Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 131/132 (2001) ► pp.139–168

Repair and Completion Strategies in the Interlanguage of Advanced EFL Learners

| Universidad del Pais Vasco (Spain)
Published online: 1 January 2001
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.131-132.07gar
References
ALLEN, P., SWAIN, M., Harley, B. & Cummins, J.
(1990): Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, and M. Swain (eds.) The Development of Bilingual Proficiency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ASTON, G.
(1986): Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics 7(2): 128–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BARDOVI-HARLIG, K. & Bofman, T.
(1989): Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 111: 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BRUTON, A. & SAMUDA, V.
(1980): Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal 111: 49–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BYGATE, M.
(1999a): Task as a context for the framing, refraining and uriframing of language. System 271: 33–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999b): Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research 3(3): 185–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CELCE-MURCIA, M.
(1991): Grarnmar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 251: 459–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CHAUDRON, C.
(1988): Second language classrooms. Research on teaching and learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CROOKES, G.
(1990): The utterance and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 183–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CROOKES, G.V. & RULON, K.
(1985): Incorporation of corrective feedback in native speaker-non-native speaker conversation. Technical Report No. 3. Center for Second Language Classroom Research. Social Science Institute. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J.
(eds.) (1998): Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DUFF, P.
(1986): Another look at interlanguage talk: taking task to task In R. Day (ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 147–181.Google Scholar
ELLIS, R.
(1994): The study of second language acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995): Interpretation tasks and grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly 29(1): 87–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FOTOS, S.
(1998): Shifting the focus from forms to form in the efl classroom. ELT Journal 52/4: 301–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GARCIA MAYO, M.P.
(1997): Oral interaction among advanced EFL learners. Research project. The University of the Basque Country (UPV 103.130-HA087/97).Google Scholar
GARCIA MAYO, M.P. & Pica, T.
(2000a): L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed? International Review of Applied Linguistics 38 (1): 35–58.Google Scholar
(2000b): ”Is the efl environment a language-learning environment? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics- University of Pennsylvania [in press].Google Scholar
GASS, S.
(1997): Input, interaction and the second language learner, Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
GASS, S. & Selinker, L.
(1994): Second language acquisition: An introductory course, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
GASS, S. & VARONIS, E.M.
(1994): Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 161: 283–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GASS, S., MACKEY, A. & PICA, T.
(1998): The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 82(iii): 299–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GREEN, P.S. & HECHT, K.
(1993): Pupil self-correction in oral communication in English as a Foreign Language. System 21(2): 151–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GUMPERZ, J.
(1964): Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In J. Gumperz and Hymes, D. (eds) The ethnography of communication, American Anthropologist 66 (6): 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1970): Verbal strategies in multilingual communication. In J. Alatis, J. (ed.) Report of the Twenty-first Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies (Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics). Reprinted in R. Abrahms & Troike, R. (eds.) (1972) Language, Culture and Education, Engle-wood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall, 184–196.Google Scholar
HARLEY, B.
(1992): Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies 21: 159–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HARLEY, B. and SWAIN, M.
(1984): The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper and A. Howatt (eds.) Interlanguage, 291–311. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
HOLLIDAY, L.
(1995): NS syntactic modifications in NS-NNS negotiations as input data for second language acquisition of syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
HULSTIJN, J.
(1990): Appealing to consciousness in the L2 classroom. AILA Review 111: 57–68.Google Scholar
KASPER, G.
(1985): Repair in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 71: 200–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LIGHTBOWN, P. & SPADA, N.
(1993): How languages are learnt, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LINNELL, J.
(1995): Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
LONG, M.
(1996): The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds.) Handbook of second language acquisition, New York: Academic Press, 413–468.Google Scholar
(in press): Task-based language teaching, Oxford: Blackwell.
LONG, M. & CROOKES, G.
(1992): Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly 261: 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LONG, M. & ROBINSON, P.
(1998): Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds.)Google Scholar
LYSTER, R. & ranta, L.
(1997): Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 191: 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MCLAUGHLIN, B.
(1987): Theories of second language learning, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1990): Restructuring. Applied Linguistics 111:113–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MITCHELL, R. & MYLES, F.
(1998): Second language learning theories, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
PICA, T.
(1994): Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44(3): 493–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998): Handout on interaction, negotiation and L2 learning. The University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
PICA, T. & DOUGHTY, C.
(1985): Input and interaction in the communicative classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & Madden, C. (eds) Input in second language acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 115–132.Google Scholar
PICA, T., YOUNG, R. & DOUGHTY, C.
(1987): The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 211: 737–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PICA, T., HOLLIDAY, L., Lewis, N. & Morgenthaler, L.
(1989): Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 111: 63–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PICA, T., KANAGY, R. & Falodun, J.
(1993) :Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Grookes & Gass, S. (eds.) Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 9–34.Google Scholar
PICA, T., LINCOLN-PORTER, F., PANINOS, F. & Linnell, J.
(1995): What can second language learners learn from each other? Only their researcher knows for sure. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 11(1): 1–36.Google Scholar
PICA, T., LINCOLN-PORTER, F., Paninos, F. & Linnell, J.
(1996): Language learners' interaction: How does it address input, output and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly 30(1): 59–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SADOW, S.A.
(1982): Idea bank: Creative activities for the language class, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
SAVIGNON, S.
(1991): Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly 25(2): 261–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SCHEGLOFF, E., JEFFERSON, G. & SACKS, H.
(1977): The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SCHMIDT, R.W.
(1990): The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993): Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1992, 131: 206–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994): Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious. In N. Ellis (ed.) Implicit and explicit learning of languages, London: Academic Press, 165–209.Google Scholar
SPADA, N. & LIGHTBOWN, P.
(1989): Intensive esl programs in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal 71: 11–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
STORCH, N.
(1998): A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal 52/4: 291–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SWAIN, M.
(1985): Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development”. In S. Gass & Madden, C. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235–253.Google Scholar
(1988): Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning TESL Canada Journal 61: 68–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991): French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B.F. Freed (ed.) Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 91–103.Google Scholar
(1993): The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review 501: 158–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995): Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & Seidlhofer, B., (eds.) Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–144.Google Scholar
(1998): Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds.) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 64–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SWAIN, M. & LAPKIN, S.
(1995): Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 161: 371–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
THORNBURY, S.
(1997): Reformulation and reconstruction tasks that promote noticing. ELT Journal 51(4): 326–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UR, P.
(1996)[1981]: Discussions that work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, J.
(1995): Focus on form in communicative language teaching: Research fhidings and the classroom teacher. TESOL Journal 121–16.Google Scholar
(1999): Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49(4): 583–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Del Pilar García Mayo, María
2002. The effectiveness of two form‐focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
del Pilar Garcı́a Mayo, Marı́a
2002. Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: a comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research 37:3-4 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.