High proficiency in L2 partly depends on acquiring many formulaic sequences (FSs), yet post-childhood learners find this difficult. Ways of accelerating the acquisition of FSs would be welcome. Small-scale studies have indicated that assonance (e.g., strong bond) makes studied FSs especially retrievable if, during exposure, assonance is made the object of teacher-instigated awareness-raising and attention direction. However, questions remain about effect size and duration. In two new experiments a mnemonic effect of assonance was detected after 5–10 minutes. This was despite a sorting task thought likely to direct participants’ attention particularly to the control collocations. The effect appeared to fade over an hour and disappear after a day. A small-scale meta-analysis indicates the effect is initially of medium size. We discuss how short-term operation of such an effect could facilitate the fuller acquisition of partly learned assonant FSs. We propose avenues for research into means whereby the mnemonic effect of assonance might be exploited in learning materials. We touch on effects of item frequency, mutual information, and concreteness-imageability of meaning.
Boers, F., Deconinck, J., & Lindstromberg, S. (2010). Choosing motivated chunks for teaching. In De Knop, S., Boers, F., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 239–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second languageAnnual Rev. of Applied Linguistics, 321, 83–110. DOI:
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2012). Are alliterative word combinations comparatively easy to remember for adult learners?RELC J., 43(1), 85–99.
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2013). Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising?Language Awareness. DOI:
Boers, F, Lindstromberg, S., & J. Eyckmans. (2014a). When does assonance make L2 lexical phrased memorable?The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 3(1): 93–107.
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014b). Some explanations for the slow acquisition of L2 collocations. Vigo International Journal of Linguistics, 111: 41–62.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
Cao, R. (2012). The word frequency and list length effects on cued recall. Ohio State University research thesis. [URL](5 July 2013).
Church, K., & Hanks, P. (1991). Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 161, 22–29.
Criss, A., Aue, W., & Smith, L. (2011). The effects of word frequency and context variability in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 641, 119–132.
Cumming, G. (2011). ESCI meta-analysis. Exploratory software for confidence intervals. Retrieved from [URL]
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. London: Routledge.
Davies, M. (2008 to present). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [URL] (Accessed Oct. 2012 – July 2013).
DeLosh, E., & McDaniel, M. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 221, 1136–1146.
Dunlap, W., Cortina, J., Vaslow, J., & Burke, M. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 11, 170−177.
Ellis, N., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 411, 375–396.
Ellis, P. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-Analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge: CUP.
Evert, S., & Krenn, B. (2001). Methods for the qualitative evaluation of lexical association measures. In
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
, Toulouse, France, 188–195. [URL] (18 July 2013).
Fliessbach, K., Weis, S., Klaver, P., Elger, C., & Weber, B. (2006). The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory. NeuroImage, 321, 1413–1421.
Forsberg, F. (2010). Using conventional sequences in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 481, 25–51.
Friendly, M., Franklin, P., Hoffman, D., & Rubin, D. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods, 141, 375–399.
Gregg, V., Montgomery, D., & Castaño, D. (1980). Recall of common and uncommon words from pure and mixed lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 191, 240–245.
Gries, S. (2011). Phonological similarity in multi-word symbolic units. Cognitive Linguistics, 221, 491–510.
Grissom, R., & Kim, J. (2012). Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Howell, D. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.; International edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kuiper, K., Columbus, G., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Acquiring phrasal vocabulary. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 216–240). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 611, 647–672. .
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove: LTP.
Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2009). The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 181, 85–102. .
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008a). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 291: 200−222.
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008b). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The mnemonic power of assonance. System, 361, 423−436.
Lowry, R. (1998-2013). Vassarstats: Website for statistical computation. [URL] (accessed August 2012 through July 2013).
Madan, C., Glaholt, M., & Caplan, J. (2010). The influence of item properties on association-memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 631, 46–63.
Marschak, M., & Paivio, A. (1977). Integrative processing of concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 161, 217–231.
Merritt, P., DeLosh, E., & McDaniel, M. (2006). Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: Tests of the order-encoding view. Memory and Cognition, 341, 1615–1627.
Murray, K. & Conner, M. (2009). Methods to quantify variable importance: Implications for the analysis of noisy ecological data. Ecology, 901, 349–355.
Nadel, L., & Hardt, O. (2011). Update on memory systems and processes. Neuropsychopharmacology, 361, 251–273.
Nattinger, J. & DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Nekrasova, T. (2009). English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning, 591, 647–686.
Oxford idioms dictionary for learners of English. (2006). Oxford: OUP.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native like selection and native like fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.
Qi, Y., & Ding, Y. (2011). Use of formulaic sequences in monologues of Chinese EFL learners. System, 391, 164–174.
Statcrunch. 2007-2014. Data Analysis on the Web. London: Pearson Education. [URL] (23 January, 2014).
Tellings, A., Coppens, K., Gelissen, J., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Clusters of word properties as predictors of elementary school children’s performance on two word tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 341, 461–481.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Tulving, E. (1985a). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist, 401, 385–398.
Tulving, E. (1985b). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 261, 1–12.
Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 1256–1271.
Wessa P. (2013). Skewness and Kurtosis Test (v1.0.3) in Free Statistics Software (v1.1.23-r7). Office for Research Development and Education. [URL] (accessed August 2012 through July 2013).
Zumbo, B., & Jennings, M. (2002). The robustness of validity and efficiency of the related samples t-test in the presence of outliers. Psicológica, 231, 415–450.
2021. THE RETRIEVABILITY OF L2 ENGLISH MULTIWORD ITEMS IN A CONTEXT OF STRONGLY FORM-FOCUSED EXPOSURE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:5 ► pp. 1040 ff.
Eyckmans, June & Seth Lindstromberg
2017. The power of sound in L2 idiom learning. Language Teaching Research 21:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
Lindstromberg, Seth
2016. Inferential statistics in Language Teaching Research: A review and ways forward. Language Teaching Research 20:6 ► pp. 741 ff.
Lindstromberg, Seth
2020. Surplus interword phonological similarity in English multiword units. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Peters, Elke & Paul Pauwels
2015. Learning academic formulaic sequences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20 ► pp. 28 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.