Article published in:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 165:1 (2014) ► pp. 1945
References

References

Boers, F., Deconinck, J., & Lindstromberg, S.. (
2010) Choosing motivated chunks for teaching. In De Knop, S., Boers, F., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 239–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.. (
2009) Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012) Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language Annual Rev. of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110. DOI:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J.. (
2012) Are alliterative word combinations comparatively easy to remember for adult learners? RELC J., 43(1), 85–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013) Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising? Language Awareness. DOI:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F, Lindstromberg, S., & J. Eyckmans. (
2014a). When does assonance make L2 lexical phrased memorable? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 3(1): 93–107.
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J.. (
2014b) Some explanations for the slow acquisition of L2 collocations. Vigo International Journal of Linguistics, 11: 41–62.Google Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H.. (
2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cao, R.. (
2012) The word frequency and list length effects on cued recall. Ohio State University research thesis. <https://​kb​.osu​.edu​/dspace​/bitstream​/handle​/1811​/51893​/Cao​_Thesis​.pdf​?sequence​=1> (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Church, K., & Hanks, P.. (
1991) Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16, 22–29.Google Scholar
Criss, A., Aue, W., & Smith, L.. (
2011) The effects of word frequency and context variability in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 119–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G.. (
2011) ESCI meta-analysis. Exploratory software for confidence intervals. Retrieved from <http://​www​.latrobe​.edu​.au​/psy​/documents​/ESCI​-readme​.pdf>Google Scholar
2012) Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M.. (
2008 to present) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). <http://​www​.americancorpus​.org> (Accessed Oct. 2012 – July 2013).Google Scholar
DeLosh, E., & McDaniel, M.. (
1996) The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1136–1146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, W., Cortina, J., Vaslow, J., & Burke, M.. (
1996) Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170−177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C.. (
2008) Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 375–396.Google Scholar
Ellis, P.. (
2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-Analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evert, S., & Krenn, B.. (
2001) Methods for the qualitative evaluation of lexical association measures. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , Toulouse, France, 188–195. <http://​www​.collocations​.de​/EK​/> (18 July 2013).
Fliessbach, K., Weis, S., Klaver, P., Elger, C., & Weber, B.. (
2006) The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory. NeuroImage, 32, 1413–1421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, F.. (
2010) Using conventional sequences in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 25–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friendly, M., Franklin, P., Hoffman, D., & Rubin, D.. (
1982) The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods, 14, 375–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, V., Montgomery, D., & Castaño, D.. (
1980) Recall of common and uncommon words from pure and mixed lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 240–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.. (
2011) Phonological similarity in multi-word symbolic units. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 491–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grissom, R., & Kim, J.. (
2012) Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howell, D.. (
2010) Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.; International edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R.. (
2003) Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuiper, K., Columbus, G., & Schmitt, N.. (
2009) Acquiring phrasal vocabulary. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 216–240). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T.. (
2011) Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647–672. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.. (
1993) The Lexical Approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove: LTP.Google Scholar
Li, J., & Schmitt, N.. (
2009) The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 85–102. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F.. (
2008a) The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 29: 200−222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b) Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The mnemonic power of assonance. System, 36, 423−436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, R.. (
1998-2013) Vassarstats: Website for statistical computation. <http://​www​.vassarstats​.net​/> (accessed August 2012 through July 2013).Google Scholar
Madan, C., Glaholt, M., & Caplan, J.. (
2010) The influence of item properties on association-memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 46–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, M., & Paivio, A.. (
1977) Integrative processing of concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 217–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, P., DeLosh, E., & McDaniel, M.. (
2006) Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: Tests of the order-encoding view. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1615–1627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, K. & Conner, M.. (
2009) Methods to quantify variable importance: Implications for the analysis of noisy ecological data. Ecology, 90, 349–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, L., & Hardt, O.. (
2011) Update on memory systems and processes. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 251–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. & DeCarrico, J.. (
1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nekrasova, T.. (
2009) English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning, 59, 647–686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford idioms dictionary for learners of English
(2006) Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.. (
1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native like selection and native like fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Qi, Y., & Ding, Y.. (
2011) Use of formulaic sequences in monologues of Chinese EFL learners. System, 39, 164–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Really Learn 100 Phrasal Verbs
(2nd ed.) (2007) Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N.. (Ed.). (
2004) Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Statcrunch
2007-2014Data Analysis on the Web. London: Pearson Education. <www​.statcrunch​.com> (23 January, 2014).Google Scholar
Tellings, A., Coppens, K., Gelissen, J., & Schreuder, R.. (
2013) Clusters of word properties as predictors of elementary school children’s performance on two word tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 461–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E.. (
1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985a) How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985b) Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, I., & Hulme, C.. (
1999) Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1256–1271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wessa P.. (
2013) Skewness and Kurtosis Test (v1.0.3) in Free Statistics Software (v1.1.23-r7). Office for Research Development and Education. <http://​www​.wessa​.net​/rwasp​_skewness​_kurtosis​.wasp​/> (accessed August 2012 through July 2013).Google Scholar
Zumbo, B., & Jennings, M.. (
2002) The robustness of validity and efficiency of the related samples t-test in the presence of outliers. Psicológica, 23, 415–450.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Eyckmans, June & Seth Lindstromberg
2017. The power of sound in L2 idiom learning. Language Teaching Research 21:3  pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
Lindstromberg, Seth
2016. Inferential statistics in Language Teaching Research: A review and ways forward. Language Teaching Research 20:6  pp. 741 ff. Crossref logo
Lindstromberg, Seth
2020. Surplus interword phonological similarity in English multiword units. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Lindstromberg, Seth & June Eyckmans
2020. THE RETRIEVABILITY OF L2 ENGLISH MULTIWORD ITEMS IN A CONTEXT OF STRONGLY FORM-FOCUSED EXPOSURE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lindstromberg, Seth & June Eyckmans
2020. The effect of frequency on learners’ ability to recall the forms of deliberately learned L2 multiword expressions. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Elke & Paul Pauwels
2015. Learning academic formulaic sequences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.