Cover not available
Article published In:
Language for Specific Purposes
Edited by Antoon De Rycker, Kris Buyse and Lieve Vangehuchten
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 162] 2011
► pp. 1–19

Lsp Research Today

A General Approach for Specific Purposes?

| Taylor’s University, School of Communication, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| Lessius Hogeschool and K.U.Leuven, Belgium
| University of Antwerp, Belgium

The purpose of this article is to examine whether a “general approach for specific purposes”, i.e. a general approach to Language for Specific Purposes (LSP) research, is possible or even desirable. We will briefly review some of the major changes that have taken place in LSP research, and this with a view to situating the five studies that have been included in this special issue of ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics. The approach is based on the existing LSP literature, but rather than attempting a comprehensive overview, we will discuss only those trends that may be instrumental in forging a general research agenda for the near future. LSP research has gradually replaced texts as its main object of enquiry in favour of the complex social and discursive practices of a particular discipline. Though the areas covered in this special issue are business, legal and maritime discourse, it is equally interesting to?tices (like recreational team sports). The shift from text to practice, from terminology to communication, has necessitated a principled inter-disciplinary and multi-perspectival stance in terms of both theories and methodologies. In addition, globalisation, technology and other societal forces have affected the dynamics of professional and organisational communication. This article will argue that it is to these trends and developments that the special issue makes a significant contribution. At the same time, it is hoped that our article will open up new possibilities for applied linguistic research and will also stimulate debate on what direction LSP researchers, both experienced practitioners and newcomers, should be moving in.

Published online: 1 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.162.01ryc
References
Alvarez-Pompilius, F.
(2009) What alter says and ego hears: A discourse-based analysis of control, trust and information in a professional organization. In F. Ramallo, A. Suárez, X. Rodriguez-Yáñez & P. Cap (Eds.), New approaches to discourse and business communication (pp. 212–230). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S.
(2004) Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(4/5), 501–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., & Planken, B.
(Eds.) (2007) Business discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1994) Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(2004) Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K., Candlin, C., & Engberg, J.
(Eds.) (2008) Legal discourse across cultures and systems. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K., Sánchez Hernández, P., & Pérez-Paredes, P.
(Eds.) (2011) Researching specialized languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C., & Sarangi, S.
(Eds.) (2011) Handbook of communication in organisations and professions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C.
(2011, 4 July) Reconceptualising applied linguistic research in professional & organizational communication as an inter-disciplinary project. Paper presented at the Applied Linguistics & Professional and Organisational Communication Symposium, University of Malaya, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Carliner, S., Verckens, J. P., & de Waele, C.
(Eds.) (2006) Information and document design: Varieties on recent research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P.
(2004) Identifying technical vocabulary. System, 321, 251–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CILT
(2007) Effects on the European Union economy of shortages of foreign language skills in enterprise. London: CILT, the National Centre for Languages.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A.
(2010) The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Rycker, A.
(2011) Coaching in recreational team sports as a professional and discursive practice (RFGS Grant application). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics [Introduction to the Special Issue]. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg, J.
(2006) Languages for specific purposes. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 679–683). Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, G.
(2010) The cultural dimension of international business (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Field, J.
(2006) Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Galinski, C., & Nedobity, W.
(1988) Special languages, terminology planning and standardization. In R. Strehlow (Ed.), Standardization of technical terminology: Principles and practices (Vol. 21, pp. 4–13). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, J.
(2003) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giannoni, D., & Frade, C.
(2010) Researching language and the law: Textual features and translation issues. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gnutzmann, C.
(2009) Language for specific purposes vs. general language. In K. Knapp & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Handbook of foreign language communication and learning (pp. 517-544). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gotti, M., & Williams, C.
(2010) Legal discourse across languages and cultures. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graves, H., & Graves, R.
(2007) A strategic guide to technical communication. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Gunarsson, B.-L.
(2008) Professional communication. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Second and foreign language education (2nd ed., Vol. 41, pp. 83–95). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewings, A., & North, S.
(2010) Texts and practices. In J. Maybin & J. Swann (Eds.), Routledge companion to English language studies (pp. 42–75). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G.
(2001) From Saussure to critical sociolinguistics: The turn towards a social view of language. In M. Wetherell, Taylor, S. & Yates, S. (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 29–38). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Malloch, M., Cairns, L., Evans. K., & O’Connor, B.
(2010) The Sage handbook of workplace learning. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McArthur, T.
(Ed.) (1992) The Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nekvapil, J.
(2006) The development of languages for special purposes. In U. Ammon, Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (2nd ed., Vol. 31, pp. 2223–2232). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nickerson, C., & Planken. B.
(2009) Europe: The state of the field. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, Nickerson, C. & B. Planken, B. (Eds.), Handbook of business discourse (pp. 18–29). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Olsson, J.
(2004) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language, crime and the law. London/ New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, C., & Watson, M.
(Eds.) (2011) Specialized languages in the global village: A multi-perspective approach. Cambridge: Scholars.Google Scholar
Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S.
(2005) A theme-oriented approach to discourse analysis. Medical Education, 39(6), 632–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C.
(2001) Motivational relevancies: Some methodological reflections on sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, Sarangi, S. & C. Candlin (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory (pp. 350–388). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shanks, D.
(1995) The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Temmerman, R.
(2000) Towards new ways of terminology description: The sociocognitive approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T.
(2009) Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 144–161). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L.
(2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wüster, E.
(1979) Introduction to the general theory of terminology and terminological lexicography. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar