Article published In:
Interaction StudiesVol. 7:3 (2006) ► pp.297–337
The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research
The development of robots that closely resemble human beings can contribute to cognitive research. An android provides an experimental apparatus that has the potential to be controlled more precisely than any human actor. However, preliminary results indicate that only very humanlike devices can elicit the broad range of responses that people typically direct toward each other. Conversely, to build androids capable of emulating human behavior, it is necessary to investigate social activity in detail and to develop models of the cognitive mechanisms that support this activity. Because of the reciprocal relationship between android development and the exploration of social mechanisms, it is necessary to establish the field of android science. Androids could be a key testing ground for social, cognitive, and neuroscientific theories as well as platform for their eventual unification. Nevertheless, subtle flaws in appearance and movement can be more apparent and eerie in very humanlike robots. This uncanny phenomenon may be symptomatic of entities that elicit our model of human other but do not measure up to it. If so, very humanlike robots may provide the best means of pinpointing what kinds of behavior are perceived as human, since deviations from human norms are more obvious in them than in more mechanical-looking robots. In pursuing this line of inquiry, it is essential to identify the mechanisms involved in evaluations of human likeness. One hypothesis is that, by playing on an innate fear of death, an uncanny robot elicits culturally-supported defense responses for coping with death’s inevitability. An experiment, which borrows from methods used in terror management research, was performed to test this hypothesis.
[Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators: Fast Breaking Paper in Social Sciences, May 2008]
Cited by
Cited by 399 other publications
Abdulrahman, Amal & Deborah Richards
2022. Is Natural Necessary? Human Voice versus Synthetic Voice for Intelligent Virtual Agents. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6:7 ► pp. 51 ff. 
Adali, Sibel
2013. Trust as a Social and Cognitive Construct. In Modeling Trust Context in Networks [SpringerBriefs in Computer Science, ], ► pp. 25 ff.
Alač, Morana
2009. Moving Android. Social Studies of Science 39:4 ► pp. 491 ff.
Alač, Morana, Javier Movellan & Fumihide Tanaka
2011. When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Social Studies of Science 41:6 ► pp. 893 ff.
Baddoura, Ritta & Gentiane Venture
2013. Social vs. Useful HRI: Experiencing the Familiar, Perceiving the Robot as a Sociable Partner and Responding to Its Actions. International Journal of Social Robotics 5:4 ► pp. 529 ff.
Baddoura, Ritta, Gentiane Venture & Ryo Matsukata
2012. 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012), ► pp. 234 ff.
Balas, Benjamin & Christopher Tonsager
2014. Face Animacy is Not All in the Eyes: Evidence from Contrast Chimeras. Perception 43:5 ► pp. 355 ff.
Baldrighi, Eric, Nicholas Thayer, Michael Stevens, Sonya Ranson Echols & Shashank Priya
2014. Design and Implementation of the Bio-inspired Facial Expressions for Medical Mannequin. International Journal of Social Robotics 6:4 ► pp. 555 ff.
Balistreri, Giuseppe, Shuichi Nishio, Rosario Sorbello & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2011. Integrating Built-in Sensors of an Android with Sensors Embedded in the Environment for Studying a More Natural Human-Robot Interaction. In AI*IA 2011: Artificial Intelligence Around Man and Beyond [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6934], ► pp. 432 ff.
Balistreri, Maurizio & Francesco Casile
2020. Care Robots: From Tools of Care to Training Opportunities. Moral Considerations. In Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference, Workshops [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1008], ► pp. 18 ff.
Bardy, Benoit G., Robin N. Salesse, Mathieu Gueugnon, Zhao Zhong, Julien Lagarde & Ludovic Marin
2014. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), ► pp. 772 ff.
Barney, Christian, Tyler Hancock, Carol L. Esmark Jones, Brett Kazandjian & Joel E. Collier
2022. Ideally human-ish: How anthropomorphized do you have to be in shopper-facing retail technology?. Journal of Retailing 98:4 ► pp. 685 ff.
Baud-Bovy, Gabriel, Pietro Morasso, Francesco Nori, Giulio Sandini & Alessandra Sciutti
2014. Human Machine Interaction and Communication in Cooperative Actions. In Bioinspired Approaches for Human-Centric Technologies, ► pp. 241 ff.
Becker-Asano, Christian
2011. Affective Computing Combined with Android Science. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 25:3 ► pp. 245 ff.
Becker-Asano, Christian & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2011. 2011 IEEE Workshop on Affective Computational Intelligence (WACI), ► pp. 1 ff.
Beiboer, Julian & Eduardo B. Sandoval
2019. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 608 ff.
Belanche, Daniel, Luis V. Casaló, Carlos Flavián & Jeroen Schepers
2020. Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda. The Service Industries Journal 40:3-4 ► pp. 203 ff.
Belk, Russell
2022. Artificial Emotions and Love and Sex Doll Service Workers. Journal of Service Research 25:4 ► pp. 521 ff.
Benjamin, Rachele & Steven J. Heine
2023. From Freud to Android: Constructing a Scale of Uncanny Feelings. Journal of Personality Assessment 105:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Bennett, Casey C. & Selma Šabanović
2014. Deriving Minimal Features for Human-Like Facial Expressions in Robotic Faces. International Journal of Social Robotics 6:3 ► pp. 367 ff.
Bennett, Casey C. & Selma Šabanović
2015. The effects of culture and context on perceptions of robotic facial expressions. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:2 ► pp. 272 ff.
Beuter, N., T. Spexard, I. Lutkebohle, J. Peltason & F. Kummert
2008. Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, ► pp. 585 ff.
Bishop, J. Mark
2021. Artificial Intelligence Is Stupid and Causal Reasoning Will Not Fix It. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Brink, Kimberly A., Kurt Gray & Henry M. Wellman
2019. Creepiness Creeps In: Uncanny Valley Feelings Are Acquired in Childhood. Child Development 90:4 ► pp. 1202 ff.
Broadbent, Elizabeth
2017. Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology 68:1 ► pp. 627 ff.
Bruk-Lee, Valentina, Erica N. Drew & Ben Hawkes
2013. Candidate Reactions to Simulations and Media-Rich Assessments in Personnel Selection. In Simulations for Personnel Selection, ► pp. 43 ff.
Bruk‐Lee, Valentina, Julie Lanz, Erica N. Drew, Chris Coughlin, Pamela Levine, Kathy Tuzinski & Kimberly Wrenn
2016. Examining Applicant Reactions to Different Media Types in Character‐based Simulations for Employee Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 24:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Buckingham, Gavin, Johnny Parr, Greg Wood, Sarah Day, Alix Chadwell, John Head, Adam Galpin, Laurence Kenney, Peter Kyberd, Emma Gowen & Ellen Poliakoff
2019. Upper- and lower-limb amputees show reduced levels of eeriness for images of prosthetic hands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:4 ► pp. 1295 ff.
Burdett, Emily R. R., Shogo Ikari, Yo Nakawake & Zheng Yan
2022. British Children’s and Adults’ Perceptions of Robots. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2022 ► pp. 1 ff.
Burleigh, Tyler J.
2015. A challenge to the study of individual differences in uncanny valley sensitivity. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Burleigh, Tyler J. & Jordan R. Schoenherr
2015. A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization?. Frontiers in Psychology 5
Burleigh, Tyler J., Jordan R. Schoenherr & Guy L. Lacroix
2013. Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior 29:3 ► pp. 759 ff.
Burnett, Gary, David R. Large & Eddie Brown
2022. Infotainment (Displays & Controls) I: Haptics/Ultrasound. In User Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 980], ► pp. 425 ff.
Calverley, David J.
2006. Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist?. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 403 ff.
Cantrell, Kate & Lesley Hawkes
2021. Empathy, Anthropomorphism, and the Uncanny Valley Effect: Why Audiences Strayed Away from the Film Adaptation of Cats. The Journal of Popular Culture 54:3 ► pp. 571 ff.
Carp, Sarah B., Anthony C. Santistevan, Christopher J. Machado, Alexander M. Whitaker, Brittany L. Aguilar & Eliza Bliss-Moreau
2022. Monkey visual attention does not fall into the uncanny valley. Scientific Reports 12:1
Carpenter, Julie
2013. Just Doesn’t Look Right. In Handbook of Research on Technoself, ► pp. 609 ff.
Carpenter, Julie
2014. Just Doesn’t Look Right. In Robotics, ► pp. 1354 ff.
Chaminade, Thierry
2006. ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 769 ff.
Chatzoglou, Prodromos D., Vasiliki Lazaraki, Savvas D. Apostolidis & Antonios C. Gasteratos
2023. Factors Affecting Acceptance of Social Robots Among Prospective Users. International Journal of Social Robotics
Cheetham, Marcus, Pascal Suter & Lutz Jancke
2014. Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the Uncanny Valley: more like a “Happy Valleyâ€. Frontiers in Psychology 5
Chen, Aihui, Mengqi Xiang, Mingyu Wang & Yaobin Lu
2023. Harmony in intelligent hybrid teams: the influence of the intellectual ability of artificial intelligence on human members’ reactions. Information Technology & People 36:7 ► pp. 2826 ff.
Chen, Yonghao, Tilman Stephani, Milena Teresa Bagdasarian, Anna Hilsmann, Peter Eisert, Arno Villringer, Sebastian Bosse, Michael Gaebler & Vadim V. Nikulin
2024. Realness of face images can be decoded from non-linear modulation of EEG responses. Scientific Reports 14:1
Ciechanowski, Leon, Aleksandra Przegalinska, Mikolaj Magnuski & Peter Gloor
2019. In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems 92 ► pp. 539 ff.
Ciechanowski, Leon, Aleksandra Przegalinska & Krzysztof Wegner
2018. The Necessity of New Paradigms in Measuring Human-Chatbot Interaction. In Advances in Cross-Cultural Decision Making [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 610], ► pp. 205 ff.
