Article published In:
Language for Specific Purposes
Edited by Antoon De Rycker, Kris Buyse and Lieve Vangehuchten
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 162] 2011
► pp. 2035
References
Bargiela-Chiappini, F.
(2009) The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C. & Planken, B.
(2007) Business discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowker, J.
(2009) Descriptive processes in business audio-conferencing: Telling the corporate story. In S. Radighieri & P. Tucker (Eds.). Rome: Officina Edizioni (pp. 175–193).Google Scholar
(2011a) From Communities of Practice to Communities of Learning: Interdiscursivity in changing corporate priorities”. In P. Gillaerts, E. de Groot, Dieltjens, S., Heynderickx, P. & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Researching discourse in business genres. Cases and corpora. Bern: Peter Lang. (pp 115-138)Google Scholar
(2011b) (in press, Amsterdam: John Benjamins). Variation across spoken and written genres in internal corporate communication: multimodality and blending in evolving channels. Proceedings of International Conference, CLAVIER 2009, Corpus and Language Variation in English Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, 5-7 November 2009.Google Scholar
Jian, G., Schmisseur, A.M. & Fairhurst, G.T.
(2008) Organizational discourse and communication: The progeny of Proteus. Discourse & Communication, 2/3, (pp. 299–320). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2001) Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. In M. Pütz, Niemeier, S. & R. Dirven (Eds.) (pp. 3–37).Google Scholar
(2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M.
1989Speaking: from Intent to Articulation. Cambridge (Mass.): M.IT. Press.Google Scholar
Pütz M., Niemeier, S. & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (2001) Applied Cognitive Linguistics I, II: Theory and Language Acquisition. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radighieri, S. & Tucker, P.
(2009) (Eds.), Point of view: Description and evaluation across discourses. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
Rayson, P.
(2003) Wmatrix / USAS, Semantic Annotation System. Lancaster: University of Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1996) Fictive motion in language and “–ception”. In, Bloom, P., Garret, M., Nadel, L. & Peterson, M. (Eds.). Language and Space. Cambridge (Mass.): M.I.T. Press (pp. 211-276).Google Scholar
Tucker, P., S. Radighieri, S.
(Eds.) (2009) Point of View: Description and Evaluation across Discourses. Rome: Officina Edizioni (pp. 175–193).Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
(2001) The relationship between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: The non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In, Putz, M., Niemeier, S. & R. Dirven (Eds.), Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter (pp. 63–108).Google Scholar