Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 129/130 (2000) ► pp.225–274

The Role of Input in Second Language Acquisition

More Comprehensible Input Supported by Grammar Instruction or More Grammar Instruction?

 | Istanbul (Turkey)
The present study investigates the combined effects of different amounts of comprehension-based and form-focused instruction on skill-based proficiency and knowledge of grammatical structures of beginner-level efl students. Specifically, the study addresses the following research questions : 1) Does a basically comprehension-based program of instruction supported by form-focused instruction help beginner-level efl learners improve/develop their listening, reading and writing abilities more than a basically form- focused program of instruction? 2) Does a basically form-focused program of instruction help beginner-level efl learners improve their knowledge of grammatical structures more than a basically comprehension-based program of instruction?
One experimental and one control group, each containing 20 lycee prep level Turkish efl students, participated in the study. The subjects in the experimental and control groups were randomly selected from among lycee prep classes in two different schools. The experimental group enrolled in a program of comprehension-based instruction supported by form- focused instruction; whereas, the control group enrolled in a basically form-focused program of instruction. Both the experimental and control groups had 29 hours of efl instruction per week for 36 weeks.
Different instruments were used to see the effects of these two different types of instruction on their reading, listening, writing skills and knowledge of grammatical structures. At the end of the fourth month, both groups were given the listening, reading and writing components of the Key English Test (ket) and the grammar component of the Oxford Placement Test. At the end of the eighth month, they were given the Preliminary English Test (pet) and another version of the grammar component of the Oxford Placement Test.
The results indicated that the program of comprehension-based efl instruction supported by form-focused instruction was more effective than a basically form-focused program of instruction in helping beginner-level students develop their listening, reading, and writing skills as well as their knowledge of grammatical structures.
Published online: 1 January 2000
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.129-130.04isi
References (133)
ADELSON-GOLDSTEIN, J. (1991). Listen First. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
AKYEL, A. (1991). Evaluatýon of an ESP program : a case study report. I.T.L. 93-94, 1–23.Google Scholar
ALLEN, P., SWAIN, M., HARLEY, B. & CUMMINS, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment : toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins and M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp.57–82). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ASHER, J., KUSUDO, J.A. & TORRE, R. (1983). Learning a second language through commands : the second field test. In J.W. Oiler and P.A. Ricchard-Amato (Eds.), Methods That Work (pp. 59–72). Rowley, Massachusetts : Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
BALTOVA, I. (1994).The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. The Canadian Modern Language Review 50, (3) 507–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BALTRA, A. (1992). On breaking with tradition : The significance of Terrell's Natural Approach. The Canadian Modern Language Review 48, (3) 565–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BIALYSTOK, E. (1988). Psycholinguistic dimensions of second Language Proficiency. In W. Rutherford and M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds), Grammar and Second Language Teaching, (pp. 31–50). Boston, Massachusetts : Heinle and Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
(1991). Achieving proficiency in a second language : A processing description. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selin-ker, M. Sharwood-Smith & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research (pp. 63–78). Philedelphia : Multilýngual Matters.Google Scholar
(1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 161, 157–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BROWN, D.H. (1987). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
BRUSCH, W. (1991). The role of reading in foreign language acquisition : designing and expeimental project. ELT Journal 45/2, 156–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BURGER, S. (1989). Content- based ESL in a sheltered psychology course : input, output and outcomes. TESL Canada Journal, 6 (2) 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CALL, M.E. (1985). Audithory short-term memory, listening comprehension, and the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 19, (4) 765–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CARSON, J.A. (1990). Reading and writing : cognitive perspectives. In J.E. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom : Second Language Perspectives. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
CELCE-MURCIA, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 25, (3) 459–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CHAUDRON, C. (1983). Simplification of input : topic reinstatements and theireffects on L2 learners cognition and recall. TESOL Quarterly 17, (3) 437–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COLLINS, C. (1980). Sustained silent reading periods : Effecy of teachers' behaviors and students' achievement. Elementary School Journal 811, 109–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COOK, V. (1986). Experimental approaches applied to two areas of second language learning research : age and listening based teaching methods. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental Approaches to Second Language Learning (pp. 23–27). Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Second Language Learning and Teaching. London : Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
DAMHUIS, R. (1993). Immigrant children in infant-class interactions. Studies in Second Language Acqusition 151, (3) 305–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DOUGHTY, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acqusition 13, (4) 431–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DULAY, H. and BURT, M. (1974). A new perspective on the creative construction process in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 241, 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983). Optimal language learning environments. In J. W. Oiler & P.A. Richard-Amato (Eds.), Methods That Work (pp. 38–48). Rowley, Massachusetts : Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
DULAY, H., BURT, M. & KRASHEN, S. (1982). Language Two. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DUNKEL, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language : toward an integratino of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly 25, (3) 431–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELLEY, W., BARHAM, I., LAMB, H., and Wyllie, M. (1979). The Role of Grammar in a secondary School Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand : New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
ELLEY, W. and MANGUBHAI, E. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly 191, 53–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELLIS, R. (1982). Informal and formal approaches to communicative lannguage teaching. ELT Journal 36, (2) 73–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1984). Can syntax be taught? A study of the effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of Wh-questions by children. Applied Linguistics 51, 138–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Second language learning and second language learners : growth and diversity. TESL Canada Journal 7, (1) 74–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993a). Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge : Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1993b). Ssecond language acquision and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly 27, (1) 91–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993C). Second language acquisition research : how does it help teachers? ELT Journal 47, (1) 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ELLIS, R. and M. RATHBONE. (1987). The Acquisition of German in a Classroom Context. Mimeograph. London : Ealing College of Higher Education.Google Scholar
EISTERHOLD, J.C. (1991). Reading-writing connections : toward a description for second language learners. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing (pp. 88–102). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
EVANS, M.A. & SCHMIDT, F. (1991). Repeated maternal book reading cwith two children : language-normal and language-impaired. First Language 111, 269–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EVANS, H. and TOWNER, J. (1975) "Sustained silent reading : Does it increase skills?" Reading Teacher 291, 155–156.Google Scholar
FAERCH, C. and G. KASPER. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 71, 257–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FEYTEN, C.M. (1991). The power of listening ability : an overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 75, (2). 173–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FLAHIVE, D.E. & BAILEY, N.H. (1990). Exploring reading/writing relationships in second language learner. In J.E. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom : Second Language Perspectives. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
FOTOS, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly 28, (2). 323–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GASS, S. (1988). Integrating research areas : a framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics 91, 198–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GASS, S.M. (1991). Grammar instruction, selective attention and learning process. In R. Phillipson., E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research (pp. 134–141). Philadelphia : Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
GASS, S.M. & Varonis, E.M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, (3). 283–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GRADMAN, H.L. & HANANIA, E. (1991). Language learning background factors and ESL proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 75, (1). 39–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GREGG, K. (1984). "Krashen's Monitor and Occam's Razor". Applied Linguistics 51, 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HAFIZ, F.M. & TUDOR, I. (1989). Extensive reading and the development of language skills. ELT Journal 43, (1). 4–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HARLEY, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French Immersion, a classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 191, 331–59.Google Scholar
(1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 151, (2). 245–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HARTLEY, V. & VINEY, P. (1983). American Streamline Departures. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1983). American Streamline Connections. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
HAUPTMAN, P.C., WESCHE, M.B. & READY, D. (1985). Second language acquisition through subject-matter learning : a follow-up study at the University of Ottawa. Language Learning 38, (3), 433–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HAWISHER, G. & SELFE, C. (1989). Critical Perspectives on Computers and Composition Instruction. New York : TC Press.Google Scholar
