Cover not available
Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.1–25

Combinatory rules and chunk structure in male Mueller’s gibbon songs

| | | The School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo | Laboratory for Biolinguistics, RIKEN Brain Science Institute
| | Research and Development Division Yayasan Sabah Group
|
| | | | Cognition and Behavior Joint Research Laboratory, RIKEN Brain Science Institute | Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo

Understanding whether the long and elaborate songs of male gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) have syntax and hierarchical structures (chunks) is an interesting question in the evolution of language, because gibbons are near humans in the phylogenetic tree and a hierarchically organized syntax is considered to be a basic component of human language. We conducted field research at Danum Valley Conservation Area in northern Borneo to test the hypothesis that gibbon songs have syntax and chunks. We followed one Mueller’s gibbon group for 1 week in the dry and rainy seasons every year from 2001 to 2009, collecting vocal and behavioral data. Results show that songs emitted by the studied male gibbon were governed by combinatory rules. Some context-dependent songs had different combinatory rules, although they overlapped with the songs whose contexts were uncertain. The male Mueller’s songs had characteristics that suggest existence of chunk structure. These results provided an important perspective in the study of language origin.

Keywords: Danum Valley Conservation Area, Mueller’s gibbon, male song, combinatory rule, chunk
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Study areas and animals
    • 2.2Behavioral data collection
    • 2.3Recording protocol
    • 2.4Data analysis
    • 2.5Acoustic terms and definitions
    • 2.6Analyses of song syntax
    • 2.7Syntactical difference among songs
    • 2.8Analyses of chunk existence
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Analyses of song syntax
    • 3.2Syntactic difference among songs
    • 3.3Analyses of chunk existence
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 10 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.1.01ino
References
Arnold, K., & Zuberbühler, K
(2006) Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature, 441, 303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Call combinations in monkeys: Compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain and Language, 1201, 303–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beer, C
(1976) Some complexities in the communication behavior of gulls. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2801, 413–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G.J. L., & Bolhuis, J. J
(2011) Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 161, 113–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brockelman, W. Y., & Schilling, D
(1984) Inheritance of stereotyped gibbon calls. Nature, 3121, 634–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chew, L
(1981) Geographic and individual variation in the morphology and sequential organization of the song of the savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 591, 702–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, E., Reichard, U. H., & Zuberbühler, K
(2006) The syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs. PLoS One, 11, e73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, J., & Snowdon, C. T
(1982) The complex vocal repertoire of the adult cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie., 581, 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crockford, C., & Boesch, C
(2005) Call combinations in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour, 1421, 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C
(1859) On the origin of species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Geissmann, T
(1984) Inheritance of song parameters in the gibbon song, analyzed in 2 hybrid gibbons (Hylobates pileatus × H. lar). Folia Primatologica, 421, 216–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Duet songs of the siamang, Hylobates syndactylus: II, Testing the pair-bonding hypothesis during a partner exchange. Behaviour, 1361, 1005–1039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geissmann, T., & Orgeldinger, M
(2000) The relationship between duet songs and pair bonds in siamangs, Hylobates syndactylus. Animal Behaviour, 601, 805–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geissmann, T., Bohlen-Eyring, S., & Heuck, A
(2005) The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch). Contributions to Zoology, 741, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groves, C. P
(1972) Systematics and phylogeny of gibbons. In D. M. Rumbaugh (Eds.), Gibbon and siamang, vol. 11 (pp. 1–89). Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Hailman, J. P., Ficken, M. S., & Ficken, R. W
(1985) The “chick-a-dee” calls of Parus atricapillus: a recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica, 561, 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haimoff, E. H
(1984) Acoustic and organizational features of gibbon songs. In: H. Preuschoft, D. J. Chivers, W. Y. Brockelman, & N. Creel (Eds.), The lesser apes. Evolutionary and behavioural biology (pp. 333–353). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(1985) The organization of song in Mueller’s gibbon (Hylobates muelleri). International Journal of Primatology, 61, 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hope, A.C. A
(1968) A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society . Series B, 301, 582–598.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R
(2011) The origins of grammar: language in the light of evolution II (Vol. 21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, Y., Waidi, S., Yosida, S., & Okanoya, K
(2013) Intergroup and intragroup antiphonal songs in wild male Mueller’s gibbons (Hylobates muelleri). Interaction Studies, 141, 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R