Clayton, Russell B. & Glenn Leshner
2015. The Uncanny Valley: The Effects of Rotoscope Animation on Motivational Processing of Depression Drug Messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Clocksin, William F.
2024. Introduction. In Computational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationality [SpringerBriefs in Computer Science, ], ► pp. 3 ff.
Coeckelbergh, Mark
2011. Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations. International Journal of Social Robotics 3:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Coeckelbergh, Mark
2022. Three Responses to Anthropomorphism in Social Robotics: Towards a Critical, Relational, and Hermeneutic Approach. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:10 ► pp. 2049 ff.
Conrad, Frederick G., Michael F. Schober, Matt Jans, Rachel A. Orlowski, Daniel Nielsen & Rachel Levenstein
2015. Comprehension and engagement in survey interviews with virtual agents. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Conti, Daniela, Santo Di Nuovo, Serafino Buono & Alessandro Di Nuovo
2017. Robots in Education and Care of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Study on Acceptance by Experienced and Future Professionals. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Corti, Kevin & Alex Gillespie
2015. A truly human interface: interacting face-to-face with someone whose words are determined by a computer program. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Corti, Kevin & Alex Gillespie
2015. Offscreen and in the Chair Next to Your: Conversational Agents Speaking Through Actual Human Bodies. In Intelligent Virtual Agents [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9238], ► pp. 405 ff.
Corti, Kevin & Alex Gillespie
2016. Co-constructing intersubjectivity with artificial conversational agents: People are more likely to initiate repairs of misunderstandings with agents represented as human. Computers in Human Behavior 58 ► pp. 431 ff.
Cowley, Stephen J.
2007. Distributed Language: Biomechanics, Functions, and the Origins of Talk. In Emergence of Communication and Language, ► pp. 105 ff.
Cowley, Stephen J. & Karl F. Macdorman
2006. What baboons, babies and Tetris players tell us about interaction: a biosocial view of norm-based social learning. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 363 ff.
Cuculo, Vittorio & Alessandro D’Amelio
2019. OpenFACS: An Open Source FACS-Based 3D Face Animation System. In Image and Graphics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11902], ► pp. 232 ff.
Cui, Jinsheng, Mengwei Zhang & Jianan Zhong
2023. When frontline robots emerge: the double-edged-sword effect of anticipated trust on intention to switch brands after service failure. Journal of Service Theory and Practice 33:6 ► pp. 842 ff.
Dabo, Elodie, Wafa Cherigui, Lise Haddouk & Julien Nelson
2023. Proceedings of the 18th "Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée" Conference, ► pp. 1 ff.
Damiano, Luisa & Paul Dumouchel
2018. Anthropomorphism in Human–Robot Co-evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Damiano, Luisa & Paul Dumouchel
2023. Emotions in (Human-Robot) Relation. Structuring Hybrid Social Ecologies. In Emotional Machines [Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society, ], ► pp. 61 ff.
Danaher, John
2016. Robots, law and the retribution gap. Ethics and Information Technology 18:4 ► pp. 299 ff.
Datteri, Edoardo, Thierry Chaminade & Donato Romano
2022. Going Beyond the “Synthetic Method”: New Paradigms Cross-Fertilizing Robotics and Cognitive Neuroscience. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Dautenhahn, Kerstin
2007. Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 4:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Dautenhahn, Kerstin
2007. A Paradigm Shift in Artificial Intelligence: Why Social Intelligence Matters in the Design and Development of Robots with Human-Like Intelligence. In 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4850], ► pp. 288 ff.
Dautenhahn, Kerstin
2007. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362:1480 ► pp. 679 ff.
Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, Michael L. Walters, Ben Robins, Hatice Kose-Bagci, N. Assif Mirza & Mike Blow
2009. KASPAR – a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human–robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6:3-4 ► pp. 369 ff.
de Borst, Aline W. & Beatrice de Gelder
2015. Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: an affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 6
de la Rosa, Stephan, Tobias Meilinger, Stephan Streuber, Aurelie Saulton, Laura Fademrecht, M. Alejandra Quiros-Ramirez, Heinrich Bülthoff, Isabelle Bülthoff & Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
2020. Visual appearance modulates motor control in social interactions. Acta Psychologica 210 ► pp. 103168 ff.
Decker, Michael
2010. Ein Abbild des Menschen: Humanoide Roboter. In Information und Menschenbild [Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, 37], ► pp. 41 ff.
Decker, Michael, Rüdiger Dillmann, Thomas Dreier, Martin Fischer, Mathias Gutmann, Ingrid Ott & Indra Spiecker genannt Döhmann
2011. Service robotics: do you know your new companion? Framing an interdisciplinary technology assessment. Poiesis & Praxis 8:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
del Valle-Canencia, Marta, Carlos Moreno Martínez, Rosa-María Rodríguez-Jiménez & Ana Corrales-Paredes
2022. The emotions effect on a virtual characters design–A student perspective analysis. Frontiers in Computer Science 4
Di Natale, Anna Flavia, Matilde Ellen Simonetti, Stefania La Rocca & Emanuela Bricolo
2023. Uncanny valley effect: A qualitative synthesis of empirical research to assess the suitability of using virtual faces in psychological research. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 10 ► pp. 100288 ff.
Dickinson, Helen, Catherine Smith, Nicole Carey & Gemma Carey
2021. Exploring governance tensions of disruptive technologies: the case of care robots in Australia and New Zealand. Policy and Society 40:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Diekhoff, Deana D, George M Diekhoff & Michael A Vandehey
2019. A comparison of men’s and women’s perceptions of the female body using a multidimensional scaling analysis of naturalistic stimuli. Health Psychology Open 6:1 ► pp. 205510291985466 ff.
Diel, Alexander & Michael Lewis
2022. Structural deviations drive an uncanny valley of physical places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 82 ► pp. 101844 ff.
Diel, Alexander & Michael Lewis
2022. The uncanniness of written text is explained by configural deviation and not by processing disfluency. Perception 51:10 ► pp. 729 ff.
Diel, Alexander & Michael Lewis
2022. Familiarity, orientation, and realism increase face uncanniness by sensitizing to facial distortions. Journal of Vision 22:4 ► pp. 14 ff.
Diel, Alexander & Michael Lewis
2024. Domain-general and -specific individual difference predictors of an uncanny valley and uncanniness effects. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2:1 ► pp. 100041 ff.
Diel, Alexander, Michael Lewis & Micah B. Goldwater
2022. The deviation-from-familiarity effect: Expertise increases uncanniness of deviating exemplars. PLOS ONE 17:9 ► pp. e0273861 ff.
Diel, Alexander, Sarah Weigelt & Karl F. Macdorman
2022. A Meta-analysis of the Uncanny Valley's Independent and Dependent Variables. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Dill, Vanderson, Laura Mattos Flach, Rafael Hocevar, Christian Lykawka, Soraia R. Musse & Márcio Sarroglia Pinho
2012. Evaluation of the Uncanny Valley in CG Characters. In Intelligent Virtual Agents [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7502], ► pp. 511 ff.
Dinet, J. & R. Vivian
2015. Perception et attitudes à l’égard des robots anthropomorphes en France : validation d’une échelle d’attitudes. Psychologie Française 60:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Dinet, Jérôme & Robin Vivian
2014. Exploratory investigation of attitudes towards assistive robots for future users. Le travail humain Vol. 77:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
DOĞAN ERDİNÇ, Ece & Ayda UZUNÇARŞILI SOYDAŞ
2024. Tekinsiz Vadi Teorisi Bağlamında Yapay Zeka Etkileyicileri. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ İLETİŞİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİK DERGİSİ
Dubé, S., M. Santaguida, D. Anctil, C. Y. Zhu, L. Thomasse, L. Giaccari, R. Oassey, D. Vachon & A. Johnson
2023. Perceived stigma and erotic technology: From sex toys to erobots. Psychology & Sexuality 14:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Dubé, Simon & Dave Anctil
2021. Foundations of Erobotics. International Journal of Social Robotics 13:6 ► pp. 1205 ff.
Dubé, Simon, Maria Santaguida & Dave Anctil
2022. Erobots as research tools: Overcoming the ethical and methodological challenges of sexology. Journal of Future Robot Life 3:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Esposito, Anna, Terry Amorese, Marialucia Cuciniello, Ilaria Pica, Maria Teresa Riviello, Alda Troncone, Gennaro Cordasco & Antonietta M. Esposito
2019. 2019 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Consumer Technologies (ISCT), ► pp. 243 ff.
Esposito, Anna, Terry Amorese, Marialucia Cuciniello, Filippo Cavallo, Alessandro Vinciarelli & Gennaro Cordasco
2022. Comparing Middle-Aged and Seniors’ Preferences Toward Virtual Agents and Android Robots: Is There a Generational Shift in Assistive Technologies’ Preferences?. In Ambient Assisted Living [Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 884], ► pp. 85 ff.
Esposito, Anna, Terry Amorese, Marialucia Cuciniello, Antonietta M. Esposito & Gennaro Cordasco
2023. Do you like me? Behavioral and physical features for socially and emotionally engaging interactive systems. Frontiers in Computer Science 5
Eyssel, Friederike
2017. An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 87 ► pp. 363 ff.
Fan, Shaojing, Rangding Wang, Tian-Tsong Ng, Cheston Y.-C. Tan, Jonathan S. Herberg & Bryan L. Koenig
2014. Human Perception of Visual Realism for Photo and Computer-Generated Face Images. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 11:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Feng, Shuyuan, Xueqin Wang, Qiandong Wang, Jing Fang, Yaxue Wu, Li Yi, Kunlin Wei & Nicholas Greatorex Riches
2018. The uncanny valley effect in typically developing children and its absence in children with autism spectrum disorders. PLOS ONE 13:11 ► pp. e0206343 ff.
Fernández-Llamas, Camino, Miguel A. Conde, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Sedano & Francisco García
2018. May I teach you? Students' behavior when lectured by robotic vs. human teachers. Computers in Human Behavior 80 ► pp. 460 ff.
Ferrari, Francesco, Maria Paola Paladino & Jolanda Jetten
2016. Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness. International Journal of Social Robotics 8:2 ► pp. 287 ff.
Ferrey, Anne E., Tyler J. Burleigh & Mark J. Fenske
2015. Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Fischer, Martin
2012. Interdisciplinary technology assessment of service robots: the psychological/work science perspective. Poiesis & Praxis 9:3-4 ► pp. 231 ff.
Fitzpatrick, Paul, Kensuke Harada, Charles C. Kemp, Yoshio Matsumoto, Kazuhito Yokoi & Eiichi Yoshida
2016. Humanoids. In Springer Handbook of Robotics [Springer Handbooks, ], ► pp. 1789 ff.
Flores, Edgar & Sidney Fels
2014. The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 205 ff.
Fortunati, Leopoldina, Anna Maria Manganelli, Joachim Höflich & Giovanni Ferrin
2023. Exploring the Perceptions of Cognitive and Affective Capabilities of Four, Real, Physical Robots with a Decreasing Degree of Morphological Human Likeness. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:3 ► pp. 547 ff.
Gadde, Prathik, Hadi Kharrazi, Himalaya Patel & Karl F. MacDorman
2011. Toward Monitoring and Increasing Exercise Adherence in Older Adults by Robotic Intervention: A Proof of Concept Study. Journal of Robotics 2011 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus
2022. Seeming autonomy, technology and the uncanny valley. AI & SOCIETY 37:2 ► pp. 595 ff.
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus & Stephen J. Cowley
2022. Autonomous technologies in human ecologies: enlanguaged cognition, practices and technology. AI & SOCIETY 37:2 ► pp. 687 ff.
Gale, Ella & Andrew Adamatzky
2016. Translating Slime Mould Responses: A Novel Way to Present Data to the Public. In Advances in Physarum Machines [Emergence, Complexity and Computation, 21], ► pp. 777 ff.
Gerner, Alexander Matthias
2020. Hacking into Cybertherapy: Considering a Gesture-enhanced Therapy with Avatars (g+TA). Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 23:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Ghafurian, Moojan, Gabriella Lakatos & Kerstin Dautenhahn
2022. The Zoomorphic Miro Robot’s Affective Expression Design and Perceived Appearance. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:4 ► pp. 945 ff.
Gillespie, Alex & Kevin Corti
2016. The Body That Speaks: Recombining Bodies and Speech Sources in Unscripted Face-to-Face Communication. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Goldie, Peter
2010. The Moral Risks of Risky Technologies. In Emotions and Risky Technologies [The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, 5], ► pp. 127 ff.
Goldie, Peter, Sabine Döring & Roddy Cowie
2011. The Ethical Distinctiveness of Emotion-Oriented Technology: Four Long-Term Issues. In Emotion-Oriented Systems [Cognitive Technologies, ], ► pp. 725 ff.
Gonçalves, André & Dora Biro
2018. Comparative thanatology, an integrative approach: exploring sensory/cognitive aspects of death recognition in vertebrates and invertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373:1754 ► pp. 20170263 ff.
Goodrich, Michael A., Jacob W. Crandall & Emilia Barakova
2013. Teleoperation and Beyond for Assistive Humanoid Robots. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 9:1 ► pp. 175 ff.
Graham, Emily M., Russell Hendrycks, Christopher M. Baschuk, Diane J. Atkins, Lana Keizer, Christopher C. Duncan & Shaun D. Mendenhall
2021. Restoring Form and Function to the Partial Hand Amputee. Hand Clinics 37:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Gray, Kurt & Daniel M. Wegner
2012. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Grazzini, Laura, Giampaolo Viglia & Daniel Nunan
2023. Dashed expectations in service experiences. Effects of robots human-likeness on customers’ responses. European Journal of Marketing 57:4 ► pp. 957 ff.
Green, Robert D., Karl F. MacDorman, Chin-Chang Ho & Sandosh Vasudevan
2008. Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness. Computers in Human Behavior 24:5 ► pp. 2456 ff.
Grundke, Andrea, Jan-Philipp Stein & Markus Appel
2023. Improving evaluations of advanced robots by depicting them in harmful situations. Computers in Human Behavior 140 ► pp. 107565 ff.
Hai-Jew, Shalin
2019. Multidimensional Mappings of Political Accounts for Malicious Political Socialbot Identification. In Global Cyber Security Labor Shortage and International Business Risk [Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage, ], ► pp. 263 ff.
Hai-Jew, Shalin
2022. Multidimensional Mappings of Political Accounts for Malicious Political Socialbot Identification. In Research Anthology on Social Media's Influence on Government, Politics, and Social Movements, ► pp. 244 ff.
Hai-Jew, Shalin
2022. Multidimensional Mappings of Political Accounts for Malicious Political Socialbot Identification. In Research Anthology on Combating Cyber-Aggression and Online Negativity, ► pp. 911 ff.
Han, Boon Siew, Alvin Hong Yee Wong, Yeow Kee Tan & Haizhou Li
2010. 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 797 ff.
HARING, Kerstin Sophie, C^|^eacute;line MOUGENOT, Fuminori ONO & Katsumi WATANABE
2014. Cultural Differences in Perception and Attitude towards Robots. International Journal of Affective Engineering 13:3 ► pp. 149 ff.
HASHIKAWA, Rino, Hideyuki TAKAHASHI & Yohei YANASE
2023. THE UNKNOWN WORLD OF MY STUFFED ANIMAL: EFFECTS OF THE PRESENTATION OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN VIRTUAL SPACE ON THE SOCIAL PRESENCE OF STUFFED ANIMALS. PSYCHOLOGIA 65:2 ► pp. 170 ff.
Hauser, Sabrina, Melinda J. Suto, Liisa Holsti, Manon Ranger & Karon E. MacLean
2020. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Herz, Rachel S. & Alden Hinds
2013. Stealing Is Not Gross: Language Distinguishes Visceral Disgust From Moral Violations. The American Journal of Psychology 126:3 ► pp. 275 ff.
Hirasawa, Y, T Takahashi, K Komatani, T Ogata & H G Okuno
2010. 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, ► pp. 450 ff.
Hirasawa, Yasuharu, Toru Takahashi, Tetsuya Ogata & Hiroshi G. Okuno
2011. Robot with Two Ears Listens to More than Two Simultaneous Utterances by Exploiting Harmonic Structures. In Modern Approaches in Applied Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6703], ► pp. 348 ff.
Ho, Chin-Chang & Karl F. MacDorman
2010. Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior 26:6 ► pp. 1508 ff.
Ho, Chin-Chang & Karl F. MacDorman
2017. Measuring the Uncanny Valley Effect. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:1 ► pp. 129 ff.
Ho, Chin-Chang, Karl F. MacDorman & Z. A. D. Dwi Pramono
2008. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, ► pp. 169 ff.
Ho, Tzu-Hua
2020. The Ideas of Robot Design and Application from the First-Year Undergraduate Students. In Cognitive Cities [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1227], ► pp. 499 ff.
Hofree, Galit, Paul Ruvolo, Audrey Reinert, Marian S. Bartlett & Piotr Winkielman
2018. Behind the Robot’s Smiles and Frowns: In Social Context, People Do Not Mirror Android’s Expressions But React to Their Informational Value. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 12
Hoorn, Johan F. & Ivy S. Huang
2024. The media inequality, uncanny mountain, and the singularity is far from near: Iwaa and Sophia robot versus a real human being. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 181 ► pp. 103142 ff.
Hube, Natalie, Katrin Angerbauer, Daniel Pohlandt, Kresimir Vidackovic & Michael Sedlmair
2021. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), ► pp. 139 ff.
Hudlicka, Eva
2014. Affective BICA: Challenges and open questions. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 7 ► pp. 98 ff.
Hui Sung Lee, Jeong Woo Park & Myung Jin Chung
2007. A Linear Affect–Expression Space Model and Control Points for Mascot-Type Facial Robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23:5 ► pp. 863 ff.
Hutson, Suzanne, Soo Ling Lim, Peter J. Bentley, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze & Ann Bowling
2011. Investigating the Suitability of Social Robots for the Wellbeing of the Elderly. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6974], ► pp. 578 ff.
Igaue, Takuya & Ryusuke Hayashi
2023. Signatures of the uncanny valley effect in an artificial neural network. Computers in Human Behavior 146 ► pp. 107811 ff.
Infantino, Ignazio, Giovanni Pilato, Riccardo Rizzo & Filippo Vella
2013. Humanoid Introspection: A Practical Approach. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 10:5 ► pp. 246 ff.