HELGESEN, M. & BROWN, S. (1994). Active Listening Building. New York : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
HIGGS, T.V. (1985). The input hypothesis : an inside look. Foreign Language Annals 18, (3), 197–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1982). Principals and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1983). The din in the head, input, and the language acquisition device. In J.W. Oiler & P.A. Richard-Amato (Eds.), Methods That Work (pp. 295–304). Rowley, Massachusetts : Newbury House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
(1984). Writing : Research, Theory, and Application. Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1985a). The Input Hypothesis : Issues and Implications. Harlow : Longman.Google Scholar
(1985b). Inquiries and Insights. Englewood Cliffs : Alemany Press.Google Scholar
(1989). Language Acquisition and Language Education. Hertfortshire : Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
(1993). The case for voluntary reading. The Canadian Modern Language Journal 501, 72–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KRASHEN, S.D. & TERREL, T.D. (1983). The Natural Approach. Hay-ward, California : The Alemany Press.Google Scholar
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. (1991). Second language acquisistion research : staking out the territory. TESOL Quarterly 25, (2), 315–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. & LONG, M.H. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London : Longman.Google Scholar
LEOW, R.P. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 151, 333–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LIGHTBOWN, P.M. & SPADA, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 121, 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). How Languages are Learned. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LIGHTBOWN, P.M., SPADA, N. & WHITE, L. (1993). The role of instruction in SLA : introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, (2). 143–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LONG, H.L. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly 17, (3). 359–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985). A role of instruction in second language acquisition : task based language training. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp. 77–100). Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1994). On the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly 28, (4), 782–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LOSCHKY, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, (3). 303–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MASNY, D. (1989). Linguistic awareness and second language learning. I.T.L. 85-86, 85–104.Google Scholar
MCLAUGHLIN, B. (1987). Theories of Second Language Learning. London : Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
MONTGOMERY, C. & EISENSTEIN, M. (1985). Real reality revisited : an experimental communicative course in ESL. TESOL Quarterly 191, 317–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OLIVER, M. (1973). The effect of high intensity practice on reading comprehension. Reading Improvement 101, 16–18.Google Scholar
(1976). The effect of high intensity practice on reading achievement. Reading Improvement 131, 226–228.Google Scholar
ÖZGÜLER, Ü. & GÜRMAN, N. (1991). An English Course for Turks. Istanbul : Milli Eðitim Basýmevi.Google Scholar
PICA, T. (1985). Linguistic simplicity and learnability : implications for language syllabus design. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp. 137–152). Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 211, 737–758.Google Scholar
PICA, T., Young, N. & DOUGHTY, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 211, 737–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PICA, T. (1991). Input as a theoretical and research construct. IRAL 29, (3). 185–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). The language learner's environment as a resource for linguistic input : a review of theory and research. I.T.L. 105-1061, 69–116.Google Scholar
PIENEMANN, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp. 23–76). Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1987). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. In C. Plaff (Ed.), First and Second Language Acquisition Processes (pp. 143–168). Cambridge : Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
PRABHU, N.S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
RAHT, C., DENMAN, B.R., LAVIE, N.E., & BRIGGS, S.J. (1991). Scott Foresman English In Contact 1. Glenview, Illinois : Scott Fores-man.Google Scholar
REID, J. (1990). Historical perspectives as writing and reading in ESL classroom. In J.E. Carson and I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the Composition Classroom : Second Language Perspectives. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, J., GORDON, D., & HARPER, A. (1987). Listen For It. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ROMNEY, J.C., ROMNEY, D.M. & BRAUN, C. (1988). The effects of readind aloud in French to immersion children on second language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review 45, (3), 530–538.Google Scholar
ROST, M. & KUMAI, N. (1990). First Steps in Listening. Harlow, Essex : Lingual House.Google Scholar
RUTHERFORD, W. (1987). Second Language Grammar : Learning and Teaching. New York : Longman.Google Scholar
(1988). Grammatical consciousness raising in brief historical perspective. In W. Rutherford, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and Second Language Teaching (pp. 15–19). New York : Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
SALEEMI, P.A. (1989). Inputs for L2 acquisition. IRAL, 17, (3), 173–191.Google Scholar
SCHNEIDER, J.M. (1989). The apartment House and experiment in simulation and the Natural Approach : focusing on cultural competence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 45, (4), 625–629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SCHWARTZ, B.D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 151, 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SELIGER, W.H. (1978). Does practice make perfect? : a study of interaction patterns and L2 competence. Language Learning 27, (2), 263–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979). On the nature and function of language rules in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 13, (3). 359–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SHARWOOD-SMITH, M. (1981). Consciousness raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2, (2). 159–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988). Consciousness and the second language learner. In M. Rutherford & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Grammar and Second Language Teaching (pp. 51–60). New York : Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
(1991). Speaking to many minds : on the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 7, (2). 118–132.Google Scholar
(1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 151, 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SPADA, N. (1986). "The interaction between types of content and type of instruction : some effects on the L2 proficiency of adult learners". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 81, 181–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SPADA, N. & LIGHTBOWN, M. (1993). Instruction and the development of question, in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 151, 205–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
STERN, H.H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp. 93–109). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SWAIN, M. (1985). Communicative competence : some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in the Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass : Newbury House.Google Scholar
SWAIN, M. & CARROL, S. (1987). The immersion observation study. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins (Eds.), The Development of Bilingual Proficiency : Volume II-Classroom Treatment. Toronto : Modern Language Center.Google Scholar
SWAIN, M. & LAPKIN, S. (1989). Canadian immersion and adult second language teaching : what's the connection? The Modern Language Journal 73, (2). 150–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SWAIN, M. (1991a). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research (pp. 234–250). Clevedon, Avon : Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1991b). French immersion and its off-shoots : getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign Language Acquisition Research and the Classroom (91–103). Lexington, Mass : P.L. Heath.Google Scholar
TERREL, T.D. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. The Modern Language Journal 75, (1), 52–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TRAHEY, M. & WHITE, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 151, 181–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VANPATTEN, B. (1987). On babies and bathwater : input in foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal 71 (2), 156–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988). How juries get hung : problems with the evidence for a focus on form in teaching. Language Learning 38, (2), 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 121, 287–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Foreign language classroom as a place to communicate. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign Language Acquisition and the Classroom (pp. 54–73). Lexington, Massachuttes : P.L. Heath.Google Scholar
VANPATTEN, B. & CADIERNO, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, (2). 225–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VINEY, P. (1985). Connections in Reading. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Departures in Reading. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
VINEY, P. & VINEY, K. (1989). A Weekend Away. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1990). A Week by the Sea. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WESLANDER, D. and G. STEPHANY. (1983). Evaluation of English as a second Language program for Southeast Asian Students. TESOL QUARTERLY 17 (3), 473–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WHITE, L. (1986). Implications of parametric variations for adult second language acquisition : an investigation of the pro-drop parameter. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental Approaches to Second Language Learning (pp. 55–72). Oxford : Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1987). Against comprehensible input : The input hypothesis and the development of second language competence. Applied Linguistics 8, (2). 95–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition : some effects of positive and negative evidence in the claassroom. Second Language Research 7, (2), 133–161.Google Scholar
WHITE, L., SPADA, N., LIGHTBOWN, P.M. & RANTA, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12, (4), 419–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WINITZ, H. & GARCIA, P.A. (1986). Teaching German to college students through the Comprehension Approach : a four-semester program of study. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental Approaches to Second Language Learning (pp. 127–149). Oxford : Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
WOODS, D. (1989). Error correction and the improvement of language form. TESL Canada Journal 6, (2). 60–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kürüm, Eyyüp Yaşar
2024. Türkiye’de Uygulanmakta Olan Yabancı Dil Eğitiminin Değerlendirilmesi ve Çözüm Önerileri. İZÜ Eğitim Dergisi 6:1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.