Article published in:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 17:1 (2016) ► pp. 4876
References

References

AbdulSabur N, Xu Y, Liu S, Chow H, Baxter M., et al.
2014Neural correlates and network connectivity underlying narrative production and comprehension: A combined fMRI and PET study. Cortex 57: 107–27 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates E, MacWhinney B.
1987Competition, variation, and language learning In Mechanisms of language acquisition, ed. B MacWhinney, E Bates, pp. 157–93. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Becker RB, Ferretti TR, Madden-Lombardi CJ.
2013Grammatical aspect, lexical aspect, and event duration constrain the availability of events in narratives. Cognition 129: 212–20 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner J.
1991The narrative construction of reality. Critical inquiry: 1–21 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft W.
2012Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft W, Wood EJ.
2000Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence Meaning and Cognition: A multidisciplinary approach ed. by Liliana Albertazzi: 51–78 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey P, Boucher J.
2005aDevelopmental stages of perception and language acquisition in a perceptually grounded robot. Cognitive Systems Research 6: 243–59 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF.
2001A model of learning syntactic comprehension for natural and artificial grammars In Basic mechanisms of language and language disorders., ed. E Witruk, AD Friederici, T Lachmann, pp. 61–77. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
. 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston 2003.Google Scholar
2005Aspects of descriptive, referential, and information structure in phrasal semantics: A construction-based model. Interaction Studies 6: 287–310 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 65 ]
2013Recurrent temporal networks and language acquisition-from corticostriatal neurophysiology to reservoir computing. Frontiers in psychology 4: 1–14 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF, Boucher JD.
2005bLearning to talk about events from narrated video in a construction grammar framework. Artificial Intelligence 167: 31–61 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF, Hoen M Blanc JM, Lelekov-Boissard T.
2003Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies. Brain Lang 86: 207–25 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF, Hoen M, Inui T.
2006A neurolinguistic model of grammatical construction processing. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 2088–107 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF, Inui T.
2009Cortico-striatal function in sentence comprehension: insights from neurophysiology and modeling. Cortex 45: 1012–8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF, Inui T, Hoen M.
2009Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing. Brain & Language 109: 80–92 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dominey PF, Ramus F.
2000Neural network processing of natural language: I. Sensitivity to serial, temporal and abstract structure of language in the infant. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 40 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doshi F, Roy N.
2008Spoken language interaction with model uncertainty: an adaptive human–robot interaction system. Connection Science 20: 299–318 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty D.
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. language: 547–619 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman CF.
1987Thought from language: the linguistic constructino of cognitive representations In Making sense: the child's construction of the world, ed. J Bruner, pp. 131–46. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors P.
2014The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors P, Warglien M
2012Using conceptual spaces to model actions and events. Journal of Semantics: ffs007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón T.
2001Syntax: an introduction. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Gorniak P, Roy D.
2004Grounded semantic composition for visual scenes. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 21: 429–70Google Scholar
Hassin RR, Aarts H, Ferguson MJ.
2005Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41: 129–40 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinaut X, Dominey PF.
2013Real-time parallel processing of grammatical structure in the fronto-striatal system: a recurrent network simulation study using reservoir computing. PLoS One 8: 1–18 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinaut X, Petit M, Pointeau G, Dominey PF.
2014Exploring the acquisition and production of grammatical constructions through human-robot interaction with echo state networks. Front Neurorobot 8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff R.
2002Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kollar T, Tellex S, Roy D, Roy N.
2010 Proceeding of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction - HRI ’10. Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
Lakoff G, Narayanan S.
2010AAAI Fall Symposium: Computational Models of Narrative.Google Scholar
Lallée S, Hamann K, Steinwender J, Warneken F, Martienz U., et al.
2013Cooperative Human Robot Interaction Systems: IV. Communication of Shared Plans with Naïve Humans using Gaze and Speech. Presented at IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, TokyoGoogle Scholar
[ p. 66 ]
Lallée S, Madden C, Hoen M, Dominey P.
2010Linking language with embodied teleological representations of action for humanoid cognition. Frontiers in Neurobotics CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker RW.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford university press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lauria S, Bugmann G, Kyriacou T, Klein E.
2002Mobile robot programming using natural language. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 38: 171–81 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin B, Hovav MR.
2005Argument realization. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li P, Macwhinney B.
2013Competition Model. The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
Maguire MJ, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM, Imai M, Haryu E., et al.
2010A developmental shift from similar to language-specific strategies in verb acquisition: a comparison of English, Spanish, and Japanese. Cognition 114: 299–319 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metta G, Fitzpatrick P, Natale L.
2006YARP: yet another robot platform. International Journal on Advanced Robotics Systems 3: 43–48Google Scholar
Palomares NA.
2008Toward a Theory of Goal Detection in Social Interaction Effects of Contextual Ambiguity and Tactical Functionality on Goal Inferences and Inference Certainty. Communication Research 35: 109–48 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peelen MV, Romagno D, Caramazza A.
2012Independent representations of verbs and actions in left lateral temporal cortex. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 24: 2096–107 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pointeau G, Petit M, Dominey PF.
2014Successive Developmental Levels of Autobiographical Memory for Learning Through Social Interaction. Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regier T, Zheng M.
2007Attention to Endpoints: A Cross‐Linguistic Constraint on Spatial Meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–19 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosen ST.
1999The syntactic representation of linguistic events. Glot International 4: 3–11Google Scholar
Roy D.
2002Learning visually grounded words and syntax for a scene description task. Computer Speech and Language 16: 353–85 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semin GR, Fiedler K.
1988The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 558 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy L.
1988Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H.
2005Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675–91 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warglien M, Gärdenfors P, Westera M.
2012Event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs. Theoretical Linguistics 38: 159–93 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu C, Smith LB.
2012Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition 125: 244–62 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zacks JM, Tversky B.
2001Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological bulletin 127: 3 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan RA, Madden CJ, Whitten SN.
2000The presence of an event in the narrated situation affects its availability to the comprehender. Mem Cognit 28: 1022–8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts J.
2008Aspects of a typology of direction. Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspects: 79–106 Crossref[ p. 67 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Dominey, Peter Ford, Victor Paleologue, Amit Kumar Pandey & Jocelyne Ventre-Dominey
2017.  In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Gardenfors, Peter
2020. An Epigenetic Approach to Semantic Categories. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 12:2  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Gharaee, Zahra, Peter Gärdenfors & Magnus Johnsson
2017. First and second order dynamics in a hierarchical SOM system for action recognition. Applied Soft Computing 59  pp. 574 ff. Crossref logo
Gharaee, Zahra, Peter Gärdenfors & Magnus Johnsson
2017. Online recognition of actions involving objects. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 22  pp. 10 ff. Crossref logo
Gärdenfors, Peter
2019. Using Event Representations to Generate Robot Semantics. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 8:4  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Mealier, Anne-Laure, Gregoire Pointeau, Solène Mirliaz, Kenji Ogawa, Mark Finlayson & Peter F. Dominey
2017. Narrative Constructions for the Organization of Self Experience: Proof of Concept via Embodied Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Pointeau, Gregoire & Peter Ford Dominey
2017. The Role of Autobiographical Memory in the Development of a Robot Self. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.