Article published In:
Interaction StudiesVol. 8:2 (2007) ► pp.281–305
Are robots like people?
Relationships between participant and robot personality traits in human–robot interaction studies
Sarah Woods | Adaptive Systems Research Group, School of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire
Identifying links between human personality and attributed robot personality is a relatively new area of human–robot interaction. In this paper we report on an exploratory study that investigates human and robot personality traits as part of a human–robot interaction trial. The trials took place in a simulated living-room scenario involving 28 participants and a human-sized robot of mechanical appearance. Participants interacted with the robot in two task scenarios relevant to a ‘robot in the home’ context. It was found that participants’ evaluations of their own personality traits are related to their evaluations of the robot’s personality traits. The statistical analysis of questionnaire data yields several statistically significant results: (a) Participants do not tend to assign their personality traits to match the robots’, (b) For individual personality traits, participants rated themselves as having stronger personality characteristics compared to the robot, (c) Specific significant correlations were found between participants’ and robot personality traits, and (d) Significant group differences for participant gender, age and technological background are highlighted. The results are discussed in light of developing personalized robot companions.
Cited by
Cited by 48 other publications
Agrigoroaie, Roxana, Stefan Dan Ciocirlan & Adriana Tapus
2017. News Application Adaptation Based on User Sensory Profile. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10652], ► pp. 708 ff. 
Agrigoroaie, Roxana & Adriana Tapus
2017. Influence of Robot’s Interaction Style on Performance in a Stroop Task. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10652], ► pp. 95 ff.
Aly, Amir & Adriana Tapus
2013. 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 325 ff.
Aly, Amir & Adriana Tapus
2016. Towards an intelligent system for generating an adapted verbal and nonverbal combined behavior in human–robot interaction. Autonomous Robots 40:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Anzalone, Salvatore Maria, Giovanna Varni, Serena Ivaldi & Mohamed Chetouani
2017. Automated Prediction of Extraversion During Human–Humanoid Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:3 ► pp. 385 ff.
Arora, Anshu Saxena, Amit Arora, K. Sivakumar & Vasyl Taras
2024. The role of anthropomorphic, xˆenocentric, intentional, and social (AXˆIS) robotics in human-robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2:1 ► pp. 100036 ff.
Baxter, Paul, Emily Ashurst, Robin Read, James Kennedy, Tony Belpaeme & Natalia Reich-Stiebert
2017. Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning. PLOS ONE 12:5 ► pp. e0178126 ff.
Belanche, Daniel, Luis V. Casaló, Carlos Flavián & Jeroen Schepers
2020. Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda. The Service Industries Journal 40:3-4 ► pp. 203 ff.
Cameron, David, Abigail Millings, Samuel Fernando, Emily C. Collins, Roger Moore, Amanda Sharkey, Vanessa Evers & Tony Prescott
2018. The effects of robot facial emotional expressions and gender on child–robot interaction in a field study. Connection Science 30:4 ► pp. 343 ff.
Chang, Rebecca Cherng-Shiow, Hsi-Peng Lu & Peishan Yang
2018. Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior 84 ► pp. 194 ff.
Chanseau, Adeline, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Kheng Lee Koay, Michael L. Walters, Gabriella Lakatos & Maha Salem
2019. How does peoples’ perception of control depend on the criticality of a task performed by a robot. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10:1 ► pp. 380 ff.
Dobrosovestnova, Anna, Tim Reinboth & Astrid Weiss
2024. Towards an Integrative Framework for Robot Personality Research. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Forgas-Coll, Santiago, Ruben Huertas-Garcia, Antonio Andriella & Guillem Alenyà
2022. Does the Personality of Consumers Influence the Assessment of the Experience of Interaction with Social Robots?. International Journal of Social Robotics
Ghafurian, Moojan & Kerstin Dautenhahn
2023. International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, ► pp. 46 ff.
Gubenko, Alla, Christiane Kirsch, Jan Nicola Smilek, Todd Lubart & Claude Houssemand
2021. Educational Robotics and Robot Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8
Halpern, Daniel & James E. Katz
2012. Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 139 ff.
Jost, Jana, Thomas Kirks, Stuart Chapman & Gerhard Rinkenauer
2021. 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA ), ► pp. 1 ff.
Kaplan, Alexandra D., Tracy Sanders & Peter A. Hancock
2019. The Relationship Between Extroversion and the Tendency to Anthropomorphize Robots: A Bayesian Analysis. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5
Karahasanović, Amela, Asbjørn Følstad & Patrick Schittekat
2021. Putting a Face on Algorithms: Personas for Modeling Artificial Intelligence. In Artificial Intelligence in HCI [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12797], ► pp. 229 ff.
Karimova, Gulnara Z.
2022. A Personality-Grounded Framework for Designing Artificial Intelligence-Based Product Appearance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction ► pp. 1 ff.
Karjalainen, Kari Daniel, Anna Elisabeth Sofia Romell, Photchara Ratsamee, Asim Evren Yantac, Morten Fjeld & Mohammad Obaid
2017. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, ► pp. 89 ff.
Katz, James E. & Daniel Halpern
2014. Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance. Behaviour & Information Technology 33:9 ► pp. 941 ff.
