Article published In:
Interaction StudiesVol. 24:3 (2023) ► pp.484–514
Research report
Dog talk
Dogs and humans barking and growling during interspecies play
Canid and human barks and growls were examined in videotapes of 24 humans (Homo sapiens) and 24 dogs (Canis familiaris) playing with familiar and unfamiliar cross-species play partners. Barks and growls were exhibited by 9 humans and 9 dogs. Dogs barked and (less often) growled most frequently when being frustrated by humans and/or engaged in competitive games, and less often when being chased or inviting chase, and being instigated or captured. Dogs never growled when playing with an unfamiliar human, and humans did so rarely when playing with an unfamiliar dog. Humans growled and (less often) barked most frequently when chasing and capturing the dog, less often when engaging in competitive games, being frustrated by the dog, and/or instigating the dog, and rarely when showing or throwing an object. Dog barks were most often requests for the human to make an object available to the dog. Dog growls were often pretend threats when competing for an object or being frustrated by the human’s actions. Human barks and growls were typically pretend threats, and were sometimes used to emphasize simultaneous behaviors. Human barks and growls allow humans to connect with their canid partner.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Methods
- Participants and subjects, and creation of materials
- Coding
- Data analysis
- Results
- Time spent playing and barking or growling
- Who barked, who growled?
- Did humans and dogs imitate each other’s barks and growls?
- Additional imitative and other vocalizations
- What was happening when dogs and humans barked and growled?
- Dogs
- Humans
- Barks and growls in different contexts
- Dogs
- Humans
- Comparison of contexts
- Discussion
- Acknowledgments
-
References
References (56)
Bálint, A., Faragó, T., Dóka, A., Miklósi, A., & Pongrácz, P.
(2013) ‘Beware,
I am big and non-dangerous!’ Playfully growling dogs are perceived larger than their actual size by their canine
audience. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
148
1, 128–137. 
Faragó, T., Andics, A., Devecseri, V., Kis, A., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, A.
(2014) Humans
rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog
vocalizations. Biology
Letters,
10
(20130926), 1–5.
Faragó, T., Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, A., Huber, L., Virányi, Z., & Range, F.
(2010) Dogs’
expectations about signalers’ body size by virtue of their growls. PLoS
One,
5
(12), e15175.
Faragó, T., Pongrácz, P., Range, F., Virányi, Z., & Miklósi, A.
(2010) ‘The
bone is mine’: Affective and referential aspects of dog growls. Animal
Behaviour,
79
1, 917–925.
Faragó, T., Takács, N., Miklósi, A., & Pongrácz, P.
(2017) Dog
growls express various contextual and affective content for human listeners. Royal Society Open
Science,
4
(170134), 1–11.
Faragó, T., Townsend, S. & Range, F.
(2014) The
information content of wolf (and dog) social communication. In G. Witzany (Ed.), Biocommunication
in
animals (pp. 41–62). Springer. [URL].
Feddersen-Petersen, D. U.
(2000) Vocalization
of European wolves (Canis lupus lupus L.) and various dog breeds (Canis lupus f.
fam.), Archiv Tierzucht/Archives Animal
Breeding,
43
(4), 387–398.
Fugazza, C., Dror, S., Sommese, A., Temesi, A., & Miklósi, Á.
(2021) Word
learning dogs (Canis familiaris) provide an animal model for studying exceptional
performance. Scientific
Reports,
11
(14070).
Gácsi, M., Vas, J., Topál, J., & Miklósi, A.
(2013) Wolves
do not join the dance: Sophisticated aggression control by adjusting to human social signals in
dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science, 145(3–4), 109–122.
Gibson, J. M., Scavelli, S. A., Udell, C. J., & Udell, M. A. R.
(2014) Domestic
dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are sensitive to the “human” qualities of vocal
commands. Animal Behavior and
Cognition,
1
(3), 281–295.
Griebel, U., & Oller, D. K.
(2012) Vocabulary
learning in a Yorkshire Terrier: Slow mapping of spoken words. PLoS
One
7
(2), e30182.
Győri, B., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, Á.
(2010) Friend
or foe: Context dependent sensitivity to human behaviour in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
128
1, 69–77.
Hantke, S., Cummins, N., & Schuller, B.
(2018) What
is my dog trying to tell me? The automatic recognition of the context and perceived emotion of dog
barks. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
Proceedings (pp. 5134–5138).
Harjunpää, K.
(2022) Repetition
and prosodic matching in responding to pets’ vocalizations. Langage et
Société,
176
(2), 69–102. [URL].
Herron, M. E., Shofer, F. S., & Reisner, I. R.
(2009) Survey
of the use and outcome of confrontational and non-confrontational training methods in client-owned dogs showing undesired
behaviors. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
117
1, 47–54.
Heschl, A.
(2021) A
dog with a sense of humor. Academia Letters, Article
2074.
Horowitz, A., & Hecht, J.
(2016) Examining
dog-human play: The characteristics, affect, and vocalizations of a unique interspecific
interaction. Animal
Cognition,
19
(4), 779–788.
Huber, A., Barber, A. L. A., Faragó, T., Müller, C. A., & Huber, L.
(2017) Investigating
emotional contagion in dogs (Canis familiaris) to emotional sounds of humans and
conspecifics. Animal
Cognition,
20
1, 703–715.
Jakovcevic, A., Elgier, A., Mustaca, A., & Bentosela, M.
(2013) Frustration
behaviors in domestic dogs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare
Science,
16
1, 19–34.
Jeannin, S., Gilbert, C., & Leboucher, G.
(2017) Effect
of interaction type on the characteristics of pet-directed speech in female dog owners. Animal
Cognition,
20
1, 499–509.
Jégh-Czinege, N., Faragó, T., & Pongrácz, P.
(2020) A
bark of its own kind – The acoustics of ‘annoying’ dog barks suggests a specific attention-evoking effect for
humans. Bioacoustics,
29
(2), 210–225.
Jerolmack, C.
(2009) Humans,
animals, and play: Theorizing interaction when intersubjectivity is problematic. Sociological
Theory,
27
(4), 371–389.
Maros, K., Pongrácz, P., Bárdos, G., Molnár, C., Faragó, T., & Miklósi, A.
(2008) Dogs
can discriminate barks from different situations. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
114
(1–2), 159–167.
McConnell, P. B., & Baylis, J. R.
(1985) Interspecific
communication in cooperative herding: Acoustic and visual signals from human shepherds and herding
dogs. Zeitschrift für
Tierpsychologie,
67
1, 302–328.
McPeake, K. J.
(2020) Characterisation
and management of frustration in the dog (Canis familiaris). [Doctoral
thesis, University of Lincoln]. [URL]
Mitchell, R. W.
(2001) Americans’
talk to dogs during play: Similarities and differences with talk to infants. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction,
34
1, 182–210.
(Ed.) (2002) Pretending
and imagination in animals and children. Cambridge University Press.
(2004) Controlling
the dog, pretending to have a conversation, or just being friendly? Influences of sex and familiarity on Americans’ talk to
dogs during play. Interaction
Studies,
5
1, 99–129.
(2015) Creativity
in the interaction: The case of dog-human play. In A. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Animal
creativity and
innovation (pp. 31–42). Elsevier.
(2017) A
critique and empirical assessment of Alexandra Horowitz and Julie Hecht’s “Examining dog-human play: The characteristics,
affect, and vocalizations of a unique interspecific interaction.” Animal
Cognition,
20
1, 554–565.
(2021) You
talkin’ to me? An assessment of commands as play signals during dog-human play. Animal
Cognition,
24
1, 329–339.
Mitchell, R. W., & Edmonson, E.
(1999) Functions
of repetitive talk to dogs during play. Society and
Animals,
7
1, 55–81.
Mitchell, R. W., Reed, E., & Alexander, L.
(2018) Functions
of pointing by humans, and dogs’ responses, during dog-human play between familiar and unfamiliar
players. Animal Behavior and
Cognition,
5
(2), 181–200.
Mitchell, R. W., & Sinkhorn, K.
(2014) Why
do humans laugh during dog-human play
interactions? Anthrozoös,
27
1, 235–250.
Mitchell, R. W., & Thompson, N. S.
(1990) The
effects of familiarity on dog-human
play. Anthrozoös,
4
1, 24–43.
(1991) Projects,
routines, and enticements in dog-human play. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives
in
ethology (Vol. 91, pp. 189–216). Plenum Press.
Molnár, C., Kaplan, F., Roy, P., Pachet, F., Pongrácz, P., Dóka, A., & Miklósi, A.
(2008) Classification
of dog barks: A machine learning approach. Animal
Cognition,
11
(3), 389–400.
Molnár, C., Pongrácz, P., Faragó, T., Dóka, A., & Miklósi, A.
(2009) Dogs
discriminate between barks: The effect of context and identity of the caller. Behavioural
Processes,
82
(2), 198–201.
Molnár, C., Pongrácz, P., & Miklósi, A.
(2010) Seeing
with ears: Sightless humans’ perception of dog bark provides a test for structural rules in vocal
communication. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology,
63
(5), 1004–1013.
Mondémé, C.
(2018) Comment
parle-t-on aux animaux? Formes et effets pragmatiques de l’adresse des animaux de compagnie [How do we talk with animals?
Modes and pragmatic effects of communication with pets]. Langage et
Société,
163
(1), 77–99. English
translation: [URL]
Paladini, A.
(2020) Barking
and its meaning in inter and intra-specific language. Dog
Behavior,
1
1, 21–30.
Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K.
(2011) Border
collie comprehends object-names as verbal referents. Behavioral
Processes,
86
1, 184–195.
Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Dóka, A., & Miklósi, A.
(2006) Do
children understand man’s best friend? Classification of dog barks by pre-adolescents and
adults. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
135
1, 95–102.
Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., & Miklósi, A.
(2006) Acoustic
parameters of dog barks carry emotional information for humans. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
100
1, 228–240.
Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Miklósi, A., & Csányi, V.
(2005) Human
listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different
situations. Journal of Comparative
Psychology,
119
1, 136–144.
Pongrácz, P., Szabó, E., Anna, K., András, P., & & Miklósi, A.
(2014) More
than noise? Field investigations of intraspecific acoustic communication in dogs (Canis
familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour
Science,
159
1, 162–168.
Ramos, D., & Mills, D. S.
(2019) Limitations
in the learning of verbal content by dogs during the training of OBJECT and ACTION
commands. Journal of Veterinary
Behavior,
31
1, 92–99.
Reed, B. S.
(2020) Reconceptualizing
mirroring: Sound imitation and rapport in naturally occurring interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics,
167
1, 131–151.
Reeve, C., & Jacques, S.
(2022) Responses
to spoken words by domestic dogs: A new instrument for use with dog owners. Applied Animal
Behaviour Science.
Rooney, N. J., Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Robinson, I. H.
(2001) Do
dogs respond to play signals given by humans? Animal
Behaviour,
61
1, 715–722.
Sanders, C., & Arluke, A.
(1993) If
lions could speak: Investigating the animal-human relationship and the perspectives of nonhuman
others. Sociological
Quarterly,
34
(3), 377–390.
Silva, K., Faragó, T., Pongrácz, P., Romeiro, P., Lima, M., & de Sousa, L.
(2021) Humans’
ability to assess emotion in dog barks only slightly affected by their country of residence: A replication of Pongrácz et al.
(2005) in a Portuguese sample. Animal Behavior &
Cognition,
8
(2), 107–123.
Taylor, A. M., Reby, D., & McComb, K.
(2009) Context-related
variation in the vocal growling behaviour of the domestic dog (Canis
familiaris). Ethology,
115
1, 1–11.
(2010) Size
communication in domestic dog, Canis familiaris, growls. Animal
Behaviour,
79
1, 205–210.
Yin, S.
(2002) A
new perspective on barking in dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative
Psychology,
116
(2), 189–193.
Yin, S., & McCowan, B.
(2004) Barking
in domestic dogs: Context specificity and individual identification. Animal
Behaviour,
68
1, 343–355.