(1999) Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 31, 272–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leighton, D. R
(1987) Gibbons: Territoriality and monogamy. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 135–145). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manser, M. B., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L
(2002) Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 61, 55–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. T., & Marshall, E. R
(1976) Gibbons and their territorial songs. Science, 1931, 235–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsudaira, K., Ishida, T., Reichard, U. H., & Malaivijitnond, S
(2015) Male kin network and dispersal pattern of white-handed gibbons. The 31st Congress of the Primate Society of Japan .
Meyer, P. E
(2014) infotheo: Information-Theoretic Measures. R package version 1.2.0. URL [URL].
Miller, G. A
(1955) Note on the bias of information estimates. In H. Quastler (Eds.), Information theory in psychology; problems and methods II-B (pp. 95–100). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 631, 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C
(1985) Location-specific responses of gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) to male songs. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie., 701, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C., & Marler, P
(1989) A phonological analysis of male gibbon singing behavior. Behaviour, 1091, 20–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, E. S
(1977) Occurrence and significance of motivation structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. American Naturalist, 1111, 855–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okanoya, K., & Merker, B
(2007) Neural substrates for string-context mutual segmentation: A path to human language. In C. Lyon, L. Nehaniv, A. Cangelosi & (Eds.), Emergence of communication and language (pp. 421–434). Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouattara, K., Lemasson, A., & Zuberbuhler, K
(2009) Campbell’s monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Staes of America, 106(51), 222026–22031.Google Scholar
R. Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL].Google Scholar
Reichard, U., & Sommer, V
(1997) Group encounters in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar): Agonism, affiliation, and the concept of infanticide. Behaviour, 1341, 1135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. G
(1979) An analysis of the organization of vocal communication in the titi monkey Callicebus moloch. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie., 491, 381–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1984) Syntactic structures in the vocalisations of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys, Cebus olivaceus. Behaviour, 901, 46–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A
(1974) How big is a chunk? By combining data from several experiments, a basic human memory unit can be identified and measured. Science, 1831, 482–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, R., Buck, J. R., & Tyack, P. L
(2006) Information entropy of humpback whale songs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1191, 1849–1866. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Templeton, C. N., Green, E., & Davis, K
(2005) Allometry of alarm calls: Black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science, 3081, 1934–1937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ten Cate, C., & Slater, P.J. B
(1991) Song learning in zebra finches: how are elements from two tutors integrated? Animal Behaviour, 421, 150–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D
(2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, H., & Staples, K
(1992) Syllable chunking in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1061, 278–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zuberbühler, K
(2002) A syntactic rule in forest monkey comunication. Animal Behaviour, 631, 293–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Asano, Rie
2022. The evolution of hierarchical structure building capacity for language and music: a bottom-up perspective. Primates 63:5 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Bergman, Thore J., Jacinta C. Beehner, Melissa C. Painter & Morgan L. Gustison
2019. The speech-like properties of nonhuman primate vocalizations. Animal Behaviour 151 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Clink, Dena J., Abdul Hamid Ahmad & Holger Klinck
2020. Brevity is not a universal in animal communication: evidence for compression depends on the unit of analysis in small ape vocalizations. Royal Society Open Science 7:4 ► pp. 200151 ff. DOI logo
Gabrić, Petar
2022. Overlooked evidence for semantic compositionality and signal reduction in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Mingpan, Haigang Ma, Changyong Ma, Paul A. Garber & Pengfei Fan
2020. Male gibbon loud morning calls conform to Zipf's law of brevity and Menzerath's law: insights into the origin of human language. Animal Behaviour 160 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Inoue, Yoichi, Waidi Sinun & Kazuo Okanoya
2019. Copulation calls in wild Mueller’s gibbons (Hylobates muelleri). Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 20:2 ► pp. 362 ff. DOI logo
2021. Increase in social interactions of wild Northern Gray gibbons (Hylobates funereus) during the mast fruiting period in the Danum Valley Conservation Area, Sabah, Malaysia. acta ethologica 24:3 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Inoue, Yoichi, Waidi Sinun, Shigeto Yosida & Kazuo Okanoya
2020. Note orders suggest phrase-inserting structure in male Mueller’s gibbon songs: a case study. acta ethologica 23:2 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Pedersen, Janni
2020. Nonhuman Primates and Language: Vocal Communication. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

audio