Article published In:
Gaze in human-robot communicationGuest-edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Interaction Studies 14:3] 2013
► pp. 329–350
Guest-edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Interaction Studies 14:3] 2013
► pp. 329–350
Robots can be perceived as goal-oriented agents
Understanding the goals of others is fundamental for any kind of interpersonal interaction and collaboration. From a neurocognitive perspective, intention understanding has been proposed to depend on an involvement of the observer’s motor system in the prediction of the observed actions (Nyström et al. 2011; Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia 2010; Southgate et al. 2009). An open question is if a similar understanding of the goal mediated by motor resonance can occur not only between humans, but also for humanoid robots. In this study we investigated whether goal-oriented robotic actions can induce motor resonance by measuring the appearance of anticipatory gaze shifts to the goal during action observation. Our results indicate a similar implicit processing of humans’ and robots’ actions and propose to use anticipatory gaze behaviour as a tool for the evaluation of human-robot interactions. Keywords: Humanoid robot; motor resonance; anticipation; proactive gaze; action understanding
Cited by
Cited by 33 other publications
Bono, Mayumi, Perla Maiolino, Augustin Lefebvre, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2015. Challenges for Robots Acting on a Stage. In Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies, ► pp. 1 ff. 
Bono, Mayumi, Perla Maiolino, Augustin Lefebvre, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2017. Challenges for Robots Acting on a Stage. In Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies, ► pp. 935 ff.
de Graaf, Maartje M.A. & Bertram F. Malle
2019. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 239 ff.
Dermy, Oriane, Alexandros Paraschos, Marco Ewerton, Jan Peters, François Charpillet & Serena Ivaldi
2017. Prediction of Intention during Interaction with iCub with Probabilistic Movement Primitives. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4
Edwards, Autumn & Chad Edwards
2022. Does the Correspondence Bias Apply to Social Robots?: Dispositional and Situational Attributions of Human Versus Robot Behavior. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8
Edwards, Autumn, Chad Edwards & Andrew Gambino
2020. The Social Pragmatics of Communication with Social Robots: Effects of Robot Message Design Logic in a Regulative Context. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:4 ► pp. 945 ff.
Kim, Sangmin, Jongsuk Choi, Yoonseob Lim & Sonya S. Kwak
2022. 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), ► pp. 8234 ff.
Kolbeinsson, Ari, Erik Lagerstedt & Jessica Lindblom
2019. Foundation for a classification of collaboration levels for human-robot cooperation in manufacturing. Production & Manufacturing Research 7:1 ► pp. 448 ff.
Kupferberg, Aleksandra, Marco Iacoboni, Virginia Flanagin, Markus Huber, Anna Kasparbauer, Thomas Baumgartner, Gregor Hasler, Florian Schmidt, Christoph Borst & Stefan Glasauer
2018. Fronto‐parietal coding of goal‐directed actions performed by artificial agents. Human Brain Mapping 39:3 ► pp. 1145 ff.
Lagerstedt, Erik & Serge Thill
2023. Multiple Roles of Multimodality Among Interacting Agents. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 12:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Levillain, Florent, Elisabetta Zibetti & Sébastien Lefort
2017. Interacting with Non-anthropomorphic Robotic Artworks and Interpreting Their Behaviour. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Liang, Claire, Julia Proft, Erik Andersen & Ross A. Knepper
2019. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Lindblom, Jessica & Beatrice Alenljung
2020. The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction. Sensors 20:15 ► pp. 4284 ff.
Michael, John & Alessandro Salice
2017. The Sense of Commitment in Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:5 ► pp. 755 ff.
Quadflieg, Susanne, Israr Ul-Haq & Nikolaos Mavridis
2016. Now you feel it, now you don’t. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 17:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Sandini, Giulio, Vishwanathan Mohan, Alessandra Sciutti & Pietro Morasso
2018. Social Cognition for Human-Robot Symbiosis—Challenges and Building Blocks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 12
Sandini, Giulio, Alessandra Sciutti & Francesco Rea
2017. Movement-Based Communication for Humanoid-Human Interaction. In Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, ► pp. 1 ff.
Sandini, Giulio, Alessandra Sciutti & Francesco Rea
2019. Movement-Based Communication for Humanoid-Human Interaction. In Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, ► pp. 2169 ff.
Sciutti, Alessandra, Caterina Ansuini, Cristina Becchio & Giulio Sandini
2015. Investigating the ability to read others’ intentions using humanoid robots. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Sciutti, Alessandra, Laura Patane, Oskar Palinko, Francesco Nori & Giulio Sandini
2014. 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics, ► pp. 331 ff.
Sciutti, Alessandra & Giulio Sandini
2017. Interacting With Robots to Investigate the Bases of Social Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 25:12 ► pp. 2295 ff.
Srinivasan, Vasant, Robin R. Murphy & Cindy L. Bethel
2015. A Reference Architecture for Social Head Gaze Generation in Social Robotics. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:5 ► pp. 601 ff.
Stiber, Maia & Chien-Ming Huang
2020. Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ► pp. 97 ff.
Svensson, Henrik & Serge Thill
2016. Beyond bodily anticipation: Internal simulations in social interaction. Cognitive Systems Research 40 ► pp. 161 ff.
Székely, Marcell, Henry Powell, Fabio Vannucci, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti & John Michael
2019. The perception of a robot partner’s effort elicits a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 20:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Thellman, Sam, Maartje de Graaf & Tom Ziemke
2022. Mental State Attribution to Robots: A Systematic Review of Conceptions, Methods, and Findings. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11:4 ► pp. 1 ff.
Thellman, Sam, Asenia Giagtzidou, Annika Silvervarg & Tom Ziemke
2020. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 473 ff.
Thellman, Sam, Annika Silvervarg & Tom Ziemke
2017. Folk-Psychological Interpretation of Human vs. Humanoid Robot Behavior: Exploring the Intentional Stance toward Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Vasylkiv, Yurii, Heike Brock, Yu Fang, Eric Nichols, Keisuke Nakamura, Serge Thill & Randy Gomez
2020. An Exploration of Simple Reactive Responses for Conveying Aliveness Using the Haru Robot. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12483], ► pp. 108 ff.
Wykowska, Agnieszka, Thierry Chaminade & Gordon Cheng
2016. Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371:1693 ► pp. 20150375 ff.
Ziemke, Tom
2023. Understanding Social Robots: Attribution of Intentional Agency to Artificial and Biological Bodies. Artificial Life 29:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Zonca, Joshua, Anna Folsø & Alessandra Sciutti
2021. The role of reciprocity in human-robot social influence. iScience 24:12 ► pp. 103424 ff.
Zonca, Joshua, Anna Folsø & Alessandra Sciutti
2023. Social Influence Under Uncertainty in Interaction with Peers, Robots and Computers. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.