Article published in:
How the Brain Got Language: Towards a New Road Map
Edited by Michael A. Arbib
[Interaction Studies 19:1/2] 2018
► pp. 167182


Arbib, M.
(2012) How the brain got language. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M., Ganesh, V., & Gasser, B.
(2014) Dyadic brain modelling, mirror systems and the ontogenetic ritualization of ape gesture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369(1644), 20130414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M. A.
(2016) Towards a computational comparative neuroprimatology: framing the language-ready brain. Physics of life reviews, 16, 1–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R.
(1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., and Van Schaik, C. P.
(2009) Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 18(5), 175–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Allon, O., Amici, F., Fichtel, C., Finkenwirth, C., Heschl, A., … and Meulman, E. J.
(2014) The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nature communications 5, 4747.Google Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Guerreiro Martins, E. M., Miss, F., & Zürcher, Y.
(2018) From sharing food to sharing information. Cooperative breeding and language evolution. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 136–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chow, C. P., Mitchell, J. F., and Miller, C. T.
(2015) Vocal turn-taking in a non-human primate is learned during ontogeny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 282 (1807), 20150069.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language, Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., and Selting, M.
(1996) “Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction,” in Prosody in Conversation, eds. E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (Cambridge: CUP), 11–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, M., Kokal, I., Blokpoel, M., Liu, R., Stolk, A., Roelofs, K., … & Toni, I.
(2017) Oxytocin modulates human communication by enhancing cognitive exploration. Psychoneuroendocrinology 86, 64–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedurek, P., Slocombe, K. E., Hartel, J. A., and Zuberbühler, K.
(2015) Chimpanzee lip-smacking facilitates cooperative behavior. Scientific reports, 5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, T.
(2004) “Kin selection and ‘mother tongues’: a neglected component in language evolution”, in Evolution of communication systems: A comparative approach, eds. D. K. Oller and U. Griebel (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 275–296.Google Scholar
(2010) The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, M., Kuchenbuch, P., Müller, G., Fruth, B., Furuichi, T., Wittig, R. M. and Pika, S.
(2016) Unpeeling the layers of language: Bonobos and chimpanzees engage in cooperative turn-taking sequences. Scientific reports, 6, 25887.[ p. 180 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, M.
(2017) Taking turns across channels: Conversation-analytic tools in animal communication. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 80, 201–209 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P.
(2004) Cooperation and the evolution of symbolic communication. In: Oller, K., Griebel, U. (Eds) The Evolution of Communication Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
Ghazanfar, A. A. and Takahashi, D. Y.
(2014) The evolution of speech: vision, rhythm, cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Science 18(10), 543–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) “Logic and conversation”, in Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts (vol. 3), eds. P. Cole and J. Morgan (New York: Academic Press), 41–58.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M. and Bock, K.
(2000) What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 4, 274–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hare, B.
(2017) Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual review of psychology 68, 155–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. A., and Fitch, T.
(2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569–1579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
(1963) “The Problem of Universals in Language” in J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–29.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.
(2009) Mothers and others. London: HUP.Google Scholar
Hurford, J.
(2007) The origins of meaning. Language in the light of evolution. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, A. V., Burkart, J. M., & Van Schaik, C. P.
(2010) On the psychology of cooperation in humans and other primates: combining the natural history and experimental evidence of prosociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365(1553), 2723–2735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G. and Hove, M. J.
(2014) Rhythm in joint action: psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369 (1658), 20130394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
(2004) Gesture. Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C.
(1998) Ritual/speech coevolution: A solution to the problem of deception. In Hurford, J. et al. (Eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge: CUP, 68–91.Google Scholar
Knight, C., and Lewis, J. D.
(2017) Wild Voices: Mimicry, Reversal, Metaphor, and the Emergence of Language. Current Anthropology, 58(4), 435–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Dawkins, R.
(1984) “Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation”, in J. R. Krebs and R. Dawkins (Eds.), Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell, 380–402.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. M.
(1999) “Producing spoken language: a blueprint of the speaker,” in The Neurocognition of Language, eds. C. Brown and P. Hagoort, Oxford: OUP, 83–122.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(2006) On the human “interaction engine”. In: Enfield, N. J., Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Berg, Oxford, pp. 39–69.Google Scholar
(2016) Turn-taking in human communication, origins, and implications for language processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 (1), 6–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S., and Torreira, F.
(2015) Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 731.Crossref[ p. 181 ]Google Scholar
Masataka, N., and Biben, M.
(1987) Temporal rules regulating affiliative vocal exchanges of squirrel monkeys. Behavior 101 (4), 311–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., and Harper, D.
(2003) Animal Signals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mitani, J. C.
(2009) Cooperation and competition in chimpanzees: current understanding and future challenges. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 18(5), 215–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M.
(2015) Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 772–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okanoya, K.
(2002) Sexual display as a syntactical vehicle: the evolution of syntax in birdsong and human language through sexual selection. In: Wray, A. (Ed.), The Transition to Language. Oxford: OUP, 46–63.Google Scholar
Power, C.
(2014) “Female philopatry and egalitarianism and conditions for the emergence of intersubjectivity”. In Cartmill, E. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Evolang, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 252–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S. G., Torreira, F., and Levinson, S. C.
(2015) The effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn-taking: a corpus study. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossano, F.
