Cover not available
Article published In:
Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Kris Van den Branden and Machteld Verhelst
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 152] 2006
► pp. 85–109

Taking Text to Task

Issues and Choices in Curriculum Construction1

| Georgetown University
| University of llinois at Urbana-Champaign
| Georgetown University
This article argues that the construct of task can provide a principled and effective foundation for the development of extended, multi-year curricula and pedagogies for second/foreign language learning of adults. That assertion is made with an important condition: "task" must be expanded, both theoretically and empirically, toward issues that arise in conjunction with textuality and literacy rather than being grounded primarily in psycho linguistic, sentence-oriented processing considerations, as original proposals by Long and Crookes (1992) had suggested.
The article presents that overall theoretical argument and then describes how genre-based tasks have been used (1) for selection and sequencing decisions within an existing contentoriented collegiate curriculum in the German Department at Georgetown University; (2) as a way to inform pedagogical choices that target advanced levels of L2 ability, particularly the crucial area of vocabulary development; and (3) to devise genre-based tasks that assess L2 learners' language abilities and content knowledge across the curriculum and also help to further specify learning objectives and curricular choices.
Published online: 1 January 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017864
References (51)
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (ed.), translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, The dialogic imagination (pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37-74). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.1-20). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 262-295). New York: MLA.Google Scholar
(2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 191,419-437.Google Scholar
(2004). Advanced L2 literacy: Beyond option or privilege. ADFL Bulletin, 361(1), 52-60.Google Scholar
(2006a). A semiotic perspective on culture and foreign language teaching: Implications for collegiate materials development. In V. Galloway, & B. Cothran (Eds.), Language and culture out of bounds: Discipline-blurred perspectives on the foreign language classroom (pp. 37-66). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.Google Scholar
(2006b). Perspectives: Interrogating communicative competence as a framework for collegiate foreign language study. Modern Language Journal, 901(2), 244-266.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Sprang, K.A. (2004). Fostering advanced L2 literacy: A genre-based, cognitive approach. In H. Byrnes, & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 47-85). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.Google Scholar
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Crane, C., Liamkina, 0., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2004). Three papers delivered in the colloquium "Expanding notions of explicit instruction: The potential of genre-based tasks," American Association for Applied Linguistics (MAL), Portland, OR, May 3, 2004.Google Scholar
Developing multiple literacies: A curriculum renewal project of the German Department at Georgetown University, 1997-2000. (2000). [URL].
Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 305-352.Google Scholar
Elfis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, ,J. P. (1998). What is literacy? In V. Zamel, & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp. 51-59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2002). Literacies, identities, and discourses. In M. J. Schleppegrell, & M. Cecilia Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 159-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Greene, S. (1992). Mining texts in reading to write. Journal of Advanced Composition, 121, 151-170.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1974). The place of "functional sentence perspective" in the system of linguistic description. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (Janua Linguarum, Ser. Minor 147) (pp. 43-53). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
(1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 51(2), 93-116.Google Scholar
(1994, 2nd ed.). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. LondonlWashington: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. (1995). The conception of context in text. In P. H. Fries, & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday (pp. 183-283). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1996). Speech genre, semiotic mediation and the development of higher mental functions. In C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning: Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp. 152-190). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 303-317.Google Scholar
Holquist, M. (1981). The politics of representation. In S. J. Greenblatt (Ed.), Allegory and representation: Selected papers from the English Institute, 1979-80 (pp. 163-183). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected readings (pp. 269-283). Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Joe, A. (1998). What effect do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 191,357-377.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Labov, w., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 71(1-4),3-38.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1994). On the advocacy of the task-based syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 281, 782-790.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 261, 27-56.Google Scholar
(1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes, & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In J. D. Benson, & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), SystemiC perspectives on discourse (pp. 243-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. (1993). Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 221–292). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2006). Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Exploring the meaning-making resources of languages systemically. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2004). Expanding visions for collegiate advanced foreign language learning. In H. Byrnes, & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 180–193). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson.Google Scholar
Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2005). The essential roles of assessment, measurement, and evaluation in taskbased language teaching. Plenary address presented at the First International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, University of Leuven, Belgium (Sept. 23, 2005). Retrieved from [URL].
(2006). Assessing advanced foreign language learning and learners: From measurement constructs to educational uses. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 167–187.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 891, 427–443.Google Scholar
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (2006). Lexical inferencing in L 1 and L2: Implications for vocabulary instruction and learning at advanced levels. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 118–135.Google Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2006). Construction of coherent discourse in written texts by American learners of German: Towards attainment of advanced levels of literacy in a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, Wachington , DC.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwanenftugel, P., & Akin, C. (1994). Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quarterly, 291, 251–264.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sprang, K.A. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition and advanced learners: The role ofgrammaticization and conceptual organization in the acquisition of German verbs with inseparable prefixes. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2006). Generalized collective dialogue and advanced foreign language capacities. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 59–72.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 207–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (38)

