Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 163 (2012) ► pp. 2142
References

References

Barcroft, J. & VanPatten, B.
(1997) Acoustic salience of grammatical forms: The effect of location, stress and boundedness on Spanish L2 input processing. In A. Perez-Leroux & W. R. Glass (eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Production, processing, and comprehension. Somerville, Ma: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
(2002) Frequency in production, comprehension, and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 209–213.Google Scholar
Church, B. A. & Fisher, C.
(1998) Long-term auditory word priming in preschoolers: Implicit memory support for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 523–542.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V.
(1993a) The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Criddle, M.J. & K. Durkin
(2002) Phonological representation of novel morphemes in children with SLI and typically developing children. Applied Psycholinguistics 22, 363–382.Google Scholar
De Beider, E. & V.. Huyge
(1998) De problemen van kinderen uit niet-Nederlandse en taalgemengde gezinnen in het Nederlandstalige onderwijs in Brussel, In P. Van de Craen (ed.), Brusselse Thema's 3. Mondig Brussel. Brussel: VUBPress.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M.
(2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. & S.. Gillis
(1998) Dutch child language: an overview. In A. De Houwer & S. Gillis (eds.), The acquisition of Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
(1994) Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
(2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 305–352.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2002) Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24,223–236.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22, 455–479.Google Scholar
Gass, S.
(1997) Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S. & Mackey, A.
(2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 249–260.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. & Aslin, R.N.
(2005) Thirty years of research on infant speech perception: the legacy of Peter W. Jusczyk. Language Learning and Development 1, 5–21.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.H.
(2002) Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research 18, 193–223.Google Scholar
(2002) What does the impact of frequency tell us about the language acquisition device? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24,269–273.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
(2005) Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 129–140.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K.
(2002) Picture naming in early sequential bilinguals: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 45, 759–771.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.
(1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2002) Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 275–285.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J.
(2001) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22, 1–26.Google Scholar
Mason, B. & Krashen, S.
(2004) Is form-focused vocabulary instruction worthwhile? RELC Journal 35, 179–185.Google Scholar
Melka, F.
(1997) Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nation, I.S.P.
(2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E.
(2001) Finding first words in the input: Evidence from a bilingual child. In: J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (eds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M. & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, 417–528.Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2009) Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Rast, R. & Dommergues, J.
(2003) Towards a characterisation ofsaliency on first exposure to a second language, In EUROSLA Yearbook 3 (1). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidl, A. & Johnson, E.K.
(2006) Infant word segmentation revised: edge alignment facilitates target extraction. Developmental Science 9, 565–573.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I.
(1973) Cognitive prerequisites from the development of grammar. In C. Ferguson & D. Slobin (eds.), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seildholfer (eds.), Principles and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E.
(2002) Frequency effects, noticing, and creativity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 287–296.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Truscott, J.
(1998) Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review. Second Language Research 14, 103–117.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(1997) Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning 47, 589–636.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(2004) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Verhelst, M.
(2002) De relatie tussen mondeling taalaanbod en woordenschat verwerving van het Nederlands als tweede taal door 2,5-jarige allochtone kleuters in Brussel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Leuven: K.U. Leuven.Google Scholar
(2004) De relatie tussen kenmerken van de leerder en leersituatie en woordenschatverwerving van het Nederlands als tweede taal door 2,5-jarige allochtone kleuters in Brussel. In A. Housen, M. Pierrard & P. Van de Craen (eds.), Brusselse Thema's 12 - Taal, Attitude en Onderwijs in Brussel. Brussel: VUB Press.Google Scholar
(2005) A box full of feelings: Promoting infants' second language acquisition all day long'. In K.Van den Branden (ed.), Task-based Language Teaching. From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wijnen, F., Kempen, M. & Gillis, S.
(2001) Roof infinitives in Dutch early child language: an effect of input? Journal of Child Language 28, 629–660.Google Scholar
Yu, C., Ballard, D. & Aslin, R.
(2005) The Role of Embodied Intention in Early Lexical Acquisition. Cognitive Science 29,961–1005.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. & Taylor, L.
(2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology 135, 1–11.Google Scholar