Article published In:
Psychological Benchmarks of Human–Robot InteractionEdited by Peter H. Kahn, Jr. and Karl F. MacDorman
[Interaction Studies 8:3] 2007
► pp. 363–390
Edited by Peter H. Kahn, Jr. and Karl F. MacDorman
[Interaction Studies 8:3] 2007
► pp. 363–390
What is a Human?
Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human–robot interaction
In this paper, we move toward offering psychological benchmarks to measure success in building increasingly humanlike robots. By psychological benchmarks we mean categories of interaction that capture conceptually fundamental aspects of human life, specified abstractly enough to resist their identity as a mere psychological instrument, but capable of being translated into testable empirical propositions. Nine possible benchmarks are considered: autonomy, imitation, intrinsic moral value, moral accountability, privacy, reciprocity, conventionality, creativity, and authenticity of relation. Finally, we discuss how getting the right group of benchmarks in human–robot interaction will, in future years, help inform on the foundational question of what constitutes essential features of being human.
Cited by
Cited by 94 other publications
Airenti, Gabriella
2015. The Cognitive Bases of Anthropomorphism: From Relatedness to Empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:1 ► pp. 117 ff. 
Airenti, Gabriella
2019. The Place of Development in the History of Psychology and Cognitive Science. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Alenljung, Beatrice & Jessica Lindblom
2021. Analysing Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction with ANEMONE. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Techniques and Novel Applications [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12763], ► pp. 181 ff.
Almousa, Ohoud & Sharifa Alghowinem
2023. Conceptualization and development of an autonomous and personalized early literacy content and robot tutor behavior for preschool children. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 33:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
Aly, Amir, Sascha Griffiths & Francesca Stramandinoli
2017. Metrics and benchmarks in human-robot interaction: Recent advances in cognitive robotics. Cognitive Systems Research 43 ► pp. 313 ff.
Apraiz, Ainhoa, Ganix Lasa & Maitane Mazmela
2023. Evaluation of User Experience in Human–Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Apraiz, Ainhoa, Jose Antonio Mulet Alberola, Ganix Lasa, Maitane Mazmela & Hien Ngoc Nguyen
2023. Development of a new set of Heuristics for the evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction in industrial settings: Heuristics Robots Experience (HEUROBOX). Frontiers in Robotics and AI 10
Badia, Sergi Bermúdez i, Paula Alexandra Silva, Diogo Branco, Ana Pinto, Carla Carvalho, Paulo Menezes, Jorge Almeida & Artur Pilacinski
2022. Virtual Reality for Safe Testing and Development in Collaborative Robotics: Challenges and Perspectives. Electronics 11:11 ► pp. 1726 ff.
Bankins, Sarah & Paul Formosa
2020. When AI meets PC: exploring the implications of workplace social robots and a human-robot psychological contract. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 29:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Barresi, John
2020. On building a person: benchmarks for robotic personhood. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 32:4 ► pp. 581 ff.
Billard, Aude & Daniel Grollman
2012. Human-Robot Interaction. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, ► pp. 1474 ff.
Bonaci, Tamara, Jeffrey Herron, Charles Matlack & Howard Jay Chizeck
2015. Securing the Exocortex: A Twenty-First Century Cybernetics Challenge. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34:3 ► pp. 44 ff.
Budiharto, Widodo, Anggita Dian Cahyani & Pingkan C.B. Rumondor
2017. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), ► pp. 172 ff.
Caine, Kelly, Selma Šabanovic & Mary Carter
2012. Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 343 ff.
Chiang, Ai-Hsuan, Silvana Trimi & Yu-Ju Lo
2022. Emotion and service quality of anthropomorphic robots. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 177 ► pp. 121550 ff.
Cooney, Martin & Maria Menezes
2018. Design for an Art Therapy Robot: An Explorative Review of the Theoretical Foundations for Engaging in Emotional and Creative Painting with a Robot. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2:3 ► pp. 52 ff.
