Article published In:
Learning and Teaching L2 Writing
Guest-edited by Daphne van Weijen, Elke Van Steendam and Gert Rijlaarsdam
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156] 2008
► pp. 203226
References
Beare, S., & Bourdages, J. S.
(2007) Skilled writers’ generating strategies in L1 and L2: an exploratory study. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), M. Torrance, L. Van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 20, Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 151–161). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Breetvelt, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
(1994) Relations between writing processes and text quality: when and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12 (2), 103–123.Google Scholar
Breuker, J. A., Elshout, J. J., Van Someren, M. W., & Wielinga, B. J.
(1986) Hardopdenken en protokolanalyse [Thinking aloud and protocol analysis]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 11 (5), 241–254.Google Scholar
Broekkamp, H., & Van den Bergh, H.
(1996) Attention strategies in revising a foreign language text. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 2, Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 170–181). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, L., & J., & Flower, L.
(1989) Foundations for creativity in the writing process: Rhetorical representations of ill-defined problems (Tech. Rep. No. 32). Berkeley, CA; and Pittsburgh, PA: Center for the Study of Writing.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R.
(2001) Fluency in writing, generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18 (1), 80–98.Google Scholar
Couzijn, M., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
(2002) Writing Processes and text quality: effects of L1/L2. Paper presented at the SIG Writing ‘02 Conference, Staffordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Cumming, A.
(2001) Learning to write in a second language: two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 1 (2), 1–23.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
(2004) The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (1), 59–84.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Yuan, F.
(2005) The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In N. Spada & J. Hulstijn (Series Eds.), R. Ellis (Ed.), Language learning and language teaching Vol. 11, Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A.
(1998) Protocol analysis. In W. Bechteld & G. Graham (Eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science (pp. 425–432). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A.
(1980) Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review, 87 (3), 215–251.Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R.
(1980) The Dynamics of composing: making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1981) Plans that guide the composing process. In C. H. Frederiksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication. Volume 2: Writing: process, development and communication (pp. 39–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grabe, W.
(2001) Notes toward a theory of second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On Second Language Writing (pp. 39–57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S.
(1980) Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Gradwohl Nash, J.
(1996) On the nature of planning in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences & applications (pp. 29–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Janssen, D., Van Waes, L., & Van den Bergh, H.
(1996) Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences & applications (pp. 233–250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jones, S., & Tetroe, J.
(1987) Composing in a second language. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time; Modelling production processes (pp. 34–57). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. L.
(1985) The composing process of college students writing from sources. Written Communication, 2 (4), 434–456.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levy, C. M., Marek, J. P., & Lea, J.
(1996) Concurrent and retrospective protocols in writing research. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 2, Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 542–556). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S.
(1995) Is writing as difficult as it seems? Memory and Cognition, 23 (6), 767–779.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2005) Using concurrent protocols to explore L2 writing Processes: methodological issues in the collection and analysis of data. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing research; perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 191–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Qi, D. S.
(1998) An inquiry into language-switching in second language composing processes. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des languages vivantes, 54 (3), 413–435.Google Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H.
(1996) The dynamics of composing-an agenda for research into an interactive compensatory model of writing: many questions, some answers. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences & applications (pp. 107–125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2006) Writing process theory: a functional dynamic approach. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 41–53). NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., & Murphy, L.
(2006) Generating text in native and foreign language writing: a temporal analysis of problem-solving formulation processes. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (i), 100–114.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Marín, J., & Murphy, L.
(2001) A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing Language Learning, 51 (3), 497–538.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Marín, J.
(2002) A critical examination of L2 writing process research. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), S. Ransdell & M. L. Barbier (Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 11, New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 11–47): Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sanders, T., & Schilperoord, J.
(2006) Text structure as a window on the cognition of writing; How text analysis provides insights in writing products and writing processes. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 386–402). NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M.
(2002) Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), Studies in Writing Vol. 11, New directions for research in L2 Writing (pp. 49–80): Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
(2004) A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54 (3), 525–582.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., Van Gelderen, A., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P.
