Cover not available
Article published In:
Interaction Studies
Vol. 23:1 (2022) ► pp.1–20

Imitation, focus of attention and social behaviours of children with autism spectrum disorder in interaction with robots

| University of Zagreb
| University of Zagreb
| University Hospital of Split
| University of Zagreb
Many studies have shown that using robot platforms can be effective for teaching children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The aim of this study was to compare performance on an imitation task, as well as focus attention levels and the presence of social behaviours of children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children during an imitation task under two different conditions, with robots and human demonstrators. The results suggested that TD children did not imitate more than children with ASD. Children with ASD did not imitate the robot more than they imitated a person, but they showed more focused attention to robots and expressed more social behaviours in interaction with the robots. Behaviours that were significantly more present in ASD children than in TD children included touching the robot in the robot demonstrator condition and focusing on the robot in the person demonstrator condition. This implies a possible preference of children with ASD towards robots rather than towards people.
Keywords: imitation, autism spectrum disorder, humanoid robot
Article outline
  • Imitation as the backbone of acquiring new social skills in infants and young children
  • Social assistive robotics in children with ASD
  • Robot use for imitation learning and elicitation of social behaviours in children with ASD
  • Methods
    • Participants
    • Procedure
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Published online: 20 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.21037.sim
References (56)
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition – DSM-5. American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Anzalone, S. M., Tilmont, E., Boucenna, S., Xavier, J., Jouen, A.-L., Bodeau, N., Maharatna, K., Chetouani, M., & Cohen, D. (2014). How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D+time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8 (7), 814–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aryania, A., Aghdasi, H. S., Beccaluva, E. A., & Bonarini, A. (2020). Social engagement of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in imitating a humanoid robot: A case study. SN Applied Sciences, 2 (6). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aryania, A., Aghdasi, H. S., Heshmati, R., & Bonarini, A. (2021). Robust risk-averse multi-armed bandits with application in social engagement behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder while imitating a humanoid robot. Information Sciences, 573 1, 194–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, R., & Hayne, H. (2003). It’s not what you know, it’s who you know: Older siblings facilitate imitation during infancy. International Journal of Early Years Education, 11 (1), 7–21.Google Scholar
Bartl-Pokorny, K. D., Pykala, M., Uluer, P., Barkana, D. E., Baird, A., Kose, H., Zorcec, T., Robins, B., Schuller, B. W., & Landowska, A. (2021). Robot-based intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9 1, 165433–165450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bird, G., Leighton, J., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 274 (1628), 3027–3031. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaminade, T., Fonseca, D. D., Rosset, D., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., & Deruelle, C. (2012). FMRI study of young adults with autism interacting with a humanoid robot. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 380–385). IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Cox, A., & Drew, A. (2000). Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15 (4), 481–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, P., Kompatsiari, K., Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A. (2020). Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27 (2), 217–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, P., Raiola, G., Martin, J., Isableu, B., Bazile, C., & Tapus, A. (2017). Do sensory preferences of children with autism impact an lmitation task with a robot? In 2017 12th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 177–186). IEEE.Google Scholar
Chung, E. Y.-H. (2021). Robot-mediated social skill intervention programme for children with autism spectrum disorder: An ABA time-series study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13 (5), 1095–1107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A. P., Charpiot, L., Lera, F. R., Ziafati, P., Nazarikhorram, A., van der Torre, L., & Steffgen, G. (2018). A comparison between a person and a robot in the attention, imitation, and repetitive and stereotypical behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorder. In Proceedings workshop on social human-robot interaction of human-care service robots at HRI2018 (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
Duquette, A., Michaud, F., & Mercier, H. (2008). Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Autonomous Robots, 24 (2), 147–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feil-Seifer, D., & Mataric, M. J. (2005). Defining socially assistive robotics. In 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2005 ICORR 2005 (pp. 465–468). IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In O. Khatib, V. Kumar, & G. J. Pappas (Eds.), Experimental robotics (pp. 201–210). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huijnen, C. A. G. J., Lexis, M. A. S., Jansens, R., & de Witte, L. P. (2016). Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46 (6), 2100–2114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47 (10), 3079–3096. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huskens, B., Palmen, A., Van der Werff, M., Lourens, T., & Barakova, E. (2015). Improving collaborative play between children with autism spectrum disorders and their siblings: The effectiveness of a robot-mediated intervention based on lego® therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45 (11), 3746–3755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hwang, B., & Hughes, C. (2000). Increasing early social-communicative skills of preverbal preschool children with autism through social interactive training. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25 (1), 18–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, B. (2008). The social role of imitation in autism: Implications for the treatment of imitation deficits. Infants & Young Children, 21 (2), 107–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, B., & Gergans, S. (2007). The effect of a parent-implemented imitation intervention on spontaneous imitation skills in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28 (2), 163–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E. (2007). Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37 (8), 1446–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, B., & Meyer, K. (2011). Do object and gesture imitation skills represent independent dimensions in autism? Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23 (5), 421–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, B., & Schreibman, L. (2006). Teaching reciprocal imitation skills to young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral approach: Effects on language, pretend play, and joint attention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36 (4), 487–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jouaiti, M., & Hénaff, P. (2019). Robot-based motor rehabilitation in autism: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11 (5), 753–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., & Scassellati, B. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43 (5), 1038–1049. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Hirokawa, M., Matsuda, S., Funahashi, A., & Suzuki, K. (2021). Smiles as a signal of prosocial behaviors toward the robot in the therapeutic setting for children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8 1, 599755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., Bishop, S. L. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Modules 1–4, Second Edition [Manual]. Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Maljaars, J., Noens, I., Jansen, R., Scholte, E., & van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. (2011). Intentional communication in nonverbal and verbal low-functioning children with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44 (6), 601–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEwen, F., Happé, F., Bolton, P., Rijsdijk, F., Ronald, A., Dworzynski, K., & Plomin, R. (2007). Origins of individual differences in imitation: Links with language, pretend play, and socially insightful behavior in two-year-old twins. Child Development, 78 (2), 474–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peca, A., Simut, R., Pintea, S., & Vanderborght, B. (2015). Are children with ASD more prone to test the intentions of the robonova robot compared to a human? International Journal of Social Robotics, 7 (5), 629–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S., & Pioggia, G. (2016). Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9 (2), 165–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petric, F., Hrvatinić, K., Babić, A., Malovan, L., Miklić, D., Kovačić, Z., Cepanec, M., Stošić, J., & Šimleša, S. (2014). Four tasks of a robot-assisted autism spectrum disorder diagnostic protocol: First clinical tests. In IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC 2014) (pp. 510–517). IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petric, F., Miklić, D., Cepanec, M., Cvitanović, P., & Kovačić, Z. (2017). Functional imitation task in the context of robot-assisted autism spectrum disorder diagnostics: Preliminary investigations. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1471–1478). IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierno, A. C., Mari, M., Lusher, D., & Castiello, U. (2008). Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism. Neuropsychologia, 46 (2), 448–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pioggia, G., Igliozzi, R., Sica, M. L., Ferro, M., Muratori, F., Ahluwalia, A., & De Rossi, D. (2008). Exploring emotional and imitational android-based interactions in autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, 1 (1), 49–61.Google Scholar
Poon, K. K., Watson, L. R., Baranek, G. T., & Poe, M. D. (2012). To what extent do joint attention, imitation, and object play behaviors in infancy predict later communication and intellectual functioning in ASD? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42 (6), 1064–1074. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranatunga, I., Beltran, M., Torres, N. A., Bugnariu, N., Patterson, R. M., Garver, C., & Popa, D. O. (2013). Human-robot upper body gesture imitation analysis for autism spectrum disorders. In G. Herrmann, M. J. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, & U. Leonards (Eds.), Social robotics ICSR 2013. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 218–228). Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, C. E., Adamson, L. B., Winner, E., & McGee, G. G. (2016). A cross-sectional study of shared attention by children with autism and typically developing children in an inclusive preschool setting. Topics in Language Disorders, 36 (3), 245–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, S. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). A theoretical approach to the deficits in infantile autism. Development and Psychopathology, 3 (2), 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scassellati, B., Henny, A., & Matarić, M. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14 (1), 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Ismail, L. I., Mohamed, S., Hanapiah, F. A., & Zahari, N. I. (2012). Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Procedia Engineering, 41 1, 1533–1538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simut, R. E., Vanderfaeillie, J., Peca, A., Van de Perre, G., & Vanderborght, B. (2016). Children with autism spectrum disorders make a fruit salad with Probo, the social robot: an interaction study. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 46(1), 113–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taheri, A., Meghdari, A., & Mahoor, M. H. (2020). A close look at the imitation performance of children with autism and typically developing children using a robotic system. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13 (5), 1125–1147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tapus, A., Mataric, M., & Scassellati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14 (1), 35–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tapus, A., Peca, A., Aly, A., A. Pop, C., Jisa, L., Pintea, S., Rusu, A. S., & David, D. O. (2012). Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13 (3), 315–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, K., Munson, J., Meltzoff, A. N., & Dawson, G. (2006). Early predictors of communication development in young children with autism spectrum disorder: Joint attention, imitation, and toy play. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36 (8), 993–1005. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uzgiris, I. C. (1981). Two functions of imitation during infancy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4 (1), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanderborght, B., Simut, R., Saldien, J., A. Pop, C., Rusu, A. S., Pintea, S., Lefeber, D., & David, D. O. (2012). Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interaction Studies, 13 (3), 348–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivanti, G., & Hamilton, A. (2014). Imitation in autism spectrum disorder. In F. R. Volkmar, S. J. Rogers, R. Paul, & K. A. Pelphrey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders: Diagnosis, development, and brain mechanisms (pp. 278–301). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Warren, Z., Zheng, Z., Das, S., Young, E. M., Swanson, A., Weitlauf, A., & Sarkar, N. (2015). Brief report: Development of a robotic intervention platform for young children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45 (12), 3870–3876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wild, K. S., Poliakoff, E., Jerrison, A., & Gowen, E. (2012). Goal-directed and goal-less imitation in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42 (8), 1739–1749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., & Singh, T. (2004). A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34 (3), 285–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Z., Young, E. M., Swanson, A. R., Weitlauf, A. S., Warren, Z. E., & Sarkar, N. (2016). Robot-mediated imitation skill training for children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 24 (6), 682–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubak, I., Kovačić, Z., Petric, F., Stošić, J., Cepanec, M., & Šimleša, S. (2018). Reaction to robots in social and non-social contexts – comparison of children with autism spectrum disorders and their typical peers. Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istraživanja, 54 (2), 28–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dubois-Sage, Marion, Yasmina Lembert, Frank Jamet & Jean Baratgin
2024. Dictator Game with a Robot in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Sharing is Predicted by Positive Attributions Towards the Agent. In Human and Artificial Rationalities [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14522], ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Vagnetti, Roberto, Alessandro Di Nuovo, Monica Mazza & Marco Valenti
2024. Social Robots: A Promising Tool to Support People with Autism. A Systematic Review of Recent Research and Critical Analysis from the Clinical Perspective. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.