Article published In:
Interaction StudiesVol. 16:2 (2015) ► pp.219–248
Autistic traits and sensitivity to human-like features of robot behavior
Agnieszka Wykowska | General and Experimental Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München | Chair for Cognitive Systems, Technische Universität München | [email protected]
Jasmin Kajopoulos | Neuro-cognitive Psychology Master Programme, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München | [email protected]
Karinne Ramirez-Amaro | Chair for Cognitive Systems, Technische Universität München | [email protected]
This study examined individual differences in sensitivity to human-like features of a robot’s behavior. The paradigm comprised a non-verbal Turing test with a humanoid robot. A “programmed” condition differed from a “human-controlled” condition by onset times of the robot’s eye movements, which were either fixed across trials or modeled after prerecorded human reaction times, respectively. Participants judged whether the robot behavior was programmed or human-controlled, with no information regarding the differences between respective conditions. Autistic traits were measured with the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) questionnaire in healthy adults. We found that the fewer autistic traits participants had, the more sensitive they were to the difference between the conditions, without explicit awareness of the nature of the difference. We conclude that although sensitivity to fine behavioral characteristics of others varies with social aptitude, humans are in general capable of detecting human-like behavior based on very subtle cues.
Keywords: Human-robot interaction, Non-verbal Turing test, Autism-Spectrum Quotient, Human-like behavior, Individual differences, Gaze cueing, Shared attention, Social robotics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Sensitivity to detecting human behavior
- 1.2Evolutionary benefits
- 1.3Social aptitude
- 1.4Aim of study and design
- 2.Materials and methods
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Ethics statement
- 2.3Stimuli and apparatus
- 2.4Procedure
- 2.5Data analysis
- 2.5.1Sensitivity to human behavior
- 2.5.2Social aptitude
- 2.5.3Target discrimination performance
- 3.Results
- 3.1Social aptitude and sensitivity to human-like behavior
- 3.2General sensitivity to human’s behavior
- 3.3Target discrimination task
- 3.3.1Perceived humanness
- 3.3.2Actual humanness
- 3.4Questionnaire data
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1General sensitivity to human’s behavior
- 4.2The influence of humanness attribution on social attention mechanisms
- 4.3Implications
- 5 Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
-
References
References
Admoni, H., Datsikas, C., & Scassellati, B
(2014) Speech and gaze conflicts in collaborative human-robot interactions. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (eds.),
Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2014)
, 104–109.
Cabibihan, J.J., Javed, H., Ang, M. Jr., & Aljunied, S.M
(2013) Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 51, 593–618. 
Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J.W., Kim, E.S., & Scassellati, B
(2010) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 31, 41–52.
Baron-Cohen, S
(1995) Mindblindness: An essay on autism and the theory of mind. Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I
(2001a) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 421, 241–251.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E
(2001b) The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 311, 5–17.
Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M
(2007) Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 581, 47–73.
Blake, R., Turner, L.M., Smoski, M.J., Pozdol, S.L., & Stone, W.L
(2003) Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological Science, 141, 151–157.
Chaminade, T., Rosset, D., Da Fonseca, D., Nazarian, B., Lutscher, E., Cheng, G., & Deruelle, C
(2012) How do we think machines think? Not as intentional agents! An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 103.
Cohen, J
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 1121, 155–159.
Cousineau, D
(2005) Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’ s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 11, 42–45.
Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S
(1999) Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 61, 509–540.
DSM-5 (2013) (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
Ehrlich, S., Wykowska, A., Ramirez-Amaro, K., & Cheng, G
(2014) When to engage in interaction – and how? EEG-based enhancement of robot’s ability to sense social signals in HRI. In
IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots
, Madrid, Spain 2014 DOI:
Farroni, T., Massaccessi, S., Pividori, D., Simion, F., & Johnson, M.H
(2004) Gaze Following in Newborns. Infancy, 51.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A
(2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 391, 175–191.
Friesen, C.K., & Kingstone, A
(1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 51, 490–495.
Frith, C.D., & Frith, U
(2008) Implicit and explicit processes in social cognition. Neuron, 601, 503–510.