Kiss, Csaba, Vanda Harmat & Anda Milassin
2022. A robotizáció térnyerésével kapcsolatos attitűdök Magyarországon = Attitudes towards the rise of robotization in Hungary. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review ► pp. 2 ff.
Liu, Xiaohui, Xiaoyu He, Mengmeng Wang & Huizhang Shen
2022. What influences patients' continuance intention to use AI-powered service robots at hospitals? The role of individual characteristics. Technology in Society 70 ► pp. 101996 ff.
McGinn, Conor
2020. Why Do Robots Need a Head? The Role of Social Interfaces on Service Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:1 ► pp. 281 ff.
Meyer, Christian
2016. Interaktionskrisen oder anthropologische Normalität?. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41:S1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Meyer, Christian
2017. Interaktionskrisen oder anthropologische Normalität?. In Handlungs- und Interaktionskrisen [Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14], ► pp. 75 ff.
Mou, Yi, Changqian Shi, Tianyu Shen & Kun Xu
2020. A Systematic Review of the Personality of Robot: Mapping Its Conceptualization, Operationalization, Contextualization and Effects. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36:6 ► pp. 591 ff.
Obaid, Mohammad, Eduardo B. Sandoval, Jakub Zlotowski, Elena Moltchanova, Christina A. Basedow & Christoph Bartneck
2016. 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 354 ff.
Paradeda, Raul, Maria José Ferreira, Raquel Oliveira, Carlos Martinho & Ana Paiva
2019. What Makes a Good Robotic Advisor? The Role of Assertiveness in Human-Robot Interaction. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11876], ► pp. 144 ff.
Reiser, Ulrich, Theo Jacobs, Georg Arbeiter, Christopher Parlitz & Kerstin Dautenhahn
2013. Care-O-bot® 3 – Vision of a Robot Butler. In Your Virtual Butler [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7407], ► pp. 97 ff.
Rodriguez-Lizundia, Eduardo, Samuel Marcos, Eduardo Zalama, Jaime Gómez-García-Bermejo & Alfonso Gordaliza
2015. A bellboy robot: Study of the effects of robot behaviour on user engagement and comfort. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 82 ► pp. 83 ff.
Shen, Zhihao, Armagan Elibol & Nak Young Chong
2019. 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), ► pp. 402 ff.
Shen, Zhihao, Armagan Elibol & Nak Young Chong
2019. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 578 ff.
Staffa, Mariacarla, Alessandra Rossi, Benedetta Bucci, Davide Russo & Silvia Rossi
2021. Shall I Be Like You? Investigating Robot’s Personalities and Occupational Roles for Personalised HRI. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13086], ► pp. 718 ff.
Tung, Wei-Feng & Jaileez Jara Santiago Campos
2022. User experience research on social robot application. Library Hi Tech 40:4 ► pp. 914 ff.
Walters, M. L., D. S. Syrdal, K. L. Koay, K. Dautenhahn & R. te Boekhorst
2008. RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ► pp. 707 ff.
Walters, Michael L., Dag S. Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, René te Boekhorst & Kheng Lee Koay
2008. Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Autonomous Robots 24:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Walters, Michael L., Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Anna Dumitriu, Alex May, Bruce Christiansen & Kheng Lee Koay
2012. My Familiar Robot Companion: Preferences and Perceptions of CHARLY, a Companion Humanoid Autonomous Robot for Living with You. In Advances in Autonomous Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7429], ► pp. 300 ff.
Wang, Xingyu, YooHee Hwang & Priyanko Guchait
2023. When Robot (Vs. Human) Employees Say “Sorry” Following Service Failure. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration 24:4 ► pp. 540 ff.
Wood, Luke Jai, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Austen Rainer, Ben Robins, Hagen Lehmann, Dag Sverre Syrdal & Mel Slater
2013. Robot-Mediated Interviews - How Effective Is a Humanoid Robot as a Tool for Interviewing Young Children?. PLoS ONE 8:3 ► pp. e59448 ff.
Xiong, Xiling, IpKin Anthony Wong & Fiona X. Yang
2021. Are we behaviorally immune to COVID-19 through robots?. Annals of Tourism Research 91 ► pp. 103312 ff.
Xu, Kun
2020. Language, modality, and mobile media use experiences: Social responses to smartphone cues in a task-oriented context. Telematics and Informatics 48 ► pp. 101344 ff.
Xu, Kun, Mo Chen & Leping You
2023. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to a Credible and Socially Present Robot: Two Meta-Analyses of the Power of Social Cues in Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
You, Sangseok & Lionel P. Robert Jr.
2018. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 251 ff.
Zedda, Eleonora, Marco Manca, Fabio Paterno & Carmen Santoro
2023. Proceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter, ► pp. 1 ff.
Zedda, Eleonora, Marco Manca, Fabio Paternò & Carmen Santoro
2023. Older adults’ user experience with introvert and extravert humanoid robot personalities. Universal Access in the Information Society
[no author supplied]
2019. A Personalized and Platform-Independent Behavior Control System for Social Robots in Therapy: Development and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 11:3 ► pp. 334 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.