Ishiguro, Hiroshi
2006. Android science: conscious and subconscious recognition. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 319 ff.
Ishihara, Hisashi, Saneyuki Iwanaga & Minoru Asada
2021. Comparison Between the Facial Flow Lines of Androids and Humans. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8
Ishihara, Hisashi, Nobuyuki Ota & Minoru Asada
2017. Derivation of simple rules for complex flow vector fields on the lower part of the human face for robot face design. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 13:1 ► pp. 015002 ff.
Itakura, Shoji, Hiraku Ishida, Takayuki Kanda, Yohko Shimada, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Kang Lee
2008. How to Build an Intentional Android: Infants' Imitation of a Robot's Goal‐Directed Actions. Infancy 13:5 ► pp. 519 ff.
Itakura, Shoji, Mako Okanda & Yusuke Moriguchi
2008. Discovering Mind: Development of Mentalizing in Human Children. In Origins of the Social Mind, ► pp. 179 ff.
Jain, Lakhmi C., Anas Quteishat & Chee Peng Lim
2007. Intelligent Machines: An Introduction. In Innovations in Intelligent Machines - 1 [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 70], ► pp. 1 ff.
James, Thomas W., Robert F. Potter, Sungkyoung Lee, Sunah Kim, Ryan A. Stevenson & Annie Lang
2015. How Realistic Should Avatars Be?. Journal of Media Psychology 27:3 ► pp. 109 ff.
Jia, Jing Wen, Namho Chung & Jooyoung Hwang
2021. Assessing the hotel service robot interaction on tourists' behaviour: the role of anthropomorphism. Industrial Management & Data Systems 121:6 ► pp. 1457 ff.
Jones, Keith S. & Elizabeth A. Schmidlin
2011. Human-Robot Interaction. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 7:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
Jones, Raya A.
2013. Relationalism through Social Robotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
Kahn, Peter H., Rachel L. Severson & Jolina H. Ruckert
2009. Technological Nature – And the Problem When Good Enough Becomes Good. In New Visions of Nature, ► pp. 21 ff.
Kahn, , Peter H. & Solace Shen
2017. NOC NOC, Who’s There? A New Ontological Category (NOC) for Social Robots. In New Perspectives on Human Development, ► pp. 106 ff.
Kamide, Hiroko, Koji Kawabe, Satoshi Shigemi & Tatsuo Arai
2014. Relationship between familiarity and humanness of robots – quantification of psychological impressions toward humanoid robots. Advanced Robotics 28:12 ► pp. 821 ff.
Kanngiesser, Patricia, Shoji Itakura, Yue Zhou, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Bruce Hood
2015. The role of social eye-gaze in children’s and adults’ ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Karnouskos, Stamatis
2020. Artificial Intelligence in Digital Media: The Era of Deepfakes. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 1:3 ► pp. 138 ff.
Karuzaki, Effie, Nikolaos Partarakis, Nikolaos Patsiouras, Emmanouil Zidianakis, Antonios Katzourakis, Antreas Pattakos, Danae Kaplanidi, Evangelia Baka, Nedjma Cadi, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, Chris Ringas, Eleana Tasiopoulou & Xenophon Zabulis
2021. Realistic Virtual Humans for Cultural Heritage Applications. Heritage 4:4 ► pp. 4148 ff.
Katevas, Kleomenis, Patrick G. T. Healey & Matthew Tobias Harris
2015. Robot Comedy Lab: experimenting with the social dynamics of live performance. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Kemp, Charles C., Paul Fitzpatrick, Hirohisa Hirukawa, Kazuhito Yokoi, Kensuke Harada & Yoshio Matsumoto
2008. Humanoids. In Springer Handbook of Robotics, ► pp. 1307 ff.
Kenny, Sophie, Naureen Mahmood, Claire Honda, Michael J. Black & Nikolaus F. Troje
2019. Perceptual Effects of Inconsistency in Human Animations. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, Boyoung, Micala Bruce, LeSean Brown, Ewart de Visser & Elizabeth Phillips
2020. 2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, Boyoung, Ewart de Visser & Elizabeth Phillips
2022. Two uncanny valleys: Re-evaluating the uncanny valley across the full spectrum of real-world human-like robots. Computers in Human Behavior 135 ► pp. 107340 ff.
Kim, Jun San, Dahyun Kang, JongSuk Choi & Sonya S. Kwak
2022. Effects of Realistic Appearance and Consumer Gender on Pet Robot Adoption. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13818], ► pp. 627 ff.
Kim, Seo Young, Bernd H. Schmitt & Nadia M. Thalmann
2019. Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking. Marketing Letters 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, Seoyoung & Yoonhyuk Jung
2023. Development of Semantic Differential Scales for Artificial Intelligence Agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:7 ► pp. 1155 ff.
Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, Jens & Mathias Clasen
2023. Creepiness and the Uncanny. Style 57:3 ► pp. 322 ff.
Knox, W. Bradley, Brian D. Glass, Bradley C. Love, W. Todd Maddox & Peter Stone
2012. How Humans Teach Agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 4:4 ► pp. 409 ff.
Kohler, Petra, Sebastian Pannasch & Boris M. Velichkovsky
2009. Enhancing Mutual Awareness, Productivity, and Feeling: Cognitive Science Approach to Design of Groupware Systems. In Future Interaction Design II, ► pp. 31 ff.
Kolb, Daniel
2022. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, ► pp. 1 ff.
Koschate, Miriam, Richard Potter, Paul Bremner & Mark Levine
2016. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 359 ff.
Kose-Bagci, Hatice, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Dag S. Syrdal & Chrystopher L. Nehaniv
2010. Drum-mate: interaction dynamics and gestures in human–humanoid drumming experiments. Connection Science 22:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Krueger, Frank, Kelsey C. Mitchell, Gopikrishna Deshpande & Jeffrey S. Katz
2021. Human–dog relationships as a working framework for exploring human–robot attachment: a multidisciplinary review. Animal Cognition 24:2 ► pp. 371 ff.
Krumhuber, Eva G., Lina Skora, Dennis Küster & Linyun Fou
2017. A Review of Dynamic Datasets for Facial Expression Research. Emotion Review 9:3 ► pp. 280 ff.
Kuzminykh, Anastasia, Jenny Sun, Nivetha Govindaraju, Jeff Avery & Edward Lank
2020. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Kätsyri, Jari, Klaus Förger, Meeri Mäkäräinen & Tapio Takala
2015. A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Kätsyri, Jari, Beatrice de Gelder & Tapio Takala
2019. Virtual Faces Evoke Only a Weak Uncanny Valley Effect: An Empirical Investigation With Controlled Virtual Face Images. Perception 48:10 ► pp. 968 ff.
Kätsyri, Jari, Meeri Mäkäräinen & Tapio Takala
2017. Testing the ‘uncanny valley’ hypothesis in semirealistic computer-animated film characters: An empirical evaluation of natural film stimuli. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 97 ► pp. 149 ff.
Küster, Dennis, Eva Krumhuber & Arvid Kappas
2015. Nonverbal Behavior Online: A Focus on Interactions with and via Artificial Agents and Avatars. In The Social Psychology of Nonverbal Communication, ► pp. 272 ff.
Lan, Junbang, Bocong Yuan & Yuanyuan Gong
2022. RETRACTED: Predicting the change trajectory of employee robot-phobia in the workplace: The role of perceived robot advantageousness and anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior 135 ► pp. 107366 ff.
Lawrence, Louise & Deborah Abdel Nabi
2013. The Compilation and Validation of a Collection of Emotional Expression Images Communicated by Synthetic and Human Faces. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions 4:2 ► pp. 34 ff.
Lee, Billy
2006. Empathy, androids and ‘authentic experience’. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 419 ff.
Lee, Joseph
2016. Brain–computer interfaces and dualism: a problem of brain, mind, and body. AI & SOCIETY 31:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Lehmann, Stephanie, Esther Ruf & Sabina Misoch
2021. Emotions and Attitudes of Older Adults Toward Robots of Different Appearances and in Different Situations. In Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1387], ► pp. 21 ff.
Leung, Rosanna
2022. “Konnichiwa, Mr. Robot”: a direct observation of hotel visitors' attitudes and anxiety regarding service robots. International Hospitality Review
Li, Jamy
2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 77 ► pp. 23 ff.
Liao, Shilong, Long Lin, Qin Chen & Hairun Pei
2024. Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Lin, Chaolan, Selma Šabanović, Lynn Dombrowski, Andrew D. Miller, Erin Brady & Karl F. MacDorman
2021. Parental Acceptance of Children’s Storytelling Robots: A Projection of the Uncanny Valley of AI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8
Lindblom, Jessica
2015. Discussion and Conclusions. In Embodied Social Cognition [Cognitive Systems Monographs, 26], ► pp. 263 ff.
Lindblom, Jessica & Tom Ziemke
2006. The social body in motion: cognitive development in infants and androids. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 333 ff.
Lischetzke, Tanja, David Izydorczyk, Christina Hüller & Markus Appel
2017. The topography of the uncanny valley and individuals’ need for structure: A nonlinear mixed effects analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 68 ► pp. 96 ff.
Liu, Xiaofeng, Yizhou Chen, Jie Li & Angelo Cangelosi
2023. Real-Time Robotic Mirrored Behavior of Facial Expressions and Head Motions Based on Lightweight Networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10:2 ► pp. 1401 ff.
Lomanowska, Anna M. & Matthieu J. Guitton
2014. My avatar is pregnant! Representation of pregnancy, birth, and maternity in a virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior 31 ► pp. 322 ff.
Lortie, Catherine L., Matthieu J. Guitton & Attila Szolnoki
2011. Judgment of the Humanness of an Interlocutor Is in the Eye of the Beholder. PLoS ONE 6:9 ► pp. e25085 ff.
Lozano-Goupil, Juliette, Ludovic Marin, Lise Aubin, Amandine Decombe, Hélène Serré, Delphine Capdevielle, Ghilès Mostafaoui & Stéphane Raffard
2024. Impaired perception of a partner's synchronizing behavior reduces positive attitude toward humanoid robot in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Research 264 ► pp. 511 ff.
Lu, Chia-Chen & Yuan-Ming Lin
2017. Exploring preschool children’s preferences for artificial animal appearances according to the uncanny valley phenomenon. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
López, Joaquín, Diego Pérez, Eduardo Zalama & Jaime Gómez-García-Bermejo
2013. BellBot - A Hotel Assistant System Using Mobile Robots. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 10:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F, Joseph A Coram, Chin-Chang Ho & Himalaya Patel
2010. Gender Differences in the Impact of Presentational Factors in Human Character Animation on Decisions in Ethical Dilemmas. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19:3 ► pp. 213 ff.
Macdorman, Karl F.
2006. Introduction to the special issue on android science. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 313 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F.
2019. In the uncanny valley, transportation predicts narrative enjoyment more than empathy, but only for the tragic hero. Computers in Human Behavior 94 ► pp. 140 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F.
2024. Does mind perception explain the uncanny valley? A meta-regression analysis and (de)humanization experiment. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans ► pp. 100065 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F.
2019. La Vallée de l’Étrange de Mori Masahiro. e-Phaïstos :VII-2
MacDorman, Karl F. & Debaleena Chattopadhyay
2016. Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not. Cognition 146 ► pp. 190 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F. & Steven O. Entezari
2015. Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F., Robert D. Green, Chin-Chang Ho & Clinton T. Koch
2009. Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior 25:3 ► pp. 695 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F., Hiroshi Nobuta, Satoshi Koizumi & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2007. Memory-Based Attention Control for Activity Recognition at a Subway Station. IEEE Multimedia 14:2 ► pp. 38 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F., Preethi Srinivas & Himalaya Patel
2013. The uncanny valley does not interfere with level 1 visual perspective taking. Computers in Human Behavior 29:4 ► pp. 1671 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F., Sandosh K. Vasudevan & Chin-Chang Ho
2009. Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI & SOCIETY 23:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Macias-Huerta, Pablo Isaac, Carlos Natanael Lecona-Valdespino, Guillermo Santamaría-Bonfil & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
2024. Can We Take Out CARLA from the Uncanny Valley? Analyzing Avatar Design of an Educational Conversational Agent. In Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2023 International Workshops [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14502], ► pp. 50 ff.
Mahdi, Hamza, Sami Alperen Akgun, Shahed Saleh & Kerstin Dautenhahn
2022. A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and future. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 156 ► pp. 104193 ff.
Makarius, Erin E., Debmalya Mukherjee, Joseph D. Fox & Alexa K. Fox
2020. Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research 120 ► pp. 262 ff.
Mandl, Sarah, Jennifer Brade, Maximilian Bretschneider, Frank Asbrock, Bertolt Meyer, Georg Jahn, Philipp Klimant & Anja Strobel
2023. Perception of embodied digital technologies: robots and telepresence systems. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration 5:1-2 ► pp. 43 ff.
Manzi, Federico, Davide Massaro, Daniele Di Lernia, Mario A. Maggioni, Giuseppe Riva & Antonella Marchetti
2021. Robots Are Not All the Same: Young Adults' Expectations, Attitudes, and Mental Attribution to Two Humanoid Social Robots. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24:5 ► pp. 307 ff.
Manzi, Federico, Giulia Peretti, Cinzia Di Dio, Angelo Cangelosi, Shoji Itakura, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Davide Massaro & Antonella Marchetti
2020. A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children’s Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Mara, Martina & Markus Appel
2015. Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots. Computers in Human Behavior 44 ► pp. 326 ff.
Mara, Martina & Markus Appel
2015. Science fiction reduces the eeriness of android robots: A field experiment. Computers in Human Behavior 48 ► pp. 156 ff.
Mara, Martina, Markus Appel & Timo Gnambs
2022. Human-Like Robots and the Uncanny Valley. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 230:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Marchetti, Antonella, Cinzia Di Dio, Davide Massaro & Federico Manzi
2020. The Psychosocial Fuzziness of Fear in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Era and the Role of Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Marcos-Pablos, Samuel & Francisco José García-Peñalvo
2022. Emotional Intelligence in Robotics: A Scoping Review. In New Trends in Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1410], ► pp. 66 ff.
Masson, Oliveir, Jean Baratgin & Frank Jamet
2017. 2017 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT), ► pp. 256 ff.
Masson, Olivier, Jean Baratgin, Frank Jamet, Fabien Ruggieri & Darya Filatova
2016. 2016 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT), ► pp. 190 ff.
Mastrogiovanni, Fulvio, Lorenzo Natale, Giorgio Cannata & Giorgio Metta
2015. Special issue on advances in tactile sensing and tactile-based human–robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 63 ► pp. 227 ff.
Matsuda, Goh, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Kazuo Hiraki
2015. Infant discrimination of humanoid robots. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Matsui, Tetsuya & Seiji Yamada
2018. 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 88 ff.
Matsumoto, Kazuyuki, Manabu Sasayama, Minoru Yoshida & Kenji Kita
2019. 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), ► pp. 31 ff.
Matsusaka, Yosuke
2008. History and Current Researches on Building a Human Interface for Humanoid Robots. In Modeling Communication with Robots and Virtual Humans [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4930], ► pp. 109 ff.
Mazuz, Keren & Ryuji Yamazaki
2023. Adaptive learning in human–android interactions: an anthropological analysis of play and ritual. AI & SOCIETY
Mazzei, Daniele, Nicole Lazzeri, David Hanson & Danilo De Rossi
2012. 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), ► pp. 195 ff.
Mende, Melinda A., Martin H. Fischer & Katharina Kühne
2019. The Use of Social Robots and the Uncanny Valley Phenomenon. In AI Love You, ► pp. 41 ff.
Meyer, Jean-Arcady & Agnès Guillot
2008. Biologically Inspired Robots. In Springer Handbook of Robotics, ► pp. 1395 ff.
Meyer, Stefanie, Sarah Mandl, Dagmar Gesmann-Nuissl & Anja Strobel
2023. Responsibility in Hybrid Societies: concepts and terms. AI and Ethics 3:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Micheletti, Silvia
2018. Hybrids of the Romantic: Frankenstein, Olimpia, and Artificial Life. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41:2 ► pp. 146 ff.
Mikami, Takuya & Jun Fujiki
2022. Development of a method to improve the empathy of observers by virtual experience of becoming a plant.. The Journal of the Society for Art and Science 21:2 ► pp. 37 ff.
Miklósi, Ádám, Péter Korondi, Vicente Matellán & Márta Gácsi
2017. Ethorobotics: A New Approach to Human-Robot Relationship. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Misselhorn, Catrin
2009. Empathy with Inanimate Objects and the Uncanny Valley. Minds and Machines 19:3 ► pp. 345 ff.
Mitchell, Wade J, Kevin A Szerszen, Amy Shirong Lu, Paul W Schermerhorn, Matthias Scheutz & Karl F MacDorman
2011. A Mismatch in the Human Realism of Face and Voice Produces an Uncanny Valley. i-Perception 2:1 ► pp. 10 ff.
Mitchell, Wade J., Chin-Chang Ho, Himalaya Patel & Karl F. MacDorman
2011. Does social desirability bias favor humans? Explicit–implicit evaluations of synthesized speech support a new HCI model of impression management. Computers in Human Behavior 27:1 ► pp. 402 ff.
Miura, N., M. Sugiura, M. Takahashi, T. Moridaira, A. Miyamoto, Y. Kuroki & R. Kawashima
2008. 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, ► pp. 2465 ff.
Mohammad, Yasser & Toyoaki Nishida
2015. Introduction to Social Robotics. In Data Mining for Social Robotics [Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, ], ► pp. 171 ff.
Mol, Artur Martins, Romulo Santos Silva & Lucila Ishitani
2019. 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), ► pp. 1 ff.
Moore, Roger K.
2012. A Bayesian explanation of the ‘Uncanny Valley’ effect and related psychological phenomena. Scientific Reports 2:1
Mouritzen, Simone Lykke Tranholm, Valeria Penttinen & Susanne Pedersen
2024. Virtual influencer marketing: the good, the bad and the unreal. European Journal of Marketing 58:2 ► pp. 410 ff.
Mousas, Christos, Dimitris Anastasiou & Ourania Spantidi
2018. The effects of appearance and motion of virtual characters on emotional reactivity. Computers in Human Behavior 86 ► pp. 99 ff.
Mustafa, Maryam, Stefan Guthe, Jan-Philipp Tauscher, Michael Goesele & Marcus Magnor
2017. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 5098 ff.
Mutlu, Bilge, Nicholas Roy & Selma Šabanović
2016. Cognitive Human–Robot Interaction. In Springer Handbook of Robotics [Springer Handbooks, ], ► pp. 1907 ff.
Muzyka, Kamil
2020. The basic rules for coexistence: The possible applicability of metalaw for human-AGI relations. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 11:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Mäkäräinen, Meeri, Jari Kätsyri, Klaus Förger & Tapio Takala
2015. Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, ► pp. 175 ff.
