Article published in:
Holophrasis vs Compositionality in the Emergence of ProtolanguageEdited by Michael A. Arbib and Derek Bickerton
[Interaction Studies 9:1] 2008
► pp. 1–17
Is a holistic protolanguage a plausible precursor to language?
A test case for a modern evolutionary linguistics
Kenny Smith | Northumbria University
If protolanguage was a holistic system where complex meanings were conveyed using unanalysed forms, there must be some process (analysis) which delivered up the elements of modern language from this system. This paper draws on evidence from computational modelling, developmental and historical linguistics and comparative psychology to evaluate the plausibility of the analysis process. While some of the criticisms levelled at analysis can be refuted using such evidence, several areas are highlighted where further evidence is required to decide key issues. More generally, the debate over the nature of protolanguage offers a framework for developing and showcasing a modern, evidence-based evolutionary linguistics.
Keywords: segmentation, protolanguage, evidence, analysis
Published online: 07 March 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.02smi
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.02smi
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Fleming, Luke
Gong, Tao, James W. Minett & William S.-Y. Wang
Gong, Tao, Lan Shuai & Bernard Comrie
Nowak, Iga & Giosuè Baggio
Steels, Luc
Sutcliffe, A. G. & D. Wang
Sutcliffe, A. G. & D. Wang
Tin, T. B.
Tin, Tan Bee
Vallauri, Edoardo Lombardi & Viviana Masia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.