Gonzalez-Pacheco, V., Malfaz, M., Fernandez, F., & Salichs, M.A
(2013) Teaching human poses interactively to a social robot. Sensors (Basel), 131, 12406–12430.
Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M
(2010) Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference. Developmental Science, 131, 252–263.
Gray, H.M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D
(2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 3151.
Grossman, E., &Blake, R
(2002) Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 351, 1157–1165.
Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M., & Bastian, B
(2005) More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 891, 937–950.
Johansson, G
(1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 141, 201–211.
Johnson, M.H
(2006) Biological motion: A perceptual life detector? Current Biology, 161, R376-R377.
Jung, Y. & Lee, K.M
(2004) Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. Proceedings of PRESENCE, 80–87.
Kagan, J
(2004) The uniquely human in human nature. Daedalus, 1331, 77–88.
Kozima, H., Nakagawa, C., & Yasuda, Y
(2005) Interactive robots for communication-care: A case-study in autism therapy. IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communications (RO-MAN), 341–346.
Kuhlmeier, V.A., Troje, N.F., & Lee, V
(2010) Young infants detect the direction of biological motion in point-light displays. Infancy, 151, 83–93.
Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S.R
(2006) Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human-robot ineracton. International Jouranl in Human-Computer Studies, 641, 962–973.
Li, H., Cabibihan, J.J., & Tan, Y.K
(2011) Towards an effectivee design of social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 31, 333–335.
Metta, G., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Natale, L., & Nori, F (2008) The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition.
Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems
, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 50–56.
MacDorman, K.F., & Ishiguro, H
(2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research. Interaction Studies, 71, 297–337.
Moll, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M
(2007) Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagement. Developmental Science, 101, 826–835.
Mori, M
(1970) The uncanny valley. Energy, 71, 33–35.
Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J., & Hodgins, J
(2006) A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior.
IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots
, 518–523.
Mutlu, B., Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N
(2009) Nonverbal leakage in robots: communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior.
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI ‘09)
. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69–76.
Pfeiffer, U.J., Timmermans, B., Bente, G., Vogeley, K., & Schilbach, L
(2011) A non-verbal Turing test: differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction. PLoS One, 6(11), e27591.
Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., & Matarić, M
(2012) Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 141, 275–294.
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K
(2013) Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 361, 393–414.
Schuwerk, T., Vuori, M., & Sodian, B
(2014) Implicit and explicit Theory of Mind reasoning in autism spectrum disorders: The impact of experience. Autism.
Senju, A., & Johnson, M.H
(2009) The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 131, 127–134.
Soni, B., & Hingston, P
(2008) Bots trained to play like a human are more fun. Neural Networks, 2008. IJCNN 2008. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 363–369.
Takahashi, H. et al.
(2014) Different impressions of other agents obtained through social interaction uniquely modulate dorsal and ventral pathway activities in the social human brain. Cortex, 581, 289–300.
Thornton, I.M., & Vuong, Q.C
(2004) Incidental processing of biological motion. Current Biology,141, 1084–1089.
Turing, A
(1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 591, 433–460.
Wang, Y., & Hamilton, A.F
(2014) Why does gaze enhance mimicry? Placing gaze-mimicry effects in relation to other gaze phenomena. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 671, 747–762.
Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., & Müller, H.J
(2014) What we observe is biased by what other people tell us: Beliefs about the reliability of gaze behavior modulate attentional orienting to gaze cues. PloS One, 9(4), e94529.
Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J., & Muller, H.J (2012) I see what you mean: How attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PLoS One, 7(9), e45391.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J
(1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 131, 103–128.
Wykowska A, Wiese. E., Prosser, A., & Müller H.J
(2014) Beliefs about the minds of others influence how we process sensory information. PLoS One, 9(4).
Wykowska, A., Kajopoulos, J., Obando-Leitón, M., Cabibihan, J., Chauhan, S., & Cheng, G
(2015) Humans are well tuned to detecting agents among non-agents. International Journal of Social Robotics.
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
Chevalier, Pauline, Kyveli Kompatsiari, Francesca Ciardo & Agnieszka Wykowska
2020. Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27:2 ► pp. 217 ff. 
