Article published In:
Socially Acceptable Robot Behavior: Approaches for Learning, Adaptation and Evaluation
Edited by Oliver Roesler, Elahe Bagheri, Amir Aly, Silvia Rossi and Rachid Alami
[Interaction Studies 23:3] 2022
► pp. 360390
Abelson, R. P.
(1981) Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist 36 1, 715–729. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ajibo, C. A., Ishi, C. T., & Ishiguro, H.
(2021) Advocating Attitudinal Change Through Android Robot’s Intention-Based Expressive Behaviors: Toward WHO COVID-19 Guidelines Adherence. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6 ( 4 ), 6521–6528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avrunin, E., & Simmons, R.
(2014) Socially-appropriate approach paths using human data. 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1037–1042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barraquand, R., & Crowley, J. L.
(2008) Learning polite behavior with situation models. 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 209–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellon, J.
(2023) Emotions components and understanding in humans and machines. In: Misselhorn, C. et al. (eds): Emotional Machines. Perspectives from Affective Computing and Emotional Human-Machine Interaction. Springer.Google Scholar
Bellon, J., Eyssel, F., Gransche, B., Nähr-Wagener, S., & Wullenkord, R.
(2022a) Theory and practice of sociosensitive and socioactive systems. Springer. Available at [URL]. DOI logo
Bellon, J., Gransche, B., Nähr-Wagener, S.
(2022b) Soziale Angemessenheit. Forschung zu Kulturtechniken des Verhaltens. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. C., & Šabanović, S.
(2015) The effects of culture and context on perceptions of robotic facial expressions. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 16 ( 2 ). 272–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, S., Hatt, H., Ockenfels, A.
(2017) Exposure to Hedione increases reciprocity in humans. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11 ( 79 ). 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A.
(2010) Behaving as expected. Public information and fairness norms. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23 ( 2 ). 161–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, G. B.
(2011) On the organization of repair in multiperson conversation: The case of “other”-selection in other-initiated repair sequences. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 44 ( 3 ). 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou, M. P., & Saucier, G.
(2016) The conceptual link between social desirability and cultural normativity. International Journal of Psychology, 51 ( 6 ). 474–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Böhle, K., & Bopp, K.
(2014) What a vision: The artificial companion. A piece of vision assessment including an expert survey. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 10 ( 1 ). 155–186.Google Scholar
Brown, P.
(2015) Politeness and language. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Elsevier, 326–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busse, D.
(2021) Soziale Angemessenheit: Eine Problem-Exposition aus wissensanalytischer Sicht. [Social appropriateness: A exposition of the problem from a science-analytical point of view]. Soziale Angemessenheit – Forschung zu Kulturtechniken des Verhaltens. [Social appropriateness – research on cultural behavioral techniques]. SpringerGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Hensel, L. B., Duan, Y., Ince, R. A. A., Garrod, O. G. B., & Beskow, J.
(2019) Equipping social robots with culturally-sensitive facial expressions of emotion using data-driven methods. 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Y., Chu, T., Lim, C. D., Wu, T., Tseng, S., & Fu, L.
(2014) Personalizing robot behavior for interruption in social human-robot interaction. IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, 44–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clegg, J. W.
(2012) The importance of feeling awkward: A dialogical narrative phenomenology of socially awkward situations. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9 ( 3 ). 262–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M.
(2012) “How I learned to love the robot”: capabilities, information technologies, and elderly care. The capability approach, technology and design. Springer. 77–86.Google Scholar
Costello, B. J.
(2017) Social control theory. Preventing crime and violence. Springer. 31–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creanza, N., Kolodny, O., & Feldman, M. W.
(2017) Cultural evolutionary theory. How culture evolves and why it matters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114 (30), 7782–7789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curtin, M.
(1985) A question of manners. Status and gender in etiquette and courtesy. The Journal of Modern History, 57 ( 3 ). 396–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dautenhahn, Kerstin
2007Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. In Social intelligence: From brain to culture, eds. Nathan Emery, Nicola Clayton, Chris Frith, Nathan (Ed) Emery, Nicola (Ed) Clayton and Chris (Ed) Frith, 313–351. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, M., Allouch, S. B., & Van Diik, J.
(2017) Why do they refuse to use my robot?: Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 224–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Waal, F.
(2009) The origins of fairness. New Scientist, 204 1. 34–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirks, M. A., Treat, T. A., & Weersing, V. R.
(2007) Integrating theoretical, measurement, and intervention models of youth social competence. Clinical Psychology Review, 27 ( 3 ). 327–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, W., & Hößler, U.
(2011) Perspektiven interkultureller Kompetenz. Mit 11 Tabellen. [Perspectives of intercultural competence. With 11 tables]. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fangl, Y., Lu, T., Zhang, P., Gu, H., & Gu, N.
(2018) Exploring the effect of politeness on user contribution in Q&A sites: A case study of stack overflow. 22nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 713–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U.
(2004) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8 ( 4 ). 185–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fein, M. L.