Mäkäräinen, Meeri, Jari Kätsyri & Tapio Takala
2014. Exaggerating Facial Expressions: A Way to Intensify Emotion or a Way to the Uncanny Valley?. Cognitive Computation 6:4 ► pp. 708 ff.
Nishio, Shuichi, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Norihiro Hagita
2018. Can a Teleoperated Android Represent Personal Presence?—A Case Study with Children. In Geminoid Studies, ► pp. 189 ff.
Nishio, Shuichi, Hideyuki Nakanishi & Tsutomu Fujinami
2016. Editorial: Investigating Human Nature and Communication through Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Nitsch, V. & M. Popp
2014. Emotions in robot psychology. Biological Cybernetics 108:5 ► pp. 621 ff.
Niño, Maria Fernanda
2018. Le Soi dans un autre corps. Interfaces numériques 2:1
Ogawa, Kohei, Shuichi Nishio, Kensuke Koda, Giuseppe Balistreri, Tetsuya Watanabe & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2011. Exploring the Natural Reaction of Young and Aged Person with Telenoid in a Real World. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 15:5 ► pp. 592 ff.
Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio
2018. Wrong outside, wrong inside: A social functionalist approach to the uncanny feeling. New Ideas in Psychology 50 ► pp. 38 ff.
Ollivier-Garza, Roberto
2017. Identifying the Uncanny Phenomena in Educational Practice. SSRN Electronic Journal
Osawa, Hirotaka, Yuji Matsuda, Ren Ohmura & Michita Imai
2010. 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 179 ff.
Otterbacher, Jahna & Michael Talias
2017. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 214 ff.
OYAMA, Hideki & Akiyoshi KABE
2020. Effects of Motion and Voice of an Interactive Robot on Mood of Humans: A Pilot Study. The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics 56:4 ► pp. 123 ff.
Patel, Himalaya, Lauren C. Bayliss, James D. Ivory, Kendall Woodard, Alexandra McCarthy & Karl F. MacDorman
2014. Receptive to bad reception: Jerky motion can make persuasive messages more effective. Computers in Human Behavior 32 ► pp. 32 ff.
Patel, Himalaya & Karl F. MacDorman
2015. Sending an Avatar to Do a Human's Job: Compliance with Authority Persists Despite the Uncanny Valley. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pearson, Yvette & Jason Borenstein
2014. Creating “companions” for children: the ethics of designing esthetic features for robots. AI & SOCIETY 29:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Pelachaud, Catherine, Carlos Busso & Dirk Heylen
2021. Multimodal Behavior Modeling for Socially Interactive Agents. In The Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents, ► pp. 259 ff.
Pfadenhauer, Michaela & Christoph Dukat
2015. Robot Caregiver or Robot-Supported Caregiving?. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:3 ► pp. 393 ff.
Pfadenhauer, Michaela & Christoph Dukat
2016. Zur Wirkung von Technik. In Materiale Analysen, ► pp. 33 ff.
Pino, Maribel, Mélodie Boulay, François Jouen & Anne-Sophie Rigaud
2015. “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 7
Pinsent, Andrew
2015. Neurotheological Eudaimonia. In Handbook of Neuroethics, ► pp. 1603 ff.
Piwek, Lukasz, Lawrie S. McKay & Frank E. Pollick
2014. Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition 130:3 ► pp. 271 ff.
Platek, Steven M., Amir Hasicic & Austen L. Krill
2011. Boldly going where no brain has gone: Futures of evolutionary cognitive neuroscience. Futures 43:8 ► pp. 771 ff.
Poliakoff, Ellen, Natalie Beach, Rebecca Best, Toby Howard & Emma Gowen
2013. Can Looking at a Hand Make Your Skin Crawl? Peering into the Uncanny Valley for Hands. Perception 42:9 ► pp. 998 ff.
Poliakoff, Ellen, Sophie O’Kane, Olivia Carefoot, Peter Kyberd & Emma Gowen
2018. Investigating the uncanny valley for prosthetic hands. Prosthetics & Orthotics International 42:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Pollick, Frank E.
2010. In Search of the Uncanny Valley. In User Centric Media [Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 40], ► pp. 69 ff.
Porra, Jaana, Mary Lacity & Michael S. Parks
2020. “Can Computer Based Human-Likeness Endanger Humanness?” – A Philosophical and Ethical Perspective on Digital Assistants Expressing Feelings They Can’t Have”. Information Systems Frontiers 22:3 ► pp. 533 ff.
Power, Patrick
2008. Character Animation and the Embodied Mind—Brain. Animation 3:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Prakash, Akanksha & Wendy A. Rogers
2013. Younger and Older Adults’ Attitudes Toward Robot Faces. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Prakash, Akanksha & Wendy A. Rogers
2015. Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively Than Others: Effects of Human-Likeness and Task. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:2 ► pp. 309 ff.
Prescott, Tony J. & Julie M. Robillard
2021. Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships. iScience 24:1 ► pp. 101993 ff.
Qiao, Si & Roger Eglin
2011. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, ► pp. 545 ff.
Ratajczyk, Dawid, Marcin Jukiewicz & Pawel Lupkowski
2019. Evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis based on declared emotional response and psychophysiological reaction. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 15:2
Ray, Prayag
2016. ‘Synthetik Love Lasts Forever’: Sex Dolls and the (Post?)Human Condition. In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, ► pp. 91 ff.
Riccio, Thomas
2021. Sophia Robot. TDR: The Drama Review 65:3 ► pp. 42 ff.
Richert, Anja, Sarah Müller, Stefan Schröder & Sabina Jeschke
2018. Anthropomorphism in social robotics: empirical results on human–robot interaction in hybrid production workplaces. AI & SOCIETY 33:3 ► pp. 413 ff.
Ringas, Christodoulos, Eleana Tasiopoulou, Danae Kaplanidi, Nikolaos Partarakis, Xenophon Zabulis, Emmanouil Zidianakis, Andreas Patakos, Nikolaos Patsiouras, Effie Karuzaki, Michalis Foukarakis, Ilia Adami, Nedjma Cadi, Evangelia Baka, Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, Dimitrios Makrygiannis, Alina Glushkova, Sotirios Manitsaris, Vito Nitti & Lucia Panesse
2022. Traditional Craft Training and Demonstration in Museums. Heritage 5:1 ► pp. 431 ff.
Romero, Peter & Stephen Fitz
2021. The Use of Psychometrics and Artificial Intelligence in Alternative Finance. In The Palgrave Handbook of Technological Finance, ► pp. 511 ff.
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Astrid M. & Nicole C. Krämer
2014. How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses. Computers in Human Behavior 36 ► pp. 422 ff.
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Astrid M. & Nicole C. Krämer
2015. Individuals’ Evaluations of and Attitudes Towards Potentially Uncanny Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:5 ► pp. 799 ff.
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Astrid M., Nicole C. Krämer, Christian Becker-Asano, Kohei Ogawa, Shuichi Nishio & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2014. The Uncanny in the Wild. Analysis of Unscripted Human–Android Interaction in the Field. International Journal of Social Robotics 6:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Rossi, Alessandra, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Kheng Lee Koay & Michael L. Walters
2023. A matter of consequences. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 24:3 ► pp. 380 ff.
Ryan, Mark, Simone van der Burg & Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt
2022. Identifying key ethical debates for autonomous robots in agri-food: a research agenda. AI and Ethics 2:3 ► pp. 493 ff.
Salem, M, S Kopp, I Wachsmuth & F Joublin
2010. 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, ► pp. 3592 ff.
Salem, Maha, Stefan Kopp, Ipke Wachsmuth & Frank Joublin
2009. Towards Meaningful Robot Gesture. In Human Centered Robot Systems [Cognitive Systems Monographs, 6], ► pp. 173 ff.
Salem, Maha, Stefan Kopp, Ipke Wachsmuth & Frank Joublin
2010. 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 614 ff.
Salem, Maha, Stefan Kopp, Ipke Wachsmuth, Katharina Rohlfing & Frank Joublin
2012. Generation and Evaluation of Communicative Robot Gesture. International Journal of Social Robotics 4:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Saltik, Imge, Deniz Erdil & Burcu A. Urgen
2021. Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 210 ff.
Salvini, Pericle, Diego Paez-Granados & Aude Billard
2022. Safety Concerns Emerging from Robots Navigating in Crowded Pedestrian Areas. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:2 ► pp. 441 ff.
Sarigul, Busra & Burcu A. Urgen
2023. Audio–Visual Predictive Processing in the Perception of Humans and Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:5 ► pp. 855 ff.
Sasaki, Kyoshiro, Keiko Ihaya & Yuki Yamada
2017. Avoidance of Novelty Contributes to the Uncanny Valley. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Saygin, Ayse Pinar, Thierry Chaminade, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Jon Driver & Chris Frith
2012. The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7:4 ► pp. 413 ff.
Schoenherr, Jordan Richard & Tyler J. Burleigh
2020. Dissociating affective and cognitive dimensions of uncertainty by altering regulatory focus. Acta Psychologica 205 ► pp. 103017 ff.
Schreibelmayr, Simon, Laura Moradbakhti & Martina Mara
2023. First impressions of a financial AI assistant: differences between high trust and low trust users. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6
Schweinberger, Stefan R., Maike Pohl & Paul Winkler
2020. Autistic traits, personality, and evaluations of humanoid robots by young and older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 106 ► pp. 106256 ff.