Corti, Kevin & Alex Gillespie
2016. Co-constructing intersubjectivity with artificial conversational agents: People are more likely to initiate repairs of misunderstandings with agents represented as human. Computers in Human Behavior 58 ► pp. 431 ff.
Corti, Laura, Nicola Di Stefano & Marta Bertolaso
2023. Artificial Emotions: Toward a Human-Centric Ethics. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:12 ► pp. 2039 ff.
DALTON-BROWN, SALLY
2020. The Ethics of Medical AI and the Physician-Patient Relationship. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Damiano, Luisa & Paul Dumouchel
2018. Anthropomorphism in Human–Robot Co-evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Damiano, Luisa & Paul Dumouchel
2023. Emotions in (Human-Robot) Relation. Structuring Hybrid Social Ecologies. In Emotional Machines [Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society, ], ► pp. 61 ff.
Damiano, Luisa & Pasquale Stano
2023. Explorative Synthetic Biology in AI: Criteria of Relevance and a Taxonomy for Synthetic Models of Living and Cognitive Processes. Artificial Life 29:3 ► pp. 367 ff.
Dang, Ngoc Bich & Laurent Bertrandias
2023. Social robots as healing aids: How and why powerlessness influences the intention to adopt social robots. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 196 ► pp. 122845 ff.
de Graaf, Maartje M.A., Somaya Ben Allouch & Tineke Klamer
2015. Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in Human Behavior 43 ► pp. 1 ff.
do Livramento Gonçalves, Gabrielli, Walter Leal Filho, Samara da Silva Neiva, André Borchardt Deggau, Manoela de Oliveira Veras, Flávio Ceci, Maurício Andrade de Lima & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra
2021. The Impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Smart and Sustainable Cities. Sustainability 13:13 ► pp. 7165 ff.
Filippini, Chiara, David Perpetuini, Daniela Cardone, Antonio Maria Chiarelli & Arcangelo Merla
2020. Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Affective Computing and Its Application to Facilitate Human Robot Interaction: A Review. Applied Sciences 10:8 ► pp. 2924 ff.
Fraune, Marlena R., Steven Sherrin, Selma Sabanović & Eliot R. Smith
2015. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 109 ff.
Guingrich, Rose E. & Michael S. A. Graziano
2024. Ascribing consciousness to artificial intelligence: human-AI interaction and its carry-over effects on human-human interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 15
GÜZEL, Firuze
2022. Human, Robot, and Animal Rights in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi :15 ► pp. 53 ff.
Hancock, P. A., Theresa T. Kessler, Alexandra D. Kaplan, Kimberly Stowers, J. Christopher Brill, Deborah R. Billings, Kristin E. Schaefer & James L. Szalma
2023. How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Hayashi, Kotaro, Masahiro Shiomi, Takayuki Kanda & Norihiro Hagita
2012. Are Robots Appropriate for Troublesome and Communicative Tasks in a City Environment?. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 4:2 ► pp. 150 ff.
He, Guohua, Xinnian Zheng, Wenpu Li, Lixun Zheng & Yifan He
2023. The Dark Side of Employee Collaboration with Robots: Exploring Its Impact on Self-Esteem Threat and Burnout. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction ► pp. 1 ff.
Henschel, Anna, Ruud Hortensius & Emily S. Cross
2020. Social Cognition in the Age of Human–Robot Interaction. Trends in Neurosciences 43:6 ► pp. 373 ff.
Ho, Chin-Chang & Karl F. MacDorman
2010. Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior 26:6 ► pp. 1508 ff.
Hoffman, Anna, Diana Owen & Sandra L. Calvert
2021. Parent reports of children's parasocial relationships with conversational agents: Trusted voices in children's lives. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 3:4 ► pp. 606 ff.
