Cover not available
Article published In:
Language for Specific Purposes
Edited by Antoon De Rycker, Kris Buyse and Lieve Vangehuchten
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 162] 2011
► pp. 111–133

Communication for Maritime Purposes

Some Exploratory Results of A Survey-Based Study on Intercultural and Linguistic Features

| Department of Social Sciences and Languages, Antwerp Maritime Academy
| Department of International Business Communication, University of Antwerp
| Department of Social Sciences and Languages, Antwerp Maritime Academy

Multilingual and multicultural crews have become the rule rather than the exception in the globalised maritime world. Professionals as well as researchers indicate that this increases the risk of miscommunication both on board and in external communication with major consequences for efficiency and safety (Deboo 2004, de la Campa Portela 2005 & 2006, Horck 2005, Squire 2006, Trenkner 2010). The mission statements of international shipping companies1 reveal objectives that aim not only to provide professional services, ensure safety, increase security and protect the marine environment but also to deal with cultural and linguistic diversity and how to harness its strengths and eliminate its weaknesses. Effective communication at sea plays a key role in achieving these objectives as well as in creating a harmonious and efficient working atmosphere on board.

This paper offers an analysis of a survey-based research project (University of Antwerp and Antwerp Maritime Academy2 which aims to determine the linguistic and intercultural features of maritime communication that hinder or aid the quality of work onboard a merchant ship.

Having established the profile of the respondent group, the paper explores the influence of (inter)cultural and linguistic features such as verbal and non-verbal communication, intercultural factors (ethical and social norms, thinking patterns, turn-taking in conversation, cross-cultural prejudices), gender issues and organisational factors on the quality of communication in the maritime sector.

Published online: 1 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.162.06nob
References
Baarda, B. & de Goede, M. P. M.
(2006) Basisboek methoden en technieken: handleiding voor het opzetten en uitvoeren van kwantitatief onderzoek. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Bocanegra-Valle, A.
(2010) Global markets, global challenges: The position of maritime English in today’s shipping industry. In A. Linde López & R. Crespo Jiménez (Eds.),. English in the European Context: the EHEA Challenge (pp. 151–174). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(2001) Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Claes, M-T, & Gerritsen, M.
(2007) Culturele waarden en communicatie in internationaal perspectief. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. T. and Spiegel, R. I.
(1971) A study in successful exporting. British Journal of Marketing 5/1, 2–12.Google Scholar
Davis, W.
(1995) Second language skills are vital to business. Marketing Business 451: 7.Google Scholar
Deboo, K. M.
(2004) Maritime resource management, Alert. Retrieved from: [URL] (accessed 24 September 2011)
de la Campa Portela, R.
(2005) Problemas de comunicación derivados de la lengua en el ámbito marítimo. Language Problems and Language Planning 29/1, 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) El inglés como lengua de comunicación en el ámbito marítimo, un reto pendiente para los marinos españoles. Marina Civil 811, 45–49.Google Scholar
Dillman, D.
(2007) Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Enderwick, P. & Akoorie, M. E. M.
(1994) Pilot study research note: The employment of foreign language specialists and export success–The case of New Zealand. International Marketing Review 11/4, 4–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flink, A.
(2003) The survey kit. How to sample in surveys. California: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G.
(2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organisations across nations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Horck, J.
(2005) Getting the best from multi-cultural manning. Proceedings of BIMCO 100 years and GA 2005 in Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Jacob, N.
(2003) Intercultural management. London: Kogan Page Ltd.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Stern, L. & Anderson, J.
(1993) Conducting interorganisational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal 36/6, 1633–1651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lautanen, T.
(2000) Modelling small firms’ decisions to export: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Finland, 1995. Small Business Economics 14/2, 107–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonidou, L.C., Katsikeas, C.S. & Piercy, N.F.
(2001) Identifying managerial influences on exporting: Past research and future directions. Journal of International Marketing 6/2, 74–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MARCOM project
(1998) The Seafarers International Research Centre. Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. & Campbell, S.
(2006) Talk on trial. Job interviews, language and ethnicity. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Schlegelmilch, B. B. & Ross, A. G.
(1987) The influence of managerial characteristics on different measures of export success. Journal of Marketing Management 3/2, 145–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlegelmilch, B. B. & Crook, J.
(1988) Firm-level determinants of export intensity. Managerial and Decision Economics 91, 291–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squire, D.
(2006) The importance of effective communication (online). Alert. Retrieved from: [URL] (accessed 10 February 2009).
Sutton, M.
(2008) Maritime Logistics and the World Trading System. Retrieved from: [URL] (accessed 24 September 2011)
Swift, J.
(1990) Marketing competence and language skills: UK competence in the Spanish market. International Business Communication 2/2, 21–6.Google Scholar
(1991) Foreign language ability and international marketing. European Journal of Marketing 25/12, 36–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trenkner, P.
(2010) The need to mind your language! Nautilus International Telegraph 43/02, 27.Google Scholar
Turnbull, P.W. & Welham, G.F.
(1985) The characteristics of European export marketing staff. European Journal of Marketing 19/2, 31–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ursic, M. & Czinkota, M.
(1989) The relationship between managerial characteristics and export behaviour. Developments in Marketing Science 121, 208–11.Google Scholar
Vangehuchten, L., Van Parys W. & Noble, A.
(2011) Communication for maritime purposes: a survey-based study. In C. Pérez-Llantada & M. Watson (Eds.), Specialised Languages in the Global Village: A Multi-perspective Approach (pp. 127–154). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Walters, P.G.
(1990) The significance of foreign language skills for initial entry positions in international firms. Journal of Teaching in International Business 1/3-4, 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. E. M. & Chaston, I.
(2004) Links between the linguistic ability and international experience of export managers and their export marketing intelligence behaviour. International Small Business Journal 22/5, 463–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ahmmed, Raju
2020. The discrepancy between standardised communication patterns and the real-life conversations of vessel traffic service: a case study in Chittagong Port, Bangladesh. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 19:4 ► pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
John, Peter, Benjamin Brooks & Ulf Schriever
2017. Profiling maritime communication by non-native speakers: A quantitative comparison between the baseline and standard marine communication phraseology. English for Specific Purposes 47 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.