Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:2 (2014) ► pp.184189
References
Abowd, G., Mynatt, E., & Rodden, T
(2002) The human experience. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(1), Jan-Mar: 48–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, B
(1995) The nature of research. Co-Design, 21, 6–13.Google Scholar
(2004) Designerly activity and higher degrees. DATA and Loughborough University. ISBN 1 898788 73 1.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S
(1995) Mindblindness, An essay on blindness and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler J
(2010) Universal principles of design: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Beverly Massachusetts: Rockport Publishers, ISBN 1592535879, 9781592535873.Google Scholar
Marti, P
(2006) The contagion of emotions. In S. Bagnara, & G. Crampton Smith (Eds.), Theories and practice in interaction design (pp. 77–90), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN-10 0805856188, ISBN-13: 978–0805856187.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A
(1994) How might people interact with agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 68–71. Appeared also in in J. Bradshaw (Ed.). (1997). Software agents. Menlo Park, CA and Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A
(1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Stolterman, E
(2008) The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
Suchman, L.A
(2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yonemitsu, S., Higashi, Y., Fujimoto, T., & Tamura, T
(2002) Research for practical use of rehabilitation support equipment for severe dementia. Gerontechnology, 2(1), 91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Faragó, Tamás, Márta Gácsi, Beáta Korcsok & Ádám Miklósi
2014. Why is a dog-behaviour-inspired social robot not a doggy-robot?. Interaction Studies 15:2  pp. 224 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.