Article published In:
Psychological Benchmarks of Human–Robot InteractionEdited by Peter H. Kahn, Jr. and Karl F. MacDorman
[Interaction Studies 8:3] 2007
► pp. 391–410
Edited by Peter H. Kahn, Jr. and Karl F. MacDorman
[Interaction Studies 8:3] 2007
► pp. 391–410
Intersubjectivity in human–agent interaction
What is the hallmark of success in human–agent interaction? In animation and robotics, many have concentrated on the looks of the agent — whether the appearance is realistic or lifelike. We present an alternative benchmark that lies in the dyad and not the agent alone: Does the agent’s behavior evoke intersubjectivity from the user? That is, in both conscious and unconscious communication, do users react to behaviorally realistic agents in the same way they react to other humans? Do users appear to attribute similar thoughts and actions? We discuss why we distinguish between appearance and behavior, why we use the benchmark of intersubjectivity, our methodology for applying this benchmark to embodied conversational agents (ECAs), and why we believe this benchmark should be applied to human–robot interaction.
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
Balzarotti, Stefania, Luca Piccini, Giuseppe Andreoni & Rita Ciceri
2014. “I Know That You Know How I Feel”: Behavioral and Physiological Signals Demonstrate Emotional Attunement While Interacting with a Computer Simulating Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 38:3 ► pp. 283 ff. 
Bremner, Paul, Anthony G. Pipe, Chris Melhuish, Mike Fraser & Sriram Subramanian
2011. 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, ► pp. 458 ff.
Callejas, Zoraida, David Griol & Ramón López-Cózar
2014. A framework for the assessment of synthetic personalities according to user perception. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72:7 ► pp. 567 ff.
Carter, Elizabeth J., Diane L. Williams, Jessica K. Hodgins & Jill F. Lehman
2014. Are Children with Autism More Responsive to Animated Characters? A Study of Interactions with Humans and Human-Controlled Avatars. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44:10 ► pp. 2475 ff.
Cerulo, Karen A.
2009. Nonhumans in Social Interaction. Annual Review of Sociology 35:1 ► pp. 531 ff.
Cerulo, Karen A.
2011. Social Interaction: Do Non‐humans Count?. Sociology Compass 5:9 ► pp. 775 ff.
Corti, Kevin & Alex Gillespie
2015. Offscreen and in the Chair Next to Your: Conversational Agents Speaking Through Actual Human Bodies. In Intelligent Virtual Agents [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9238], ► pp. 405 ff.
Corti, Kevin & Alex Gillespie
2016. Co-constructing intersubjectivity with artificial conversational agents: People are more likely to initiate repairs of misunderstandings with agents represented as human. Computers in Human Behavior 58 ► pp. 431 ff.
Gillespie, Alex & Kevin Corti
2016. The Body That Speaks: Recombining Bodies and Speech Sources in Unscripted Face-to-Face Communication. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Gutiérrez, Celia & Sara Pérez
2009. Convergence of Emergent Technologies for the Digital Home. In Bioinspired Applications in Artificial and Natural Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5602], ► pp. 104 ff.
Ho, Chin-Chang & Karl F. MacDorman
2010. Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior 26:6 ► pp. 1508 ff.
Hoque, Mohammed (Ehsan), Matthieu Courgeon, Jean-Claude Martin, Bilge Mutlu & Rosalind W. Picard
2013. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing, ► pp. 697 ff.
Matsuzaki, Hironori
2011. Die Frage nach der „Agency“ von Technik und die Normenvergessenheit der Techniksoziologie. In Akteur – Individuum – Subjekt, ► pp. 301 ff.
Mencía, Beatriz López, David D. Pardo, Alvaro Hernández Trapote & Luis A. Hernández Gómez
2011. Designing ECAs to Improve Robustness of Human-Machine Dialogue. In Conversational Agents and Natural Language Interaction, ► pp. 50 ff.
Mitchell, Wade J., Chin-Chang Ho, Himalaya Patel & Karl F. MacDorman
2011. Does social desirability bias favor humans? Explicit–implicit evaluations of synthesized speech support a new HCI model of impression management. Computers in Human Behavior 27:1 ► pp. 402 ff.
Ocaña, José Miguel, Elizabeth K. Morales-Urrutia, Diana Pérez-Marín & Silvia Tamayo-Moreno
2019. How to Create a Pedagogic Conversational Agent for Teaching Computer Science. In Advanced Online Education and Training Technologies [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 114 ff.
Patel, Himalaya, Lauren C. Bayliss, James D. Ivory, Kendall Woodard, Alexandra McCarthy & Karl F. MacDorman
2014. Receptive to bad reception: Jerky motion can make persuasive messages more effective. Computers in Human Behavior 32 ► pp. 32 ff.
Patel, Himalaya & Karl F. MacDorman
2015. Sending an Avatar to Do a Human's Job: Compliance with Authority Persists Despite the Uncanny Valley. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pérez-Marín, Diana & Antonio Boza
2013. A Procedure to Create a Pedagogic Conversational Agent in Secondary Physics and Chemistry Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 9:4 ► pp. 94 ff.
Ruhland, K., C. E. Peters, S. Andrist, J. B. Badler, N. I. Badler, M. Gleicher, B. Mutlu & R. McDonnell
2015. A Review of Eye Gaze in Virtual Agents, Social Robotics and HCI: Behaviour Generation, User Interaction and Perception. Computer Graphics Forum 34:6 ► pp. 299 ff.
Saberi, Maryam, Steve DiPaola & Ulysses Bernardet
2021. Expressing Personality Through Non-verbal Behaviour in Real-Time Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Sheehy, Kieron
2010. Virtual Environments: Issues and Opportunities for Researching Inclusive Educational Practices. In Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds [Human-Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sinha, Tanmay & Shivam Malhotra
2022. Embodied Agents to Scaffold Data Science Education. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13356], ► pp. 150 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.