Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 168:2 (2017) ► pp. 183202

[ p. 199 ]References

Bret Blasco, A.
(2014) L2 English young learners’ oral production skills in instructed second language contexts: A longitudinal study of CLIL and EFL settings. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Bruton, A.
(2011) Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 236–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(1996) Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain, M. (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
(2005) Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P.
(2007) (Ed.) Investigating tasks in formal second language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A.
(2016) Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 451–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A.
(2015) Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System 54, 40–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M., & Fernández-García, M.
(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S.
(2006) Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: a meta-analysis. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.
(2013a) Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref[ p. 200 ]Google Scholar
(2013b) Effects of pretask modelling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 8–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
(2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41, 829–840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1983a) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983b) Native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) A case of exercising: effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, A.
(Ed.) (2007) Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S.
(2011) Interactionist approaches. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Kanganas, A. P., & Oliver, R.
(2007) Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 285–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R.
(1998) Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The relationship between conversational interaction and second language acquisition. Modern language journal, 82, 372–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patanasorn, C.
(2010) Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context. Unpublished PHD dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A.
(2006) The impact of planning time on children’s task-based interactions. System, 34, 547–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
(1987) SLA, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) From input, output and comprehension to negotiation, evidence and attention: An overview of theory and research on learner interaction in SLA. In M. P. García Mayo, J. Gutierrez, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 49–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., & Doughty, C.
(1985) Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (115–132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pinter, A.
(2007) Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 189–207. Crossref[ p. 201 ]Google Scholar
Plough, I., & Gass, S.
(1993) Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sample, E., & Michel, M.
(2014) An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 3(Special Issue 8), 23–46.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C. A.
(Eds.) (2012) Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Celaya, M. Luz
2019. The Emergence and Development of Syntactic Patterns in EFL Writing in a School Context: A Longitudinal Study. Languages 4:2  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Hidalgo, María Ángeles & María del Pilar García Mayo
2019. The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216881986555 ff. Crossref logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & Raúl Azpilicueta-Martinez
2019. Negotiation of meaning in child-child vs. adult-adult interactions: Evidence from low proficiency EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Agurtzane Azkarai
2019. Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:1  pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.