References
Aart, F. & Schils, E.
(1995) Relative Clauses, the Accessibility Hierarchy, and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 331, 47–63.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P.
(Eds.) (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Correa, L. M. S.
(1995) An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 241,183–203.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
(1992) The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 681,81–139.Google Scholar
Eckman, F., Bell, L. & Nelson, D.
(1988) On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 91,1–20.Google Scholar
Gass, S.
(1980) An investigation of systematic transfer in adult second language learners. In R. C. Scarcella & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 132–141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
(1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humanities Computing Unit of Oxford University
(2000) British National Corpus World Edition. Oxford: Humanities Computing Unit of Oxford University.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
(1984) The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. Anderson (Ed.), Second language: A cross linguistic perspective (pp. 39–58). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ito, A.
(2001) Japanese EFL learners’ processing in English relativlzation. Review of Applied Linguistics, 133 & 134,325–345.Google Scholar
Kawauchi, C.
(1988) Universal processing of relative clauses by adult learners of English. JACET Bulletin, 191, 19–36.Google Scholar
Keenan, E.
(1975) Variation in universal grammar. In E. Fasold & R. Shuy (Eds.), Analyzing variation in language (pp. 136–149). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E.L. & Comrie, B.
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 63–99.Google Scholar
Kuno, S.
(1974) The position of relative clause and cognition. Linguistic Inquiry, 51,117–136.Google Scholar
Ohba, H.
(1995) The learning order of English relative clauses by Japanese senior high school students in an instruction-only environment. Journal of Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, 211, 19–35.Google Scholar
Romaine, S.
(1984) The language of children and adolescents: The acquisition of communicative competence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sadighi, F.
(1994) The acquisition of English relative clauses by Chinese, Japanese and Korean adult native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 321,141–153.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A.
(1974) The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 31,272–281.Google Scholar
Shumann, J. H.
(1980) Acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research In second language acquisistion (pp. 119–131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1973) Cognitive prerequisites forthe development of grammar. In C. A. Furgason & D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
SPSS Windows 7.5 version
(1996) Chicago, IL. SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Takashima, H.
(2000) Another look at the order of difficulty of relative clauses from corpus linguistics—Statistical procedures, analysis and results. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 381,313–329.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J.
(1994) An analysis of relative clauses in the Lancaster/IBM spoken English corpus. English Studies, 751,73–84.Google Scholar