Cover not available
Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 17:1 (2016) ► pp.77–97

Voice features of telephone operators predict auditory preferences of consumers

| Université de Rennes 1, France
| Université de Rennes 1, France
| Université de Rennes 1, France
| Université de Rennes 1, France
| Université de Rennes 1, France
What makes a human voice agreeable is a matter of scientific discussion. Whereas prosody was shown to play a role regarding “male-female” attraction, the impact of frequency modulations in “non-sexual”, notably commercial, contexts has attracted little attention. Another point unaddressed in the literature is auditory sensitivity to short-term frequency modulations as current studies focus more on sentence. Thirty French female operators were recorded over the phone. All “bonjour” greeting words were classified in terms of frequency modulation linearity and orientation at the syllable and word levels. Then, the different voices were played back to students and seniors who had to rate each voice according to their degree of agreeableness. Listeners preferred non-monotonous voices. Differences between age-classes were greater than between sex-classes. Results suggest that short-term frequency changes are important for auditory evaluation of voice agreeableness. This study opens new research perspectives concerning the importance of prosody during consumer-seller interactions.
Keywords: acoustic structure, human, phone interaction, prosody, voice perception
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Protocol
      • 2.2.1Voice recording of telephone operators
      • 2.2.2Playback to participants and evaluation of the agreeableness of the voices
      • 2.2.3Acoustic analyses
      • 2.2.4Data crossing and statistical analyses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Analyses at the syllable level
    • 3.2Analyses at the word level
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Published online: 7 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17.1.04and
References (57)
References
Alpert, Murray, Pouget, Enrique R, and Silva, Raul R, 2001. Reflections of depression in acoustic measures of the patients speech. Journal of Affective Disorders, 661, 59–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, DR, Buxtorf, K, Grandjean, D, and Strik, WK, 2009. The influence of emotion clarity on emotional prosody identification in paranoid schizophrenia. Psychological Medecine, 391, 927–938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benkí, José, Broome, Jessica, Conrad, Frederick, Groves, Robert, and Kreuter, Frauke, 2011. Effects of speech rate, pitch, and pausing on survey participation decisions. Proc. Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Besson, Mireille, Magne, Cyrille, and Schon, Daniele, 2002. Emotional prosody: sex differences in sensitivity to speech melody. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 61, 405–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bruce L, Strong, William J, and Rencher, Alvin C, 1973. Perceptions of personality from speech: effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 541, 29–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, 1974. Fifty four voices from two: the effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 551, 313–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, 1975. Acoustic determinants of perceptions of personality from speech. International Journal of Sociology of Language, 61, 11–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruckert, Laetitia, Bestmeyer, Patricia, Latinus, Marianne, Rouger, Julien, Charest, Ian, Rousselet, Guillaume, A., Kawahara Hideki, and Belin, Pascal, 2010. Vocal attractiveness increases by averaging. Current Biology, 20.2, 116–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruckert, Laetitia, Lienard, Jean-Sylvain, Lacroix, André, Kreutzer, Michel, and Leboucher, Gérard, 2006. Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics. Proc. Royal Society: Biology Sciences, 2731, 83–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Xuhai, Yang, Yufang, 2012. When brain differentiates happy from neutral in prosody? 6th Int. Conference on Speech Prosody.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, Domenic V., and Heavens, Robert, 1981. A computer program for determining the significance of the difference between pairs of independently derived values of kappa or weighted kappa. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41.1, 189–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Sarah A, 2000. Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 601, 773–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Sarah A, and Missing, Caroline, 2003. Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 61, 997–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Datta, S, and Sturtivant, C, 2002. Dolphin whistle classification for determining group identities. Signal processing, 821, 251–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillma, Dillman A, Phelps, Glen, Tortora, Robert, Swift, Karen, Kohrell, Julie, Berck, Jodi, and Messer, Benjamin L, 2009. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet. Social Science Research, 381, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fecteau, Shirley, Armony, Jorge L, Joanette, Yves, and Belin, Pascal, 2005. Judgment of emotional nonlinguistic vocalizations: age-related differences. Applied Neuropsychology, 121, 40–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, David R, Jones, Benedict C, Little, Anthony C, and Burt DM, 2005. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 691, 561–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, David R, Jones, Benedict C, Smith, Law MJ, Moore, FR, DeBruine, Lisa M, Cornwell, RE, Hillier, SG, and Perrett, DI, 2006. Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 491, 215–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folstein, Marshal F, Folstein, Susan E, and McHugh, Paul R, 1975. Mini-mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 121, 189–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausberger, Martine, 1997. Social influences on song acquisition and sharing in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). In Social influences on vocal learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 128–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imaizumi, Satoshi, Homma, Midori, Ozawa, Yoshiaki, Maruishi, Masahura, and Muranaka, Hiroyuki, 2004. Gender differences in the functional organization of the brain for emotional prosody processing. Int. Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jeff. W. 1996. Linking employee perceptions of service climate to customer satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 49(4), 831–851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Benedict C, Feinberg, David R, DeBruine, Lisa M, Little, Anthony C, and Vukovic, Jovana, 2008. Integrating cues of social interest and voice pitch in men’s preferences for women’s voices. Biology Letters, 41, 192–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, 2010. A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 791, 57–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klofstad, Casey, Anderson, Rindy, and Peters, Susan, 2012. Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity. Proc. Royal Society, 2791, 2698–2704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kokkinos, Constantinos. M, 2007. Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 229–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurlowicz, Lenore., & Wallace, Meredith, 1999. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Journal of gerontological nursing, 25(5), 8–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latinus, Marianne, and Belin, Pascal, 2011. Human voice perception. Current Biology, 211, 143–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemasson, Alban, and Hausberger, Martine, 2011. Acoustic variability and social significance of calls in female Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopi-thecus campbelli campbelli). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1291, 3341–3352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Little, Anthony C, Saxton, Tamsin K, Roberts, Craig S, Jones, Benedict C, Debruine, Lisa M, Vukovic, Jovana, Perrett, David I, Feinberg, David R, and Chenore, Todd, 2010. Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 351, 912–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McAleer, Phil Alexander Todorov, and Pascal Belin, 2014. How do you say ‘Hello’? Personality impressions from brief novel voices. PloS one, 9.3, e90779.Google Scholar
McCowan, Brenda, and Reiss, Diana, 1997. Vocal learning in captive bottlenose dolphins: a comparison with humans and nonhuman animals. Social influence and vocal development, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 178–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert, and Ferris, Susan R, 1967. Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 311, 248–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mill, Aire, Alink, Jüri, Realo, Anu, and Valk, Raivo, 2009. Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: across-sectional study. Emotion, 91, 619–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Rachel LC, 2007. Age-related decline in the ability to decode emotional prosody: primary or secondary phenomenon? Cognition and Emotion, 71, 1435–1454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montepare, Joann M, and Zebrowitz-McArthur, Leslie, 1987. Perceptions of adults with childlike voices in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 231, 331–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Mark. S, 2002. Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 77–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oksenberg, Lois, Coleman, Lerita, and Cannell, Charles F, 1986. Interviewer voices and refusal rates in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 501, 97–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulmann, Silke, Schmidt, Patricia, Pell, Marc D, and Kotz, Sonja A, 2008. Rapid processing of emotional and voice information as evidenced by ERPs. 4th Int. Conference Speech Prosody, 205–209.Google Scholar
Peng, Ying, Zebrowitz, Leslie A, and Lee, Hoon Koo, 1993. The impact of cultural background and cross-cultural experience on impressions of American and Korean male speakers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 241, 203–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peron, Julie, El Tamer, Sarah, Grandjean, Didier, Leray, Emmanuelle, Travers, David, Drapier Dominique, Verin, Marc, and Millet, Bruno, 2011. Major depressive disorder skews the recognition of emotional prosody. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 351, 987–996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puts, David A, 2005. Menstrual phase and mating context affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 261, 388–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Re, Daniel E, O’Connor, Jillian JM, Bennett, Patrick J, and Feinberg, David R, 2012. Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans. PLoS ONE, 71, e32719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, 1991. Sound analysis and synthesis using an amiga micro-computer. Bioacoustics, 31, 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rymarczyk, Krystyna, and Grabowska, Anna, 2007. Sex differences in brain control of prosody. Neuropsychologia, 451, 921–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saxton, Tamsin K, DeBruine, Lisa M, Jones, Benedict C, Little, Anthony C, and Roberts, Craig S, 2009. Face and voice attractiveness judgments change during adolescence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 301, 398–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R, 1972. Judging personality from voice: A cross-cultural approach to an old issue in inter-personal perception. Journal of Personality, 401, 191–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, 1978. Personality inference from voice quality: the loud voice of extroversion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 81, 467–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Leigh W, Peters, Marianne, and Rhodes, Gillian, 2011. Low pitched voices are perceived as masculine and attractive but do they predict semen quality in men? PLoS One, 61, e29271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bruce L, Brown, Bruce L, Strong, William J, and Rencher, Alvin C, 1975. Effects of speech rate on personality perceptions. Language and Speech, 181, 145–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szymaszek, A, Szelag, E and Sliwowska, M, 2006. Auditory perception of temporal order in humans: the effect of age, gender, listener practice and stimulus presentation mode. Neuroscience Letters, 4031, 190–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trout, Andrew, Magnusson, Roy, A., and Hedges, Jerris, R. 2000. Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say? Academic emergency medicine, 7(6), 695–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vukovic, Jovana, Feinberg, David R, Jones, Benedict C, DeBruine, Lisa M, Welling, LLM, Little, Anthony C, and Smith, FG, 2008. Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine men’s voices. Personality and Individual Differences, 451, 451–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weirich, Melanie, 2008. Vocal stereotypes. Proc. of International Symposium on Cumputer Architecture, pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
Yesavage, Jerome A, Brink, TL, Rose, Terence L, Lum, Owen, Huang, Virginia, Adey, Michael, and Leirer, Von Otto, 1983. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 71, 37–49.Google Scholar
Zetterholm, Elisabeth, 1998. Prosody and voice quality in the expression of emotions. Proc. of the Seventh Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, pp. 109–113.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Miron, and Miyake, Kunitate, 1993. The attractive voice: what makes it so? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 171, 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar