Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 16:1 (2015) ► pp.128
References (56)
References
Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28(3), 289–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arita, A., Hiraki, K., Kanda, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2005). Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons. Cognition, 95(3), 49–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI & Society, 21(1), 217–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11, 71–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375–32. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Beier, J., & Spelke, E. (2012). Infants’ developing understanding of social gaze. Child Development, 83(2), 486–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, P.R., Ganea, P.A., & Harris, P.L. (2012). Possession is not always the law: With age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(2), 259–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, P., & Harris, P. (2009). Children’s understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 133–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Early representations of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 39–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), 1–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G. (2008). Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 107(2), 705–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J., & Herrera, C. (1997). Conflict resolution with friends, siblings, and mothers: A developmental perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 23(5), 343–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasig, L.G. (2000). Toddlers’ understanding of ownership: Implications for self-concept development. Social Development, 9(3), 370–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 290–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, O., & Neary, K.R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107(3), 829–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frischen, A., Bayliss, A., & Tipper, S. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 6(1), 49–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1980). The Origins and Early Development of Possessive Behavior. Political Psychology, 2(1), 30–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S., Manczak, E., & Noles, N. (2012). The nonobvious basis of ownership: Preschool children trace the history and value of owned objects. Child Development, 83(5), 1732–1747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, B., Willen, J., & Driver, J. (1998). Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Lee, K. (2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants’ imitation of a robot’s goal-directed actions. Infancy, 13(5), 519–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S., Booth, A., & O’Hearn, K. (2001). Inferring the goals of a nonhuman agent. Cognitive Development, 16(1), 637–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze‐following in 12‐month‐olds. Developmental Science, 1(2), 233–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahn Jr, P.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N., Severson, R., Gill, B., Ruckert, J.H., & Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N., & Hood, B.M. (2010). The Effect of Creative Labor on Property-Ownership Transfer by Preschool Children and Adults. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1236–1241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B. (2013). Not by labor alone: Considerations for value influence use of the labor rule in ownership transfers. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 353–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B.M. (2014). Young children’s understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects. Cognitive Development, 291, 30–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanngiesser, P., Itakura, S., & Hood, B. (2014). The effect of labour on ownership decisions in two cultures: Developmental evidence from Japan and the UK. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 320–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalish, C., & Anderson, C. (2011). Ownership as a social status. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 65–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, F. (2004). Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1(03), 465–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol, 261, 22–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., & Kalish, C.W. (2009). Children’s ascription of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24(3), 322–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14(5), 402–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, K., Eskritt, M., Symons, L., & Muir, D. (1998). Children’s use of triadic eye gaze information for mind reading. Developmental psychology, 34(3), 525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, D., Rau, P., & Li, Y. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(2), 175–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDorman, K., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 297–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDorman, K., Vasudevan, S., & Ho, C. (2009). Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI & Society, 23(4), 485–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C., Hood, B., Milne, A., Rowe, A., & Mason, M. (2002). Are you looking at me? Eye gaze and person perception. Psychological Science, 13(5), 460–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A., Brooks, R., Shon, A., & Rao, R. (2010). “Social” robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following. Neural Networks, 23(8), 966–972. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2004). 12‐and 18‐month‐old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. Developmental Science, 7(1), 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moriguchi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2010). Children perseverate to a human’s actions but not to a robot’s actions. Developmental Science, 131, 62–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neary, K.R., van de Vondervoort, J., & Friedman, O. (2012). Artifacts and natural kinds: Children’s judgments about whether objects are owned. Developmental Psychology, 481, 149–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noles, N.S., Keil, F.C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S. (2012). Children’s and adults’ intuitions about who can own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 121, 265–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2009). Age differences and images of robots: Social survey in Japan. Interaction Studies, 10(3), 374–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurmsoo, E., Einav, S., & Hood, B. (2012). Best friends: Children use mutual gaze to identify friendships in others. Developmental Science, 15(3), 417–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, K.R., & Shaw, A. (2011). ‘No fair, copycat!’: What children’s response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas. Developmental Science, 14(2), 431–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121(2), 219–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, H., Conant, C., & Vickar, M. (2011). Property rights and the resolution of social conflict. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(132), 53–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, A., Li, V., & Olson, K.R. (2012). Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1998). One child’s early talk about possession. Typological Studies in Language, 361, 349–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Zhang, Xiuyuan, Paul Bloom & Julian Jara-Ettinger
2024. People Have Systematically Different Ownership Intuitions in Seemingly Simple Cases. Psychological Science 35:8  pp. 858 ff. DOI logo
Espinoza, Ulises J. & H. Clark Barrett
2023. Cultural and contextual variation in first mover norms of ownership: evidence from an Achuar community. Evolution and Human Behavior 44:6  pp. 584 ff. DOI logo
Li, Zhanxing & Dong Dong
2023. How you get it matters: Moderating role of transfer method in guiding ownership assignments for modified objects. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Sommer, Kristyn, Virginia Slaughter, Janet Wiles & Mark Nielsen
2023. Revisiting the video deficit in technology-saturated environments: Successful imitation from people, screens, and social robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 232  pp. 105673 ff. DOI logo
Starmans, Christina & Ori Friedman
2023. Why Children Believe They Are Owned. Open Mind 7  pp. 534 ff. DOI logo
Li, Zhanxing, Xiaoli Ni, Liqi Zhu, Jing Li & Lucas Payne Butler
2021. Chinese preschoolers’ ownership reasoning based on first possession heuristic. PLOS ONE 16:12  pp. e0260335 ff. DOI logo
Schmiedel, Theresa, Janine Jäger & Vivienne Jia Zhong
2021. Social Robots in Organizational Contexts: The Role of Culture and Future Research Needs. In New Trends in Business Information Systems and Technology [Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 294],  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Schmiedel, Theresa, Janine Jäger & Vivienne Jia Zhong
2023. Soziale Roboter in organisatorischen Kontexten: Die Rolle von Kultur und zukünftiger Forschungsbedarf. In Neue Trends in Wirtschaftsinformatik und eingesetzte Technologien,  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Di Dio, C., F. Manzi, S. Itakura, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, D. Massaro & A. Marchetti
2020. It Does Not Matter Who You Are: Fairness in Pre-schoolers Interacting with Human and Robotic Partners. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:5  pp. 1045 ff. DOI logo
Li, Zhanxing, Liqi Zhu, Yingjia Wan, Jing Li & Jing Yu
2020. Effect of transfer type on labor's role in ownership judgments. PsyCh Journal 9:4  pp. 553 ff. DOI logo
Manzi, Federico, Giulia Peretti, Cinzia Di Dio, Angelo Cangelosi, Shoji Itakura, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Davide Massaro & Antonella Marchetti
2020. A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children’s Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Wang, Ying, Yun‐Hee Park, Shoji Itakura, Annette Margaret Elizabeth Henderson, Takayuki Kanda, Naoki Furuhata & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2020. Infants' perceptions of cooperation between a human and robot. Infant and Child Development 29:2 DOI logo
Nancekivell, Shaylene E., Ori Friedman & Susan A. Gelman
2019. Ownership Matters: People Possess a Naïve Theory of Ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23:2  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Peter, Jochen, Rinaldo Kühne, Alex Barco, Chiara de Jong & Caroline L. van Straten
2019. Asking Today the Crucial Questions of Tomorrow: Social Robots and the Internet of Toys. In The Internet of Toys [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ],  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Friedman, Ori, Madison L. Pesowski & Brandon W. Goulding
2018. Legal Ownership Is Psychological: Evidence from Young Children. In Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Goulding, Brandon W. & Ori Friedman
2018. The development of territory-based inferences of ownership. Cognition 177  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Li, Zhanxing, Minli Qi, Jing Yu & Liqi Zhu
2018. Who Is the Rightful Owner? Young Children’s Ownership Judgments in Different Transfer Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Van de Vondervoort, Julia W., Paul Meinz & Ori Friedman
2017. Children’s judgments about ownership rights and body rights: Evidence for a common basis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 155  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kanngiesser, Patricia, Marco F. H. Schmidt & Federico Rossano
2016. Young Children’s Understanding of Social Norms and Social Institutions. In Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration,  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.