(2013) Sequence organization and timing of bonobo mother-infant interactions. Interact. Stud. 14(2), 160–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this issue). Social manipulation, turn-taking and cooperation in apes: Implications for the evolution of language-based interaction in humans. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 151–166.
Ruiter de, J. P., Mitterer, H., and Enfield, N. J.
(2006) Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language 82, 515–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. L., and Rubenstein, D. R.
(2007) The evolution of cooperative breeding; is there cheating? Behavioral Processes 76(2), 131–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, 696–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
(1978) “A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation,” in Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. Jim Schenkein (New York: Academic Press), 7–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaik van, C. P.
(2016) The primate origins of human nature. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(2000) Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language and Society 29, 1–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., and West, S. A.
(2011) Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 38–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semendeferi, K.
this issue) Why do we want to talk? Evolution of neural substrates of emotion and social cognition. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 102–120.
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T. and Levinson, S. C.
(2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(26), 10587–10592.Crossref.[ p. 182 ]Google Scholar
Takahashi, D. Y., Narayanan, D. Z. and Ghazanfar, A. A.
(2013) Coupled oscillator dynamics of vocal turn-taking in monkeys. Curr. Biol. 23(21), 2162–2168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J., Ariely, D., and Hare, B.
(2017) Bonobos respond prosocially toward members of other groups. Scientific reports, 7(1), 14733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theofanopoulou, C., Boeckx, C., Jarvis, E. D.
(2017) A hypothesis on a role of oxytocin in the social mechanisms of speech and vocal learning. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2008) Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., and Herrmann, E.
(2012) Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation. Current Anthropology 53(6), 673–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Gonzalez-Cabrera, I.
(2017) The role of ontogeny in the evolution of human cooperation. Human Nature, 1–15.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N.
(1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20(4), 410–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vega-Redondo, F., and Hasson, O.
(1993) A Game-theoretic Model of Predator – Prey Signaling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 162(3), 309–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S., Żywiczyński, P.
(2012) Human honest signalling and nonverbal communication. Psychology of Language and Communication 16 (2), 113–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S.
(2015) The shades of social. A discussion of” The social origins of language”, ed. Daniel Dor, Chris Knight and Jerome Lewis. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 11, 191–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S., Żywiczyński, P., and Chiera, A.
(2017) An evolutionary approach to low-level conversational cooperation. Language Sciences.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. E.
(2011) Direct benefits and the evolution of female mating preferences: conceptual problems, potential solutions, and a field cricket. Advances in the Study of Behavior 43(273), e319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
West, S. A., El Mouden, C., and Gardner, A.
(2011) Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 32(4), 231–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, A., and Zahavi, A.
(1997) The Handicap Principle. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
(2014) “The co-evolution of human intersubjectivity, morality, and language”, in The Social Origins of Language, eds. D. Dor, C. Knight and J. Lewis (Oxford: OUP), 249–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zywiczynski, P., Orzechowski, S., and Wacewicz, S.
(2017) Adaptors and the Turn-Taking Mechanism: The Distribution of Adaptors Relative to Turn Borders in Dyadic Conversation. Interaction Studies 18(2), is.18.2.07zyw CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Arbib, Michael A., Francisco Aboitiz, Judith M. Burkart, Michael Corballis, Gino Coudé, Erin Hecht, Katja Liebal, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi, James Pustejovsky, Shelby Putt, Federico Rossano, Anne E. Russon, P. Thomas Schoenemann, Uwe Seifert, Katerina Semendeferi, Chris Sinha, Dietrich Stout, Virginia Volterra, Sławomir Wacewicz & Benjamin Wilson
2018. The comparative neuroprimatology 2018 (CNP-2018) road map for research on How the Brain Got Language . Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:1-2  pp. 370 ff. Crossref logo
Arbib, Michael A., Francisco Aboitiz, Judith M. Burkart, Michael C. Corballis, Gino Coudé, Erin Hecht, Katja Liebal, Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi, James Pustejovsky, Shelby S. Putt, Federico Rossano, Anne E. Russon, P. Thomas Schoenemann, Uwe Seifert, Katerina Semendeferi, Chris Sinha, Dietrich Stout, Virginia Volterra, Sławomir Wacewicz & Benjamin Wilson
2020.  In How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map [Benjamins Current Topics, 112],  pp. 370 ff. Crossref logo
Brown, Steven, Emma Mittermaier, Tanishka Kher & Paul Arnold
2019. How Pantomime Works: Implications for Theories of Language Origin. Frontiers in Communication 4 Crossref logo
Ferretti, Francesco & Ines Adornetti
2021.  Persuasive conversation as a new form of communication in Homo sapiens . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 Crossref logo
von Heiseler, Till Nikolaus
2020. The Social Origin of the Concept of Truth – How Statements Are Built on Disagreements. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Przemysław Żywiczyński & Sławomir Wacewicz
2020. Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution 5:2  pp. 156 ff. Crossref logo
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 Crossref logo
Ростовцева, Виктория Викторовна, Мезенцева, Анна Александровна & Бутовская, Марина Львовна
2020. THE IMPACT OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION ON THE DYNAMICS OF MALE GROUP COOPERATION (STUDY IN BURYATS OF SOUTHERN SIBERIA). Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology :2(28)  pp. 127  ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.