Jia, Jing Wen, Namho Chung & Jooyoung Hwang
2021. Assessing the hotel service robot interaction on tourists' behaviour: the role of anthropomorphism. Industrial Management & Data Systems 121:6 ► pp. 1457 ff.
Kahn, Peter H.
2013. Revisioning Ecopsychology: Perspectives from the Community. Ecopsychology 5:4 ► pp. 207 ff.
Kahn, Peter H., Brian T. Gill, Aimee L. Reichert, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Jolina H. Ruckert
2010. 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 183 ff.
Kahn, Peter H., Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Solace Shen, Heather E. Gary & Jolina H. Ruckert
2014. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ► pp. 99 ff.
Kahn, Peter H., Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Brian T. Gill, Solace Shen, Heather E. Gary & Jolina H. Ruckert
2015. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 173 ff.
Kahn, Peter H., Jolina H. Ruckert, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Aimee Reichert, Heather Gary & Solace Shen
2010. 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 123 ff.
Kuksenok, Kit & Stefania Santagati
2019. Readable as Intimate: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Empirical Interrogation of Software Implementations of Intimacy. In AI Love You, ► pp. 97 ff.
Kühne, Rinaldo & Jochen Peter
2023. Anthropomorphism in human–robot interactions: a multidimensional conceptualization. Communication Theory 33:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Leite, Iolanda, Carlos Martinho & Ana Paiva
2013. Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey. International Journal of Social Robotics 5:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Li, Keli & Guoxin Li
2023. Study on the Impact of Service Robot Autonomy on Customer Satisfaction. In HCI in Business, Government and Organizations [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14039], ► pp. 30 ff.
Lin, Yongling, Pengfei Xu, Jiayu Fan, Ruolei Gu & Yue-jia Luo
2023. Gain-loss separability in human- but not computer-based changes of mind. Computers in Human Behavior 143 ► pp. 107712 ff.
Lindblom, Jessica & Beatrice Alenljung
2020. The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction. Sensors 20:15 ► pp. 4284 ff.
Lum, Heather C., Grace E. Waldfogle, Nicholas J. Bowser & Richard L. Greatbatch
2015. Sit, Down, Stay! The Comparison of Virtual, Robotic, and Live Entities for Human-Animal and Human-Technology Interactions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59:1 ► pp. 791 ff.
Lutz, Christoph, Maren Schöttler & Christian Pieter Hoffmann
2019. The privacy implications of social robots: Scoping review and expert interviews. Mobile Media & Communication 7:3 ► pp. 412 ff.
MacDorman, Karl F., Sandosh K. Vasudevan & Chin-Chang Ho
2009. Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI & SOCIETY 23:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Martin, Dorothea U., Madeline I. MacIntyre, Conrad Perry, Georgia Clift, Sonja Pedell & Jordy Kaufman
2020. Young Children’s Indiscriminate Helping Behavior Toward a Humanoid Robot. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Musiał, Maciej & Joanna K. Malinowska
2022. A comparison of naturalist and antinaturalist explanations for why people consider robots animate and experience emotions towards them. Journal of Future Robot Life 3:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Mathias Nebel, Oscar Garza-Vázquez & Clemens Sedmak
2022. A Common Good Approach to Development,
Nomura, Tatsuya & Takayuki Kanda
2016. Rapport–Expectation with a Robot Scale. International Journal of Social Robotics 8:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Nyholm, Sven, Cindy Friedman, Michael T. Dale, Anna Puzio, Dina Babushkina, Guido Löhr, Arthur Gwagwa, Bart A. Kamphorst, Giulia Perugia & Wijnand IJsselsteijn
2023. 3. Social Robots and Society. In Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, ► pp. 53 ff.
Onnasch, Linda & Eileen Roesler
2021. A Taxonomy to Structure and Analyze Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 13:4 ► pp. 833 ff.
Ostrowski, Anastasia K., Cynthia Breazeal & Hae Won Park
2022. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 33 ff.