, et al. (2003) First language and second language writing: the role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53 (1), 165–202.Google Scholar
Shi, L.
(2004) Textual borrowing in second language writing. Written Communication, 21 (2), 171–200.Google Scholar
Silva, T.
(1993) Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (4), 657–677.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J.
(1999) Multilevel analysis; an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M.
(2005) Reading and writing in a foreign language; a comparison of conceptual and linguistic processes in Dutch and English. SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut van de Faculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & De Glopper, K.
(2006) Revising in two languages: a multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 151, 201–233.Google Scholar
Thorson, H.
(2000) Using the computer to compare foreign and native language writing processes: a statistical and case study approach. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (ii), 155–170.Google Scholar
Uzawa, K.
(1996) Second language learners’ processes of L1 writing, L2 writing and translation from L1 into L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5 (3), 271–294.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
(1996) The dynamics of composing: modelling writing process data. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences & applications (pp. 207–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2001) Changes in cognitive activities during the writing process and relationships with text quality. Educational Psychology, 21 (4), 373–385.Google Scholar
(2007) The dynamics of idea generation during writing: an online study. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), M. Torrance, L. Van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Studies in writing Vol. 20, Writing and cognition: research and applications (pp. 125–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Van der Hoeven, J.
(1996) Children’s composing: a study of the relationships between planning and revision skill, writing processes, text quality and linguistic skills. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Studies in writing Vol. 2, Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 108–120). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T.
(2008a) Variation in the orchestration of cognitive activities and text quality in L1 writing. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
(2008b) Composing episodes: The hierarchical structure of L1 and L2 writing Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Wang, W., & Wen, Q.
(2002) L1 use in the L2 composing process: an exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11 (3), 225–246.Google Scholar
Woodall, B. R.
(2002) Language-switching: using the first language while writing in a second. Journal of Second Language Writing, 111, 7–28.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Barkaoui, Khaled
2015. Test Takers' Writing Activities During the TOEFL iBT® Writing Tasks: A Stimulated Recall Study. ETS Research Report Series 2015:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Barkaoui, Khaled
2019. WHAT CAN L2 WRITERS’ PAUSING BEHAVIOR TELL US ABOUT THEIR L2 WRITING PROCESSES?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:3  pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Bowen, Neil Evan Jon Anthony, Nathan Thomas & Nina Vandermeulen
2022. Exploring feedback and regulation in online writing classes with keystroke logging. Computers and Composition 63  pp. 102692 ff. DOI logo
Choi, Ikkyu & Paul Deane
2021. Evaluating Writing Process Features in an Adult EFL Writing Assessment Context: A Keystroke Logging Study. Language Assessment Quarterly 18:2  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P. & Melissa A. Bowles
2023. Chapter 5. Verbally mediated data. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5],  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Révész, Andrea & Marije Michel
2019. INTRODUCTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:3  pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Tillema, Marion, Huub van den Bergh, Gert Rijlaarsdam & Ted Sanders
2011. Relating self reports of writing behaviour and online task execution using a temporal model. Metacognition and Learning 6:3  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Valenzuela, Ángel & Ramón D. Castillo
2023. The effect of communicative purpose and reading medium on pauses during different phases of the textualization process. Reading and Writing 36:4  pp. 881 ff. DOI logo
Van Waes, Luuk, Daphne van Weijen & Mariëlle Leijten
2014. Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the writing process. Computers & Education 73  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
van Weijen, Daphne, Gert Rijlaarsdam & Huub van den Bergh
2019. Source use and argumentation behavior in L1 and L2 writing: a within-writer comparison. Reading and Writing 32:6  pp. 1635 ff. DOI logo
van Weijen, Daphne, Huub van den Bergh, Gert Rijlaarsdam & Ted Sanders
2009. L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing 18:4  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez-Cañizo, Marta, Olivia Afonso & Paz Suárez-Coalla
2023. Writing proficiency in English as L2 in Spanish children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia 73:1  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 january 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.