(2012) Human hierarchies: A general theory. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Dupree, C. H., Nicolas, G., & Swencionis, J. K.
(2016) Status, power, and intergroup relations. The personal is the societal. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11 1, 44–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
(1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14 ( 2 ), 219–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frese, M.
(2015) Cultural practices, norms, and values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46 ( 10 ). 1327–1330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R., & Jackson, J. C.
(2017) The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspectives on psychological science: A journal of the Association for Psychological Science 12 ( 5 ), 800–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golman, R.
(2016) Good manners. Signaling social preferences. Theory and Decision, 81 ( 1 ), 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gransche, B.
(2019) A Ulysses Pact with Artificial Systems. How to Deliberately Change the Objective Spirit with Cultured AI. Computer Ethics-Philosophical Enquiry (CEPE) Proceedings 2019 ( 1 ), 16–38.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, William
1983Uncertainty reduction and predictability of behaviour in low- and high-context structures. An exploratory study. Communication Quarterly 31 (1): 49–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., & Luhmann, N.
(1990) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung?. [Theory of societoy or social technology – what does systems research achieve?]. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hedaoo, S., Williams, A., Wadgaonkar, C., & Knight, H.
(2019) A robot barista comments on its clients: social attitudes toward robot data use. 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 66–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, L.
(2017) That robot touch that means so much: On the psychological effects of human-robot touch. Doctoral dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Hofstede, Gert Jan
2015Culture’s causes: The next challenge. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 22 (4): 545–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G.
(1984) Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 51). Beverly Hills: Sage.sGoogle Scholar
Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T.
(2018) Understanding and resolving failures in human-robot interaction: Literature review and model development. Frontiers in psychology, 9 1, 861–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A.
(2004) Das Ich im Wir: Anerkennung als Triebkraft von Gruppen. Ringen um Anerkennung in und zwischen Gruppen. [The I on the We: Appreciation as driving force of groups. Struggle for appreciation in and between groups.] Jahrbuch für Gruppenanalyse und ihre Anwendungen [Yearbook of group analysis and its applications], 91. 5–21.Google Scholar
Hunter, E. B.
(1939) Personality development: A practical self-teaching course comprising health, posture, dress, grooming, voice and speech, conversation, social and business etiquette, self-confidence, poise, living and working with others, acquiring background, improvement of mind and character, achieving success and happiness. Your way of life, 5 1. Better-Speech Institute of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hupfeld-Heinemann, J., & Helversen, B.
(2009) Models of decision making on guilt and sanctions. Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime, 275–293.Google Scholar
Ionescu, A. M., & Hierold, C.
(2011) Guardian angels for a smarter life: enabling a zero-power technological platform for autonomous smart systems. Procedia Computer Science, 7 1. 43–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishi, C. T., Mikata, R., & Ishiguro, H.
(2020) Person-directed pointing gestures and inter-personal relationship: Expression of politeness to friendliness by android robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5 ( 4 ). 6081–6088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kant, I.
(2006) Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knoop, E., Bacher, M., Wall, V., Deimel, R., Brock, O., & Beardsley, P.
(2017) Handshakiness: Benchmarking for human-robot hand interactions. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 24–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konok, V., Korcsok, B., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M.
(2018) Should we love robots? – The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 80 1. 132–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroneberg, C.
(2011) Die Erklärung sozialen Handelns: Grundlagen und Anwendung einer integrativen Theorie. [The explanation of social behavior: Basis and application of an integrative theory]. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/Springer Fachmedien. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kühne, A.
(1991) Normen, Werte und Regeln als Determinanten menschlichen Handelns. [Norms, values and rules as determinants of human behavior]. Individuelle und soziale Regeln des Handelns. Beiträge zur Weiterentwicklung geisteswissenschaftlicher Ansätze in der Psychologie. [Individual and social rules of behavior. Contributions to the development of humanistic approaches in psychology]. Asanger.Google Scholar
Langeveld, J. H., Gundersen, K. K., & Svartdal, F.
(2012) Social competence as a mediating factor in reduction of behavioral problems. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56 ( 4 ). 381–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., Gregory, R., & Irwin, J.
(2007) What’s bad is easy: Taboo values, affect, and cognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 2 ( 3 ). 169–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N.
(1984) Soziale Systeme. [Social systems]. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
(1996) Takt und Zensur im Erziehungssystem. [Tact and censorship in the educational system]. Zwischen System und Umwelt. Fragen an die Pädagogik. [Between system and environment. Questions to pedagogy]. Suhrkamp. 279–294.Google Scholar
March, J. G.
(1994) A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Free Press.Google Scholar
McQuillin, E., Churamani, N., & Gunes, H.
(2022) Learning socially appropriate robo-waiter behaviours through real-time user feedback. 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 541–550). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, H., Varpio, L., Gruppen, L., & Sandhu, G.
(2016) The ethics and etiquette of research collaboration. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 91 ( 12 ). e13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, S.
(2003) Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moshkina, L., & Arkin, R. C.
