Cover not available
Article published In:
Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation: Interdisciplinary perspectives
Edited by Federica Amici and Lucas M. Bietti
[Interaction Studies 16:3] 2015
► pp. 526–552

Nonverbal interaction patterns in the Delhi Metro

Interrogative looks and play-faces in the management of interpersonal distance

| Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherches Migrations et Sociétés, France

The aim of the article is to describe the nonverbal communication patterns that passengers of the Delhi Metro use to manage density-induced territorial intrusions, and to identify some of the contextual variables that affect their deployment. After introducing the notion of “interrogative look” and the dataset, the following section depicts the techniques that passengers were observed to employ in order to solve the problem of territorial intrusion without breaking anonymity. The bulk of the analysis deals with the structure and function of “interrogative looks”, an objectively defined pattern of nonverbal behavior that the touched uses to signal her discontent to the toucher. The rest of the section describes a less frequent pattern whereby passengers contagiously signal the playful character of their mischiefs. Next is examined if and how density, i.e., the number of individuals per surface unit, influences as a contextual variable the occurrence of interrogative looks. The closing discussion considers the main findings from the standpoint of their local specificity.

Keywords: nonverbal behavior, social interaction, Delhi Metro, emotion, public places, mass transportation
Published online: 31 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.08ara
References
Aranguren, M., & Tonnelat, S
(2014) Emotional transactions in the paris subway: Combining naturalistic videotaping, objective facial coding and sequential analysis in the study of nonverbal emotional behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(4), 495-521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G
(1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Camras, L.A
(1992) Expressive development and basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4),269-283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I
(2007) Human ethology. London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W
(1978) Facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto (California): Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
(1986) A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 10(2), 159-68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Heider, K.G
(1988) The universality of a contempt expression: A replication. Motivation and Emotion, 12(3), 303-308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Dols, J.M., Carrera, P., & Crivelli, C
(2011) Facial behavior while experiencing sexual excitement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(1), 63-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Dols, J.M., & Ruiz-Belda, M.A
(1995) Are smiles a sign of happiness? Gold medal winners at the Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1113-1119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1963) Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
(2010 [1971]) Relations in public: Microstudies of the social order. New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hall, E.T
(1966) The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hinde, R
(1982) Ethology: Its nature and relations with other sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1985) Was ‘The expression of the emotions’ a misleading phrase? Animal Behaviour, 33(3), 985-992. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjortsjö, C.H
(1969) Man’s face and mimic language. Lund, Sweden: Student-litteratur.Google Scholar
Izard, C.E., & Haynes, O.M
(1988) On the form and universality of the contempt expression: A challenge to Ekman and Friesen’s claim of discovery. Motivation and Emotion, 12(1), 1-16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D
(1995) Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 441-454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittelson and Associates, Federal Transit Administration, & Transit Development Corporation
(2003) Transit capacity and quality of service manual (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
Mehu, M., & Dunbar, R
(2008) Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour, 145(12), 1747-1780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messinger, D.S., Fogel, A., & Dickson, K.L
(2001) All smiles are positive, but some smiles are more positive than others. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 642-653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, B., Fischer, A.H., & Manstead, A.S.R
(2004) Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Belda, M.A., Fernández-Dols, J.M, Carrera, P., & Barchard, K
(2003) Spontaneous facial expressions of happy bowlers and soccer fans. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 315-326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K.R., & Ceschi, G
(2000) Criteria for emotion recognition from verbal and nonverbal expression: Studying baggage loss in the airport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 327-339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Welsch, Robin, Heiko Hecht, Lewis Chuang & Christoph von Castell
2020. Interpersonal Distance in the SARS-CoV-2 Crisis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 62:7 ► pp. 1095 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.