Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp. 99112


Beeghly, M., & Cicchetti, D.. (
1986). Early language development in children with down’s syndrome: A longitudinal study. Presented at theeleventh annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Besio, S.. (
2008). Analysis of critical factors involved in using in interactive robots for education and therapy of children with disabilities, UNIService, Trento.
Burgoyne, K.. (
2009). The link between gestures and speech in children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 12(3), 173.Google Scholar
Chapman, R.S., & Hesketh, L.J.. (
2000). Behavioral phenotype of individuals with down syndrome. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6, 84–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D.. (
1990). The organization and coherence of socio-emotional, cognitive, and representation development: Illustrations through a developmental psychopathology perspective on Down syndrome and child maltreatment. InR. Thompson(Ed.), Nebraska, Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 36, pp. 259–366).
Cicchetti, D., & Sroufe, L.A.. (
1978). An organizational view of affect: Illustration from the study of down’s syndrome infants. InM. Lewis, & L. Rosenblum(Eds.), The Development of Affect. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Costa, S., Lehmann, H., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Soares, F.. (
2013). Where is your nose? – Developing body awareness skills among Children with Autism using a humanoid robot. Proc. of the 6th ACHI 2013 , Nice, France.
Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C.L., Walters, M.L., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, A., & Blow, M.. (
2009). KASPAR – A minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 6(3), 369–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, J.J., Schmitt, L.M., Villano, M., & Crowell, C.R.. (
2012). The clinical use of robots for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 249–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, D.J., Barrett, K.C., & Most, D.E.. (
2005). Age-related differences in smiling and personality in Down syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disability, 17(3), 263–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, D.J., Most, D.E., & Philofsky, A.D.. (
2009). The Down syndrome behavioural phenotype: Taking a developmental approach. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, Doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiolle, A., Canamero, L., Andry, P., Blanchard, A., & Gaussier, P.. (
2010). Using the interaction rhythm as a natural reinforcement signal for social robots: a matter of belief. In International Conference on Social Robotics, ICSR, 2010 .
Iacono, I., Lehmann, H., Marti, P., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K.. (
2011). Robots as social mediators for Children with Autism – A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. Proceedings of ICDL- EpiRob, 2, 1–6.
IROMEC Project. (
2010). IROMEC website, url: http://​www​.iromec​.org
Kahn, P.H., Jr., Friedman, B., Pérez-Granados, D.R., & Freier, N.G.. (
2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 405–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozima, H., Nakagawa, C., & Yasuda, Y.. (
2005). Designing and observing human-robot interactions for the study of social development and its disorders. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation .
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G.. (
1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H., Iacono, I., Robins, B., Marti, P., & Dautenhahn, K.. (
2011). Make it move: Playing cause and effect games with a robot companion for children with cognitive disabilities. Proceedings of ECCE 2011 , 105–112.
Leuder, I., Fraser, W., & Jeeves, M.. (
1981). Social familiarity and communication in down syndrome. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 25, 133–142.Google Scholar
Lincoln, A., Courchesne, E., Kilman, B., & Galambos, R.. (
1985). Neurophysiological correlates of information processing by children with down’s syndrome. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 403–414.Google Scholar
Marti, P.. (
2010). Bringing playfulness to disability. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2010 , October 17–20, 2010, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Michaud, F., Salter, T., Duquette, A., & Laplant, J.F.. (
2007). Perspectives on mobile robots as tools for child development and pediatric rehabilitation. Assistive Technologies, 21–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.F.. (
1999). Profiles of language development in children with Down syndrome (pp. 11–40). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Power, T.G.. (
2000). Play and Exploration in Children and Animals. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Price-Williams, D., & Sabsay, S.. (
1979). Communicative competence among severely retarded persons. Semiotica, 26(112), 35–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dickerson, P.. (
2009). From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with Autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. Proc. Of ACHI 09, Cancun, Mexico.