(2005) Human perspective on affective robotic behavior: a longitudinal study. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1444–1451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mussakhojayeva, S., Zhanbyrtayev, M., Agzhanov, Y., & Sandygulova, A.
(2016) Who should robots adapt to within a multi-party interaction in a public space?. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 483–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nähr-Wagener, S.
(2020) Anerkennungs- und Verdinglichungsprozesse im Kontext eines vergruppten, personalisierten Webs und soziosensitiver Mensch-Technik-Interaktionen. [Processes of appreciation and reification in the context of a grouped personalized web and sociosensitive human-technology interactions]. Industrie 4.0, Kultur 2.0 und die Neuen Medien – Realitäten, Tendenzen, Mythen. [Industry 4.0, culture 2.0 and new media – realities, tendencies and myths]. 77–90.Google Scholar
Nishida, H.
(2005) Cultural schema theory. Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Sage. 401–419.Google Scholar
Ohshima, N., Kimijima, K., Yamato, J., & Mukawa, N.
(2015) A conversational robot with vocal and bodily fillers for recovering from awkward silence at turn-takings. 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 325–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, J., Martins, G. S., Jegundo, A., Dantas, C., Wings, C., & Santos, L.
(2017) Speaking robots: The challenges of acceptance by the ageing society. 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1285–1290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patrick Primeaux, S. M. Le & Veness, F. P.
(2009) What is fair. Three perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 84 1. 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, R., Broekens, J., & Neerincx, M. A.
(2017) Robots educate in style: The effect of context and non-verbal behaviour on children’s perceptions of warmth and competence. Human-robot collaboration and human assistance for an improved quality of life, 449–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piddocke, S.
(1968) Social sanctions. Anthropologica, 10 ( 2 ). 261–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quaquebeke, N. van, & Eckloff, T.
(2010) Defining respectful leadership: What it is, how it can be measured, and another glimpse at what it is related to. Journal of Business Ethics, 91 ( 3 ). 343–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F.
(2013) The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7 ( 1 ). 17–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raven, B. H.
(2008) The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8 ( 1 ). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 ( 2 ). 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C.
(1975) Conceptual information processing. Elsevier.Google Scholar
(1982) Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheutz, M., & Arnold, T.
(2016) Are we ready for sex robots?. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 351–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. J., & Steyer, R.
(1993) A latent state-trait model (not only) for social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 14 ( 4 ). 519–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, M.
(2013) Social rules and the social background. The Background of Social Reality. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H.
(1999) A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied psychology, 48 ( 1 ). 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidel, R.
(2011) Interkulturelle Kompetenz. [Intercultural competence]. Praxis der interkulturellen Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Migration und psychische Gesundheit. [Practice of intercultural psychiatry and psychotherapy. Migration and mental health]. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanton, C. J., & Stevens, C. J.
(2017) Don’t stare at me: The impact of a humanoid robot’s gaze upon trust during a cooperative human–robot visual task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9 ( 5 ). 745–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stemmler, G., Bartussek, D., Hagemann, D., Spinath, F., Amelang, M., Hasselhorn, M., Schneider, S., & Kunde, W.
(2016) Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. [Differential psychology and personality research]. Kohlhammer Verlag.Google Scholar
Thimm, C., & Kruse, L.
(1991) Dominanz, Macht und Status als Elemente sprachlicher Interaktion. Ein Literaturbericht. [Dominance, power and status as elements of verbal interaction. A literature review]. Arbeiten aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich, 245 1.Google Scholar
Tjomsland, J., Kalkan, S., & Gunes, H.
(2022) Mind your manners! a dataset and a continual learning approach for assessing social appropriateness of robot actions. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9 (669420). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolmach Lakoff, R., & Bucholtz, M.
(2004) Language and woman’s place. Text and commentaries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trommsdorff, G.
(2015) Cultural roots of values, morals, and religious orientations in adolescent development. The Oxford handbook of human development and culture. An interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press. 377–395.Google Scholar
Visser, Thomas, Martijn Vastenburg, and David V. Keyson
2011Designing to Support Social Connectedness: The Case of SnowGlobe 51:129–142.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, P.
(2016) Man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren: Das Lesebuch. [One cannot not communicate: The reading book]. (2nd edn). Hogrefe AG.Google Scholar
Whitworth, B.
(2005) Polite computing. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24 ( 5 ). 353–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiegel, V., & van den Berg, J.
(2009) Combining moral theory, modal logic and mas to create well-behaving artificial agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1 ( 3 ). 233–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, E., Metta, G., & Wykowska, A.
(2017) Robots as intentional agents: Using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 1. 1663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wullenkord, R., Fraune, M. R., Eyssel, F., & Šabanović, S.
(2016) Getting in touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 980–985. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, A.
(2008) Frames und sprachliches Wissen: Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwijsen, S. A., Niemeijer, A. R., & Hertogh, C. M.
(2011) Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: an overview of the literature. Aging & mental health, 15 (4), 419–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar