Article published In:
Interaction StudiesVol. 15:2 (2014) ► pp.321–342
Exploring emotional response to gesture in product interaction using Laban’s movement analysis
This paper explores the use of Laban’s effort actions from the field of dance and drama as a means to document user responses to physical product interaction. A range of traditional and modern product pairs were identified and reviewed in two workshops, where participants were asked to discuss and complete worksheets on their emotional response. The results provide qualitative feedback on their reactions to the different movements, and form the beginnings of an ‘emotional vocabulary’ that we plan to use in the development of semantic differentials for future studies. Key factors in emotional response to gesture have been identified, including aligning movement to product function, emotional conflicts in movement, and user readiness and framing a sequence of movements. Keywords: Design research; gesture; human factors; interface design
References (29)
Bartenieff, I., & Lewis, D. (1980). Body movement: Coping with the environment. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.
Bourne, J. (Ed.). (1938). Twenty-five modern one-act plays. London, UK: V. Gollancz.
Bull, P.E. (1987). Posture and gesture. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Davies, E. (2001). Beyond dance: Laban’s legacy of movement analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dunne, A. (2008). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Feldenkrais, M. (1972). Awareness through movement. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychology science, 48(2), 157.
Hekkert, P., Mostert, M., & Stompff, G. (2003). Dancing with a machine: A case of experience-driven design. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Klooster, S., & Overbeeke, C.J. (2005). Designing products as an integral part of choreography of interaction: The product’s form as an integral part of movemen. Paper presented at the
The 1st European workshop on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement
, Newcastle: Northumbria University.
Laban, R. (1960). The mastery of movement (2nd ed.). London, UK: MacDonald and Evans.
Laban, R., & Lawrence, F.C. (1974). Effort (2nd ed.). London, UK: MacDonald and Evans.
Lancaster, J.B. (1968). On the evolution of tool-using behavior. American Anthropologist, 70(1), 56–66.
Loke, L., Larssen, A.T., & Robertson, T. (2005, 23–25 November). Labanotation for design of movement-based interaction. Paper presented at the
Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment
, Sydney, Australia.
Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2010). Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 1–16.
Meyerhold, V., & Braun, E. (1969). On theatre. London, UK: Methuen Drama.
Moen, J. (2005). Towards people based movement interaction and kinaesthetic interaction experiences. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility
, Aarhus, Denmark.
. (2006). KinAesthetic movement interaction: Designing for the pleasure of motion: KTH, Numerical Analysis and Computer Science.
Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Moore, C.-L. (2005). Movement and making decisions: The body-mind connection in the workplace (Contemporary Discourse on Movement and Dance). New York, NY: Dance & Movement Press.
Newlove, J., & Dalby, J. (2004). Laban for all. London, UK: Nick Hern Books Limited.
Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 891, 344–350.
Russell, J.A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.
Skoyles, J.R. (1999). Human evolution expanded brains to increase expertise capacity, not IQ. Psycoloquy, 10(2), 1–14.
Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2007). The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1091–1100.
Susman, R.L. (1998). Hand function and tool behavior in early hominids. Journal of Human Evolution, 351, 23–46.
Williams, T.I. (1987). A history of invention. New York, NY: Facts on File.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Kougioumtzian, Lori, Katerina El Raheb, Akrivi Katifori & Maria Roussou
2022. Blazing fire or breezy wind? A story-driven playful experience for annotating dance movement. Frontiers in Computer Science 4 
Naka, Toshiya & Toru Ishida
2016. Dynamic Motion Analysis of Gesture Interaction. In Handbook of Research on Human-Computer Interfaces, Developments, and Applications [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ], ► pp. 23 ff.
Wodehouse, Andrew & Sylvia Tzvetanova Yung
2015. Special issue on interaction and experience design. Journal of Engineering Design 26:4-6 ► pp. 95 ff.
Wodehouse, Andrew J. & Jonathon Marks
2015. Physicality in Technological Interface Design. In Analyzing Art, Culture, and Design in the Digital Age [Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts, ], ► pp. 258 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.