Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 125/126 (1999) ► pp.195–227

A President, Speech Acts and Development in Nigeria

Analysing Consequences of the Gulf between Promise and Fulfilment

| Department of English University of Jos

The discourse strategies and social implications of speech importantly overlap to govern our relationships in person versus person, group versus group, and person versus group capacities. We apply here Speech Act Theory to communicative interactions with respect to person versus group by discourse - analytically studying the utterances of a nation’s president to his fellow country men and women. Based on the extensions by GRICE (1975), VAN DIJK (1977) and LEECH (1989) of AUSTIN’S (1962) Speech Act Theory, we examine the promise by a Nigerian Military President to return the country to democratic rule and the extent to which he kept his word. The syntactic and semantic frameworks are combined with the pragmatic acts to bring out the strategy of the spoken discourse. Saying, in the view of the theory, is tantamount to doing. Consequently, utterances carry the social responsibility weight, and there is great honour in redeeming the social weight of utterances through commensurate action. Speech acts executed with the consideration of this obligation as well as sincerity of action in mind can lead to development. However, we find that the promise in the Nigerian President’s speech acts to return the country to democracy is not fuiflied. Considering the primacy of the spoken word in the political realm, which can affect development in many ways, this paper strongly recommends that public leaders should bridge the familiar opposition between promise and fulfilment.

Published online: 1 January 1999
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.125-126.03ior
References
ADEGBIJA, E.
(1982) : A Speech act analysis of consumer advertisements in the “Nigerian Daily Times”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bloornington, Indiana. University Microfilms International, No. 8307973.Google Scholar
(1987) : “Speech act functions : Dimensions of communication and meaning in the English language in Nigeria.” ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 761:43–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) : “My friend, where is Anini? : Decoding the meaning of utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics 12(2)177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) : ‘I, Major - General X’ : Discourse tacts in military coup speeches in Nigeria Text 15(2):253–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AUSTIN, J.L.
(1962) : How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BACH, K. and HARNISH, R.M.
(1979) : Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BROWN, G. and YULE, G.
(1989) : Discourse Analysis Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CANDLIN, C.N.
(1977) : “Introduction” In M. Coulthard 1977 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis London : Longman.Google Scholar
CHURCH, G.J.
(1998) : “Helping the Helpless” Time, March 9,1998.Google Scholar
COULTHARD, M.
(1977) : An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London : Longman.Google Scholar
FRIES, C.C.
(1952) : The Structure of English New York : Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
GRICE, H.P.
(1975) : “Logic and conversation” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L. eds. 1975 Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3 : Speech Acts. New York : Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HALLIDAY, M.A.K and HASAN, R.
(1984) : Cohesion in English London : Longman.Google Scholar
IORAT1M-UBA, G.A.
(1989) : Cohesion in the written Text : An examination of the editorials of two Nigerian Newspapers published in English - “The Guardian” and “New Nigerian” M.A Dissertation. University of Jos, Nigeria.Google Scholar
KEENAN, E.O.
(1974) : “The Universality of conversational postulates” Language in Society 51:67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LARKIN, D. and O’MALLEY, M.H.
(1973) : “Declarative sentences and the rule-of-conversation hypothesis” In : Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society, 309–19.Google Scholar
LEECH, G
1989 The Principles of Pragmatics London : Longman.Google Scholar
MACDONALD, G. and PETTIT, P.
(1981) : Semantics and Social Science London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
National Concord (Nigerian)
November 19, 1992.
Newswatch (Nigerian)
November 16, 1992.
Nigerian Tribune
April 26, 1993.
ORWELL, G.
(1973) : Nineteen Eighty Four London : Penguin Books.Google Scholar
PALMER, F.R.
(1986) : Semantics London : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
POST, T.A.
(1993) : “A Despot’s Survival Guide.” Newsweek (American) April 26, 1993.Google Scholar
QUIRK, R.
et al. (1995) : Longman dictionary of contemporary English. Essex : Longman Group.Google Scholar
SCHIFFRIN, D.
(1994) : Approaches to Discourse Oxford, U.K. : Black-well.Google Scholar
SEARLE, J.R.
(1969) : Speech Acts Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tell (Nigerian)
July 19, 1993.
The Guardian (Nigerian)
September 10, 1992; august 21, 1993; August 30, 1993.
VANDIJK, T.A.
(1977) : Text and Context London : Longman.Google Scholar
Vanguard (Nigerian)
March 27, 1993.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rodríguez, Juan Luis
2022. The interplay of greetings and promises. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.