Review published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 163 (2012) ► pp.4350
References
Aitchison, J.
1991Language change: progress or decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1990Language and species. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Language and human behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Boland, A.
2006Aspect, tense and modality: theory, typology, acquisition. 21 vols. LOT: LOT Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
Botha, R. & C.. Knight
2009aThe Prehistory of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botha, R & C. Knight
2009bThe Cradle of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A.
2000 'Origins of language'. In: M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 1–18.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. & S. Kirby
(eds.) 2003Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, G.
2000Syntactic change in Akkadian. The evolution of sentential complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. & S.. Levinson
2009The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavior and Brain Sciences 321:429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, D.
2005Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahä: another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 761: 621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givon, T. & B.. Malle
(eds.) 2002The evolution of language out of pre-language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., N. Chomsky & W.T. Fitch
2002'The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, how did it evolve?' Science 2981:1569–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
2003 'Grammaficalization'. In: Joseph & Janda (eds.), 575–601.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva
2007The genesis of grammar. A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurford, J., M. Studdert-Kennedy, C. Knight
(eds.) 1998Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. & R.. Janda
(eds.) 2003The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, C., M. Studdert-Kennedy & J. Hurford
(eds.) 2000The evolutionary emergence of language: social function and the origins of linguistic form. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, M.
2008 'Grammatical complexity in cross-linguistic perspective'. In: M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.) 2008 Language complexity. Typology contact, change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R.D.
1992Deixis, grammar and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G.
2009A linguistic axion challenged. In: Sampson et al.., 2–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G., D. Gill & P.. Trudgill
(eds.) 2009Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallerman, M. & K. R. Gibson
(eds.) 2011The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M.
(ed.) 2005Language origins: perspectives from evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 'Did our ancestors speak a holistic protolanguage?'. Lingua 1171:579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.
2003 'Constructions in grammatcalizafion'. In: Joseph & Janda (eds.). 624–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. & R.. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
2010Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In: R. Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact. Oxford: Blackwell. 299–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
2002The transition to language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar