Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 101/102 (1993) ► pp. 89106
References
BLOOR, M. & BLOOR, R.
(1987), Application of the Theory of FSP to the Teaching of writing. Paper presented at BAAL Seminar, Essex University.Google Scholar
COOPER, C.R. & GREENBAUM, S.
(1986), Studying Writing: Lin-guistic Approaches. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
COUTURE, B.
(ed) (1986), Functional Approaches to writing: Re-search Perspectives. London, Francis Pinter.Google Scholar
DANEŠ, F.
(1970), One instance of Prague School Methodology: Functional Analysis of Utterance and Text. In Garvin, P.L. (ed), Method and Theory in Linguistics, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1974), Functional Sentence Perspective and the Structure of Text. In DANES, F. (ed), Papers in Functional Sentence Per-spective, Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
FIRBAS, J.
(1964), On defining Theme in Functional Sentence Anal-ysis. Travaux Linguistique de Prague, Vol. 11, pp 267–280.Google Scholar
(1974), Soms Aspects of the Cechoslovak Approach to the Problem of Functional Sentence Perspective. In DANES, F. (ed), Papers in Functional Sentence Perspective, Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
FRIES, P. H.
(1981), On the status of Theme in English: Arguments from Discourse. Forum Linguisticum, Vol. VI, No. l, pp 1–38.Google Scholar
HAMP-LYONS, L.
(1988), The Product before: Task-Related influen-ces on the Writer. In Robinson, P.C., (ed) Academic Writing: Process and Product. Modern English Publications in association with The British Council.Google Scholar
HOEY, M.
(1983), On the surface of discourse. London, George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1991), Patterns of Lexis from Text. Oxford, Oxford Uni-versity Press.Google Scholar
HOLLOWAY, D.W.
(1981), Semantic Grammars: How they can help us Teach Writing. College Composition and Communication, No. 32, pp 205–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MATHESIUS, V.
(1939), On so-called Functional Sentence Perspec-tive. Slovo a Slovensort, Vol. 171, pp 177–174.Google Scholar
MYERS, G.
(1986), The social construction of two Biologists propo-sals. Written communication, vol. 2, No.3, pp 219–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
NWOGU, K.N.
(1990), Discourse Variation in Medical Texts: Schema, Theme and Cohesion in Professional and Journalistic Accounts. Monographs in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 21, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
PARSONS, G.
(1990), Cohesion and Coherence: Scientific Texts, A Comparative Study, Monographs in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 11, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
SWALES, J.
(1981), Aspects of Article Introductions. ESP Research Report, No. l, University of Aston in Birmingham.Google Scholar
(1990), Genre-Analysis: English in Academic and Re-search settings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
STUBBS, M.
(1986), Educational Linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
VAN DIJK T.A.
(1980), Macrostructures, Hillsdale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
WEISBERG, R.C.
(1984), Given and New: Paragraph Development Models from Scientific English, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 13.Google Scholar