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Ferrari, E., Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Marti, P., Iacono, I., Gelderblom, G.J., Bernd, T., Caprino, F., & Laudanna, E.. (
2012). Scenarios of robot-assisted play for children with cognitive and physical disabilities. Interaction Studies, 13(2), 189–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robins, B., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K., Kronrief, G., Prazak, B., Gelderblom, G. J., Caprino, F., Laudanna, E., & Marti, P.. (
2010). Developing scenarios for robot assisted play informed by user panels and field trials. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies IJHCS.Google Scholar
Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., & Matarić, M.J.. (
2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, A., Jenkins, O.C., & Scassellati, B.. (
2009). The wizard of Oz: Simulating the human for interaction research. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction .
Thompson, R., Cicchetti, D., Lamb, M., & Malkin, C.. (
1985). The emotional responses of down’s syndrome and normal infants in the strange situation: The organization of affective behavior in infants. Developmental Psychology, 21, 828–841. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wainer, J., Dautenhahn, K., Robins, B., & Amirabdollahian, F.. (
2010). Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism. Proc. 2010. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots , December 6–8, 2010, Sheraton Nashville Downtown, Nashville, TN, USA.
World Health Organization. (
2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Alemi, Minoo & Shirin Bahramipour
2019. An innovative approach of incorporating a humanoid robot into teaching EFL learners with intellectual disabilities. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4:1 Crossref logo
Andrade-Altamirano, Jonnathan, Ana Parra-Astudillo, Vladimir Robles-Bykbaev, Nidia Almeida-Solíz, Sofía Bravo-Buri & Efren Lema-Condo
2021.  In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 271],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Bonarini, Andrea, Francesco Clasadonte, Franca Garzotto & Mirko Gelsomini
2015.  In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children,  pp. 351 ff. Crossref logo
Conti, Daniela, Santo Di Nuovo, Serafino Buono & Alessandro Di Nuovo
2017. Robots in Education and Care of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Study on Acceptance by Experienced and Future Professionals. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:1  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Damiano, Luisa, Paul Dumouchel & Hagen Lehmann
2015. Towards Human–Robot Affective Co-evolution Overcoming Oppositions in Constructing Emotions and Empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Garzotto, Franca & Mirko Gelsomini
2016.  In Special and Gifted Education,  pp. 1088 ff. Crossref logo
Garzotto, Franca & Mirko Gelsomini
2016.  In Virtual Reality Enhanced Robotic Systems for Disability Rehabilitation [Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice, ],  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Jimenez, Felix, Tomohiro Yoshikawa, Takeshi Furuhashi, Masayoshi Kanoh & Tsuyoshi Nakamura
2017. Feasibility of Improving the Learning Time in Collaborative Learning between Children with Potential Symptoms of a Developmental Disability and Robots Which Prompts Learning by Teaching. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 32:5  pp. A-H11_1 ff. Crossref logo
Khaksar, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh, Bret Slade, Jennifer Wallace & Kaur Gurinder
2019. Critical success factors for application of social robots in special developmental schools. International Journal of Educational Management 34:4  pp. 677 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Chaochao, Qingxuan Jia & Yongli Feng
2016.  In 2016 8th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC),  pp. 320 ff. Crossref logo
Mena, Luis J., Vanessa G. Felix, Rodolfo Ostos & Gladys E. Maestre
2019.  In Handbook of Intellectual Disabilities [Autism and Child Psychopathology Series, ],  pp. 795 ff. Crossref logo
Papakostas, George A., George K. Sidiropoulos, Cristina I. Papadopoulou, Eleni Vrochidou, Vassilis G. Kaburlasos, Maria T. Papadopoulou, Vasiliki Holeva, Vasiliki-Aliki Nikopoulou & Nikolaos Dalivigkas
2021. Social Robots in Special Education: A Systematic Review. Electronics 10:12  pp. 1398 ff. Crossref logo
Robles-Bykbaev, V., E. Andrade-Prieto, P. Solorzano-Guerrero, Y. Robles-Bykbaev, F. Pesantez-Aviles & A. Parra-Astudillo
2018.  In 2018 IEEE XXV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON),  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Stoll, Brett, Chad Edwards & Autumn Edwards
2016. “Why Aren’t You a Sassy Little Thing”: The Effects of Robot-Enacted Guilt Trips on Credibility and Consensus in a Negotiation. Communication Studies 67:5  pp. 530 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.