Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:2 (2014) ► pp. 224232
References

References

Bar-Cohen, Y.
(2006) Biomimetics: Biologically inspired technologies. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M.M.
(2008) Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 201–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J.W.S., Blackwell, E.J., & Casey, R.A.
(2009) Dominance in domestic dogs – useful construct or bad habit? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4(3), 135–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canas, J.M., & Matellan, V.
(2007) From bio-inspired vs. psycho-inspired to etho-inspired robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 55(12), 841–850. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, T.S.
(2014) Problems with using a human-dog interaction model for human-robot interaction? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issuse. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faragó, T., Andics, A., Devecseri, V., Kis, A., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, Á.
(2014) Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Biology Letters, 10(1), 20130926. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faragó, T., Miklósi, Á., Korcsok, B., Száraz, J., & Gácsi, M.
(2014) Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model of companion robot behaviour. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issuse. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feil-Seifer, D.J.
(2014) The tail shouldn’t wag the dog: Why modeling dog-human interaction is not ideal for socially assistive Robotics. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K.
(2011) How people talk with robots?: Reduce user uncertainty. AI Magazine, 32(4), 31–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) People do not interact with robots like with dogs. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gácsi, M., Szakadát, S., & Miklósi, Á.
(2013) Assistance dogs provide a useful behavioral model to enrich communicative skills of assistance robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(December), 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grollman, D.H.
(2014) Robots: Pets or people? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, J., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M.
(2012) Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 139(1–2), 134–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, C.A.
(2009) Disambiguating the “guilty look”: Salient prompts to a familiar dog behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 81(3), 447–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishiguro, H., & Nishio, S.
(2007) Building artificial humans to understand humans. Journal of Artificial Organs : The Official Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 10(3), 133–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerepesi, A., Jonsson, G.K., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., Csányi, V., & Magnusson, M.S.
(2005) Detection of temporal patterns in dog-human interaction. Behavioural Processes, 70(1), 69–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koay, K.L., Lakatos, G., Syrdal, D.S., Gacsi, M., Bereczky, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Walters, M.L.
(2013) Hey! There is someone at your door. A hearing robot using visual communication signals of hearing dogs to communicate intent. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife) (pp. 90–97). Singapore: IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, G., Gácsi, M., Tajti, F., Koay, K.L., Janiak, M., Faragó, T., & Miklósi, Á.
(2013) Dog-inspired social behaviour in robots with different embodiments. 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) .
Marshall-Pescini, S., Colombo, E., Passalacqua, C., Merola, I., & Prato-Previde, E.
(2013) Gaze alternation in dogs and toddlers in an unsolvable task: Evidence of an audience effect. Animal Cognition. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marti, P.
(2014) The temptation of mimicry. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matellán, V., & Fernández, C.
(2014) What downgrades a robot from pet to appliance? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melson, G.F.
(2014) Building better robots: Lessons from observing relationships between living beings. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M.
(2012) On the utilization of social animals as a model for social Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(March), 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naderi, S., Miklósi, Á., Dóka, A., & Csányi, V.
(2001) Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74(1), 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicolescu, M.N.
(2014) Commentary to “Social behaviors in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots.” Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novikova, J., Watts, L., & Bryson, J.J.
(2014) The role of emotions in inter-action selection. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partan, S.R.
(1999) Communication goes multimodal. Science (New York, N.Y.), 283(5406), 1272–1273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V.
(2005) Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(2), 136–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R., Scheutz, M., & Schermerhorn, P.
(2010) Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 314–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wan, M., Bolger, N., & Champagne, F. a
(2012) Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Lakatos, Gabriella, Márta Gácsi, Veronika Konok, Ildikó Brúder, Boróka Bereczky, Péter Korondi, Ádám Miklósi & Cosimo Urgesi
2014. Emotion Attribution to a Non-Humanoid Robot in Different Social Situations. PLoS ONE 9:12  pp. e114207 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.