Cited by 38 other publications

Allen, Heather Willis & Kate Paesani
2022. Genre instruction, textual borrowing, and foreign language writing: Graduate teaching assistant perspectives and practices. Language Teaching Research 26:4 ► pp. 755 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Qin, Jie
2022. Potential contribution of SFL to task-based research: An examination of planning effects using genre-based theme analysis. System 104 ► pp. 102695 ff. DOI logo
Troyan, Francis John, José David Herazo & Marianna Ryshina-Pankova
2022. SFL pedagogies in language education: Special issue introduction. System 104 ► pp. 102694 ff. DOI logo
Warner, Chantelle
2022. Playful designs: Multiliteracies and literariness in the beginning language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 55:3 ► pp. 704 ff. DOI logo
Crane, Cori & Michael Malloy
2021. The development of temporal-spatial meaning in personal recounts of beginning L2 writers of German. System 99 ► pp. 102498 ff. DOI logo
Cunningham, D. Joseph
2021. Adapting an Undergraduate Multiliteracies German Curriculum for Online Instruction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Íkala 26:3 ► pp. 749 ff. DOI logo
Kuhn‐Brown, Kerstin
2021. A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach to Instructional Design for L2 German: Connecting Language and Content. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 54:2 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
2019. Applications of Usage-Based Approaches to Language Teaching. In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 939 ff. DOI logo
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
2019. Applications of Usage-Based Approaches to Language Teaching. In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Horverak, May Olaug
2019. PhD revisited: English writing instruction in Norwegian upper secondaryschool. In English Didactics in Norway, ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Michelson, Kristen
2019. Global simulation as a mediating tool for teaching and learning language and culture as discourse. Foreign Language Annals 52:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Crane, Cori
2016. Understanding and Evaluating L2 Personal Letter Writing: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Analysis of Student Texts in German. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 49:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, Morgan
2016. Teaching Resistance to Narrative: Brecht's Theater Praxis as a Response to Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck'sDas Leben der Anderen. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 49:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Angel M. Y.
2016. Directions for Future Research and the Way Forward. In Language Across the Curriculum & CLIL in English as an Additional Language (EAL) Contexts, ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
González-Lloret, Marta & Katharine B Nielson
2015. Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research 19:5 ► pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
MOZGALINA, ANASTASIA & MARIANNA RYSHINA–PANKOVA
2015. Meeting the Challenges of Curriculum Construction and Change: Revision and Validity Evaluation of a Placement Test. The Modern Language Journal 99:2 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna
2015. A meaning-based approach to the study of complexity in L2 writing: The case of grammatical metaphor. Journal of Second Language Writing 29 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Ryshina‐Pankova, Marianna
2018. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Advanced Second Language Proficiency. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
RYSHINA–PANKOVA, MARIANNA
2010. Toward Mastering the Discourses of Reasoning: Use of Grammatical Metaphor at Advanced Levels of Foreign Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 94:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Sharma, Bal Krishna
2015. Interactional concerns in implementing group tasks: addressing silence, dominance, and off-task talk in an academic writing class. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 9:3 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Yeh, Hui-Chin
2015. Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28:6 ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Keck, Casey & YouJin Kim
2014. Pedagogical Grammar, DOI logo
Ortega, Lourdes
2012. Byrnes, Heidi. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Paesani, Kate
2011. Research in Language-Literature Instruction: Meeting the Call for Change?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Yasuda, Sachiko
2011. Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing 20:2 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Yasuda, Sachiko
2015. Exploring changes in FL writers’ meaning-making choices in summary writing: A systemic functional approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 27 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Yasuda, Sachiko
2017. Toward a Framework for Linking Linguistic Knowledge and Writing Expertise: Interplay Between SFL‐Based Genre Pedagogy and Task‐Based Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 576 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi, Hiram H. Maxim & John M. Norris
2010. Author Bios, Figures and Tables, Acronyms Used, References. The Modern Language Journal 94:s1 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez Prieto, Maria del Carmen
2010. Authentic instruction in literary worlds: Learning the stylistics of concept-based grammar. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 19:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Williams, T. A.
2009. Tasks in Action: Task-Based Language Education from a Classroom-Based Perspective. ELT Journal 63:4 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2008. Articulating a foreign language sequence through content: A look at the culture standards. Language Teaching 41:1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2008. Assessing Content and Language. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ► pp. 2182 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2009. Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education 20:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2014. Linking task and writing for language development. In Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing [Task-Based Language Teaching, 7], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2014. Theorizing language development at the intersection of ‘task’ and L2 writing. In Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing [Task-Based Language Teaching, 7], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Byrnes, Heidi
2022. Heidi Byrnes's essential bookshelf: Curriculum. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.