Scott, Ava Elizabeth, Daniel Neumann, Jasmin Niess & Paweł W. Woźniak
2023. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
Seyama, Jun'ichiro & Ruth S Nagayama
2009. Probing the Uncanny Valley with the Eye Size Aftereffect. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18:5 ► pp. 321 ff.
Sharma, Medha & Kavita Vemuri
2022. Accepting Human-like Avatars in Social and Professional Roles. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
Shaw-Garlock, Glenda
2009. Looking Forward to Sociable Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1:3 ► pp. 249 ff.
Shaw-Garlock, Glenda
2011. Loving Machines: Theorizing Human and Sociable-Technology Interaction. In Human-Robot Personal Relationships [Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 59], ► pp. 1 ff.
Shimada, Michihiro, Takashi Minato, Shoji Itakura & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2007. RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 374 ff.
Shimada, Michihiro, Takashi Minato, Shoji Itakura & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2018. Uncanny Valley of Androids and the Lateral Inhibition Hypothesis. In Geminoid Studies, ► pp. 137 ff.
Shin, Mincheol, Se Jung Kim & Frank Biocca
2019. The uncanny valley: No need for any further judgments when an avatar looks eerie. Computers in Human Behavior 94 ► pp. 100 ff.
Siebert, Ramona, Nick Taubert, Silvia Spadacenta, Peter W. Dicke, Martin A. Giese & Peter Thier
2020. A Naturalistic Dynamic Monkey Head Avatar Elicits Species-Typical Reactions and Overcomes the Uncanny Valley. eneuro 7:4 ► pp. ENEURO.0524-19.2020 ff.
Singh, Smita, Eric D. Olson & Chin-Hsun (Ken) Tsai
2021. Use of service robots in an event setting: Understanding the role of social presence, eeriness, and identity threat. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 49 ► pp. 528 ff.
Smith, Philip
2014. Of ‘near pollution’ and non-linear cultural effects: Reflections on Masahiro Mori and the Uncanny Valley. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 2:3 ► pp. 329 ff.
Sovhyra, Tetiana
2021. ROBOTIC THEATRE: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN AND MECHANIZED ACTIVITIES IN THE CREATIVE PROCESS. Creativity Studies 14:2 ► pp. 295 ff.
Sovhyra, Tetiana
2022. THE ISSUE OF TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM IN ARTISTIC PRACTICES: CULTURAL REFLECTIONS. Culture and Arts in the Modern World :23 ► pp. 138 ff.
Nicolas Spatola
2019. L’interaction Homme-Robot, de l’anthropomorphisme à l’humanisation. L’Année psychologique Vol. 119:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
Spatola, Nicolas, Sophie Monceau & Ludovic Ferrand
2020. Cognitive Impact of Social Robots: How Anthropomorphism Boosts Performances. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 27:3 ► pp. 73 ff.
Srinivas Aditya, U.S.P., Roshan Singh, Pranav Kumar Singh & Anshuman Kalla
2021. A Survey on Blockchain in Robotics: Issues, Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 196 ► pp. 103245 ff.
Steckenfinger, Shawn A. & Asif A. Ghazanfar
2009. Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:43 ► pp. 18362 ff.
Stein, Jan-Philipp, Benny Liebold & Peter Ohler
2019. Stay back, clever thing! Linking situational control and human uniqueness concerns to the aversion against autonomous technology. Computers in Human Behavior 95 ► pp. 73 ff.
Stein, Jan-Philipp & Peter Ohler
2017. Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind—The influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting. Cognition 160 ► pp. 43 ff.
Stein, Jan-Philipp & Peter Ohler
2018. Uncanny…But Convincing? Inconsistency Between a Virtual Agent’s Facial Proportions and Vocal Realism Reduces Its Credibility and Attractiveness, but Not Its Persuasive Success. Interacting with Computers 30:6 ► pp. 480 ff.
Stock, Anna, Stephan Schlögl & Aleksander Groth
2023. Tell Me, What Are You Most Afraid Of? Exploring the Effects of Agent Representation on Information Disclosure in Human-Chatbot Interaction. In Artificial Intelligence in HCI [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14051], ► pp. 179 ff.
Stock-Homburg, Ruth
2022. Survey of Emotions in Human–Robot Interactions: Perspectives from Robotic Psychology on 20 Years of Research. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:2 ► pp. 389 ff.
Stock-Homburg, Ruth, Martin Hannig & Lucie Lilienthal
2020. Conversational Flow in Human-Robot Interactions at the Workplace: Comparing Humanoid and Android Robots. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12483], ► pp. 578 ff.
Strait, Megan, Heather L. Urry & Paul Muentener
2019. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 506 ff.
Sugiyama, Osamu, Takayuki Kanda, Michita Imai, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norihiro Hagita & Yuichiro Anzai
2006. Humanlike conversation with gestures and verbal cues based on a three-layer attention-drawing model. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
Sullivan, Yulia, Marc de Bourmont & Mary Dunaway
2022. Appraisals of harms and injustice trigger an eerie feeling that decreases trust in artificial intelligence systems. Annals of Operations Research 308:1-2 ► pp. 525 ff.
Sundar, S. Shyam, Eun Hwa Jung, T. Franklin Waddell & Ki Joon Kim
2017. Cheery companions or serious assistants? Role and demeanor congruity as predictors of robot attraction and use intentions among senior citizens. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 97 ► pp. 88 ff.
Szczuka, Jessica M. & Nicole C. Krämer
2019. There’s More to Humanity Than Meets the Eye: Differences in Gaze Behavior Toward Women and Gynoid Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Takahashi, Kohske, Haruaki Fukuda, Kazuyuki Samejima, Katsumi Watanabe & Kazuhiro Ueda
2015. Impact of stimulus uncanniness on speeded response. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Tamura, Yuri, Shinji Kuriki & Tamami Nakano
2015. Involvement of the left insula in the ecological validity of the human voice. Scientific Reports 5:1
Taylor, Jebediah, Staci Meredith Weiss & Peter J. Marshall
2020. “Alexa, how are you feeling today?”. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 21:3 ► pp. 329 ff.
Thalmann, Nadia Magnenat & Daniel Thalmann
2015. SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Courses, ► pp. 1 ff.
Thalmann, Nadia Magnenat, Daniel Thalmann & Zerrin Yumak
2014. SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Courses, ► pp. 1 ff.
Thellman, Sam & Tom Ziemke
2017. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 299 ff.
Thepsoonthorn, Chidchanok, Ken-ichiro Ogawa & Yoshihiro Miyake
2021. The Exploration of the Uncanny Valley from the Viewpoint of the Robot’s Nonverbal Behaviour. International Journal of Social Robotics 13:6 ► pp. 1443 ff.
Thompson, James C, J Gregory Trafton & Patrick McKnight
2011. The Perception of Humanness from the Movements of Synthetic Agents. Perception 40:6 ► pp. 695 ff.
Thunberg, Sofia, Sam Thellman & Tom Ziemke
2017. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, ► pp. 443 ff.
Tillman, Deborah Turnbull & Mari Velonaki
2023. On Display: Robots as Culture. In Cultural Robotics: Social Robots and Their Emergent Cultural Ecologies [Springer Series on Cultural Computing, ], ► pp. 257 ff.
Tinwell, A. & M. Grimshaw
2009. Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era, ► pp. 66 ff.
Tinwell, Angela, Mark Grimshaw & Andrew Williams
2010. Uncanny behaviour in survival horror games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 2:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Tinwell, Angela, Mark Grimshaw & Andrew Williams
2011. Uncanny Speech. In Game Sound Technology and Player Interaction, ► pp. 213 ff.
Tinwell, Angela & Robin J.S. Sloan
2014. Children’s perception of uncanny human-like virtual characters. Computers in Human Behavior 36 ► pp. 286 ff.
Torresen, Jim
2018. A Review of Future and Ethical Perspectives of Robotics and AI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4
TSUKIMOTO, Takashi
2017. A Kansei-evaluation Study on the Uncanny Valley of Real-world Robots. Transactions of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering 16:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Tu, Yun-Chen, Sung-En Chien & Su-Ling Yeh
2020. Age-Related Differences in the Uncanny Valley Effect. Gerontology 66:4 ► pp. 382 ff.
Tulk Jesso, Stephanie, William G. Kennedy & Eva Wiese
2020. Behavioral Cues of Humanness in Complex Environments: How People Engage With Human and Artificially Intelligent Agents in a Multiplayer Videogame. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7
Turkle, Sherry
2011. Authenticity in the Age of Digital Companions. In Machine Ethics, ► pp. 62 ff.
Turkle, Sherry, Will Taggart, Cory D. Kidd & Olivia Dasté
2006. Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Science 18:4 ► pp. 347 ff.
Ueno, Azumi, Vaclav Hlavac, Ikuo Mizuuchi & Matej Hoffmann
2020. 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 14 ff.
Ueyama, Yuki & Valsamma Eapen
2015. A Bayesian Model of the Uncanny Valley Effect for Explaining the Effects of Therapeutic Robots in Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLOS ONE 10:9 ► pp. e0138642 ff.
Vaitonytė, Julija, Maryam Alimardani & Max M. Louwerse
2023. Scoping review of the neural evidence on the uncanny valley. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 9 ► pp. 100263 ff.
