The uncanny valley phenomenon: Does it affect all of us?

Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Astrid; Weiss, Astrid

doi:10.1075/is.16.2.07ros

Article published In:

Interaction Studies
Vol. 16:2 (2015) ► pp.206–214

The uncanny valley phenomenon

Does it affect all of us?

Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten | University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, Vienna University of Technology, Austria | [email protected]

Astrid Weiss | University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, Vienna University of Technology, Austria | [email protected]

Keywords: Uncanny Valley, personality traits, pre-experience, robot behaviour, task context, implicit reactions

Article outline

1.Introduction
2.Personality traits and pre-experience in HRI
3.Robot behaviour and task context in HRI
4.Reflective vs. Implicit Reactions
5.Conclusions
References

Published online: 26 November 2015

https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.2.07ros

References (23)

Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N

(2007, August). Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff?. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007 . (pp. 368–373). IEEE.

De Houwer, J

(2006) What are implicit measures and why are we using them. The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28).

Isbister, K., & Nass, C

(2000) Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(2), 251–267.

Joosse, M., Lohse, M., Perez, J.G., & Evers, V

(2013, May). What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 2134–2139). IEEE.

Lee, K.M., Peng, W., Jin, S.A., & Yan, C

(2006) Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754–772.

Mirnig, N., Strasser, E., Weiss, A., & Tscheligi, M

(2012) Studies in public places as a means to positively influence People’s attitude towards robots. In Social robotics (pp. 209–218). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Mori M

(1970) The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4): 33–35.

MacDorman, K.F., & Entezari, S.O

(2015) Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interaction Studies, this issue .

Mutlu, B., Osman, S., Forlizzi, J., Hodgins, J., & Kiesler, S

(2006, September). Task structure and user attributes as elements of human-robot interaction design. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006 . (pp. 74–79). IEEE.

Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K

(2008) Prediction of human behavior in human-robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 24(2), 442–451.

Nomura, T., Shintani, T., Fujii, K., & Hokabe, K

(2007, March). Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots. In Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED international conference on human computer interaction , Chamonix, France. ACTA Press (pp. 13–18).

Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A.M

(2014) Uncannily human. empirical investigation of the uncanny valley phenomenon. Dissertation Thesis.

Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A.M., & Krämer, N.C

(2014) How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 361, 422–439.

Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A.M., Krämer, N.C., Becker-Asano, C., Ogawa, K., Nishio, S., & Ishiguro, H

(2014) The Uncanny in the Wild. Analysis of Unscripted Human–Android Interaction in the Field. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(1), 67–83.

Strasser, E., Weiss, A., & Tscheligi, M (2012, March). Affect misattribution procedure: an implicit technique to measure user experience in HRI. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 243–244). ACM.

Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Walters, M.L., & Koay, K.L

(2006, September). ‘Doing the right thing wrong’-Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches. In Proceedings of The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. (pp. 183–188). IEEE.

Syrdal, D.S., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L., & Dautenhahn, K

(2007, August). A personalized robot companion?-The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. In Proceedings of The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007 . (pp. 1143–1148). IEEE.

Tapus, A., & Matarić, M.J

(2008, January). User personality matching with a hands-off robot for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. In Experimental robotics (pp. 165–175). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Kaouri, C., Woods, S.N., Nehaniv, C.L., & Werry, I

(2005, July). The influence of subjects’ personality traits on predicting comfortable human-robot approach distances’. In Proceedings of Cog Sci 2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science (pp. 29–37).

Weiss, A

(2010) Validation of an evaluation framework for human-robot interaction. The impact of usability, social acceptance, user experience, and societal impact on collaboration with humanoid robots. Ph.D. thesis, University Salzburg.

Weiss, A., & Evers, V

(2011) Exploring cultural factors in human-robot interaction: A matter of personality? Workshop Position Paper at the 2nd Comparative Informatics Workshop .

Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Kaouri, C., Boekhorst, R., & Koay, K.L

(2005, December). Is this robot like me? Links between human and robot personality traits. In Proceedings of 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (pp.375–380). IEEE.DOI:

Yamauchi, T., Ohno, T., Nakatani, M., Kato, Y., & Markman, A

(2012, February). Psychology of user experience in a collaborative video-conference system. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 187–196). ACM.

Cited by (8)

Cited by 8 other publications

Order by:

Mays, Katy

2024. Authentic Impediments: The Influence of Identity Threat, Cultivated Perceptions, and Personality on Robophobia. Human-Machine Communication 8 ► pp. 205 ff.

Ramli, Noraini, Mohd Ekram Al Hafis Hashim & Wan Azani Mustafa

2024. THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS (InCASA) 2023 [THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS (InCASA) 2023, 3135], ► pp. 020015 ff.

Horstmann, Aike C.

2023. Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 500 ff.

Kanero, Junko, Cansu Oranç, Sümeyye Koşkulu, G. Tarcan Kumkale, Tilbe Göksun & Aylin C. Küntay

2022. Are Tutor Robots for Everyone? The Influence of Attitudes, Anxiety, and Personality on Robot-Led Language Learning. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:2 ► pp. 297 ff.

Appel, Markus, David Izydorczyk, Silvana Weber, Martina Mara & Tanja Lischetzke

2020. The uncanny of mind in a machine: Humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers. Computers in Human Behavior 102 ► pp. 274 ff.

Lyons, Joseph B., Chang S. Nam, Sarah A. Jessup, Thy Q. Vo & Kevin T. Wynne

2020. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), ► pp. 1 ff.

Taylor, Jebediah, Staci Meredith Weiss & Peter J. Marshall

2020. “Alexa, how are you feeling today?”. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 21:3 ► pp. 329 ff.

Turner, Phil

2017. Other Social Beings. In A Psychology of User Experience [Human–Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 45 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.