Article published in:
Approaches to learning, testing, and researching L2 vocabulary
Edited by Stuart Webb
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169:1] 2018
► pp. 212–231

Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages

An approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009)

| KU Leuven | ITEC (KU Leuven – imec)
| KU Leuven
| KU Leuven
| ITEC (KU Leuven – imec)
| KU Leuven
The present study aims to replicate Stæhr’s (2009) study on the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. To explore the generalizability of Stæhr’s findings, two experiments were conducted. However, the study changed the population (Flemish learners) and proficiency level of the materials in the first experiment (intermediate) and also the language in the second experiment (French). Our results generally confirm Stæhr’s findings. We also found a positive correlation between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. Although our findings reveal that learners probably need fewer words for adequate listening comprehension at an intermediate proficiency level, our study also showed that learners who knew more words had higher listening comprehension scores. Finally, our study seems to suggest that learners might need less lexical coverage for intermediate listening.
Keywords: vocabulary knowledge, listening comprehension, intermediate level, English as a foreign language, French as a foreign language
Article outline
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1The original study
    • 1.2Importance of the problem
    • 1.3Relevant scholarship
    • 1.4Statement of purpose
  • 2.Research questions
  • 3.Experiment 1: English
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials
        • 3.1.2.1Listening comprehension test for English: Preliminary English Test for schools (PET)
        • 3.1.2.2Receptive vocabulary test
      • 3.1.3Procedure
      • 3.1.4Scoring and analyses
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Descriptive statistics
      • 3.2.2To what extent is vocabulary knowledge associated with listening comprehension?
      • 3.2.3How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
  • 4.Experiment 2: French
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Materials
        • 4.1.2.1Listening comprehension test for French: Diplôme d’études en langue française (DELF)
        • 4.1.2.2Receptive vocabulary test
      • 4.1.3Procedure
      • 4.1.4Scoring and analyses
    • 4.2Results
      • 4.2.1Descriptive statistics
      • 4.2.2To what extent is vocabulary knowledge associated with listening comprehension?
      • 4.2.3How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
    • 4.3The relationship between vocabulary and listening comprehension
    • 4.4How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
  • 5.Limitations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00013.nor
References
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N.
(2003) Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonk, W.
(2000) Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
n.d.) Compleat lexical tutor. Retrieved from https://​www​.lextutor​.ca​/vp/
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages; Learning, teaching, assessment.Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S.
(2014) English for specific purposes. The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 331, 66–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008) Corpus of Contemporary American English. Retrieved from http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
European Commission
(2012) The European survey on language competences.Google Scholar
Elgort, I.
(2013) Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 30(2), 253–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Levitzky-Aviad, T.
(2018) Loanword proportion in vocabulary size tests: Does it make a difference? ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 94–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & McLean, S.
(2016) Loanwords and vocabulary size test scores: A case of different estimates for different L1 learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Londsdale, D., & Le Bras, Y.
(2009) A frequency dictionary of French core vocabulary for learners. Londen: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milton, J.
(2009) Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
(2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Velghe, T., & Van Rompaey, T.
(2015, May) A post-entry English and French vocabulary size for Flemish learners. Paper presented at EALTA. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. J.
(2016) A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 538–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G.
(2012) Introduction. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp.1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Read, J.
(1993) The development of a new measure of vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Cobb, R., Horst, M. & Schmitt, D.
(2017) How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C.
(2001) Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 181, 55–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stæhr, L.
(2009) Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 577–607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N.
(2013) Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Arndt, Rebeca
2020. Gianfranco Conti and Steve Smith: BREAKING THE SOUND BARRIER: TEACHING LANGUAGE LEARNERS HOW TO LISTEN. Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
Durbahn, Marion, Michael Rodgers & Elke Peters
2020. The relationship between vocabulary and viewing comprehension. System 88 ► pp. 102166 ff. Crossref logo
Fievez, Isabeau, Maribel Montero Perez, Frederik Cornillie & Piet Desmet
2021. Promoting incidental vocabulary learning through watching a French Netflix series with glossed captions. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Giordano, Michael J.
2021. Lexical coverage in dialogue listening. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882198986 ff. Crossref logo
Ha, Hung Tan
2021. A Rasch-based validation of the Vietnamese version of the Listening Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing in Asia 11:1 Crossref logo
Ha, Hung Tan
2021. Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Language Testing in Asia 11:1 Crossref logo
Laufer, Batia, Stuart Webb, Su Kyung Kim & Beverley Yohanan
2021. How well do learners know derived words in a second language?. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 172:2 ► pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Majuddin, Elvenna, Anna Siyanova-Chanturia & Frank Boers
2021. INCIDENTAL ACQUISITION OF MULTIWORD EXPRESSIONS THROUGH AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:5 ► pp. 985 ff. Crossref logo
Masrai, Ahmed
2020. Can L2 Phonological Vocabulary Knowledge and Listening Comprehension be Developed Through Extensive Movie Viewing? the Case of Arab EFL Learners. International Journal of Listening 34:1 ► pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Noreillie, Ann-Sophie, Piet Desmet & Elke Peters
2020. Factors Predicting Low-Intermediate French Learners’ Vocabulary Use in Speaking Tasks. The Canadian Modern Language Review 76:3 ► pp. 194 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Elke
2020.  In Approaches to Learning, Testing and Researching L2 Vocabulary [Benjamins Current Topics, 109], ► pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Elke, Ann‐Sophie Noreillie, Kris Heylen, Bram Bulté & Piet Desmet
2019. The Impact of Instruction and Out‐of‐School Exposure to Foreign Language Input on Learners’ Vocabulary Knowledge in Two Languages. Language Learning 69:3 ► pp. 747 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Elke, Tom Velghe & Tinne Van Rompaey
2019. The VocabLab tests. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:1 ► pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Elke & Stuart Webb
2018. INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION THROUGH VIEWING L2 TELEVISION AND FACTORS THAT AFFECT LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:3 ► pp. 551 ff. Crossref logo
Pujadas, Geòrgia & Carmen Muñoz
2020. EXAMINING ADOLESCENT EFL LEARNERS’ TV VIEWING COMPREHENSION THROUGH CAPTIONS AND SUBTITLES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:3 ► pp. 551 ff. Crossref logo
Sakata, Naoki
2019. Profiling vocabulary for proficiency development: Effects of input and general frequencies on L2 learning. System 87 ► pp. 102167 ff. Crossref logo
Satori, Miki
2021. Effects of working memory on L2 linguistic knowledge and L2 listening comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:5 ► pp. 1313 ff. Crossref logo
Satori, Miki
2022. Effects Of Field Independence, Metacognitive Knowledge, And Vocabulary Knowledge On Second Language Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Listening ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Suárez, Maria del Mar & Ferran Gesa
2019. Learning vocabulary with the support of sustained exposure to captioned video: do proficiency and aptitude make a difference?. The Language Learning Journal 47:4 ► pp. 497 ff. Crossref logo
Uchihara, Takumi & Jon Clenton
2020. Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research 24:4 ► pp. 540 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.