Anderson, J.R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apperly, I.A., Carroll, D.J., Samson, D., Humphreys, G.W., Qureshi, A., & Moffit, G. (2010). Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 1201–1217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arslan, B., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R. (2013). Modeling developmental transitions in reasoning about false beliefs of others. In
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling
(pp. 77–82). Ottawa, CA: Carleton University.
Bacharach, M., & Stahl, D.O. (2000). Variable-frame level-n theory. Games and Economic Behavior, 32(2), 220–246. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, C., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2009). Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, 113(3), 329–349. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind?” Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergwerff, G., Meijering, B., Szymanik, J., Verbrugge, R. & Wierda, S.M. (2014). Computational and algorithmic models of strategies in turn-based games. In
Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Borst, J.P., Taatgen, N.A., & Van Rijn, H. (2010). The problem state: A cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 36(2), 363–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flobbe, L., Verbrugge, R., Hendriks, P., & Krämer, I. (2008). Children’s application of theory of mind in reasoning and language. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 17(4), 417–442. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H.M. (1992). Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind and Language, 7(1–2), 145–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harbaugh, W.T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2002). Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 5(1), 53–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hedden, T., & Zhang, J. (2002). What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition, 85(1), 1–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiatt, L.M., & Trafton, J.G. (2010). A cognitive model of theory of mind. In D. Salvucci & G. Gunzelmann (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling
(pp. 91–96). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D.J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, M.D., & Sarnecka, B.W. (2010). A model of knower-level behavior in number concept development. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 51–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 551–556. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meijering, B., Van Maanen, L., Van Rijn, H., & Verbrugge, R. (2010). The facilitative effect of context on second-order social reasoning. In R. Catrambone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 1423–1428). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R. (2012). What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game. PloS one, 7(9), e45961. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N., & Verbrugge, R. (2011). I do know what you think I think: Second-order theory of mind in strategic games is not that difficult. In L. Carslon, C. Hoelscher, & T.F. Shipley (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 2486–2491). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meijering, B., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R. (2013). Reasoning about diamonds, gravity and mental states: The cognitive costs of theory of mind. In M. Knauff, et al. (eds.),
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 3026–3031). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., & Verbrugge, R. (under submission). Reasoning about self versus others: Changing perspective is hard.
Miller, S.A. (2009). Children’s understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 749–773. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2013). No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese Wh-Questions. Language Learning and Development, (ahead-of-print), 1–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osborne, M.J., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(3), 437–471. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Qureshi, A.W., Apperly, I.A., & Samson, D. (2010). Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition, 117(2), 230–236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raijmakers, M.E.J., Mandell, D.J., Van Es, S.E., & Counihan, M. (2014). Children’s strategy use when playing strategic games. Synthese, 191(3), 355–370. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Todd, P.M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 727–780. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Maanen, L., & Verbrugge, R. (2010). A computational model of second-order social reasoning. In D. Salvucci & G. Gunzelmann (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling
(pp. 259–264). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
Van Rijn, H., Van Someren, M., & Van der Maas, H.L.J. (2003). Modeling developmental transitions on the balance scale task. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 227–257. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wellman, H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, J., Hedden, T., & Chia, A. (2012). Perspective-taking and depth of theory-of-mind reasoning in sequential-move games. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 560–573. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)