Vanman, Eric J. & Arvid Kappas
2019. “Danger, Will Robinson!” The challenges of social robots for intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 13:8
Vogan, Alistair A., Fady Alnajjar, Munkhjargal Gochoo & Sumayya Khalid
2020. Robots, AI, and Cognitive Training in an Era of Mass Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 8 ► pp. 18284 ff.
von der Pütten, Astrid M., Nicole C. Krämer, Christian Becker-Asano & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2011. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, ► pp. 283 ff.
von der Pütten, Astrid M., Nicole C. Krämer, Christian Becker-Asano, Kohei Ogawa, Shuichi Nishio & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2018. At the Café—Exploration and Analysis of People’s Nonverbal Behavior Toward an Android. In Geminoid Studies, ► pp. 375 ff.
von der Pütten, Astrid Marieke & Nicole C. Krämer
2012. Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 267 ff.
Wagner, Wolfgang, Nicole Kronberger, Motohiko Nagata, Ragini Sen, Peter Holtz & Fátima Flores Palacios
2010. Essentialist theory of ‘hybrids’: From animal kinds to ethnic categories and race. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 13:4 ► pp. 232 ff.
Walliser, James C., Ewart J. de Visser, Eva Wiese & Tyler H. Shaw
2019. Team Structure and Team Building Improve Human–Machine Teaming With Autonomous Agents. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 13:4 ► pp. 258 ff.
Walliser, James C., Patrick R. Mead & Tyler H. Shaw
2017. The Perception of Teamwork With an Autonomous Agent Enhances Affect and Performance Outcomes. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61:1 ► pp. 231 ff.
Walters, M. L., D. S. Syrdal, K. L. Koay, K. Dautenhahn & R. te Boekhorst
2008. RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 707 ff.
Walters, Michael L., Dag S. Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, René te Boekhorst & Kheng Lee Koay
2008. Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Autonomous Robots 24:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Wang, Heting, Vidya Gaddy, James Ross Beveridge & Francisco R. Ortega
2021. Building an Emotionally Responsive Avatar with Dynamic Facial Expressions in Human—Computer Interactions. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 5:3 ► pp. 13 ff.
Wang, Shensheng, Yuk F. Cheong, Daniel D. Dilks & Philippe Rochat
2020. The Uncanny Valley Phenomenon and the Temporal Dynamics of Face Animacy Perception. Perception 49:10 ► pp. 1069 ff.
Wang, Shensheng, Scott O. Lilienfeld & Philippe Rochat
2015. The Uncanny Valley: Existence and Explanations. Review of General Psychology 19:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Wang, Shensheng & Philippe Rochat
2017. Human Perception of Animacy in Light of the Uncanny Valley Phenomenon. Perception 46:12 ► pp. 1386 ff.
Wang, Yin & Susanne Quadflieg
2015. In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human–humanvshuman–robot interactions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 10:11 ► pp. 1515 ff.
Warta, Samantha F.
2015. If a Robot did “The Robot,” would it still be called “The Robot” or just Dancing? Perceptual and Social Factors in Human-Robot Interactions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59:1 ► pp. 796 ff.
Waytz, Adam, Kurt Gray, Nicholas Epley & Daniel M. Wegner
2010. Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14:8 ► pp. 383 ff.
Weisman, William D. & Jorge F. Peña
2021. Face the Uncanny: The Effects of Doppelganger Talking Head Avatars on Affect-Based Trust Toward Artificial Intelligence Technology are Mediated by Uncanny Valley Perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24:3 ► pp. 182 ff.
Weiss, Astrid, Regina Bernhaupt, Manfred Tscheligi, Dirk Wollherr, Kolja Kuhnlenz & Martin Buss
2008. RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 713 ff.
Weller, Suzanne, Joost Broekens & Gabriel A. D. Lopes
2016. The Effect of Gravity on Perceived Affective Quality of Robot Movement. In Dance Notations and Robot Motion [Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 111], ► pp. 377 ff.
Wilson, Vanessa A. D., Carolin Kade, Sebastian Moeller, Stefan Treue, Igor Kagan & Julia Fischer
2020. Macaque Gaze Responses to the Primatar: A Virtual Macaque Head for Social Cognition Research. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Winterstein, Karin, Lisa Keller, Karsten Huffstadt & Nicholas H. Müller
2021. Acceptance of Social and Telepresence Robot Assistance in German Households. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Games and Virtual Environments for Learning [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12785], ► pp. 326 ff.
WITTHAYATHADA, Ongon & Koichi NISHIO
2021. A Study on the Expression of “A sense of being alive”. International Journal of Affective Engineering 20:4 ► pp. 275 ff.
Wolff, Susann & André Brechmann
2015. Carrot and stick 2.0: The benefits of natural and motivational prosody in computer-assisted learning. Computers in Human Behavior 43 ► pp. 76 ff.
Wood, Luke Jai, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Austen Rainer, Ben Robins, Hagen Lehmann, Dag Sverre Syrdal & Mel Slater
2013. Robot-Mediated Interviews - How Effective Is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children?. PLoS ONE 8:3 ► pp. e59448 ff.
Wu, Huiyue, Zhanming Chen, Yifan Huang & Huawei Tu
2024. Research on the uncanny valley effect in artificial intelligence news anchors. Multimedia Tools and Applications
Wu, Linwan & Taylor Jing Wen
2021. Understanding AI Advertising From the Consumer Perspective. Journal of Advertising Research 61:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Wykowska, Agnieszka, Jasmin Kajopoulos, Karinne Ramirez-Amaro & Gordon Cheng
2015. Autistic traits and sensitivity to human-like features of robot behavior. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Xie-Carson, Li, Thomas Magor, Pierre Benckendorff & Karen Hughes
2023. All hype or the real deal? Investigating user engagement with virtual influencers in tourism. Tourism Management 99 ► pp. 104779 ff.
Xue, Junting, Yanqun Huang, Xu Li, Jutao Li, Peng Zhang & Zhiyu Kang
2022. Emotional Influence of Pupillary Changes of Robots with Different Human-Likeness Levels on Human. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:7 ► pp. 1687 ff.
Yam, Jodie, Tingchen Gong & Hong Xu
2024. A stimulus exposure of 50 ms elicits the uncanny valley effect. Heliyon 10:6 ► pp. e27977 ff.
YAMADA, YUKI, TAKAHIRO KAWABE & KEIKO IHAYA
2013. Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon. Japanese Psychological Research 55:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Yan, Yuchen & Yunyi Jia
2022. A Review on Human Comfort Factors, Measurements, and Improvements in Human–Robot Collaboration. Sensors 22:19 ► pp. 7431 ff.
Yang, Hongyan, Hong Xu, Yan Zhang, Yan Liang & Ting Lyu
2022. Exploring the effect of humor in robot failure. Annals of Tourism Research 95 ► pp. 103425 ff.
Yin, Jun, Shiqi Wang, Wenjiao Guo & Meixuan Shao
2023. More than appearance: the uncanny valley effect changes with a robot’s mental capacity. Current Psychology 42:12 ► pp. 9867 ff.
Yonemitsu, Fumiya, Kyoshiro Sasaki, Akihiko Gobara, Yuki Yamada & Grzegorz Pochwatko
2021. The clone devaluation effect: A new uncanny phenomenon concerning facial identity. PLOS ONE 16:7 ► pp. e0254396 ff.
Yoshida, Hirokazu & Fumihide Tanaka
2018. 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 404 ff.
Yu, Chen, Paul Schermerhorn & Matthias Scheutz
2012. Adaptive eye gaze patterns in interactions with human and artificial agents. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 1:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Yuschenko, Arkady, Sergey Vorotnikov, Dmitry Konyshev & Andrey Zhonin
2016. Mimic Recognition and Reproduction in Bilateral Human-Robot Speech Communication. In Interactive Collaborative Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9812], ► pp. 133 ff.
Zawadzki, Tomasz, Slawomir Nikiel & Gareth W. Young
2021. Prototyping VR Training Tools for Healthcare With Off-the-Shelf CGI. In Cases on Virtual Reality Modeling in Healthcare [Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice, ], ► pp. 160 ff.
Zecca, Massimiliano, Minoru Saito, Nobutsuna Endo, Yu Mizoguchi, Kazuko Itoh, Hideaki Takanobu & Atsuo Takanishi
2007. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), ► pp. 139 ff.
Zhang, Jie, Shuo Li, Jing-Yu Zhang, Feng Du, Yue Qi & Xun Liu
2020. A Literature Review of the Research on the Uncanny Valley. In Cross-Cultural Design. User Experience of Products, Services, and Intelligent Environments [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12192], ► pp. 255 ff.
Złotowski, Jakub A., Hidenobu Sumioka, Shuichi Nishio, Dylan F. Glas, Christoph Bartneck & Hiroshi Ishiguro
2018. Persistence of the Uncanny Valley. In Geminoid Studies, ► pp. 163 ff.
임종수, Hunbock Moon, Yu Seung hyun, Taeyoung Jeong, Yeonjoo Lee, Minju Shin & Jumee Yoon
2017. AI 로봇 의인화 연구: ‘알파고’ 보도의 의미네트워크분석. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 61:4 ► pp. 113 ff.
[no author supplied]
2007. An Experimental Approach to Uncanny Valley Hypothesis. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea 26:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Previous Investigation into the Uncanny Valley. In The Uncanny Valley in Games and Animation, ► pp. 25 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. The Uncanny Valley. In The Uncanny Valley in Games and Animation, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2015. Robots Everywhere. In Just Ordinary Robots, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2015. Home Is Where the Robot Is: Mechanoids, Humanoids, and Androids. In Just Ordinary Robots, ► pp. 43 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliographie. In Comprendre et soigner l'homme connecté, ► pp. 239 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliography. In Gender and Parenting in the Worlds of Alien and Blade Runner
, ► pp. 91 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.