Article published In:
Socially Acceptable Robot Behavior: Approaches for Learning, Adaptation and Evaluation
Edited by Oliver Roesler, Elahe Bagheri, Amir Aly, Silvia Rossi and Rachid Alami
[Interaction Studies 23:3] 2022
► pp. 469512
References
Andriella, A., Torras, C., & Alenyà, G.
(2020) Short-Term Human–Robot Interaction Adaptability in Real-World Environments. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12 1, 639–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraka, K., Alves-Oliveira, P., & Ribeiro, T.
(2020) An extended framework for characterizing social robots. In C. Jost, B. Le Pévédic, T. Belpaeme, C. Bethel, D. Chrysostomou, N. Crook, et al. (Eds.), Human-Robot Interaction (p. 21–64). Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, C., & Liberman, K.
(2021) Making talk together: Simultaneity and rhythm in mundane Italian conversation. Language and Communication, 80 1, 95–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benner, D., Elshan, E., Schöbel, S., & Janson, A.
(2021) What do you mean? A review on recovery strategies to overcome conversational breakdowns of conversational agents. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Austin. Available at [URL]
Borgo, S., & Blanzieri, E.
(2019) Trait-based module for culturally-competent robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 16 (6), 1950028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (pp. 56–311). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruno, B., Recchiuto, C. T., Papadopoulos, I., Saffiotti, A., Koulouglioti, C., Menicatti, R., Mastrogiovanni, F., Zaccaria, R., & Sgorbissa, A.
(2019) Knowledge representation for culturally competent personal robots: requirements, design principles, implementation, and assessment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11 (3), 515–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T.
(2018) Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81 1, 77–91. Available from [URL]
Cain, A.
(1983) A Study of Pets in the Family System. In A. Katcher, & A. Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 71–81). University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Carlucci, F. M., Nardi, L., Iocchi, L., & Nardi, D.
(2015) Explicit representation of social norms for social robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 4191–4196). IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, R.
(2004) Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortellessa, G., Scopelliti, M., Tiberio, L., Svedberg, G. K., Loutfi, A., & Pecora, F.
(2008) A cross-cultural evaluation of domestic assistive robots. In AAAI fall symposium: : Technical Report, v FS-08-02 (pp. 24–31). Retrieved from: [URL]
Crenshaw, K.
(1991) Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deriu, J., Rodrigo, A., Otegi, A., Echegoyen, G., Rosset, S., Agirre, E., & Cieliebak, M.
(2021) Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54 (1), 755–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P., Heritage, J., Lerner, G., & Pomerantz, A.
(Eds.) (2015) Talking about troubles in conversation. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eresha, G., Haring, M., Endrass, B., Andre, E., & Obaid, M.
(2013) Investigating the influence of culture on proxemic behaviors for humanoid robots. IEEE Ro-Man, 430–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evers, V., Maldonado, H., Brodecki, T. L., & Hinds, P. J.
(2008) Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI. In Proceedings of the third ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 255–262). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, R., & Housley, W.
(Eds.) (2015) Advances in Membership categorization Analysis. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. E., Gaschler, A., Giuliani, M., Isard, A., Pateraki, M., & Petrick, R. P.
(2012) Two people walk into a bar: Dynamic multi-party social interaction with a robot agent. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction (pp. 3–10). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallo, D., Shreepriya, S., Colombino, T., Grasso, M. A., & Boulard, C.
(2021) Considerations about Social Norms Compliance in a Shared Elevator Scenario. In RO-MAN 2021 Workshop on Robot Behavior Adaptation to Human Social Norms (TSAR).Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1963) A conception of and experiments with ‘trust’ as a condition of concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction: Cognitive Approaches (pp. 187–238). Ronald Press.Google Scholar
(1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Giuliani, M., Petrick, R. P. A., Foster, M. E., Gaschler, A., Isard, A., Pateraki, M., & Sigalas, M.
(2013) Comparing task-based and socially intelligent behaviour in a robot bartender. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Multimodal interaction (pp. 263–270). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
(1961) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Bobbs–Merrill.Google Scholar
(1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
(1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1983) The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J.
(1990) Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19 (1), 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guye-Vuilleme, A., & Thalmann, D. A.
(2000) High-level architecture for believable social agents. Virtual Reality 5 (2), 95–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
hooks, B.
(2014) Feminist Theory: from margin to center (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horodeck, R.
