Keas rely on social information in a tool use task but abandon it in favour of overt exploration
Gyula Koppany Gajdon | University of Vienna, Austria; Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austria
Laurent Amann | University of Vienna, Austria; Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austria
Ludwig Huber | University of Vienna, Austria; Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austria
To what extent do keas, Nestor notabilis, learn from each other? We tested eighteen captive keas, New Zealand parrots, in a tool use task involving visual feature discrimination and social learning. The keas were presented with two adjacent tubes, each containing a physically distinct baited platform. One platform could be collapsed by insertion of a block into the tube to release the bait; the other platform could not be collapsed. In contrast to birds that acted on their own (“individual learners”), birds that could observe a demonstrator bird operated the collapsible platform first. However, they soon changed their behaviour to inserting blocks indiscriminately in either tube. When we reversed the collapsibility of the platforms, only adult observers but neither their demonstrators that had individually learnt nor the juveniles immediately altered their former preference. Observers, however, did not simply reverse their initial preference but rather moved to and then stayed at a chance performance as to where to insert a block first. In conclusion, the keas' overt exploration soon overrode the effect of social learning. We argue that such behaviour might help keas to find more efficient extractive foraging techniques in their native variable, low-risk environment.
Keywords: tool use behaviour; social learning; reversal learning; physical cognition
Bastos, Amalia PM, Ximena J Nelson & Alex H Taylor
2022. From the lab to the wild: how can captive studies aid the conservation of kea (Nestor notabilis)?. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 45 ► pp. 101131 ff.
Forss, Sofia I. F., Sonja E. Koski & Carel P. van Schaik
2017. Explaining the Paradox of Neophobic Explorers: The Social Information Hypothesis. International Journal of Primatology 38:5 ► pp. 799 ff.
Laschober, Monika, Roger Mundry, Ludwig Huber & Raoul Schwing
2021. Kea (Nestor notabilis) show flexibility and individuality in within-session reversal learning tasks. Animal Cognition 24:6 ► pp. 1339 ff.
Lefebvre, Louis & Lucy M. Aplin
2017. Social Learning and Innovation. In Avian Cognition, ► pp. 93 ff.
O'Hara, Mark, Ludwig Huber & Gyula Kopanny Gajdon
2015. The advantage of objects over images in discrimination and reversal learning by kea, Nestor notabilis. Animal Behaviour 101 ► pp. 51 ff.
Pepperberg, Irene M.
2013. Abstract concepts: Data from a Grey parrot. Behavioural Processes 93 ► pp. 82 ff.
Pepperberg, Irene M.
2015. Numerical Concepts. In Evolutionary Origins and Early Development of Number Processing [Mathematical Cognition and Learning, 1], ► pp. 67 ff.
Pepperberg, Irene M.
2019. Tool use in Goffin’s cockatoos: Shape/frame
matching. Learning & Behavior 47:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pepperberg, Irene M. & Ken Nakayama
2016. Robust representation of shape in a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Cognition 153 ► pp. 146 ff.
Rössler, Theresa, Berenika Mioduszewska & Alice M. I. Auersperg
2021. Parrot Innovation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Animal Cognition, ► pp. 690 ff.
Wein, Amelia, Gyula K. Gajdon, Raoul Schwing & J. Wright
2015. Picture – Object Recognition in Kea (Nestor notabilis). Ethology 121:11 ► pp. 1059 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Innovation and Problem-Solving. In The Cambridge Handbook of Animal Cognition, ► pp. 637 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.