Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 145/146 (2004) ► pp. 167179
References
BOLINGER, DWIGHT
(1980) Language: The Loaded Weapon. London: Longman.Google Scholar
BRUTT-GRIFFLER, J.
(2002) World English: A Study of its Development. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
CANAGARARAJAH, A. SURESH
(1999) Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CINQUIN, CHANTAL
(1987) ’Homo coca-colens: from marketing to semiotics and politics’. In: Umiker-Sebeok, Jean (Ed.) Marketing and Semiotics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 485–495.Google Scholar
FAIRCLOUGH, N.
(1989) Language and Power. London: Longman (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
FREIRE, PAULO
(1970) Pedagogy ofthe Oppressed. New York: Herder.Google Scholar
HOLBOROW, M.
(1996) ’Review of The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language by Alistair Pennycook’. ELT Journal. Vol. 50. no. 2. 172–176.Google Scholar
PAVLENKO, A.
(2002a) Emotions and the body in Russian and English. Pragmatics and Cognition. Vol. 10. 201–236. Pavlenko, A. (2002b) Bilingualism and emotions. Multilingua Vol. 21. no.l. 45–78.Google Scholar
PHILLIPSON, ROBERT
(1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
PENNYCOOK, ALASTAIR
(1994) The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman (1998) English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
RAJAGOPALAN, KANAVILLIL
(1997) ’Linguistics and the myth of nativity: comments on the controversy over ’new/non-native’ Englishes’. Journal of Pragmatics. 271.225–231.Google Scholar
RAJAGOPALAN, KAKAVILLIL
(1999a) ’Of EFL teachers, conscience. and cowardice’. ELT Journal. 53(3). 200–206Google Scholar
RAJAGOPALAN, KANAVILLIL
(1999b) ’World English and its implications for linguistic theory’. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Major Varieties of English (MAVEN-2). Ms. University of Lincolnshire and Humberside, Lincoln, UK. To appear in the Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
(l999c) ’Critical approaches and their raison d’ȇtre: a rejoinder to Brumfit and Widdowson. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 9. No. 1. 127–134.Google Scholar
(2000) ’Critical pedagogy and linguistic imperialism in the EFL context’. TESOL Journal. Vol. 9. no. 4. 5–6. (2001) ’ELT classroom as an arena for identity clashes’. In Grigoletto, M. e Carmagnani, A.M.G. (eds.). Inglȇs como Lingua Estrangeira: Identidade, Praticas e Textualidade. São Paulo: Humanitas.. 23–29. (Originally delivered as a keynote speech at the XV National Encounter of University Teachers of English (XV ENPULl) , São Paulo, Brazil, July 1999)Google Scholar
(2002) ’National languages as flags of allegiance; or the linguistics that failed us: A close look at emergent linguistic chauvinism in Brazil.’ Journal of Language and Politics Vol. 1. no. 1. pp. 115–147.Google Scholar
RAJAGOPALAN, KAKAVILLIL
forthcoming).’The ambivalent role of English in Brazilian politics.’ World Englishes. Vol.22. no. 2 (Special Issue)
RAJAGOPALAN, KANAVILLIL
forthcoming-2). ’The language issue in Brazil: when local knowledge clashes with expert knowledge.’ In: S. Canagarajah Ed. Local knowledge, Globalization, and Language Teaching New York Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
forthcoming-3). ’The philosophy of applied linguistics’. To appear in, Davies, A. and Elder, C eds. The Handbook of Applied Linguistics Blackwell Publishers
forthcoming-4). ’Non-native speaker teachers of English and their anxieties: Ingredients for an experiment in action research.’ To appear in lurda, E. ed. Non-Native Language Teachers: Empirical New York Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
WIDDOWSON, H.
(1994) The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly. 281. 377–388.Google Scholar