Controlling the dog, pretending to have a conversation, or just being friendly?
Influences of sex and familiarity on Americans’ talk to dogs during play
Robert W. Mitchell | Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University
This study examines the effects of sex and familiarity on Americans’ talk to dogs during play, using categories derived from research comparing mothers’ and fathers’ talk to infants. Eight men and fifteen women were videotaped whilst playing with their own dog and with another person’s dog, and their utterances were codified for features common to infant-directed talk. Women used the baby talk speech register more than men, and both men and women used this register more when interacting with the unfamiliar dog than with the familiar dog. When playing with the familiar dog, women talked more than men, and their talk was more suggestive of friendliness and having a conversation. When playing with the unfamiliar dog people used more praise, more conversational gambits, a more diverse vocabulary, and longer utterances than when playing with the familiar dog, suggesting that when playing with the unfamiliar dog, people pretended to have more of a conversation, were more attentive to appearing friendly and were less attentive to the dog’s limited understanding. Overall, however, men and women used similar forms of talk when interacting with a dog, whether familiar or not.
de Mouzon, Charlotte, Marine Gonthier & Gérard Leboucher
2023. Discrimination of cat-directed speech from human-directed speech in a population of indoor companion cats (Felis catus). Animal Cognition 26:2 ► pp. 611 ff.
Friedman, Ori & Arber Tasimi
2023. The second-order problem of other minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46
Gergely, Anna, Tamás Faragó, Ágoston Galambos & József Topál
2017. Differential effects of speech situations on mothers’ and fathers’ infant-directed and dog-directed speech: An acoustic analysis. Scientific Reports 7:1
Horowitz, Alexandra & Julie Hecht
2016. Examining dog–human play: the characteristics, affect, and vocalizations of a unique interspecific interaction. Animal Cognition 19:4 ► pp. 779 ff.
2017. Effect of interaction type on the characteristics of pet-directed speech in female dog owners. Animal Cognition 20:3 ► pp. 499 ff.
Lee, Sherman A.
2020. Does the DSM-5 grief disorder apply to owners of deceased pets? A psychometric study of impairment during pet loss. Psychiatry Research 285 ► pp. 112800 ff.
Lee, Sherman A. & Nicole A. Surething
2013. Neuroticism and Religious Coping Uniquely Predict Distress Severity among Bereaved Pet Owners. Anthrozoös 26:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Merola, I., E. Prato-Previde & S. Marshall-Pescini
2012. Social referencing in dog-owner dyads?. Animal Cognition 15:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Meyer, Iben & Björn Forkman
2014. Nonverbal Communication and Human–Dog Interaction. Anthrozoös 27:4 ► pp. 553 ff.
Mitchell, Robert & Kristi Sinkhorn
2014. Why Do People Laugh during Dog–Human Play Interactions?. Anthrozoös 27:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Mitchell, Robert W.
2015. Creativity in the Interaction. In Animal Creativity and Innovation, ► pp. 31 ff.
Mitchell, Robert W.
2017. A critique and empirical assessment of Alexandra Horowitz and Julie Hecht’s “Examining dog–human play: the characteristics, affect, and vocalizations of a unique interspecific interaction”. Animal Cognition 20:3 ► pp. 553 ff.
Mitchell, Robert W.
2021. You talkin’ to me? An assessment of commands as play signals during dog–human play. Animal Cognition 24:2 ► pp. 329 ff.
Soderstrom, Melanie
2007. Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review 27:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Solomon, Olga
2011. Rethinking Baby Talk. In The Handbook of Language Socialization, ► pp. 121 ff.
2013. Vowel Hyperarticulation in Parrot-, Dog- and Infant-Directed Speech. Anthrozoös 26:3 ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.