Ostrowski, Anastasia K., Raechel Walker, Madhurima Das, Maria Yang, Cynthia Breazea, Hae Won Park & Aditi Verma
2022. 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 969 ff.
Pantano, Matteo, Qiaoyue Yang, Adrian Blumberg, Raven Reisch, Tobias Hauser, Benjamin Lutz, Daniel Regulin, Tobias Kamps, Konstantinos Traganos & Dongheui Lee
2022. Influence of task decision autonomy on physical ergonomics and robot performances in an industrial human–robot collaboration scenario. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9
Pilacinski, Artur, Ana Pinto, Soraia Oliveira, Eduardo Araújo, Carla Carvalho, Paula Alexandra Silva, Ricardo Matias, Paulo Menezes & Sonia Sousa
2023. The robot eyes don't have it. The presence of eyes on collaborative robots yields marginally higher user trust but lower performance. Heliyon 9:8 ► pp. e18164 ff.
Poliakoff, Ellen, Natalie Beach, Rebecca Best, Toby Howard & Emma Gowen
2013. Can Looking at a Hand Make Your Skin Crawl? Peering into the Uncanny Valley for Hands. Perception 42:9 ► pp. 998 ff.
Pollini, Alessandro
2009. A theoretical perspective on social agency. AI & SOCIETY 24:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Prescott, Tony J.
2017. Robots are not just tools. Connection Science 29:2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Prescott, Tony J. & Julie M. Robillard
2021. Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships. iScience 24:1 ► pp. 101993 ff.
Probst, Tahira M., Rebecca J. Lindgren, Ryan J. Dorosh, Justin C. Allen, Lorraine S. Pascual & Ming Luo
2023. Effects of Prior Robot Experience, Speed, and Proximity on Psychosocial Reactions to a Soft Growing Robot. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors ► pp. 1 ff.
Remagnino, Paolo, Dorothy N. Monekosso, Yoshinori Kuno, Mohan Manubhai Trivedi & How-Lung Eng
2009. Guest Editorial Introducing Automation and Engineering for Ambient Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 6:4 ► pp. 573 ff.
Ruckert, Jolina H.
2011. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, ► pp. 237 ff.
Salvini, Pericle
2014. Of Robots and Simulacra. In Evolving Issues Surrounding Technoethics and Society in the Digital Age [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ], ► pp. 66 ff.
Salvini, Pericle
2015. Of Robots and Simulacra. In Human Rights and Ethics, ► pp. 1424 ff.
Saygin, Ayse Pinar, Thierry Chaminade, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Jon Driver & Chris Frith
2012. The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7:4 ► pp. 413 ff.
Schulz, Trenton & Jo Herstad
2017. [Electronic Workshops in Computing, ],
Schulz, Trenton, Jo Herstad & Harald Holone
2018. Privacy at Home: An Inquiry into Sensors and Robots for the Stay at Home Elderly. In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications in Health, Assistance, and Entertainment [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10927], ► pp. 377 ff.
See, Swee Lan, Mitchell Tan & Qin En Looi
2009. Towards Better Human Robot Interaction: Understand Human Computer Interaction in Social Gaming Using a Video-Enhanced Diary Method. In Progress in Robotics [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 44], ► pp. 119 ff.
Serholt, Sofia, Wolmet Barendregt, Asimina Vasalou, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Aidan Jones, Sofia Petisca & Ana Paiva
2017. The case of classroom robots: teachers’ deliberations on the ethical tensions. AI & SOCIETY 32:4 ► pp. 613 ff.
Shao, Xiaolong, EunHa Jeong, SooCheong (Shawn) Jang & Yang Xu
2020. Mr. Potato Head fights food waste: The effect of anthropomorphism in promoting ugly food. International Journal of Hospitality Management 89 ► pp. 102521 ff.
Shaw-Garlock, Glenda
2011. Loving Machines: Theorizing Human and Sociable-Technology Interaction. In Human-Robot Personal Relationships [Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 59], ► pp. 1 ff.
