Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 171:2 (2020) ► pp.280–306

Effects of rhetorical text analysis on idea generation and text quality

| Tra Vinh University
| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam
| Leiden University
Producing a meaningful written discourse in a foreign language requires a high cognitive effort of EFL learners. They face challenges caused by L2 word or grammar-related difficulties, and also by the L2 genre and genre conventions that may be quite different from what they experienced in their L1. The present study focusses on the support offered to Vietnamese L2 writers to overcome these hindrances. An intensive four-week writing intervention was designed and tested to examine whether encouraging genre awareness via a short session of sample text analysis could empower students to conduct effective brainstorming for argumentative writing. In a pre-test post-test control group design with switching replications, with 66 EFL intermediate undergraduate participants, the study obtained four indicators of L2 argumentative writing quality: idea generation, productivity, global text quality and self-efficacy. The results showed that participants integrated the sample text analysis into the idea generation stage. They created significantly longer self-expressive free writing texts, perceived the generated ideas as more useful, and used more of these ideas in their argumentative texts composition, compared to students from the control condition (with teacher instruction only). No treatment effects were found for productivity, global quality of final text, and self-efficacy. Students in both control and treatment conditions generally showed a significant improvement on these variables.
Keywords: idea generation, sample text analysis, argumentative writing, second language writing, self-efficacy, text productivity
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Genre pedagogy, idea generation practice and research in an EFL setting
  • Free writing as an idea generation activity in the EFL classroom
    • The present study
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Intervention
    • Measures
    • Procedure
    • Analyses
  • Results
    • Generation of ideas
    • Productivity and quality of final text
    • Self-efficacy
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16013.rij
References (52)
References
Ahmed, A., & Ahsan, M. A. F. (2011). The right approach to teaching writing in an EAP setting: Some perspectives. In A. Ahmed, G. Cane & M. Hanzala (Eds.), Teaching English in multilingual contexts: current challenges, future directions (pp. 53–68). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowden, D. (1995). The rise of a metaphor: “voice” in composition pedagogy. Rhetoric Review, 14(1), 173–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chandler, S. (2007). Fear, teaching composition, and students’ discursive choices: re-thinking connections between emotions and college student writing. Composition Studies, 35(2), 53–70.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. (2008). Analyzing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: The case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 50–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deng, L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ generic competence: A genre-based & process genre approach. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, D. B. (2015). Writing is not natural. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies (pp. 27–29). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 591, 177–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elashri, I. I. E. A. (2013). The effect of the genre-based approach to teaching writing on the EFL Al-Azhr secondary students’ writing skills and their attitudes towards writing [Monograph]. Retrieved from [URL]
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 761, 65–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D. (2009). Teaching and Learning Writing. BJEP Monograph Series II1, 6, 5–26.Google Scholar
Gillett, A. (2012, October 24). Using English for Academic Purposes: What is EAP? [Web log post]. Retrieved from [URL]
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 991, 445–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis. Reading and Writing, 291, 781–792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gui, L. (2008). Critical pedagogy in EFL college writing instruction in China: An untested feasibility (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Toledo). Retrieved from [URL]
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Scoring procedures for ESL contexts. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Eds.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 241–276). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Going beyond NLEs to a more balanced approach. Instructional Science, 361, 395–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A regression based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. (1984). What Works in Teaching Composition: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Treatment Studies. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 133–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hy, L. V. (1990). Discursive practices and linguistic meanings. John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyon, S. (2001). Long-term effects of genre-based instruction: A follow-up study of an EAP reading course. English for Specific Purposes, 201, 417–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Genre and ESL reading: A classroom study. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 121–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A. (2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211, 264–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kostrova, O., & Kulinich, M. (2015). Text genre ‘academic writing’: intercultural view. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2061, 85–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. (2012). Teaching genre-based writing to Korean high school students at a basic level (Master’s thesis). University of Wisconsin-River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Lin, B. (2006). Vygotskian principles in a genre-based approach to teaching writing. NUCB JLCC, 8(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Luong, Q. T., & Nguyen, T. M. H. (2008). Student writing process, perceptions, problems, and strategies in writing academic essays in a second language: A case study. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 241, 184–197.Google Scholar
Manouchehry, A., Farangi, M. A., Fatemi, M. A., & Qaviketf, F. (2014). The effect of two brainstorming strategies on the improvement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners writing skill. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 176–187.Google Scholar
Maghsoudi, M., & Haririan, J. (2013). The impact of brainstorming strategies Iranian EFL learners writing skill regarding their social status. Journal of language and linguistics, 1(1), 60–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H. D. (1956). Verbal and non-verbal patterns of respect behavior in Vietnamese society. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. H. T. (2009). Teaching efl writing in Vietnam: Problems and solutions-a discussion from the outlook of applied linguistics. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 251, 61–66.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K. (1989). On the historical role of Confucianism. Vietnamese Studies, 94(4), 67–72.Google Scholar
Pham, T. H. N. (2011). Communicating with Vietnamese in intercultural communication contexts: Insights into Vietnamese values. Hanoi: Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pike-Baky, M., & Blass, L. (2007). Mosaic 1 writing student book. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rahman, M. M. (2011). Genre-based writing instruction: Implications in ESP classroom. English for Specific Purposes World, 33(11). Retrieved from [URL]
Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 62(2), 100–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, G. A., & Perin, D. (2009). A comparison of text structure and self-regulated writing strategies for composing from sources by middle school students. Reading Psychology, 301, 265–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R. (2005). Generalizability of writing scores: An application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 271, 657–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. C. (1972). The authentic voice: A pre-writing approach to student writing. Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown Co. Publishers.Google Scholar
Tillema, M., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2012). Quantifying the quality difference between L1 and L2 essays: A rating procedure with bilingual raters and L1 and L2 benchmark essays. Language Testing, 30(1), 71–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tran, N. T. (1999). The fundamentals of Vietnamese culture. Hanoi: Education Publisher.Google Scholar
Tran, T. L. (2007). Learners’ motivation and identity in the Vietnamese EFL writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 151–163. Retrieved from [URL]
Trinh, Q. L., & Nguyen, T. T. (2014). Enhancing Vietnamese learners’ ability in writing argumentative essays. The Journal of Asia TEFT, 11(2), 63–91.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, H., & Eiting, M. H. (1989). A method of estimating rater reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 29–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandermeulen, N., Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Broek, B. (2018). In search of an effective source use pattern for writing argumentative and informative synthesis texts. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 201, 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Nguyen, Phuong Nam T. & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2023. Focused Freewriting, Tchart, or Group Debate: Effects of Prewriting Conditions on EFL Argumentative Writing. English Teaching & Learning DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.