(1981) Excuses and Apologies: Discovering How They Work with the Game Excuses and Challenges. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 16 (2), 119–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joosse, M., Poppe, R., Lohse, M., & Evers, V.
(2014) Cultural differences in how an engagement-seeking robot should approach a group of people. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM international conference on Collaboration across boundaries: culture, distance & technology (pp. 121–130). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Y.
(2020) Artificial Whiteness: Politics and Ideology in Artificial Intelligence. Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
Goffman’s approach to face-to-face interaction. In: Drew, P., Wootton, A. editors Erving Goffman: exploring the interaction order. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1988 p. 14–40.Google Scholar
Khaliq, A. A., Köckemann, U., Pecora, F., Saffiotti, A., Bruno, B., Recchiuto, C. T., Sgorbissa, A., Bui, H.-D., & Chong, N.-Y.
(2018) Culturally aware Planning and Execution of Robot Actions. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 326–332). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, K.
(2013) More Studies in Ethnomethodology. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lim, V., Rooksby, M., & Cross, E. S.
(2021) Social Robots on a Global Stage: Establishing a Role for Culture During Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13 1, 1307–1333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marge, M., & Rudnicky, A. I.
(2019) Miscommunication Detection and Recovery in Situated Human–Robot Dialogue. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 9 (1), Article 3 (pp. 1–40). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mascarenhas, S., Dias, J., Alfonso, N., Enz, S., & Paiva, A.
(2009) Using rituals to express cultural differences in synthetic characters. In Proceedings of The 8th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems – Volume 1 (pp. 305–312).Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, S., Prada, R., Paiva, A., & Hofstede, G. J.
(2013a) Social Importance Dynamics: A Model for Culturally-Adaptive Agents. In R. Aylett, B. Krenn, C. Pelachaud, & H. Shimodaira (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2013), LNCS 8108. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mascarenhas, S., Silva, A., Paiva, A., Aylett, R., Kistler, F., André, E., Degens, N., Hofstede, G. J., & Kappas, A.
(2013b) Traveller: an intercultural training system with intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 1387–1388).Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., Wu, P., Vakili, V., Ott, T., & Smith, K.
(2009) Culture, Politeness and Directive Compliance. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part 1, HCII 2009 (pp. 568–577). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, R., & Arar, R.
(2019) Conversational UX Design: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Natural Conversation Framework. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Han, J., Shin, N., Burke, J. L., & Kato, K.
(2008) What People Assume about Humanoid and Animal-Type Robots: Cross-Cultural Analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 5 (1), 25–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F.
(2018) A Systematic Review of Social Presence: Definition, Antecedents, and Implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5 1, 114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onyeulo, E. B., & Gandhi, V.
(2020) What makes a social robot good at interacting with humans?. Information, 11 1, 43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T.
(2018) Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1, 861. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrick, R., & Foster, M. E.
(2013) Planning for Social Interaction in a Robot Bartender Domain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 23 (1), 389–397. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Pitsch, K.
(2016) Limits and opportunities for mathematizing communicational conduct for social robotics in the real world? Toward enabling a robot to make use of the human’s competences. AI & Society, 31 1, 587–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J., & Krishnaswamy, N.
(2021) Embodied human computer interaction. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 35 (3), 307–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, G., Hayashi, M., & Sidnell, J.
(Eds.) (2013) Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehm, M.
(2010) Developing Enculturated Agents: Pitfalls and Strategies. In E. Blanchard, & D. Allard (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Culturally-Aware Information Technology: Perspectives and Models (pp. 362–386). Idea Group Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavory, I., & Fine, G. A.
(2020) Disruption and the theory of the interaction order. Theory and Society, 49 1, 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. I.
(1923) The Unadjusted Girl: With Cases and Standpoint for Behavior Analysis. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Torta, E., Werner, F., Johnson, D. O., Juola, J. F., Cuijpers, R. H., Bazzani, M., & Bregman, J.
(2014) Evaluation of a small socially-assistive humanoid robot in intelligent homes for the care of the elderly. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 76 (1), 57–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turowetz, J., & Rawls, A. W.
(2021) The development of Garfinkel’s ‘Trust’ argument from 1947 to 1967: Demonstrating how inequality disrupts sense and self-making. Journal of Classical Sociology, 21 (1), 3–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., & Kosinski, M.
(2018) Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114 (2), 246–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. R.
(1978) Categorization, Authorization and Blame-Negotiation in Conversation. Sociology, 12 1, 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar