Article published in:
Mental Model Ascription by Intelligent Agents
Edited by Marjorie McShane
[Interaction Studies 15:3] 2014
► pp. 455477
References
Anderson, J.R
(2007) How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y
(2004) An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I.A., Carroll, D.J., Samson, D., Humphreys, G.W., Qureshi, A., & Moffit, G
(2010) Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 1201–1217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arslan, B., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R
(2013) Modeling developmental transitions in reasoning about false beliefs of others. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (pp. 77–82). Ottawa, CA: Carleton University.
Bacharach, M., & Stahl, D.O
(2000) Variable-frame level-n theory. Games and Economic Behavior, 32(2), 220–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, C., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J.B
(2009) Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, 113(3), 329–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M., & Frith, U
(1985) Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind?” Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergwerff, G., Meijering, B., Szymanik, J., Verbrugge, R. & Wierda, S.M
(2014) Computational and algorithmic models of strategies in turn-based games. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society . Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Borst, J.P., Taatgen, N.A., & Van Rijn, H
(2010) The problem state: A cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 36(2), 363–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flobbe, L., Verbrugge, R., Hendriks, P., & Krämer, I
(2008) Children’s application of theory of mind in reasoning and language. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 17(4), 417–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H.M
(1992) Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind and Language, 7(1–2), 145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W.T.Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L
(2002) Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 5(1), 53–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedden, T., & Zhang, J
(2002) What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition, 85(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiatt, L.M., & Trafton, J.G
(2010) A cognitive model of theory of mind. In D. Salvucci & G. Gunzelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 91–96). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
Johnson-Laird, P.N
(1983) Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D.J
(2003) Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.D., & Sarnecka, B.W
(2010) A model of knower-level behavior in number concept development. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 51–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N
(2010) Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 551–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meijering, B., Van Maanen, L., Van Rijn, H., & Verbrugge, R
(2010) The facilitative effect of context on second-order social reasoning. In R. Catrambone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1423–1428). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R
(2012) What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game. PloS one, 7(9), e45961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N., & Verbrugge, R
(2011) I do know what you think I think: Second-order theory of mind in strategic games is not that difficult. In L. Carslon, C. Hoelscher, & T.F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2486–2491). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meijering, B., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R
(2013) Reasoning about diamonds, gravity and mental states: The cognitive costs of theory of mind. In M. Knauff, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3026–3031). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R
under submission). Reasoning about self versus others: Changing perspective is hard.
Miller, S.A
(2009) Children’s understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 749–773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C
(2013) No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese Wh-Questions. Language Learning and Development, (ahead-of-print), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M.J., & Rubinstein, A
(1994) A course in game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H
(1985) “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(3), 437–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qureshi, A.W., Apperly, I.A., & Samson, D
(2010) Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition, 117(2), 230–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raijmakers, M.E.J., Mandell, D.J., Van Es, S.E., & Counihan, M
(2014) Children’s strategy use when playing strategic games. Synthese, 191(3), 355–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todd, P.M., & Gigerenzer, G
(2000) Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 727–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, L., & Verbrugge, R
(2010) A computational model of second-order social reasoning. In D. Salvucci & G. Gunzelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 259–264). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
Van Rijn, H., Van Someren, M., & Van der Maas, H.L.J
(2003) Modeling developmental transitions on the balance scale task. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 227–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J
(2001) Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Hedden, T., & Chia, A
(2012) Perspective-taking and depth of theory-of-mind reasoning in sequential-move games. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 560–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Arslan, Burcu, Niels A. Taatgen & Rineke Verbrugge
2017. Five-Year-Olds’ Systematic Errors in Second-Order False Belief Tasks Are Due to First-Order Theory of Mind Strategy Selection: A Computational Modeling Study. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Arslan, Burcu, Rineke Verbrugge, Niels Taatgen & Bart Hollebrandse
2020. Accelerating the Development of Second‐Order False Belief Reasoning: A Training Study With Different Feedback Methods. Child Development 91:1  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
de Weerd, Harmen, Denny Diepgrond & Rineke Verbrugge
2018. Estimating the Use of Higher-Order Theory of Mind Using Computational Agents. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 18:2 DOI logo
Ghosh, Sujata, Tamoghna Halder, Khyati Sharma & Rineke Verbrugge
2015. Human Strategic Reasoning in Dynamic Games: Experiments, Logics, Cognitive Models. In Logic, Rationality, and Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9394],  pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Ghosh, Sujata, Aviad Heifetz & Rineke Verbrugge
2016. Do players reason by forward induction in dynamic perfect information games?. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 215  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Ghosh, Sujata, Aviad Heifetz, Rineke Verbrugge & Harmen de Weerd
2017. What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 251  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Ghosh, Sujata & Rineke Verbrugge
2018. Studying strategies and types of players: experiments, logics and cognitive models. Synthese 195:10  pp. 4265 ff. DOI logo
Langley, Christelle, Bogdan Ionut Cirstea, Fabio Cuzzolin & Barbara J. Sahakian
2022. Theory of Mind and Preference Learning at the Interface of Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and AI: A Review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5 DOI logo
Top, Jakob, Rineke Verbrugge & Sujata Ghosh
2018. An Automated Method for Building Cognitive Models for Turn-Based Games from a Strategy Logic. Games 9:3  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Veltman, Kim, Harmen de Weerd & Rineke Verbrugge
2019. Training the use of theory of mind using artificial agents. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 13:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Verbrugge, Rineke, Ben Meijering, Stefan Wierda, Hedderik van Rijn & Niels Taatgen
2018. Stepwise training supports strategic second-order theory of mind in turn-taking games. Judgment and Decision Making 13:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.