Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Interaction and Iconicity in the Evolution of Language
Edited by Stefan Hartmann, Michael Pleyer, James Winters and Jordan Zlatev
[Interaction Studies 18:3] 2017
► pp. 303–313
Introduction

Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language

Introduction to the special issue

 | Universität Koblenz-Landau
 | University of Hamburg |
 | Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena |
 | Lund University |
Keywords: interaction, iconicity, language evolution
Article outline
  • 1.The role of interaction and iconicity in language evolution
  • 2.From great apes to modern English: The present volume
  • Acknowledgments
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 8 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.3.01ple
References (59)
References
Albiach-Serrani, A. (2015). Cooperation in primates: A critical, methodological review. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). On the representation of form and function. Linguistic Review, 11, 3–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2003). From mouth to hand: Gesture, speech, and the evolution of right-handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(2), 199–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2017). Evolutionary complexity of social cognition, semasiographic system, and language. In S. S. Mufwene, C. Coupé, & F. Pellegrino (Eds.), Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 101–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cuskley, C. (2013). Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5(1), 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vos, C., & Pfau, R. (2015). Sign language typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, 11, 265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S., & Mitterer, H. (2016). What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language, 92(2), E117–e133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M. (2004). Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dor, D., Knight, C., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2014). The social origins of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2017). Group size, vocal grooming and the origins of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 209–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donald, M. (2017). Key cognitive preconditions for the evolution of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 204–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elleström, L., Fischer, O., & Ljungberg, C. (Eds.). (2013). Iconic investigations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eryilmaz, K., & Little, H. (2016). Using leap motion to investigate the emergence of structure in speech and language. Behavior Research Methods. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. (1999). On the role played by iconicity in the grammaticalisation process. In M. Nänny & O. Fischer (Eds.), Form miming Meaning: Iconicity in language and literature (pp. 345–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2010. An iconic analogical approach to grammaticalization. In Jac Conradie, Ronél Johl, Marthinus Beukes, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Signergy (Iconicity in Language and Literature 8) pp. (279–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2000). The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 258–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B., & Nik S. (2010). Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M. (2004). The origins of arbitrariness in language. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 434–439). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1991). Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1), 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language. What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John (Ed.). (1985). Iconicity in SyntaxIconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983, Vol. 61 (Typological Studies in Language, 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnard, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 421, 335–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). From sensorimotor categories and pantomime to grounded symbols and propositions. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 387–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. (2012). The origins of grammar: Language in the light of evolution, Vol. 21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1965. Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes 131. 21–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, N., & Zlatev, J. (2013). Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. Public Journal of Semiotics, 51, 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. (2015). Iconicity in saussure’s linguistic work, and why it does not contradict the arbitrariness of the sign. Historiographia Linguistica, 42(1), 85–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. (1995). Zeichentheorie. Zu einer Theorie semiotischen Wissens. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Knight, C. (2000). The evolution of cooperative communication. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & J. R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp. 19–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2006). On the Human “Interaction Engine”. In Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality pp. (39–69). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Perlman, Marcus & Nathaniel Clark. (2015). Learned vocal and breathing behavior in an enculturated gorilla. Animal Cognition 181. 1165–1179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Ozyürek, A. (2004). Children creating coreproperties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (2007). The evolution of human speech: Its anatomical and neural bases. Current Anthropology, 48(1), 39–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLarnon, A. (2012). The anatomical and physiological basis of human speech production: Adaptations and exaptations. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 224–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsaja, I. G. 2008. Desa Kolok—A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara.Google Scholar
Motamedi, Y., Schouwstra, M., Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2016). Linguistic structure emerges in the cultural evolution of artificial sign languages. In S. G. Roberts, C. Cuskley, L. McCrohon, L. Barceló-Coblijn, O. Fehér, & T. Verhoef (Eds.), The evolution of laguage. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference . Available online: [URL].
Nänny, M., & Fischer, O. (Eds.). (1999). Form miming meaning: Iconicity in language and literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlman, M., Clark, N., & Tanner, J. E. (2014). Iconicity and ape gesture. In E. A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn, & H. Cornish (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (pp. 228–235). Singapore: World Scientific. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). DOI logo (5 May, 2017).Google Scholar
Pleyer, Michael. 2017. Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences 631. 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pleyer, M. (In press). Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences. DOI logo
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Padden, C., & Meir, I. (2014). Language emergence. Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 250–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. (2015). Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. London: Pelgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Számadó, S., & Szathmári, E. (2012). The co-evolution of language and the brain. In M. Tallerman & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 157–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H-J. (2006). An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow u.a.: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Iconicity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S., & Zywiczynski, P. (2017). The multimodal origins of linguistic communication. Language & Communication, 541, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U., & de Vos, C. (Eds.). (2012). Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Pleyer, Michael, Svetlana Kuleshova & Marek Placiński
2024. Integrating approaches to the role of metaphor in the evolutionary dynamics of language. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 12:1 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Mudd, Katie, Connie de Vos & Bart de Boer
2022. Shared Context Facilitates Lexical Variation in Sign Language Emergence. Languages 7:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan & Michael Pleyer
2021. Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds, DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2021. Resonance and engagement through (dis-)agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 175 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2022. Resonance as an Applied Predictor of Cross-Cultural Interaction: Constructional Priming in Mandarin and American English Interaction. Applied Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Foolen, Ad
2019. Quo vadis pragmatics? From adaptation to participatory sense-making. Journal of Pragmatics 145 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann
2019. Constructing a Consensus on Language Evolution? Convergences and Differences Between Biolinguistic and Usage-Based Approaches. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann
2024. Cognitive Linguistics and Language Evolution, DOI logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.