Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:2 (2014) ► pp.224232
References (30)
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006). Biomimetics: Biologically inspired technologies. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M.M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 201–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J.W.S., Blackwell, E.J., & Casey, R.A. (2009). Dominance in domestic dogs – useful construct or bad habit? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4(3), 135–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canas, J.M., & Matellan, V. (2007). From bio-inspired vs. psycho-inspired to etho-inspired robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 55(12), 841–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, T.S. (2014). Problems with using a human-dog interaction model for human-robot interaction? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issuse.Google Scholar
Faragó, T., Andics, A., Devecseri, V., Kis, A., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, Á. (2014). Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Biology Letters, 10(1), 20130926. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faragó, T., Miklósi, Á., Korcsok, B., Száraz, J., & Gácsi, M. (2014). Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model of companion robot behaviour. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issuse.Google Scholar
Feil-Seifer, D.J. (2014). The tail shouldn’t wag the dog: Why modeling dog-human interaction is not ideal for socially assistive Robotics. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (2011). How people talk with robots?: Reduce user uncertainty. AI Magazine, 32(4), 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). People do not interact with robots like with dogs. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Gácsi, M., Szakadát, S., & Miklósi, Á. (2013). Assistance dogs provide a useful behavioral model to enrich communicative skills of assistance robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 41(December), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grollman, D.H. (2014). Robots: Pets or people? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Hecht, J., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2012). Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 139(1–2), 134–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, C.A. (2009). Disambiguating the “guilty look”: Salient prompts to a familiar dog behaviour. Behavioural Processes, 81(3), 447–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishiguro, H., & Nishio, S. (2007). Building artificial humans to understand humans. Journal of Artificial Organs : The Official Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 10(3), 133–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerepesi, A., Jonsson, G.K., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., Csányi, V., & Magnusson, M.S. (2005). Detection of temporal patterns in dog-human interaction. Behavioural Processes, 70(1), 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koay, K.L., Lakatos, G., Syrdal, D.S., Gacsi, M., Bereczky, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Walters, M.L. (2013). Hey! There is someone at your door. A hearing robot using visual communication signals of hearing dogs to communicate intent. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife) (pp. 90–97). Singapore: IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, G., Gácsi, M., Tajti, F., Koay, K.L., Janiak, M., Faragó, T., & Miklósi, Á. (2013). Dog-inspired social behaviour in robots with different embodiments. 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) .
Marshall-Pescini, S., Colombo, E., Passalacqua, C., Merola, I., & Prato-Previde, E. (2013). Gaze alternation in dogs and toddlers in an unsolvable task: Evidence of an audience effect. Animal Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marti, P. (2014). The temptation of mimicry. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Matellán, V., & Fernández, C. (2014). What downgrades a robot from pet to appliance? Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Melson, G.F. (2014). Building better robots: Lessons from observing relationships between living beings. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2012). On the utilization of social animals as a model for social Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 31(March), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naderi, S., Miklósi, Á., Dóka, A., & Csányi, V. (2001). Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74(1), 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolescu, M.N. (2014). Commentary to “Social behaviors in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots.” Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Novikova, J., Watts, L., & Bryson, J.J. (2014). The role of emotions in inter-action selection. Interaction Studies, 15(2), this issue.Google Scholar
Partan, S.R. (1999). Communication goes multimodal. Science (New York, N.Y.), 283(5406), 1272–1273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V. (2005). Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1191(21), 136–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, R., Scheutz, M., & Schermerhorn, P. (2010). Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability. Interaction Studies, 11(2), 314–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wan, M., Bolger, N., & Champagne, F. a. (2012). Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lakatos, Gabriella, Márta Gácsi, Veronika Konok, Ildikó Brúder, Boróka Bereczky, Péter Korondi, Ádám Miklósi & Cosimo Urgesi
2014. Emotion Attribution to a Non-Humanoid Robot in Different Social Situations. PLoS ONE 9:12  pp. e114207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.