Shinohara, Maino, Daisuke Sakamoto, Tetsuo Ono & James Everett Young
2023. International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, ► pp. 133 ff.
Shiomi, Masahiro, Kayako Nakagawa & Norihiro Hagita
2015. Design of a gaze behavior at a small mistake moment for a robot. In Gaze in Human-Robot Communication [Benjamins Current Topics, 81], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sinatra, Anne M., Matthew G. Chin, Valerie K. Sims, Heather C. Lum, Nicholas Lagattuta, Mark Spitzer, Catherine Mobley & Matthew Marraffino
2009. Free Form Verbal Communication toward Robotic Entities vs. Live Entities. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 53:18 ► pp. 1422 ff.
Song, Hanqun, Yao-Chin Wang, Huijun Yang & Emily Ma
2022. Robotic employees vs. human employees: Customers’ perceived authenticity at casual dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management 106 ► pp. 103301 ff.
St-Onge, David, Nicolas Reeves & Nataliya Petkova
2017. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 30 ff.
Stanton, Cady M., Peter H. Kahn Jr., Rachel L. Severson, Jolina H. Ruckert & Brian T. Gill
2008. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, ► pp. 271 ff.
Steckenfinger, Shawn A. & Asif A. Ghazanfar
2009. Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:43 ► pp. 18362 ff.
Steinert, Steffen
2014. The Five Robots—A Taxonomy for Roboethics. International Journal of Social Robotics 6:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Straub, Ilona
2016. ‘It looks like a human!’ The interrelation of social presence, interaction and agency ascription: a case study about the effects of an android robot on social agency ascription. AI & SOCIETY 31:4 ► pp. 553 ff.
Söderlund, Magnus
2023. Service robots and artificial morality: an examination of robot behavior that violates human privacy. Journal of Service Theory and Practice 33:7 ► pp. 52 ff.
Voiculescu, Aurora
2017. Reflections on the EPSRC Principles of Robotics from the new far-side of the law. Connection Science 29:2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Walters, Michael L., Manja Lohse, Marc Hanheide, Britta Wrede, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kheng Lee Koay, Anders Green, Helge Hüttenrauch, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Gerhard Sagerer & Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh
2011. Evaluating the Robot Personality and Verbal Behavior of Domestic Robots Using Video-Based Studies. Advanced Robotics 25:18 ► pp. 2233 ff.
Walters, Michael L., Manja Lohse, Marc Hanheide, Britta Wrede, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kheng Lee Koay, Anders Green, Helge Hüttenrauch, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Gerhard Sagerer & Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh
2015. Evaluating the Robot Personality and Verbal Behavior of Domestic Robots Using Video-Based Studies1. In Household Service Robotics, ► pp. 467 ff.
Wondimu, Natnael, Maëlic Neau, Antoine Dizet, Ubbo Visser & Cédric Buche
2024. Anthropomorphic Human-Robot Interaction Framework: Attention Based Approach. In RoboCup 2023: Robot World Cup XXVI [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14140], ► pp. 262 ff.
Woo, Jinseok, Yasuhiro Ohyama & Naoyuki Kubota
2020. Robot Partner Development Platform for Human-Robot Interaction Based on a User-Centered Design Approach. Applied Sciences 10:22 ► pp. 7992 ff.
Xafopoulos, Alexandros
2016. E-Collaborative Learning (e-CL). In Cultural, Behavioral, and Social Considerations in Electronic Collaboration [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ], ► pp. 114 ff.
Xafopoulos, Alexandros
2017. E-Collaborative Learning (e-CL). In Remote Work and Collaboration, ► pp. 536 ff.
Zanatto, Debora, Massimiliano Patacchiola, Angelo Cangelosi & Jeremy Goslin
2020. Generalisation of Anthropomorphic Stereotype. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:1 ► pp. 163 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.