://​youtu​.be​/Q​_8​_71​-XdTw
Hiroyuki, T., & Rathcke, T. V.
(2016) Then, what is charisma? The role of audio-visual prosody in L1 and L2 political speeches. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of Phonetik und Phonologie im deutschsprachigen Raum (pp. 1–3), Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. B., & Rosenberg, A.
(2005) Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech. Proceedings of Proceedings of Eurospeech’05, Lisbon, Portugal 2005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jokisch, O., Iaroshenko, V., Maruschke, M., & Ding, H.
(2018) Influence of age, gender and sample duration on the charisma assessment of German speakers. Proceedings of the 29. Konferenz Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (ESSV2018), 1–8.Google Scholar
Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P.
(2003) Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129 (5), 770–814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimani, E., Murali, P., Shamekhi, A., Parmar, D., Munikoti, S., & Bickmore, T.
(2020, October). Multimodal Assessment of Oral Presentations using HMMs. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 650–654). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landgraf, R., Köhler-Kaeß, J., Lüke, C., Niebuhr, O., & Schmidt, G.
(2016) Can you hear me now? Reducing the Lombard effect in a driving car using an In-Car Communication system. In Proc. Speech Prosody (pp. 479–483). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Z.
(2019) “you bring the steaks, I’ll bring the salad?”: Presenting ordinariness in PM Netanhayahu’s public talks. In A. Fetzer and E. Weizman (Eds.), The Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres (pp. 51–72), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Z., & Lewin, B. A.
(2016) The interpersonal strand of political speech: Recruiting the audience in PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s speeches. Language and Dialogue, 6(2), 275–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marques, C., Moreno, S., Luís Castro, S., & Besson, M.
(2007) Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than non-musicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (9), 1453–1463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michalsky, J., & Niebuhr, O.
(2019) Myth busted? Challenging what we think we know about charismatic speech. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2019(2), 27–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mixdorff, H., & Amir, N.
(2002) The Prosody of Modern Hebrew-A Quantitative Study. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, International Conference. sp02_511.Google Scholar
Morrill, T., Baese-Berk, M., Heffner, C., & Dilley, L.
(2015) Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22 (5), 1451–1457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mualem, O., & Lavidor, M.
(2015) Music education intervention improves vocal emotion recognition. International Journal of Music Education, 33 (4), 413–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagano, M., Ijima, Y., & Hiroya, S.
(2021) Impact of Emotional State on Estimation of Willingness to Buy from Advertising Speech. Proc. 22nd International Interspeech Conference (pp. 2486–2490), Brno, Czech Republic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O.
(2021) Relations between Speech Sciences and Industry. In Text of the Luso-Brazilian Association of Speech Sciences.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Brem, A., Michalky, J., Neitsch, J.
(2020) What makes business speakers sound charismatic? A contrastive acoustic-melodic analysis of Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg. Cadernos de Linguística 1 (1), 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Neitsch, J., Michalsky, J.
(2020) Acoustic Charisma Profiling – Towards the Digitization of Rhetoric. Akustik Journal 2 (20), 7–22.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O. & Neitsch, J.
(2020) Digital Rhetoric 2.0: How to Train Charismatic Speaking with Speech-melody Visualization Software. In: Karpov, A., Potapova, R. (Eds.) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 123351. Springer, Cham. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O., S. Tegtmeier, & T. Schweisfurth
(2019) Female Speakers Benefit More Than Male Speakers From Prosodic Charisma Training – A Before-After Analysis of 12-Weeks and 4-h Courses. Frontiers in Communication 41, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O., & Skarnitzl, R.
(2019) Measuring a speaker’s acoustic correlates of pitch – but which? A contrastive analysis based on perceived speaker charisma. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, 1–5.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O., A. Brem, & J. Voße
(2016) What makes a charismatic speaker? A computer-based acoustic-prosodic analysis of Steve Jobs’ tone of voice. Computers in Human Behavior 641, 366–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Thumm, J., Michalsky, J.
(2018) Shapes and timing in charismatic speech – Evidence from sounds and melodies. Proc. 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018, 582–586, Poznań, Poland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niehof, J. and Niebuhr, O.
(2022) What’s pitch got to do with it? – The connection between speech prosody and investor-pitch success. Proc. 1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation, Sonderborg, Denmark, 1–5.
Pell, M. D., Paulmann, S., Dara, C., Alasseri, A., & Kotz, S. A.
(2009) Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 417–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfitzinger, H. R., Amir, N., Mixdorff, H., & Bösel, J.
(2011) Cross-language Perception of Hebrew and German Authentic Emotional Speech. In ICPhS (pp. 1586–1589).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A., & Hirschberg, J.
(2009) Charisma perception from text and speech. Speech Communication, 51 (7), 640–655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, S., Layher, G., Kane, J., Neumann, H. & Campbell, N.
(2012) An audiovisual political speech analysis incorporating eye-tracking and perception data. Proceedings of the 8th ELRA Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012, May 23–25 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, 1114–1120.Google Scholar
Seppälä, E.
(2017) Charisma is a skill, not a gift – a Stanford psychologist shares 6 ways to build it. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://​www​.businessinsider​.com​/how​-to​-be​-more​-charismatic​-2017​-5
Shadur, D.
(Director) (2018) King Bibi: The life and performances of Benjamin Netanyahu [Documentary film], Israel. Website: https://​www​.king​-bibi​.com/
Shamir, B.
(1994) Ideological position, leaders’ charisma, and voting preferences: Personal vs. partisan elections. Political Behavior, 16 (2), 265–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shukrun-Nagar, P.
(2013) Election Discourse. In: Khan, G. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics (pp. 800–806). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
(2020) “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”: Ironic echoing in pro-ethos and anti-ethos readers’ comments on Facebook posts”. In: Z. Livnat, P. Shukrun-Nagar & G. Hirsch (Eds.), The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions (pp. 59–82). John Benjamins Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strangert, E., & Gustafson, J.
(2008) What makes a good speaker? subject ratings, acoustic measurements and perceptual evaluations. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2008 (pp. 1688–1691), The Ninth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brisbane, Australia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tegtmeier, S., Niebuhr, O. & Schweisfurth, T.
(2021) How Money Talks: Speech Melody and Venture Evaluation. Available at SSRN: https://​ssrn​.com​/abstract​=3795093 or Crossref
Towler, Annette J.
2003Effects of charismatic influence training on attitudes, behavior, and performance. Personnel Psychology 561, 363–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Touati, P.
(1993) Prosodic aspects of political rhetoric. ESCA workshop on prosody, 168–171.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, M. A. M., Tucker, B., & Ernestus, M. T. C.
(2009) Semantic context effects in the recognition of acoustically unreduced and reduced words. INTERSPEECH 2009, 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (pp. 1867–1870), Brighton, United Kingdom, September 6–10, 2009.
Wörtwein, T., Chollet, M., Schauerte, B., Morency, L.-P., Stiefelhagen, R., and Scherer, S.
(2015) Multimodal public speaking performance assessment. In Proc. of the 2015 ACM on international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 43–50), ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y.
(2013) ProsodyPro – a tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013) (pp. 7–10), Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
Ynet
(2020, January 22). נתניהו מחקה את בני גנץ מגמגם [video]. YouTube. https://​youtu​.be​/oPlaJrdvR74