Introduction published in:
Interaction and Iconicity in the Evolution of Language
Edited by Stefan Hartmann, Michael Pleyer, James Winters and Jordan Zlatev
[Interaction Studies 18:3] 2017
► pp. 303–313

Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language

Introduction to the special issue

| Universität Koblenz-Landau
| University of Hamburg
| Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena
| Lund University
Keywords: interaction, iconicity, language evolution
Published online: 08 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.3.01ple
References

References

Albiach-Serrani, A.
(2015) Cooperation in primates: A critical, methodological review. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) On the representation of form and function. Linguistic Review, 1, 3–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M. C.
(2003) From mouth to hand: Gesture, speech, and the evolution of right-handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(2), 199–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2017) Evolutionary complexity of social cognition, semasiographic system, and language. In S. S. Mufwene, C. Coupé, & F. Pellegrino (Eds.), Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 101–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cuskley, C.
(2013) Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
De Vos, C., & Pfau, R.
(2015) Sign language typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 265–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P.
(2015) Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S., & Mitterer, H.
(2016) What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language, 92(2), E117–e133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M.
(2004) Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dor, D., Knight, C., & Lewis, J.
(Eds.) (2014) The social origins of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M.
(2017) Group size, vocal grooming and the origins of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 209–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donald, M.
(2017) Key cognitive preconditions for the evolution of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 204–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elleström, L., Fischer, O., & Ljungberg, C.
(Eds.) (2013) Iconic investigations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eryilmaz, K., & Little, H.
(2016) Using leap motion to investigate the emergence of structure in speech and language. Behavior Research Methods. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O.
(1999) On the role played by iconicity in the grammaticalisation process. In M. Nänny & O. Fischer (Eds.), Form miming Meaning: Iconicity in language and literature (pp. 345–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2010 An iconic analogical approach to grammaticalization. In Jac Conradie, Ronél Johl, Marthinus Beukes, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Signergy (Iconicity in Language and Literature 8) pp. (279–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T.
(2000) The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 258–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T.
(2007) Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B., & Nik S.
(2010) Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M.
(2004) The origins of arbitrariness in language. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 434–439). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
(1991) Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1), 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2003) The resilience of language. What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
(Ed.) (1985) Iconicity in SyntaxIconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983, Vol. 6 (Typological Studies in Language, 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnard, S.
(1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) From sensorimotor categories and pantomime to grounded symbols and propositions. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 387–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R.
(2012) The origins of grammar: Language in the light of evolution, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1965 Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes 13. 21–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, N., & Zlatev, J.
(2013) Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5, 3–20.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E.
(2015) Iconicity in saussure’s linguistic work, and why it does not contradict the arbitrariness of the sign. Historiographia Linguistica, 42(1), 85–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R.
(1995) Zeichentheorie. Zu einer Theorie semiotischen Wissens. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Knight, C.
(2000) The evolution of cooperative communication. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & J. R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp. 19–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
(2006) On the Human “Interaction Engine”. In Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality pp. (39–69). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Perlman, Marcus & Nathaniel Clark
(2015) Learned vocal and breathing behavior in an enculturated gorilla. Animal Cognition 18. 1165–1179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Ozyürek, A.
(2004) Children creating coreproperties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.
(1969) Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P.
(2007) The evolution of human speech: Its anatomical and neural bases. Current Anthropology, 48(1), 39–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacLarnon, A.
(2012) The anatomical and physiological basis of human speech production: Adaptations and exaptations. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 224–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsaja, I. G.
2008 Desa Kolok—A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara.Google Scholar
Motamedi, Y., Schouwstra, M., Smith, K., & Kirby, S.
(2016) Linguistic structure emerges in the cultural evolution of artificial sign languages. In S. G. Roberts, C. Cuskley, L. McCrohon, L. Barceló-Coblijn, O. Fehér, & T. Verhoef (Eds.), The evolution of laguage. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference . Available online: http://​evolang​.org​/neworleans​/papers​/27​.html.
Nänny, M., & Fischer, O.
(Eds.) (1999) Form miming meaning: Iconicity in language and literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, M., Clark, N., & Tanner, J. E.
(2014) Iconicity and ape gesture. In E. A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn, & H. Cornish (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (pp. 228–235). Singapore: World Scientific. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G.
(2014) The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). Crossref (5 May, 2017).Google Scholar
Pleyer, Michael
2017 Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences 63. 69–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pleyer, M.
In press). Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences. Crossref
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Padden, C., & Meir, I.
(2014) Language emergence. Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 250–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T.
(2015) Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. London: Pelgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Számadó, S., & Szathmári, E.
(2012) The co-evolution of language and the brain. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 157–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H.
(2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H-J.
(2006) An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow u.a.: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Langendonck, W.
(2007) Iconicity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D.
(2014) Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S., & Zywiczynski, P.
(2017) The multimodal origins of linguistic communication. Language & Communication, 54, 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U., & de Vos, C.
(Eds.) (2012) Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Dingemanse, Mark
2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Foolen, Ad
2019. Quo vadis pragmatics? From adaptation to participatory sense-making. Journal of Pragmatics 145 ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Hartmann, Stefan & Michael Pleyer
2021. Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 Crossref logo
Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann
2019. Constructing a Consensus on Language Evolution? Convergences and Differences Between Biolinguistic and Usage-Based Approaches. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021.  In Language and Social Minds, Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2021. Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 175 ► pp. 94 ff. Crossref logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2021. Resonance as an Applied Predictor of Cross-Cultural Interaction: Constructional Priming in Mandarin and American English Interaction. Applied Linguistics Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.