Cover not available
Article published In:
Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Kris Van den Branden and Machteld Verhelst
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 152] 2006
► pp. 85–109

Taking Text to Task

Issues and Choices in Curriculum Construction1

| Georgetown University
| University of llinois at Urbana-Champaign
| Georgetown University
This article argues that the construct of task can provide a principled and effective foundation for the development of extended, multi-year curricula and pedagogies for second/foreign language learning of adults. That assertion is made with an important condition: "task" must be expanded, both theoretically and empirically, toward issues that arise in conjunction with textuality and literacy rather than being grounded primarily in psycho linguistic, sentence-oriented processing considerations, as original proposals by Long and Crookes (1992) had suggested.The article presents that overall theoretical argument and then describes how genre-based tasks have been used (1) for selection and sequencing decisions within an existing contentoriented collegiate curriculum in the German Department at Georgetown University; (2) as a way to inform pedagogical choices that target advanced levels of L2 ability, particularly the crucial area of vocabulary development; and (3) to devise genre-based tasks that assess L2 learners' language abilities and content knowledge across the curriculum and also help to further specify learning objectives and curricular choices.
Published online: 1 January 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017864
References
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (ed.), translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, The dialogic imagination (pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1986) The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(2002) A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37-74). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M.
(2001) Introduction. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.1-20). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(1998) Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 262-295). New York: MLA.Google Scholar
(2002) The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 191,419-437.Google Scholar
(2004) Advanced L2 literacy: Beyond option or privilege. ADFL Bulletin, 361(1), 52-60.Google Scholar
(2006a) A semiotic perspective on culture and foreign language teaching: Implications for collegiate materials development. In V. Galloway, & B. Cothran (Eds.), Language and culture out of bounds: Discipline-blurred perspectives on the foreign language classroom (pp. 37-66). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.Google Scholar
(2006b) Perspectives: Interrogating communicative competence as a framework for collegiate foreign language study. Modern Language Journal, 901(2), 244-266.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Sprang, K.A.
(2004) Fostering advanced L2 literacy: A genre-based, cognitive approach. In H. Byrnes, & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 47-85). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.Google Scholar
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M.
(Eds.) (1993) The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Crane, C., Liamkina, 0., & Ryshina-Pankova, M.
(2004) Three papers delivered in the colloquium "Expanding notions of explicit instruction: The potential of genre-based tasks," American Association for Applied Linguistics (MAL), Portland, OR, May 3, 2004.Google Scholar
Developing multiple literacies
: A curriculum renewal project of the German Department at Georgetown University, 1997-2000. (2000) [URL].
Ellis, N.
(2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 305-352.Google Scholar
Elfis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, ,J. P.
(1998) What is literacy? In V. Zamel, & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp. 51-59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P.
(2002) Literacies, identities, and discourses. In M. J. Schleppegrell, & M. Cecilia Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 159-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Greene, S.
(1992) Mining texts in reading to write. Journal of Advanced Composition, 121, 151-170.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1974) The place of "functional sentence perspective" in the system of linguistic description. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (Janua Linguarum, Ser. Minor 147) (pp. 43-53). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
(1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 51(2), 93-116.Google Scholar
(1994, 2nd ed.). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
(1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. LondonlWashington: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, R.
(1995) The conception of context in text. In P. H. Fries, & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday (pp. 183-283). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1996) Speech genre, semiotic mediation and the development of higher mental functions. In C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning: Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp. 152-190). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B.
(1999) Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 303-317.Google Scholar
Holquist, M.
(1981) The politics of representation. In S. J. Greenblatt (Ed.), Allegory and representation: Selected papers from the English Institute, 1979-80 (pp. 163-183). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1972) On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected readings (pp. 269-283). Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Joe, A.
(1998) What effect do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 191,357-377.Google Scholar
Johnson, K.
(1982) Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Labov, w., & Waletzky, J.
(1997) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 71(1-4),3-38.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1994) On the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 281, 782-790.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G.
(1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 261, 27-56.Google Scholar
(1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes, & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
(1985) Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In J. D. Benson, & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), SystemiC perspectives on discourse (pp. 243-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C.
(1993) Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 221–292). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2006) Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Exploring the meaning-making resources of languages systemically. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Maxim, H. H.
(2004) Expanding visions for collegiate advanced foreign language learning. In H. Byrnes, & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 180–193). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.Google Scholar
Melka, F.
(1997) Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M.
(2005) The essential roles of assessment, measurement, and evaluation in taskbased language teaching. Plenary address presented at the First International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, University of Leuven, Belgium (Sept. 23, 2005). Retrieved from [URL].
(2006) Assessing advanced foreign language learning and learners: From measurement constructs to educational uses. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 167–187.Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2005) For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 891, 427–443.Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M.
(2006) Lexical inferencing in L 1 and L2: Implications for vocabulary instruction and learning at advanced levels. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 118–135.Google Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M.
(2006) Construction of coherent discourse in written texts by American learners of German: Towards attainment of advanced levels of literacy in a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, Wachington , DC.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwanenftugel, P., & Akin, C.
(1994) Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quarterly, 291, 251–264.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sprang, K.A.
(2003) Vocabulary acquisition and advanced learners: The role ofgrammaticization and conceptual organization in the acquisition of German verbs with inseparable prefixes. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L.
(1975) An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V.
(2006) Generalized collective dialogue and advanced foreign language capacities. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 59–72.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P.
(2002) Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 207–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar