Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 121/122 (1998) ► pp.51–84

Learning English as an L3

| University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
Published online: 1 January 1998
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.121-122.05las
References
ARTAMENDI, J.A.
(1994) : Rendimiento de bilingues en Test de Aptitudes según lengua/s de presentación. InI. Idiazabal & A. Kaifer (eds.) Eficacia educativa y enseñanza bilingüe en el País Vasco. Vitoria-Gasteiz : IVAP.Google Scholar
BASQUE GOVERNMENT-DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
(1993) : Evaluación de las experiencias de inglés. Unpublished study.Google Scholar
BlALYSTOK, E.
(1997) : The structure of age : in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13-2, 116-137.Google Scholar
BURSTALL, C.
(1975) : Factors affecting foreign-language learning : a consideration of some recent research findings. Language Teaching and Linguistics : Abstracts 81, 5-25.Google Scholar
CENOZ, M.A.
(1991) : Enseñanza-aprendizaje del inglés como L2 o L3. Ph.D. dissertation. Donostia : University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
CENOZ, J & LINDSAY, D.
(1994) : Teaching English in primary school : A project to introduce a third language to eight year olds. Language and Education 81, 201-210.Google Scholar
CLÉMENT, R.
(1978) : Motivational characteristics of francophones learning English. Quebec : International Center for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
CUMMINS, J.
(1979) : Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimal age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism 191, 198-203.Google Scholar
ELLIS, R.
(1985) : Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) : The study of second language acquisition. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FARHADY, H.
(1982) : Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly 161, 43-59.Google Scholar
GABIÑA, J.J., GOROSTIDI, R., IRURETAGOIENA, R., OLAZIREGI, I. & SIERRA, J.
(1986) : EIFE-1 Euskararen irakaskuntza: faktoreen eragina. Gasteiz : Hezkuntza, Unibertsitate eta Ikerketa Saila.Google Scholar
GARDNER, R.C.
(1985) : Social psychology and second language learning : the role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
GARDNER, R.C. & LAMBERT, W.
(1959) : Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology 131, 266-272.Google Scholar
(1972) : Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Routledge, Mass. : Newbury House.Google Scholar
GARDNER, R.C. & CLÉMENT, R.
(1990) : Social psychological perspectives on second language acquisition. In H. Giles & W.P. Robinson (eds.) Handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester : Wiley.Google Scholar
GENESEE, F.
(1976) : The role of intelligence in second language learning. Language Learning 261, 267-280.Google Scholar
GILES, H. & BYRNE, J.L.
(1982) : An intergroup approach to second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11, 17-40.Google Scholar
HOLOBOW, N., GENESEE, F. & LAMBERT, W.
(1991) : The effectiveness of a foreign language immersion program for children from different ethnic and social class backgrounds : Report 2. Applied Psycholinguistics 121, 179-198.Google Scholar
HÜTT, C.
(1972) : Males and females. Harmondsworth : Penguin.Google Scholar
IOUP, G., BOUSTAGUI, E., TIGI, M.E., & MOSELLE, M.
(1994) : Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: a case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 161, 73-98.Google Scholar
JACOBS, H.L.; ZINKGRAF, S.A.; WORMUTH, D.R.; HARTFIEL, V.F.; HUGHEY, J.B.
(1981) : Testing ESL composition. Newbury : Rowley.Google Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D.
(1981) : Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1985) : The input hypothesis : issues and implications. London : Longman.Google Scholar
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. & LONG, M.H.
(1991) : An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York : Longman.Google Scholar
LASAGABASTER, D.
(1998) : Creatividad y conciencia metalingüistica: incidencia en el aprendizaje del inglés como L3. Ph.D. dissertation. Leioa: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
in press) : The threshold hypothesis applied to three languages in contact at school. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. DOI logo
LAURÉN, U.
(1994) : The written production of bilingual and monolingual students. Performance and creativity. Vaasa, Finland : Universitas Wasaensis.Google Scholar
LONG, M.
(1990) : Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 121, 251-285.Google Scholar
MACKENZIE, J.L.
(1997) : Easing multilingual encounters in the Europe of today and tomorrow. In J.L. Otal, I. Fortanet & V. Codina (eds.) Estudios de lingüistica aplicada. Castellón : Universidad Jaume I.Google Scholar
OLSHTAIN, E., SHOHAMY, E., KEMP, J. & CHATOW, R.
1990) : Factors predicting success in EFL among culturally different learners. Language Learning 401, 23-44.
OLLER, J. & PERKINS, K.
(1978) : Intelligence and language proficiency as sources of variance in self-reported affective variables. Language Learning 281, 85-97.Google Scholar
OWEN, M.H.
(1960) : The attitude of parents and teachers of primary school children and ministers of religion to the teaching of Welsh as a second language in a selected area. M. A. thesis. University of Wales.Google Scholar
PATKOWSKY, M.
(1994) : The critical age hypothesis and interlanguage phonology. In M. Yavas (ed.) First and Second Language Phonology. San Diego : Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
PUJANTE, A.L. & GARCIA CARRASCO, J.
(1979) : Motivación y aprendizaje del inglés en el bachillerato y curso de orientación universitaria. In A.L. Pujante (ed.) Aspectos psicopedagógicos del aprendizaje de idiomas extranjeros. Salamanca : ICE de la Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
SANDERS, M. & MEIJERS, G.
(1995) : English as L3 in the elementary school. ITL. Review of Applied Linguistics 107-108, 59-78.Google Scholar
SCO VEL, T.
1988) : A Time to Speak : a Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. New York : Newbury House.
SELINKER, L. & LAMENDELLA, J.T.
(1978) : Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 31, 143-191.Google Scholar
SIERRA, J. & OLAZIREGI, I.
(1989) : EIFE-2 Euskararen irakaskuntza : faktoreen eragina. Gasteiz: Hezkuntza, Unibertsitate eta Ikerketa Saila.Google Scholar
(1990) : EIFE-3 Euskararen irakaskuntza: faktoreen eragina. Gasteiz: Hezkuntza, Unibertsitate eta Ikerketa Saila.Google Scholar
SKEHAN, P.
(1991) : Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 131, 275-298.Google Scholar
SWACKER, M.
(1975) : The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (eds.) Language and sex. Rowley : Newbury.Google Scholar
WHITE, L. & GENESEE, F.
(1996) : How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12-3, 233-265.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Siemund, Peter & Eliane Lorenz
2024. Chapter 5. Multilingual advantages. In Multifaceted Multilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 66], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.