Article published In:
Human and Robot Interactive CommunicationEdited by Kerstin Dautenhahn
[Interaction Studies 9:2] 2008
► pp. 258–276
Edited by Kerstin Dautenhahn
[Interaction Studies 9:2] 2008
► pp. 258–276
Social and physiological influences of robot therapy in a care house
This article presents research on robot therapy for elderly residents in a care house. Experiments were conducted from June 2005, lasting more than 2 months. Two therapeutic baby seal robots were introduced to the residents, and activated for over 9 hours daily. To investigate the psychological and social effects of the robots, the residents’ activities in public areas were recorded using video cameras, during the daytime (8:30–18:00) for over 2 months. In addition, urinalysis of the residents was performed for 17-ketosteroid sulfate and 17-hydroxycorticosteroid. Results of the video analysis indicated that social interaction increased through interaction with the seal robots. Results of the urine tests showed that the reactions of the subjects’ vital organs to stress improved after the introduction of the robots.
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Abdi, Jordan, Ahmed Al-Hindawi, Tiffany Ng & Marcela P Vizcaychipi
2018. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 8:2 ► pp. e018815 ff. 
Asl, Aysan Mahmoudi, Jose Miguel Toribio-Guzmán, Henriëtte van der Roest, Álvaro Castro-González, María Malfaz, Miguel A. Salichs & Manuel Franco Martin
2022. The usability and feasibility validation of the social robot MINI in people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment; a study protocol. BMC Psychiatry 22:1
Barata, Ana Nunes
2019. Social Robots as a Complementary Therapy in Chronic, Progressive Diseases. In Robotics in Healthcare [Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1170], ► pp. 95 ff.
Bemelmans, Roger, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Pieter Jonker & Luc de Witte
2012. Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Systematic Review into Effects and Effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 13:2 ► pp. 114 ff.
Bock, Nikolai, Laura Hoffmann & Astrid Rosenthal-v. d. Pütten
2018. Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 71 ff.
Cheklin, Marianna, Florian 'Floyd' Mueller & Stefan Greuter
2016. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, ► pp. 153 ff.
Eriksson, Henrik & Martin Salzmann-Erikson
2018. Twitter discussions about the predicaments of robots in geriatric nursing: forecast of nursing robotics in aged care. Contemporary Nurse 54:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Eriksson, Henrik & Martin Salzmann‐Erikson
2017. The digital generation and nursing robotics: A netnographic study about nursing care robots posted on social media. Nursing Inquiry 24:2
Flandorfer, Priska
2012. Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance. International Journal of Population Research 2012 ► pp. 1 ff.
Haltaufderheide, Joschka, Annika Lucht, Christoph Strünck & Jochen Vollmann
2023. Increasing efficiency and well-being? a systematic review of the empirical claims of the double-benefit argument in socially assistive devices. BMC Medical Ethics 24:1
Hung, Lillian, Mario Gregorio, Jim Mann, Christine Wallsworth, Neil Horne, Annette Berndt, Cindy Liu, Evan Woldum, Andy Au-Yeung & Habib Chaudhury
2021. Exploring the perceptions of people with dementia about the social robot PARO in a hospital setting. Dementia 20:2 ► pp. 485 ff.
Hung, Lillian, Cindy Liu, Evan Woldum, Andy Au-Yeung, Annette Berndt, Christine Wallsworth, Neil Horne, Mario Gregorio, Jim Mann & Habib Chaudhury
2019. The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. BMC Geriatrics 19:1
Kachouie, Reza, Sima Sedighadeli, Rajiv Khosla & Mei-Tai Chu
2014. Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 30:5 ► pp. 369 ff.
Khan, Arshia, Mehdi Bahrami & Yumna Anwar
2019. 2019 IEEE International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom), ► pp. 1 ff.
Lancaster, Karen
2022. Granny and the Sexbots. In Social Robotics and the Good Life [Edition Moderne Postmoderne, ], ► pp. 181 ff.
Mahmoudi Asl, Aysan, Mauricio Molinari Ulate, Manuel Franco Martin & Henriëtte van der Roest
2022. Methodologies Used to Study the Feasibility, Usability, Efficacy, and Effectiveness of Social Robots For Elderly Adults: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24:8 ► pp. e37434 ff.
Mordoch, Elaine, Angela Osterreicher, Lorna Guse, Kerstin Roger & Genevieve Thompson
2013. Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: A literature review. Maturitas 74:1 ► pp. 14 ff.
Oh, Young Hoon & Da Young Ju
2020. Age-Related Differences in Fixation Pattern on a Companion Robot. Sensors 20:13 ► pp. 3807 ff.
Oh, Young Hoon, Jaewoong Kim & Da Young Ju
2019. Investigating the preferences of older adults concerning the design elements of a companion robot. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 20:3 ► pp. 426 ff.
Perruchoud, S., N. Banwell, Ralf R. Jox & N. Eggert
2023. Social robots in care homes in French-speaking Switzerland: A qualitative and reflective study. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 29 ► pp. 100918 ff.
Perugia, Giulia, Marta Diaz-Boladeras, Andreu Catala-Mallofre, Emilia I. Barakova & Matthias Rauterberg
2022. ENGAGE-DEM: A Model of Engagement of People With Dementia. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 13:2 ► pp. 926 ff.
Perugia, Giulia, Daniel Rodriguez-Martin, Marta Diaz Boladeras, Andreu Catala Mallofre, Emilia Barakova & Matthias Rauterberg
2017. 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), ► pp. 1248 ff.
Perugia, Giulia, Roos van Berkel, Marta Díaz-Boladeras, Andreu Català-Mallofré, Matthias Rauterberg & Emilia Barakova
2018. Understanding Engagement in Dementia Through Behavior. The Ethographic and Laban-Inspired Coding System of Engagement (ELICSE) and the Evidence-Based Model of Engagement-Related Behavior (EMODEB). Frontiers in Psychology 9
Ryumin, Dmitry, Ildar Kagirov, Alexandr Axyonov, Nikita Pavlyuk, Anton Saveliev, Irina Kipyatkova, Milos Zelezny, Iosif Mporas & Alexey Karpov
2020. A Multimodal User Interface for an Assistive Robotic Shopping Cart. Electronics 9:12 ► pp. 2093 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.