Ciardo, F., D. De Tommaso & A. Wykowska
2022. Human-like behavioral variability blurs the distinction between a human and a machine in a nonverbal Turing test. Science Robotics 7:68
Dubois-Sage, Marion, Baptiste Jacquet, Frank Jamet & Jean Baratgin
2024. People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Could Interact More Easily with a Robot than with a Human: Reasons and Limits. Behavioral Sciences 14:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
El-Muhammady, Muhammad Faisal, Sarah Afiqah Mohd Zabidi, Hazlina Md. Yusof, Mohammad Ariff Rashidan, Shahrul Na’im Sidek & Aimi Shazwani Ghazali
2023. Initial Response in HRI: A Pilot Study on Autism Spectrum Disorder Children Interacting with a Humanoid QTrobot. In Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 7 [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 642], ► pp. 393 ff.
Grynszpan, Ouriel, Jacqueline Nadel, Jean-Claude Martin & Philippe Fossati
2017. The awareness of joint attention. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Ishikawa, Kenta, Takato Oyama, Yoshihiko Tanaka & Matia Okubo
2024. Perceiving social gaze produces the reversed congruency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Kompatsiari, K., J. Perez-Osorio, D. De Tommaso, G. Metta & A. Wykowska
2018. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), ► pp. 3403 ff.
Kompatsiari, Kyveli, Francesco Bossi & Agnieszka Wykowska
2021. Eye contact during joint attention with a humanoid robot modulates oscillatory brain activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 16:4 ► pp. 383 ff.
Kompatsiari, Kyveli, Francesca Ciardo, Vadim Tikhanoff, Giorgio Metta & Agnieszka Wykowska
2018. On the role of eye contact in gaze cueing. Scientific Reports 8:1
Kompatsiari, Kyveli, Francesca Ciardo, Vadim Tikhanoff, Giorgio Metta & Agnieszka Wykowska
2021. It’s in the Eyes: The Engaging Role of Eye Contact in HRI. International Journal of Social Robotics 13:3 ► pp. 525 ff.
Kompatsiari, Kyveli, Vadim Tikhanoff, Francesca Ciardo, Giorgio Metta & Agnieszka Wykowska
2017. The Importance of Mutual Gaze in Human-Robot Interaction. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10652], ► pp. 443 ff.
Marchesi, Serena, Davide Ghiglino, Francesca Ciardo, Jairo Perez-Osorio, Ebru Baykara & Agnieszka Wykowska
2019. Do We Adopt the Intentional Stance Toward Humanoid Robots?. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Morgan, Emma J., Daniel T. Smith & Megan Freeth
2023. Gaze cueing, mental States, and the effect of autistic traits. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 85:2 ► pp. 485 ff.
Natale, Lorenzo, Chiara Bartolozzi, Daniele Pucci, Agnieszka Wykowska & Giorgio Metta
2017. iCub: The not-yet-finished story of building a robot child. Science Robotics 2:13
Perez-Osorio, J., D. De Tommaso, E. Baykara & A. Wykowska
2018. 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 152 ff.
Perez-Osorio, Jairo & Agnieszka Wykowska
2019. Adopting the Intentional Stance Towards Humanoid Robots. In Wording Robotics [Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 130], ► pp. 119 ff.
Robert, Lionel P., Marcelo Fantinato, Sangseok You & Patrick C. K. Hung
2024. Social Robotics Business and Computing. Information Systems Frontiers 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Schellen, Elef, Francesco Bossi & Agnieszka Wykowska
2021. Robot Gaze Behavior Affects Honesty in Human-Robot Interaction. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4
Willemse, Cesco, Abdulaziz Abubshait & Agnieszka Wykowska
2022. Motor behaviour mimics the gaze response in establishing joint attention, but is moderated by individual differences in adopting the intentional stance towards a robot avatar. Visual Cognition 30:1-2 ► pp. 42 ff.
Willemse, Cesco, Serena Marchesi & Agnieszka Wykowska
2018. Robot Faces that Follow Gaze Facilitate Attentional Engagement and Increase Their Likeability. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Wykowska, Agnieszka, Thierry Chaminade & Gordon Cheng
2016. Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371:1693 ► pp. 20150375 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.