Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 155 (2008) ► pp.77–93

Collex-Biz

A Corpus-Based Lexical Syllabus for Business English

| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – Interfacultair Instituut voor Levende Talen
| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – FWO-Vlaanderen
| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – Interfacultair Instituut voor Levende Talen

This paper reports on the development of Collex-Biz, a corpus-driven web-based learning platform for general economic English. The design of this platform was informed by a number of research-based principles, particularly frequency and collocation, which are insufficiently incorporated in existing Business English course materials. Following Sinclair & Renouf (1988) and Nelson (2000), we first developed a ‘lexical syllabus’ for first-year Business English students on the basis of frequency data from a self-compiled 6 million word corpus of business news reports. A didactically inspired selection of the most useful single words and collocations was then thematically classified. On the basis of concordances, finally, exercises were created in which lexical items were maximally contextualised and systematically recycled. In this article, we discuss the criteria that guided our selection of items and elaborate on the principles behind the exercise design.

Published online: 1 January 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.155.0.2032359
References
Altenberg, B., & Granger, S.
(2001) The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 221, 173–194.Google Scholar
Baker, P.
(2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Barnbrook, G.
(1996) Language and computers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Journal of Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
(1998) Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication and culture. ELT Journal, 521, 43–56.Google Scholar
Doughty, C.
(1991) Second Language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in second language acquisition, 131, 431–496.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.
(1995) Consciousness in second language acquisition: A review of field studies and laboratory experiments. Language Awareness, 41, 143–188.Google Scholar
(1997) SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fotos, S.
(1994) Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 323–351.Google Scholar
Francis G.
(1993) A corpus-driven approach to grammar - principles, methods and examples. In M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds), Text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E.
(1996) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Francis, G., Manning E. & Hunston, S.
(1997) Verbs: Patterns and practice. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gavioli, L.
(2005) Exploring corpora for ESP learning. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 21. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2004) The textual priming of lexis. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (Eds), Corpora and language learners (pp. 21–41). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(1995) Grammar in teacher education: the role of a corpus. Language Awareness, 41, 15–32.Google Scholar
(2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mascull, B.
(1996) Collins COBUILD: Keywords in business. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.J.
(2001) Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Y. Tono
(2006) Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P
(1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Nation, I.S.P. & R. Waring
(1997) Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, M.
(2000) A corpus-based study of the lexis of business English and business English teaching materials. Unpublished PhD thesis. Manchester: University of Manchester. Retrieved January 23, 2007 from [URL]
Nesselhauf, N.
(2004a) How learner corpus analysis can contribute to language teaching: A study of support verb constructions. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp. 109–124). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2004b) Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pickett, D.
(1988) English in business: Knowing and acting. In S. Holden (Ed.), Language and Literature. Oxford: Modern English Publications..Google Scholar
Powell, M.
(1996) The real language of Business. English Book Centre Newsletter. Winter 1996 (51). Oxford: The English Book Centre.Google Scholar
Scott, M.
(1997) PC Analysis of Key Words and Key Key Words. System, 25(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1966) Beginning the study of lexis. In C. E. Bazell, J.C. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday & R. H. Robins (Eds), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp. 410–430). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
(1991) Corpus, concordance,collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) The lexical item. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Contrastive lexical semantics (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. & A. J. Renouf
(1988) A lexical syllabus for language learning. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary in language teaching (pp.140–160). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(Ed.) (1995) The Collins COBUILD English Dictionary. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(1995) Collocations and semantic profiles: on the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language, 2(1), 23–55.Google Scholar
Trahey, M. & L. White
(1993) Positive evidence and preemption in the L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 151, 181–204.Google Scholar