Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 16:2 (2015) ► pp.173179
References
Baron-Cohen, S
(1995) Mindblindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Jolliffe, & Therese
(1997) Is there a“ language of the eyes”? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4(3), 311–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P., & Smith, P.K
(1996) Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge Univ Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C.L., Walters, M.L., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, N.A., & Blow, M
(2009) KASPAR–a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human–robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 6(3–4), 369–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Destephe, M., Zecca, M., Hashimoto, & Takanishi, A (2014, October). Paper presented at IIEEE-Robotics and Biomimetics Conference , Bali, Indonesia.
Freud, S
(1919) The uncanny. London, UK: Penguin Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., Jenkins, A.C., Heberlein, A.S., & Wegner, D.M
(2011) Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. PNAS, 108(2), 477–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., & Wegner, D.M
(2012) Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Looser, C.E., & Wheatley, T
(2010) The tipping point of animacy. How, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1854–1862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDorman, K.F., Green, R.D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C.T
(2009) Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 695–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mori, M
(1970) The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pioggia, G., Ahluwalia, A., Carpi, F., Marchetti, A., Ferro, M., Rocchia, W., & Rossi, D.D
(2004) FACE: Facial automaton for conveying emotions. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 1(2), 91–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dubowski, J
Scassellati, B
(2007) How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. In Robotics research (pp. 552–563). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senju, A., & Johnson, M.H
(2009) Atypical eye contact in autism: Models, mechanisms and development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(8), 1204–1214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seyama, J., & Nagayama, R.S
(2007) The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(4), 337–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starmans, C., & Bloom, P
(2012) Windows to the soul: Children and adults see the eyes as the location of the self. Cognition, 123(2), 313–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uljarevic, M., & Hamilton, A
(2013) Recognition of emotions in autism: a formal meta-­analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1517–1526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Benjamin, Rachele & Steven J. Heine
2023. From Freud to Android: Constructing a Scale of Uncanny Feelings. Journal of Personality Assessment 105:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Cassidy, Brittany S., Robert W. Wiley, Mattea Sim & Kurt Hugenberg
2022. Inversion Reduces Sensitivity to Complex Emotions in Eye Regions. Social Cognition 40:3  pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Delgado, Naira, Simone Mattavelli, Marco Brambilla, Laura Rodríguez-Gómez & Lasana T. Harris
2023. Humanity at first sight: Exploring the relationship between others' pupil size and ascriptions of humanity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 106  pp. 104455 ff. DOI logo
Deska, Jason C. & Kurt Hugenberg
2017. The face‐mind link: Why we see minds behind faces, and how others' minds change how we see their face. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 11:12 DOI logo
Feng, Shuyuan, Xueqin Wang, Qiandong Wang, Jing Fang, Yaxue Wu, Li Yi, Kunlin Wei & Nicholas Greatorex Riches
2018. The uncanny valley effect in typically developing children and its absence in children with autism spectrum disorders. PLOS ONE 13:11  pp. e0206343 ff. DOI logo
Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, Jens & Mathias Clasen
2023. Creepiness and the Uncanny. Style 57:3  pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
Saneyoshi, Ayako, Matia Okubo, Hikaru Suzuki, Takato Oyama & Bruno Laeng
2022. The other-race effect in the uncanny valley. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 166  pp. 102871 ff. DOI logo
Stein, Jan-Philipp & Peter Ohler
2018. Uncanny…But Convincing? Inconsistency Between a Virtual Agent’s Facial Proportions and Vocal Realism Reduces Its Credibility and Attractiveness, but Not Its Persuasive Success. Interacting with Computers 30:6  pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Strait, Megan, Heather L. Urry & Paul Muentener
2019. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI),  pp. 506 ff. DOI logo
Strait, Megan K., Victoria A. Floerke, Wendy Ju, Keith Maddox, Jessica D. Remedios, Malte F. Jung & Heather L. Urry
2017. Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Taylor, Jebediah, Staci Meredith Weiss & Peter J. Marshall
2020. “Alexa, how are you feeling today?”. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 21:3  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Yam, Kai Chi, Yochanan Bigman & Kurt Gray
2021. Reducing the uncanny valley by dehumanizing humanoid robots. Computers in Human Behavior 125  pp. 106945 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.